Federal Judge Blocks Oklahoma Video Game Law

October 12, 2006 -
Federal District Judge Robin Cauthron has issued a preliminary injunction to block Oklahoma's video game law from taking effect on November 1st. The bill was signed into law by Gov. Brad Henry (left)  in June.

Although not a final ruling, the issuance of the preliminary injunction means that the law is likely to be ruled unconsititutional and that the video game industry will prevail in its suit against the statute.

Of the ruling, Bo Andersen, president of the Entertainment Merchants Association, which represents video game retailers and renters said:
"We are pleased that the federal district court... recognized that the Oklahoma law is very likely to be found to violate the First Amendment and thus should not be allowed to be enforced. Video game restriction laws have been enacted by state and local governments nine times in the past six years, and nine times the federal courts have blocked these laws from going into effect..."

Read Judge Cauthron's ruling here.

Comments

To Hecksville with constitutionality - trying to enact an unenforceable law that would fail to remedy a problem that doesn’t exist is a dumb enough.


Andrew Eisen

Dennis, jeeze man, take a break.

Five articles already and it isn't even noon central.

Go have a coffee. *nods*

Wasn't this law a replica of the Unconstitutional Indiana bill?

It's probably going to have to be 52 for 52 before certain people learn that the First Amendment applies to things they DON'T like, too.

If only one would appeal to a higher court, then we could have faster resolution. But hey, why waste the effort, it was only to get re-elected anyway...
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

"If only one would appeal to a higher court, then we could have faster resolution. But hey, why waste the effort, it was only to get re-elected anyway…"

These DO get appealed to the Supreme Court, and the SC always denies cert, since there's no reason for them to hear it. They will probably continue to refuse to hear these cases unless one of the federal circuits ultimately rules that the law IS constitutional. Then they would take the case in order to resolve the circuit split.

I thought this already happened? Well, either way, it's a victory for the ESA and a loss for gamers. Why? Every Video Game law defeated brings us closer to the day Gamers are hunted down in the streets like dogs while the ESA claims we are all Pirates.

Think about it, whenever this stops, the ESA is still going to have lawyers on the payroll, and they can't just sit around and do nothing, lawyers are infamous for their desire to stay busy. After all this business, what would be their next move? Logically, to get rid of Piracy. According to Snoop Doug E Doug, the number one threat to the software industry is piracy. ARGH!

So, how will they go after pirates? Shut down mod chip sellers? Nope, they'll do the easiest thing and just bring everyone who signed up for VGVN to court and then drum up some reason why we're pirates, like say, you copied the free flash game you downloaded over to your PDA...or you have a share file...something like that.

@Kadamon: ...he's had a coffee- that's the problem. ;P

/b

Honestly, so many of these laws have been blocked, I can't keep up with which state it is anymore. It's like a domino effect.

I hope this gives a message to potential video game lawmakers that if it didn't work in other states, it sure as hell won't work in yours either.

I keep wonderign why they keep even trying to get these laws passed its like they don't learn from current history or realize that freedom of speech is worth more than its weight in gold to judges(if words can have weight.....dont ask).

@thefremen

I find it odd that they keep fighting to kill piracy givin the fact they put the games ina medium thats easily pirated to begin with(then againa true pirate can kill any protection you can put ona game even the high end 7 million number encryptions are cake)what bothers me is they go afetr folks pirateing games that are long past thier popularity and sales(like megaman X2 for example)instead of the ones really hurting the industry(ones that pirate current on the market games.

Ill admit right now yes i have a large collection of nes and snes roms(and not care if the esa reads this)not becuase i want something for nothing ,more to the fact i cannot find any of these games anywhwere for sale and the fact the companies are not making any money from these old titles(excluding capcom which pumps out the same crap for decades at a time).

If you ask me having a copyright on a single game for 20+ years is just insane not only does it block creativity and improvements but no copying of the game past its lifetime(meaning yes some games will dissapear forever like how i cant find a cart for ring king or caveman games from data east nor can i call them to buy a copy )means some will no longer be avialible to the next generation to enjoy.

In eiether case im relitively safe as are most people with roms as companies normaly go after much bigger fish(that and i have no money to really take :p)normaly folks who mass produce and sell the games.

ps:beena long time since i posted here.good to be back

nice victory for us. I guess I can continue to buy games without my ID.

of course it's going to be ruled unconstitutional. Jack Thompson penned it.

