
In an op-ed for the
Provo Daily Herald, Paul McMasters of the First Amendment Center, writes:
"Video games, it appears, are replacing television, which replaced movies, which replaced the penny press, as the "new pornography" threatening the minds and morals of the nation's youth.
"For more than eight decades... experts have produced study after study and political leaders have conducted hearing after hearing, all in an effort to prove -- by repetition if not by hard evidence -- that media violence harms young people, even adults... Despite those efforts, drawing a straight line from violence in the media to violence in reality remains difficult if not impossible."
Meanwhile, in the
Springfield News-Leader, columnist Michael Brothers (seen at left) weighs in:
In an effort to save young people from themselves, the powers that be at every level of American life are shooting legislative arrows at low-hanging fruit — usually the fruit of pop culture — all the while talking about giving parents 'tools' to protect their kids..."
"Attitudes (and ignorance) toward games is perhaps the worst. Nowhere in American culture is the rift between generations X and Y and older people so apparent. A new game out this week called "Bully" has generated a storm of backlash from the out-of-touch crowd. One anti-game zealot called the game a "Columbine simulator" based solely on the title..."
"When are we going to give young people an ounce of credit — around here and in this country? Why do we mistrust them to make good choices?"
Comments
On a related note about profits and scare mongering... While I do think sometimes the misrepresentation of games is about scaremongering (most prominently among broadcast outlets), I really believe that it ultimately comes down to a lack of familiarity and context. (I could write a book on that one.) None of these activists or journalists play games, and it shows. From my perspective as a journalist, it's pure ignorance, not a play for profits.
Hopefully, Holodecks and virtual vision stuff.
That age is young for some. older for others.
My parents never gave me enough credit till I started fixing their computers and building the house network.
Why, because the Boomer/Hippie mantra "Don't Trust Anyone Over 30" was neatly flipped to "UNDER 30" as soon as they all hit that magical number. Thankfully it's not universal. I know plenty of people in their fifties and sixties who are rational and reasonable about video games and media content in general: they may deplore the content, but they don't take it as a sign of the fall of the Republic.
I saw in one article Henry Jenkins was talking about how people who grew up playing video games are coming into power slowly and that this hubub over games will die down. However, he said the new thing the older generation would not understand and lash out against could be something like the new social networking sites. I immediately thought "Crap like MySpace is for losers and sissies..." after reading it before being hit by the irony of it. Apparently I'm already old.
I'm glad we got people like those two. Makes me feel more wam and squishy on the inside.
It's nice to hear articles that talk about the issue and not try to make it this over sensationalized story based on pure opinion
Thanks, you cunt.
Maybe... although MySpace and social networking sites are attacked from a different angle.
In the case of games, they are being bashed by people who have no understanding about how stuff works (a.k.a. Thompsonisms). Myspace and blog systems can be bashed by people who feel that they create people who have no understanding about how stuff works (a.k.a. AOL Syndrome).
While there is still opposition to the new media, it is based around a different concept. One is lack of education, the other is the lack of providing education. The relationship is only with the result - the rational is slightly different.
Unfortunately, the pro-gaming view just isn't profitable at the moment. You can make money associating yourself with what the press and ignorant populace considers evil. I'm sure that at one point, we'll find something new and shiny to rant about (i.e PS3 prices o.O), but until then, lets just give these guys a spotlight :D
As pointed out prior a lot of the video game bashers do so because they don't understand the technology or the product. A lot of the myspace bashers do understand.
There are plenty of "acceptable" social sites/forums that don't cater to the bottom of the gene pool and create an environment which embraces stupidity. Selectively bashing myspace is like bashing that old custers last stand atari game. Simply for being the most glaring example of when something goes horribly wrong.
...
Post new comment