Federal Judge Blocks Oklahoma Video Game Law

October 12, 2006 -
Federal District Judge Robin Cauthron has issued a preliminary injunction to block Oklahoma's video game law from taking effect on November 1st. The bill was signed into law by Gov. Brad Henry (left)  in June.

Although not a final ruling, the issuance of the preliminary injunction means that the law is likely to be ruled unconsititutional and that the video game industry will prevail in its suit against the statute.

Of the ruling, Bo Andersen, president of the Entertainment Merchants Association, which represents video game retailers and renters said:
"We are pleased that the federal district court... recognized that the Oklahoma law is very likely to be found to violate the First Amendment and thus should not be allowed to be enforced. Video game restriction laws have been enacted by state and local governments nine times in the past six years, and nine times the federal courts have blocked these laws from going into effect..."

Read Judge Cauthron's ruling here.

Comments

To Hecksville with constitutionality - trying to enact an unenforceable law that would fail to remedy a problem that doesn’t exist is a dumb enough.


Andrew Eisen

Dennis, jeeze man, take a break.

Five articles already and it isn't even noon central.

Go have a coffee. *nods*

Wasn't this law a replica of the Unconstitutional Indiana bill?

It's probably going to have to be 52 for 52 before certain people learn that the First Amendment applies to things they DON'T like, too.

If only one would appeal to a higher court, then we could have faster resolution. But hey, why waste the effort, it was only to get re-elected anyway...
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

"If only one would appeal to a higher court, then we could have faster resolution. But hey, why waste the effort, it was only to get re-elected anyway…"

These DO get appealed to the Supreme Court, and the SC always denies cert, since there's no reason for them to hear it. They will probably continue to refuse to hear these cases unless one of the federal circuits ultimately rules that the law IS constitutional. Then they would take the case in order to resolve the circuit split.

I thought this already happened? Well, either way, it's a victory for the ESA and a loss for gamers. Why? Every Video Game law defeated brings us closer to the day Gamers are hunted down in the streets like dogs while the ESA claims we are all Pirates.

Think about it, whenever this stops, the ESA is still going to have lawyers on the payroll, and they can't just sit around and do nothing, lawyers are infamous for their desire to stay busy. After all this business, what would be their next move? Logically, to get rid of Piracy. According to Snoop Doug E Doug, the number one threat to the software industry is piracy. ARGH!

So, how will they go after pirates? Shut down mod chip sellers? Nope, they'll do the easiest thing and just bring everyone who signed up for VGVN to court and then drum up some reason why we're pirates, like say, you copied the free flash game you downloaded over to your PDA...or you have a share file...something like that.

@Kadamon: ...he's had a coffee- that's the problem. ;P

/b

Honestly, so many of these laws have been blocked, I can't keep up with which state it is anymore. It's like a domino effect.

I hope this gives a message to potential video game lawmakers that if it didn't work in other states, it sure as hell won't work in yours either.

I keep wonderign why they keep even trying to get these laws passed its like they don't learn from current history or realize that freedom of speech is worth more than its weight in gold to judges(if words can have weight.....dont ask).

@thefremen

I find it odd that they keep fighting to kill piracy givin the fact they put the games ina medium thats easily pirated to begin with(then againa true pirate can kill any protection you can put ona game even the high end 7 million number encryptions are cake)what bothers me is they go afetr folks pirateing games that are long past thier popularity and sales(like megaman X2 for example)instead of the ones really hurting the industry(ones that pirate current on the market games.

Ill admit right now yes i have a large collection of nes and snes roms(and not care if the esa reads this)not becuase i want something for nothing ,more to the fact i cannot find any of these games anywhwere for sale and the fact the companies are not making any money from these old titles(excluding capcom which pumps out the same crap for decades at a time).

If you ask me having a copyright on a single game for 20+ years is just insane not only does it block creativity and improvements but no copying of the game past its lifetime(meaning yes some games will dissapear forever like how i cant find a cart for ring king or caveman games from data east nor can i call them to buy a copy )means some will no longer be avialible to the next generation to enjoy.

In eiether case im relitively safe as are most people with roms as companies normaly go after much bigger fish(that and i have no money to really take :p)normaly folks who mass produce and sell the games.

ps:beena long time since i posted here.good to be back

nice victory for us. I guess I can continue to buy games without my ID.

of course it's going to be ruled unconstitutional. Jack Thompson penned it.

@ Siftr

I thought he penned the Louisanna game law.

- Warren Lewis

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

@cyn1c42

While most of these bill are pretty much the same (which explains why they keep failing), didn't this one mix things up a little by punishing the buyer?

@Siftr

No, I think you're thinking of the Lousiana bill.

@Terminator44

You're thinking the Minnesota bill. It fined the buyer $25, and was primarily designed not to be enforcable, but to "make parents aware". Rather costly education campaign...
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Yet another victory for us. This bill was the worst of them all as it would have even fined parents for buying their 14 or 15 year old teen son/daughter who they fell were mature enough to handle it, the games. Not to mention the wording in the bill was so vague and overtly broad no retailer would have any fucking idea which games would fall under the restrictions or not.

@Jabrwock

Ah, now I remember. Thanks for clearing that up.

I'm ashamed to be an Oklahoman.

I really wish I didn't have to say that so often.

If they do another Batman movie, Brad Henry should play The Ventriloquist.

Another one bites the dust.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should 'Hatred' have been removed from Steam Greenlight?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelante"It's not OUR fault that our game doesn't work, it's YOUR fault for having so many friends."12/17/2014 - 9:48pm
Matthew Wilsonapparently tetris did not work because he has a full friends list12/17/2014 - 9:21pm
WonderkarpSo Sony cancelled the release of the Interview. was it ever confirmed that the Sony hacking was done because of that specific movie?12/17/2014 - 8:54pm
MaskedPixelanteWow, Ubisoft went four for four, I didn't think it was actually possible.12/17/2014 - 8:37pm
MechaTama31Oh, ok, I was mixing up "on Greenlight" and "Greenlit".12/17/2014 - 8:23pm
Matthew Wilson@phx you beat me to it. how do you screw up tetris?! my ubisoft this is just stupid. no one should ever preorder a ubisoft game again! ps people should never preorder any game regardles of dev.12/17/2014 - 6:28pm
PHX Corphttp://www.ign.com/videos/2014/12/17/what-the-heck-is-wrong-with-tetris-ps4 I give up on ubisoft12/17/2014 - 6:01pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://comicbook.com/blog/2014/08/16/exclusive-original-unaltered-cut-of-star-wars-trilogy-to-be-rele/ Yeah, this'll never happen.12/17/2014 - 5:03pm
NeenekoThey have and exercise control over which games are allowed on their privately controlled 'open forum'. Their endorsement is fairly minimal since it is only 'we do not reject this', but it is still an endorsement of sorts.12/17/2014 - 3:58pm
NeenekoHistorically there have been issues with libraries allowing some groups but not others. Perhaps 'endorsement' is too strong a word, but their editorial control IS a preapproval process, even if the standards are pretty minimal.12/17/2014 - 3:56pm
E. Zachary KnightLet's put this a different way. My local library allows any group to reserve and use multipurpose rooms. That does not mean that the Library endorses all events that take place in those rooms.12/17/2014 - 12:54pm
E. Zachary KnightValve's editorial control comes from removing problem games and accepting games to Steam. They make no claim over any games otherwise.12/17/2014 - 12:52pm
E. Zachary KnightNeeneko, It is not at all a form of endorsement. Grenlight is an open forum for game developers to pitch their game to Valve/Steam and Steam users. Does Valve have some editorial control? Yes, but not to the point that they preapprove games.12/17/2014 - 12:51pm
Neeneko@EZK - I disagree. Greenlight is built off Valve's brand. While not an explicit endorsement, it is a form of it, otherwise Greenlight would have no value over other platforms.12/17/2014 - 12:05pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.latino-review.com/news/exclusive-viola-davis-bags-amanda-waller-role-in-suicide-squad Latino Review says Viola Davis will be Amanda Waller. History of Latino Review says "wait for a REAL news site to confirm".12/17/2014 - 10:48am
PHX Corphttp://www.polygon.com/2014/12/17/7407869/assassins-creed-unity-glitch-broken-problems-xbox-one-patch -Facepalm- Screwup means Assassin's Creed Unity's patch is the 40GB full game on Xbox One12/17/2014 - 10:17am
PHX Corphttp://www.theverge.com/2014/12/16/7401769/the-mpaa-wants-to-strike-at-dns-records-piracy-sopa-leaked-documents Sony leaks reveal Hollywood is trying to break DNS, the backbone of the internet12/17/2014 - 10:05am
E. Zachary KnightA Game being on Greenlight is not an endorsement of said game by Valve, Steam or anyone related to Valve or Steam. Greenlight is a combined sales pitch to Steam and its users.12/17/2014 - 9:51am
E. Zachary KnightThe Life cycle of a Greenlight game: A game gets made->Developer puts it on Greenlight->Gamers vote for it->Valve decides it is worthy of a Steam release->Game is sold on Steam. While the game is merely on greenlight, it is not available for sale on Steam12/17/2014 - 9:50am
InfophileGreenlight games may in the future be sold through Steam. A game there may be "greenlit" and then sold on Steam proper, or it may not, and never actually be sold on steam. That quote refers to them selecting some games from Greenlight which they will sell12/17/2014 - 9:39am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician