Sunday Editorial Roundup: Senate is Wasting Tax Money on Video Game Study

Sunday Editorial Roundup: Senate is Wasting Tax Money on Video Game Study

October 1, 2006
Meanwhile, in the Asbury Park (NJ) Press, Paul K. McMasters of the First Amendment Center in Arlington, Virginia pens an op-ed decrying the U.S. Senate's recent passage of the CAMRA Act, which calls for a $90 million study of the effects of media on children. McMasters writes:

"In the 15th century, the printing press was a technological advance revolutionizing the ability of those who published books to inform, provoke and entertain. Those suspected of using this 'new media' to promote heresy or insurrection were threatened with the rack or worse."

"How little things have changed. These days, those suspected of wielding new media to inflict psychic injuries among the young and weak of mind also are threatened — with expert studies that seek to prove harm by putting reason on the rack."

"Those who believe that certain media are a menace in any hands but their own obsess over the potential negatives and dismiss the demonstrated positives of electronic media. They show impatience with common sense, disrespect for parental responsibility and an unrequited infatuation with 'studies' when courts fail to support their attempts to regulate."

"We should not be surprised that yet another round of research on the potential harm caused by electronic media is being ordered by legislation passed by the U.S. Senate... the drive to tame new media never loses momentum or new targets."

"As much as political leaders, advocates, researchers and some parents would like to hope otherwise, sure proof of the cause-and-effect relationship between media content and bad behavior among adults or children remains elusive."

"But the assumption is pervasive, especially when an event occurs that shocks our conscience and sends us in a desperate search for causes and answers. For example, when a 25-year-old Montreal man used a semiautomatic rifle to turn a junior college campus into a killing field, many minds raced to the conclusion that video games made him do it..."

"Being against violence or indecency for our kids is low-hanging political fruit for politicians. They can't help themselves when they exploit our understandable concerns..."

"To argue that violence in media causes actual violence, or that indecency in media causes harmful sexual adventurism, is to argue that the cleansing of movies, TV, radio, video games, comic books, the Internet and even books will remove crime, perversion and other unpleasantness from our midst."

Comments

YES!!! There ARE people with brains out there!
Well what do you know? He's about the same age as most of the politicians tryign to regulate what we say or do, but, he's got a brain.
@kurisu7885:

Maybe that's why he's not in politics?
Kurisu, you and I both know that politics isn't about smarts, it's about power and lies.

Lies get you power, and then you use that power to spread more lies. When someone challanges those lies, you slander and defame them as best you can.

Want proof, look at the democrats right now, using anything, even when it's an outright lie, to attack there republican oppenents. Why? Cause they want there power back. Yet they offer no better solutions, will not support the troops, call them murders and killers, then backpedal claiming they mispoke.

Fuck them, fuck the Mainstream media, and fuck the "Moral Crusaders". They can blow me for all I care, I've had enough of this crap.

I still say, and will continue to advocate, that the ESA bring hard, heavy handed legal action against these Jack holes till they ether stop lying, or are bankrupt. Cause i bet you money, they will run out of money before the industry ever does.
Yukimura sanada
yickes you got one foul mouth..altho when one gets tired of being complacent one tends to be simple when they speak :3

The Mainstream media is a mindless viewer whore not caring how they gain viewers

The Politicians are mindless vote whores doign the same...gotta love it....


Altho on the up side if this study is done right it could greatly help shut morons up..but then they never listen to facts..and this has a 50/50 chance of being misdone......blahg
Vote Paul K. McMasters for president!
Given that, correct me if I'm wrong, the CDC is responsible for the survey, I don't think the concern is them doing their study "right." The CDC is a team of skilled scientists and professionals. The concern is that politicians have elected to throw $90 million into a toilet and will not go by those findings if they contradict their own.

Does anyone honestly believe that Hillary Clinton, Joe Lieberman, and other anti-gaming crusaders would stop just because the CDC contradicted them? Hardly. It's called fishing for evidence where there isn't any. If they don't get their way this time, they'll just order another $90 M study, and then another, until one eventually proves their point and they can go "A-HA! See? We were right!" Yes, it's childish... but you're talking about politicians.

Given that Lieberman wants to cling to power, and Clinton isn't going away, the option of just removing them in their respective races does not seem likely. To me, what it REALLY boils down to is an industry that refuses government control. I can see Lieberman in a trenchcoat telling the ESA, "Fine little industry you've got here. It would be a shame if we passed laws against it. But you can change that, you know," as he extends his hand for the briefcase of money. After all... you don't see them crusading against Hollywood or the music industry anymore, even as Hollywood releases "Unrated" DVDs and foul-mouthed rap continues to ascend in popularity.
Somehow I think this study will end up like the intelligence reports to the whitehouse. You know what I mean.

CIA: "It's highly unlikely that Saddam Huissien has any weapons of mass destruction at this time."

GW: "So what ya mean is there's a very strong chance that he's got WMDs? Great!"

CIA: "No, there's virtually no reason to believe he has wmds!"

GW:"cool, so there's virtually no reason why invading Iraq would be a bad idea."

Anyways, same thing happened when the White House said an intelligence report supported their insistance that because of the war in Iraq we were safer then ever. Then, when GW declassified the report (probably because he was scared the New York Times would get it eventually) and anyone with third grade reading skillz could tell that the report said terrorism is now a growing problem in large part because of the massive failure in Iraq that has created such ill will towards America in Iraq that Al Quida's recruitment numbers are higher than ever.

My point is, no matter what the report says, it will say what politicians want it to say. I would like to think that at least since GW looks fondly back on his generation's Rock & Roll he might veto any federal anti-game measure. Especially since No Child Left Behind has helped so many Pedophiles find victims. (No Child allowed recruiters to get kid's home address and phone number to help them recruit. Last year, 80 recruiters from the various armed services have been disciplined for improper conduct, rape, etc.)
@Yukimura

I know I've said this before, but I don't believe the ESA and the industry can "sue people for spreading lies" as you put it. We're not talking about a tabloid saying somebody slept with so-and-so here. We're talking about peoples' opinions on the subject. And while we all know there's no direct causal link between violence and violent media, saying or implying that there is isn't illegal or an offense anyone could sue over. It's infuriating yes, but not illegal.
Ah, it warms my heart to see someone who really understands what's going on with the scapegoating that has occurred. The guy McMasters is roughly the same age as most of these close minded politicians, yet he realises what many of us have been screaming about for years. Games aren't the problem.

If CAMRA doesn't find a direct causal link, I'm willing to bet everything that whatever the results may be, and whatever the executive summary may say that Clinton and Lieberman will somehow twist the facts to their advantage. Then we will cry foul and the whole thing will come full circle.

Games companies are not exactly destitute, if the US sanctions restrictions on games, they will pack their bags and move overseas. It wouldn't be the first industry to do so.
ACtually mike, yes they can, its why theres slander, libel, and defamation laws. Just ask the PTC about how bad a Slander suit can get.

Regardless of the outcome, the threat of lawsuit would be enough to stop the lies. It's no sure thing, as it's a hard case to make, but it can work, and will often force major change. Hell, the PTC hasn't had any real impact on the world since the WWF sued there asses. They sure learned not to lie after that. I'll tell you what.
I've been saying the same things, but not nearly as eloquently.

Post new comment

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/06/08 at 01:57pm
BlackIce: It might be just a bit too late now.
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:07pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: Jack, Jack, Jack... When will you learn?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:38am
tallimar: hmm... youre right, im not getting the right mind frame... "YOU WILL LIKE FRIES WITH THAT!" how's that?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:36am
gameman9: Nah, he will just scare the customers.
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:35am
tallimar: i think jack's new line may end up being "would you like fries with that?"
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:00am
Adamas Draconis: His fave line. Always thought it should be "They've got me right where I want them."
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:43am
gamepolitics: he's got 'em right where he wants 'em,LOL
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:30am
Silencets: It was a great idea. Just another step in the overarcing master plan off JT...we little people wouldn't understand....
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:35am
Jack Wessels: Yeah I knew that part. I'm just amazed at whatever thought process led him to think that was a good idea.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:33am
gamepolitics: actually, he also sent similar material to the FL Supreme Court about 6 months before that
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:24am
Jack Wessels: for him and would somehow get Kent in trouble.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:23am
Jack Wessels: @GP: Wow, I've skimmed that one before, but I never noticed that JT actually thought this was good news....
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am
gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am
infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm
eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm
Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm
Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm
Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
Posted 07/05/08 at 03:27pm
Silencets: I'm sure JT had a perfectly good reason sending gay porn....It'll come to me any day now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:54pm
Grendal: once you send gay porn to judges, I'm comfortable calling you crazy
Login or register to post shouts