
It's Sunday, so a good day to talk about religion and video games, two topics which don't often intersect.
In addition to the Boston Globe's look at
Left Behind: Eternal Forces, we take note of this
op-ed by Father Germogen Tucker in the Community Press (Florence, KY). The Rev seems to be saying that video games cause sin.
Perhaps surprisingly, Fr. Tucker disdains scientific research to make his point, drawing largely upon the writings of a priest from the 3rd Century.
Recently there was a big flap on CNN news about a study that stated that video games caused the players to become violent. Of course the makers of the games immediately attacked CNN for flawed studies and biased reporting.
It is a sad state in this society that plain old common sense has disappeared. To put it simply, we act on what we see, hear and are taught, and by what our imaginations can create. This notion was well explained by the early church fathers in their explanation of how we sin.
St. Hesycios the Priest (3rd Cen.?) stated: "...we and the demons combine in committing sins. The demons work through evil thoughts alone by forming in the intellect what fanciful pictures they wish..."
Thus what we conceive in the mind, if acted upon, becomes sin. If we see violence, and do not dismiss it immediately, it then becomes a compulsion that we attempt to act on.
We need to protect the minds of ourselves and our youth from the violence in the world and portrayed in video games. The killings, the blood and guts portrayed, will affect the minds and eventually cause us to act in a similar way.
Comments
Yes, there is the "why risk it" idea. But the only risk involved is for people with unhealthy minds, and if it isn't video games then it will be something else anyway so it is not specifically the games that did it. Even an unhealthy mind has to make that choice to act or not to act, but in the unhealthy mind there is a certain impairment of judgement that frequently leads to poor decisions or outright strange ones.
Entertainment in any media does not lead to, effect, influence, or sway people. That gives human traits to objects. The message contained within such media may do so, if sufficiently strong, and the person sufficiently open to it. But, in the end, it is the individual that chooses, either to act or not to act. Human beings have free will. We choose right or wrong. Defining right and wrong is a ticklish subject, proven by the tit-for-tat on this article's comments. But no one can deny that a human being made a choice. So like I said, it is a piss-poor excuse to blame one's actions on scapegoat object or message.
I'm not perfect, I do the same thing - it seems we human beings are wired this way. I find it to be interesting that you thought I was flaunting atheism, would it suprise you to know that I am not an athiest? I would go on about exactly why, but my guess is that you'd prefer not to learn anything about the many forms of athiesm and my views on their flaws. You can always PM in the forums, but this has gone far enough afield of the topic.
I find Father Germogen Tucker's views to be false, as I stated above. He bases them on loose information about video games (without even attempt to understand the context), as well as passages that even the myriad christians that posted here can't agree on just what they mean. So, we are at an impasse - you agree (to some extent) and I disagree (to a large extent). I hope this has clarified my statements.
If you want to flaunt atheism, do it somewhere else. I explained what the priest said and why he was totally justified in what he said.
Because I am responsible for my own actions, and I refuse to allow myself (and others) the piss-poor excuse of, "The devil (or [insert vice here]) made me do it."
Good shepard or no, I am not a sheep, so there is no risk in being "led astray."
The priest himself, in a certain way, is correct. It is said in the Our Father a prayer to ask God to lead us away from temptation. Video games have violence, sex, and all of the like, and the man who said this has a point.
We see these vices, and to some, over time, it may lead to a change in behavior and sinning against God. The problem I DO see with what this priest says, is that this statement has one terrible flaw.
If you say that video games and mass media are a large assistant in the immoraility of society - does that imply that society as a whole was more morally sound before the dawn of mass media? The answer to that question is no, not really. People have been people, and video games, along with mass media have been created for entertainment. It is certainly possible to walk around and have a body count of over five hundred thousand, along with summon demons to do your bidding, and then go to Church on Saturday or Sunday.
Video games, to a weak person, yes, they may cause changed in behavior, and a degeneration of the morailty of a person. That person, though, will seem to have much deeper underlying problems than the video game itself. For most of the general community, though, it won't effect them at all. The priest through teaching is expressing the belief that this practice of playing video games influencing a soul may lead them astray.
And thus he asked the question, which through the eyes of Catholicism is perfectly legitmate, and I agree with.
"Why risk it?"
"...sad state... blah blah... common sense... yada yada... compulsion that we attempt to act on."
Yeah, sounds like standard religious rambling. It's funny that everytime I hear a homily, I feel a need to debate everything the priest says in my mind. And I usually end up only agreeing with maybe 10% of what he says. It makes me wonder sometimes that what a priest is saying is not what he actually means. I think it may be due to huge difference in perspective. Spending every day of your adult life in contemplation, prayer, and worship, I'd imagine, tends to make you introspect a lot more than consider the 'average guy' perspective. I may have gotten a little off topic, but my point is that you can't always analyse to the smallest detail what a priest says. They are only human.
combination of ignorance, fear and superstition to condemn anything they don't even remotely understand and don't even try. Their logic
is and has always been, "If it's new and strange and we don't understand it or it doesn't fit in with our beliefs, then it must be evil!"