@ Siftr

I thought he penned the Louisanna game law.

- Warren Lewis

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

@cyn1c42

While most of these bill are pretty much the same (which explains why they keep failing), didn't this one mix things up a little by punishing the buyer?

@Siftr

No, I think you're thinking of the Lousiana bill.

@Terminator44

You're thinking the Minnesota bill. It fined the buyer $25, and was primarily designed not to be enforcable, but to "make parents aware". Rather costly education campaign...
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Yet another victory for us. This bill was the worst of them all as it would have even fined parents for buying their 14 or 15 year old teen son/daughter who they fell were mature enough to handle it, the games. Not to mention the wording in the bill was so vague and overtly broad no retailer would have any fucking idea which games would fall under the restrictions or not.

@Jabrwock

Ah, now I remember. Thanks for clearing that up.

I'm ashamed to be an Oklahoman.

I really wish I didn't have to say that so often.

If they do another Batman movie, Brad Henry should play The Ventriloquist.

Another one bites the dust.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should ‘sexism’ factor into a video game’s rating?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenIf you missed the HuffPost segment I guested on, the replay is now embedded in the story.11/21/2014 - 6:05pm
Wonderkarphttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2__4yZCcAA9Ytp.jpg these look amazing. Peach is the only one I'm tempted to open cause her packaging is bent. get another nonbent one....man. toycollector me and gamecollector me is fighting11/21/2014 - 5:51pm
WonderkarpJust finalized my Smash Bros free Sound Track Order. Also got 4 amiibos and they look fantastic. I'm afraid to open them. they look spectacular!11/21/2014 - 5:45pm
james_fudgeCan we all agree that Andrew cleans up nicely and can go on any program?11/21/2014 - 5:01pm
Wonderkarpthank you for that line, Andrew. alot of great films fail the bechdel test. Gravity fails it and it has a female lead.11/21/2014 - 4:48pm
Andrew EisenAw, thanks James! Well, now I have to drive back to work!11/21/2014 - 4:45pm
Andrew EisenDidn't have a chance to say this on the HuffPost segment but while the Bechdel test is useful as a broad examination of gender representation in media, it's not at all appropriate as a judgement of quality.11/21/2014 - 4:45pm
james_fudgeAndrew you killed it!11/21/2014 - 4:44pm
WonderkarpMadeline Bergman. second female, they never speak of men, just a computer program. it passes the test11/21/2014 - 4:34pm
E. Zachary KnightDoes Other M have more than one woman in it?11/21/2014 - 4:31pm
Wonderkarpyet Metroid Other M, a game where people cried sexist due to the commanding officers restricting Samus, passes the test....11/21/2014 - 4:21pm
Wonderkarpwait...they are using the bechdel test to determine which games are sexist?.....how does that work with a game like Super Mario Bros when there is no Dialogue? test itself is BS. Alien doesn't pass it11/21/2014 - 4:20pm
james_fudgeAndrew Eisen on Ice! Please join in at 4:23 pm et and support our bestie! http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/sweden-sexism-video-game/546d41cffe344486d400023711/21/2014 - 4:05pm
Matthew Wilsonthose are the same people that said google should pay to list news sites in their news reader, and than accused google of blackmail when google said no and delisted them.11/21/2014 - 4:03pm
Wonderkarpwait....europe can dismantle a company not founded in europe?11/21/2014 - 3:54pm
NeenekoHrm, that does raise interesting questions about anti-trust laws and transnational corporations.11/21/2014 - 3:54pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/11/europes-parliament-poised-to-call-for-a-break-up-of-google/ what is with Europe? good think they dont have the power to do it. worse comes to worse google can block any European country that tries.11/21/2014 - 3:49pm
Andrew EisenFun Fact: Back when it was new, I was linked to that docket by three separate people in the same day. It was submitted as proof of their claim. In all three cases, the docket didn't even address what they were talking about. Did any of them read it?11/21/2014 - 3:00pm
Wonderkarpits not a piece. its just a press docket. its like a wiki11/21/2014 - 2:52pm
NeenekoAnd for not being about feminism, the piece spends a lot of focus talking about it....11/21/2014 - 2:44pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician