Australian Official Thinks Bully Rating Too Lenient

Australian Official Thinks Bully Rating Too Lenient

September 24, 2006
Some politicians in Australia are taking issue with the official government rating given to Rockstar's controversial Bully, or, as the game is now known outside of the North American market, Canis Canem Edit.

The West Australian is reporting that New South Wales Education Minister Carmel Tebbutt is concerned about what she considers an overly-lenient rating given to Bully by Australia's Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC). Ms Tebbutt urged parents to keep the game out of the hands of their children, and has requested that the country's Attorney General review the classification.

"I'm concerned that its message for violence is undermining what we're doing in schools to counteract bullying," she said. "I also want (the A.G.) to assure me that everything that needs to be taken into account has been taken into account in this classification process."

Even before the ESRB assigned Bully a "T" (13 and older) rating, the Australian OFLC rated the game "M" for "Moderate Themes, Violence, Sexual References", which, under the Australian system means the game is recommended for players older than 15. No legal restrictions are placed upon its sale, however.

New Zealand rated the game "R13" with the descriptor "contains violence", which means it's sales are restricted to those 13 and up.

-Reporting from Canada, GP Correspondent Colin "Jabrwock" McInnes

Comments

I sent this letter to Ms Tebbutt... No response of coures...


Dear Ms Tebbutt,

Why are you writing to the Attorney General about the game Bully without ever setting eyes on the game or your hands on a controller?

You claim it's sending the wrong message to school students, but yet you have absolutely no idea about what messages are in the game, because it has not been released in Australia.

I ask that you play the game before you criticise it and the company that made it.

And more importantly, I ask you to allow the Office of Film, Literature and Classification to do it's job free of political interference.

In other words, I ask you to allow the democratic process, the same process that has seen you elected to the position of Minister for Education in the New South Wales parliament, to take it's course and not bully it because you happen to think erroneously about the subject matter at hand.

I would also like to add that there has been absolutely no conclusive scientific evidence to show that violent games lead to violent behavior to any greater degree than any other media.

Sure, go ahead and cite Dr Craig Anderson to me, and I'll respond with what the courts have claimed in every single instance where Dr Anderson's 'evidence' was provided to the courts: "Dr. [Craig] Anderson's studies have not provided any evidence that the relationship between violent video games and aggressive behavior exists." (Eastern District of Michigan, United States District Court, ESA, et al., v. Granholm, et al. April, 2006)

The Judge then added that the evidence introduced alleging that new brain mapping studies show a link between violent games and aggressive thought is equally unpersuasive.

"The research not only fails to provide concrete evidence that there is a connection between violent media and aggressive behavior, it also fails to distinguish between video games and other forms of media,"(Eastern District of Michigan, United States District Court, ESA, et al., v. Granholm, et al. April, 2006)

Go on, I dare you to cite Dr Funk, or Prof. Gentile, or any of the other scientists who try to “prove” violent video games lead to violent behavior and not only can I deconstruct them to show they fundamental flaws in their logic and scientific method used to make their claims, I can show, one for one, studies that are more scientifically sound that disprove that hypothesis.

Video games have simply become the whipping boy for idiot reactionaries looking to get their name in the headlines, but their influence is no greater than television, comics, music or movies.

Like those other media, time will show that there is no need to worry about their impact the future generations as it is parents and guardians who have the greatest impact on raising children, not the violent media du jour.

Thank you

J
Games reviewer and developer
America is not Australia, your courts don't mean jack over here. We've been banning games (and movies) for years.
Jakethe8lf...

Not sure if you're responding to me, but I'm Australian...

I was using the court ruling to prove my point that craig Anderson, and similar research, has been rejected time and time again by both science and the courts...

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am
JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am
chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:56am
JDKJ: But if it turns out that they actually did, they'll have Hell to pay.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:45am
JDKJ: And I'd tend to rule out the possibilty of FN Herstal supplying restricted ammunition to someone merely because they're ordering it from a military base.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:37am
JDKJ: I know you don't leave your gated community and get around much in dark alleys, so you may be surprised to learn that there's this thing called "the black market" where, if you've got enough money, ain't too much of anything which can't be bought.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:36am
Austin_Lewis: Or, maybe he or someone else at the base ordered the SS190 from FN Herstal.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:32am
Austin_Lewis: the hands of private owners. They run about 300 dollars minimum for a box of 50, and boxes of AP 5.7 are extremely scarce, mainly residing in the hands of Class III stores or individuals who for one reason or another got a demo box of it.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:30am
Austin_Lewis: There are other firearms that fire the 5.7. However, I too would like to know where he got the ammo and what kind was used. Maybe Hasan, planning not to live through this, went out and bought one the boxes of SS190 that are floating around in
Posted 11/07/09 at 08:44am
JDKJ: And it isn't yet clear what type of ammunition Hasan used. It's strange that he purchased a gun but didn't purchase ammunition for it at the same place and time. Especially because the calibre required is peculiar to the actual gun.
Login or register to post shouts