It goes all the way back to the middle ages (That the author points to medieval writings does not surprise me, as they've been mired in that mindset for almost that long), when they condemned Galileo when he discovered the Earth was not the center of the universe, and Columbus for asserting the world was not flat. Intelligent Design and oppostion to Stem Cell research are just the latest in a long parade of ignorance. You want the biggest stumbling block on the road
to a more enlightened society and better quality of life? Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Christianity.
Seeking pleasure does not equal sin. IF that were the case, then gay marriage would not be a topic in the news of late because Christian churches and it's leaders would denounce marriage of any kind, seeing as how those are very pleasure filled experiences that come from lust and want and form into any number of good and/or bad behaviors, etc.
Nobody would sing in churches either, because songs were written by both pleasurable and/or evil experiences committed and/or experienced by the song writer. If I remember correctly, Christian churches love to sing songs written by a star of the bible by the name of David. Let's remember, not only did he write songs, but he also had a man killed in order to have his wife. That is not the end of his sins, but it's interesting that he is held in such high regard.
Finally, violent videogames don't necessarily fall into this writing as this man believes. Violent thoughts aren't created in the minds of children at all times, even when playing the games, because the images are being shown, not sowed to them.
Gentleman like this are the very reason I am non-denominational and why I spent 6 months going to churches and have since stopped. They can't teach me anymore.
So... thinking for myself is a bad thing? Or am I somehow reading this wrong?
You're reading it right.
In school, we we're studying world history. And guess what subject came up? Religion. And which religion came across as a bunch of arrogant control freaks? Christianity. I believe in God and Jesus and all that stuff, but outside of that, I'm not religious at all. This guy's just another moron that degrades what he doesn't understand.
To quote Reverend Lovejoy in the Simpsons: "Have you read this thing? (the Bible) Everything's a sin. Technically, we're not even allowed to go to teh bathroom."
I love that Simpsons quote, and I too thought of it while reading this story.
http://www.americancatholic.org/Features/SaintOfDay/default.asp?id=1894
And let's not forget the Inquisitions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition
Oh yeah, religious leaders during that time really knew about "sin".
nightwng2000
NW2K Software
"St. Hesycios the Priest (3rd Cen.?) stated: “…we and the demons combine in committing sins. The demons work through evil thoughts alone by forming in the intellect what fanciful pictures they wish…”
Thus what we conceive in the mind, if acted upon, becomes sin. If we see violence, and do not dismiss it immediately, it then becomes a compulsion that we attempt to act on."
So, this means committing a sin is a sin and viewing a fake sin is also a sin? By this argument, viewing a Catholic appreciated film like "The Passion of the Christ" and not walking out is a sin. All Easter plays are a sin (we aren't repudiating the violence when we view them, are we?) and we'd better get rid of The Stations of the Cross in all Catholic Churches (more violence we're complicitly putting up with) and we need to alter all those crucifixes that show Christ in agony.
I'd agree that committing real violence is a sin, but virtual fake violence (the kind I prefer by a wide margin) is also sinful? Absurd.
It always bothers me when anyone thinks the way to live is to isolate yourself from the world. Especially when the person advocating this is a representative of a religion that seems to think it's entitled to make real-world decisions that effect everyone (stem cell research, gay marriage....). They can't have it both ways.
Matthew 5:27-28
"You have heard that it was said, 'Do not commit adultery. But I tell
you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed
adultery with her in his heart."
I also love this: "I believe in God and Jesus and all that stuff, but outside of that, I’m not religious at all."
Yeah, "I only believe in the truly baseless and untenable parts of the Bible, but all that stuff about morality I just ignore." Somebody's got her priorities backwards.
I'm pretty strongly anti-Christian. But there are a lot of things in the Bible that are worth looking into. For one, this concept that thought leads to sin. Buddhist psychology confirms this. Neuroscience confirms this. The moral question is whether or not we should embrace a "sinful" existence. I think that--in the case of violence especially--sin is a necessary part of American life. Children should be capable of self-defense, and that means killing without remorse if need be. So I'm pro-military simulator.
Of course, one could argue that a just killing is not murder and therefore not sin. Or a religious person could agree with me on the basic value of killing but argue that video games teach UNJUST killing. We could go back and forth all day. But I think you get my basic point. These gray areas are where parental guidance becomes important.
The key phrase being "if acted upon." Surely, if a person plays GTA and goes off and murders someone, there's a sin there. If you did a lot of the things you can do in GTA in real life, you'd be committing sin (and a crime). But you can't deny the fact that over 20 million people own this game and, by the "pure evil" logic a lot of critics use, we should all be dead.
