Pennsylvania Legislators Hold Video Game Hearing

Pennsylvania Legislators Hold Video Game Hearing

September 24, 2006
Add Pennsylvania to the list of states examining the video game violence issue.

As reported by the Harrisburg Patriot-News a committee of the Pennsylvania House held a hearing in late August to consider the effects of violent games on children.

Rep. Ronald Waters (D) said, "I watch young people play these games, and they play them for long periods of time. It's hard for me to watch that kind of activity without wondering what kind of effects it's having on them. What are we doing subliminally to our children that we allow them to entertain themselves with this type of activity..."

Waters expressed concerns about Grand Theft Auto and worried that the ESRB rating system might not be working at the retail level. Although he would support video game legislation, Waters was more interested in research similar to the federal government's proposed CAMRA study.

"I'm just asking for a study," Waters said. "Whatever the outcome of the study is, I'm willing to accept it. If we find that there is no consequences of this, then I will be someone who will say 'OK, I accept the study.' But if the study says yes, there are things we need to alarm parents about, then we need to make sure that parents know that."

Child psychologist Marolyn Morford of State College told the Patriot-News, "You can never predict human behavior 100 percent, but you can talk about probabilities, and it is more likely that [children] would engage in an antisocial behavior if that behavior is reinforced for them over many hours and if their cohort also supports those sorts of behaviors. That's how games operate."

Morford, who uses The Sims and other games to help socially phobic patients, does not see legislation as the answer, but rather increased education and awareness on the learning effects of games.

"There is entertainment, but there's also learning that's going on, and I think that anybody who ignores the learning factor is ignoring a very powerful motivating dimension of that experience," Morford said. "I would like the gaming industry to not be so stupid and ignorant or act like they're so ignorant, that this is just like watching a violent movie and not recognizing what kind of power they do have and how they can play into people's weaknesses."

Clay Calvert of the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment testified before the committee.

"The Legislature is right to be concerned about violence in society," said Calvert. "They are right to be concerned about violence in the media. The question is what is really the answer and from my perspective, I don't think legislation is. The Legislature in Pennsylvania is stepping deeply into the culture wars when it decides to legislate about violent video games."

Calvert praised the committee for keeping an open-mind.

"This was not a hostile group of people," he said. "They seemed like they were genuinely interested in these issues. I think they wanted to learn about the situation. So I give them credit for having an open mind going in. It wasn't 'bash the video game industry day.'"

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
At least he sounds like he's not going to be gung-ho with legislation, but at least he's willing to get a study first before coming to any conclusions. Granted, that study could very well be biased. However, what I do like is that he said he would accept whatever the result is and even if the result of the study is positive, he'd rather educate parents first than propose legislation. After all, he did say he would give support to such legislation, but he wouldn't fire it off. In short, for now I'm okay with him.

ECA IconA PUBLICATION OF THE ECA RSS IconSUBSCRIBE User LoginLOGIN / REGISTER

Crispy Gamer




       

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 03/22/10 at 10:25am
HarmlessBunny: Back on the Pro-R18+ topic; the petition list is now 35,000+ :) Here is hoping with Atkinson gone, this is going to be a step in the right direction. http://tinyurl.com/ycux63n
Posted 03/22/10 at 09:58am
ZippyDSMlee: Vlag:I mostly read on a collage level so meh.
Posted 03/22/10 at 09:50am
Valdearg: @DS: Lol, I see we were thinking the same thing in the Stabbing article..
Posted 03/22/10 at 09:45am
Valdearg: Forgive me, Zip, for saying this, but I highly doubt your ability to read and comprehend the legalese they use in the HCR bill. The meaning and effect of the various sections is hard to understand for college educated Americans, let alone anyone else.
Posted 03/22/10 at 09:39am
ZippyDSMlee: Vlag:I been reading it on and off..its a half assed feel good bill....they may be able to fix it in time but good lord its a mess but I guess thats reflected in the government itself....
Posted 03/22/10 at 09:18am
DarkSaber: So your whole objection is based around "I don't want my free handouts to be affected"
Posted 03/22/10 at 09:18am
Valdearg: @Zip: I think you probably should understand what's in the bill before you pass judgement on it..
Posted 03/22/10 at 07:37am
ZippyDSMlee: ds:ha! BY THE TIME THEY GET THIER BENFITS i WONT HAVE ANY LEFT!! :p
Posted 03/22/10 at 07:02am
DarkSaber: for it to cost YOU personally zippy, you'd have to actually be paying taxes instead of sponging benefits.
Posted 03/22/10 at 02:42am
ZippyDSMlee: Like most train wrecks it wont help people much and cost us more in the end than what we would benefit from it.....
Posted 03/22/10 at 02:37am
TBoneTony: Great to see MA go to the back bench in SA, hope that new AG is more ballanced
Posted 03/22/10 at 02:36am
TBoneTony: Oh there it is
Posted 03/22/10 at 02:36am
TBoneTony: Shout is not working for me at the moment
Posted 03/22/10 at 02:34am
SimonBob: (Would you like to rent our Green party? We're not doing anything with it.)
Posted 03/22/10 at 02:31am
SimonBob: hey america: I was watching CNN earlier, and I was thinking, you guys could use a third party.
Posted 03/21/10 at 10:12pm
Valdearg: They beat the parliamentary trick. The senate bill is officially law, pending the President's signature. Now they vote on the fixes to that bill, in the next 15 minutes or so.
Posted 03/21/10 at 10:04pm
gellymatos: Vald: No worries. I do it all the time. Trying to break the habit.
Posted 03/21/10 at 10:01pm
Valdearg: @Gelly: Sorry for jumping to conclusions, LOL.. I guess I read your text in a depressed voice in my head. :D
Posted 03/21/10 at 10:00pm
Valdearg: I'm staying up late, watching CSPAN and MSNBC, and cheering each and every democrat victory.
Posted 03/21/10 at 10:00pm
Valdearg: Yes indeedy. Even Abortion rights got gutted. Obama's going to pass an EO ensuring no federal funds are used for abortions.
Login or register to post shouts