I disagree with most people on the interpretation of that passage.
Somewhere near there it says that feeling anger is just as bad as murder.
That bothered me until I realized what I belive he really meant.
Jesus often talked metaphorically, and I think this particular passage is meant to illustrate that sin is unavoidable. Even when we consiously avoid sin, basic instinct make it happen anyways.
So, rather than consiously focusing on what is a sin, you should listen to God on what you should do. What anyone else says doesn't matter (Be they a priest, Pope, President, or whatever).
Once you do this, your attitudes change. You get angry less often, lust less often (By lust I mean thinking, "Daaayyyummm! I want to fuck that like a goat on wheels!" every time you see a hot girl. Appreciating beauty is not lust.) and are generally happier.
Tucker does have a point though.
We need to be mindful of our thoughts. Know how what you're thinking affects you.
Virtual violence doesn't affect you unless you let it.
Note: By listening to God, I don't mean hearing voices. I'm not schizophrenic. I mean meditation with the solution coming naturally.
DO you REALLY...and I mean REALLY want to go there?common sense dictats males should not have free will because they are violent and prone to hurting others...common sense dictats that condoms are needed in school to keep kids from getting knocked up because you cant protect them from life 24/7...common sense dictats religion is evil because of the wars and greed it creates...common sense dictats using common sense as a shield is BS...its just common sense .....................
""
I also love this: “I believe in God and Jesus and all that stuff, but outside of that, I’m not religious at all.”""
I do believe but I don't believe in the church,a organization founded by old men to keep their power and rule by using god and heracy as the big stick to keep the masses down....I am not a fan of large mindless goverment either *L*
*Goes reads bible*
*Has anal sex, Adultry, Incest, beastiality and goes on a killing spree nailing people to crosses*
If I went by their logic of "Monkey see, monkey do" reading the bible has got to be worst thing a kid can ever do in his life time.
Bizzo, if he REALLY meant such a thing, he doesn't know it. It's too much credit for someone who truly believes that everything is a sin.
Speaking of sin, the approach that the christian religion gives is that no matter what you do, you are doing something wrong, and you're going to hell because of it. Here's a nice pardody on this subject: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/72146
I loved that quote from the Simpsons.
So much of the bible is a metaphor. Genesis is most definitely a metaphor, revelations can not be taken literally at all, if you do, well i just won't go there.
I also hate how everyone bashes Christianity in general when one nut or one sect decides to think a certain way.
"We need to protect the minds of ourselves and our youth from the violence in the world and portrayed in video games. The killings, the blood and guts portrayed, will affect the minds and eventually cause us to act in a similar way."
I was twelve when 9/11 happened. I watched the news coverage on it most of the day. I can't say I've ever felt an urge to fly an airplane into the nearest tall building. Probably because I "dismissed it immediately," which - surprise, surprise - any intelligent person will do with video games. Most people are capable of keeping their real life and their entertainments separate. About the only thing he's right about is that children shouldn't be playing violent, graphic video games (some kids can handle it, but I'm not going to get into that), but he seems to also be saying that NOBODY should be playing them.
People like this make me ashamed to call myself a Christian.
Everyone here isn't bashing the Christians themselves; it's some of the things in their teachings and what this preist has said that they're bashing about.
@ Trencher
I had to laugh at that statement. Sadly, it makes alot of sense, and yet it's what people like that preist need in order to connect the dots of life.
"O.K people, this is one priest saying what he thinks, this isn’t an edict by the Pope or a message from Jesus Christ himself so stop with the fuckin’ Christian bashing. If some atheist came out and bitched about video games being bad and causing violence we wouldn’t be bashing all atheists now would we."
Atheists don't follow a system of organized beliefs. So an atheist calling something 'sinful' just won't happen. The term 'sin' carries with it the weight of the christian morality, which has historical connotations, political connotations, and carries with it a stigma of 'wrongness' that is vastly different than an individual simply saying, " I think video games cause violence," or, "I am agaisnt video games."
First, show me an atheist that is against video games. Second, recognize that a priest carries infinitely more weight behind his words than any atheist, no matter what obscure, particular sect of christianity (This case - Eastern Orthodox - is hardly obscure, but that isn't central to my point). Third, if an atheist came out an "bashed video games," as you put it, I (and most others here) would most definitely be "bashing" that person, if their opinion was based on specious, mis-translated, mis-information from a by-gone age. Or, even if the person was just trusting the so-called 'studies.' Or, even if it was simply their personal opinion.
I will state that quite often a person from the anti-christian crowd over-generalizes all christians. And when I see that, I take that particular person's view with a critical eye.
Is this guy saying that living is a sin? Who is he kidding, not me and definately not many. Anyone who listens to this doesn't deserve to be a part of a foward moving society. Go back to the middle ages.
don't blame him, he's too stupid and arrogant for his own good. the majority of christians are humble, which is what they are SUPPOSED to be.
I agree and I am a devout Catholic too. I agree that people don't act on what they see at all. That's a bogus theory and there's nothing wrong with simulating clrimes in video games because, as you said and I said earlier, they don't hurt anybody and they never have and they never will. Please keep posting things like this. Also if you want to help the violent video game industry, email you representative and tell him or her not to support the Family Entertainment Protection Act I have heard that it would limit the number of violent video games that will exist in the future and trying to ban video games for being violent is very communistic in nature because in a communist government, the governemnt says, "We don't like this, so no one should have it." It is a travesty and must not ever pass. I have already emailed my representative and urged her not to support this awful bill. The government and the church have nothing to do with video games and shoud stay out of it.
Thank You,
A Concerned Video Gamer
It doesn't work that way, dude. We can't send him and others like him back to the dark ages. They would like the idea. The problem is, they like it so much that they want to take all of us with them.
It is a sad state in this society that plain old common sense has disappeared
I agree, common sense is scarce these days. I see examples of this every day. Let's look up the definition of common sense, shall we? According to dictionary.com, common sense is sound practical judgment that is independent of specialized knowledge, training, or the like; normal native intelligence. So, what common sense is this man arguing is lacking? To sum up, he claims that everybody fails to realize we learn from experience. His idea is that if we experience evil, we will become evil. I disagree with that and I also would like to argue that whether or not we know about us learning from experience is irrelevant. Going for an extreme example, if you experience your house being robbed at gunpoint, you just gained some knowledge. If a person has even a slightly healthy mind, they will realize that GUN = BAD and STEALING = BAD. I could go on, but let's move to another quote.
Thus what we conceive in the mind, if acted upon, becomes sin.
My first problem is that he does not specify that only evil thoughts can manifest sin, but that can be interpreted as simply me being picky about grammar. More importantly, I would like to say that this is entirely right. Doing things that you know are bad is definitely bad. However, this does not apply to video games either. We know for a fact that playing GTA will not kill anybody, will not rob them of their possessions, or any other evil acts in the game. As soon as the game is turned off, the world you just robbed from disappears, and nobody is harmed. There is no evil in simulating such events. Let's apply something more applicable to myself and see how I fare against this arguement. I like this particular game series called "Thief" which you might have heard of. Obviously criminal intent will be involved, somewhat of a similar nature to what a D&D rogue might do. One thing you can do is pick locks. I was influenced by this, no doubt. I have a set of picks which I use as a hobby only with consent or on my own locks, and I have developed useful skills in case the worst happens. However, I have no intention of ever breaking into a room I was not given permission to enter. I have even developed an interest in security in general and hope that I can make a living from it. All in all, I would say that playing that game has influenced me very positively. Let's move on to another quote.
We need to protect the minds of ourselves and our youth from the violence in the world and portrayed in video games.
Protect them from what? Evil? Isolation might work. Evil will exist around a person no matter what. It is up to parents to tell a child what is right and what is not (and also to get that information right themselves so they can give a good example), and it is up to that child to obey what they have learned and know what's okay and what's not. Attempting to remove the ambient evil in the world is not the answer, it won't happen. All in all, it is up to each individual to lead a life of goodness on his own to the best of his ability, despite the bad happening around him. If a man plays video games, that does not seem to contradict a life of goodness to me. The contradiction occurs when we carry that into the real world, and I hardly see that happening so the only answer is that those who do have sick minds (like, literally sick as in a disease). Assuming you have a healthy mind (not the same as being intelligent) you are safe from your video games.
Anyways. This dude loses in life. It is sin to look at violence? Wow. Better tell everyone who watched Passion.
(Exists. Cry if you want to ^_^)
You know what they say, don't let religion spoil your faith.
I'll accept video games as sin the day priests stop touching children.
But when you realize that there are no gods, no demons, just the thoughts in your head, which can be acted on or not, you can begin to take control of (and responsibility for) your own life. And that is the way to freedom and happiness.
Far too many people in this country persist in living in the demon-haunted world---especially people with political and social power---and they and the people around them continue to suffer for it. (Among other things, notice that Ted Haggard has been making the same kind of statements about struggling with magical demons to explain away his actions.)
"If some atheist came out and bitched about video games being bad and causing violence we wouldn’t be bashing all atheists now would we."
No, and that's because atheists don't have a centuries-long history of trying to forcibly impress their beliefs on others. There's a reason why Christians get a bad rap, they don't get picked on for the hell of it. I'm not saying it's right or deserved, but when some clown comes out with the clown talk people tend to react more harshly because of that reputation.
Post new comment