Sunday Editorial Roundup: Boston Globe Dishes on Religion & Rock'n'Roll in "Left Behind"

Sunday Editorial Roundup: Boston Globe Dishes on Religion & Rock'n'Roll in "Left Behind"

November 12, 2006
Given all of its pre-release controversy, Left Behind: Eternal Forces slipped into retail channels rather quietly last week.

Scribe Hiawatha Bray of the Boston Globe has reviewed Left Behind, but GamePolitics is less interested in Bray's report on its design elements than his take on the social, cultural and political aspects of the game. Here's what Bray has to say:
...staying alive may sometimes lead to the taking of life...  And that raises a knotty moral conundrum for any game designer who worships Jesus, the Prince of Peace...

Every time (the good guys) kill, even if it's justified, it weakens their moral fiber. Force them to kill too often, and they'll fall away from the faith and move to the Dark Side.

(Left Behind) also provides interesting and sometimes amusing insights into the cultural crotchets of evangelical America. Characters keep shouting "Praise the Lord!" at odd moments. Bad guys fight back with the devil's music -- rock 'n' roll.

The theory of evolution comes in for a good deal of rough handling along the way, and there are friendly invitations to the faith for unbelieving gamers...

It's easy to jeer at a group of Christians seeking to make their mark in an industry that so often celebrates amoral savagery. Yet you can't help respecting the effort that went into Left Behind: Eternal Forces.

GP hasn't yet seen any reviews of LBEF by other outlets, although reader reviews on GameSpot gave the game a so-so 7.1 rating.

Comments

I've gotta admit, I do like those mechanics Bray talked about. Maybe I'll buy this controversial game too, or at least scavenge for a demo.
Demo is on Gamespot, at the least.

I'm getting ready to try it out right now.

nightwng2000
NW2K Software
I like the idea of having killing make you go to the dark side....

But are the creator's against rock and roll or something? or are they just commenting on it?
@Grahamr

Indeed - and how, may I ask, do they 'fight you' with it?
They aim their Guitar Hero controllers at you and fire bursts of Star Power, how else?

Regardless of the issues Left Behind has had over its development cycle, I think people interested in a religious game seem to finally have something to point to. There have been a lot of awful games that use religion as an excuse to generate more sales than they otherwise would. If Left Behind does pan out as a generally solid game, it is nice that someone made the effort to create a legitimate product.
@Darth_Toxic

According ot the article, listening makes people "loose their religon" so it's prayer in reverse.

I can't say of that makes anti-rock n' roll or it's just toung-in-cheak however, we'd need to see it in game to know.
@Nightwing

Thanks for the heads up.
Has that tracker worm that was in the game been removed yet?
It was soem form of in game advert was it not?
Ok, I've played through the tutorials in the demo.

Pretty straight forward RTS for the most part. Instead of building your special building, you "Acuire" buildings and remodel them to your purposes. You can level up buildings and "Friends" for better purposes as well. A clinic becomes a Hospital. A Cafe can become a Food court and so on.

I'm a little nitpicky about how your deciples can recruit "Friends who are under your control". Makes it sound like brainwashing. But really, it's just a matter of going to a Neutral unit, recruiting them which turns the unit to a "Friend" and therefore a unit under your direct control.

From what it sounds like, in the Single Player game, you can only play on the "good side", while in multiplayer mode, you can play on either side. The opposing side is called the "Global Community Peacekeepers". Not really a horrid sounding name. In fact, a rather good name for the followers of the Anti-Christ.

A function that seperates this from many RTS games I've played is that each unit seems to be a specific character. Whether this is random or they are actual characters from the book series, I don't know. But each character actually has a name and "Life Story" that you can view and seems to be updated as you play.

You don't wage battles but rather "Spiritual Warfare" which begs the question: If it's "Spiritual" Warfare, is War still Hell? Sorry, had to do it. :)

Another addition which stands out from most RTS games, but I don't think it's unique, is that units can carry additional equipment, thereby enhancing their abilities.

The tutorial did not indicate if you can "recruit" or use vehicles. But passing the arrow over some moving vehicles displays the grey "neutral unit" circle. So I wonder if you can make use of vehicles in the game itself.

I'm not sure of the 7 deadly sins is a factor in the game, but since food and money (as well as banks) play a part, one would think that over indulging in food (glutoney) or money (greed) would have a negative impact on players. Would be an interesting addition and, moreover, would serve as an interesting counterpoint to cheating (such as infinite food or money).

I also noticed something else. You can recruit male or female characters. Most of the unit types seem generic. Deciples, Musician, Builder, and so on. But for medic, you have Medic (Male) and Medic Woman (Female). Fascinating.

I don't know if you have to for the full game, but after installing the demo, when I double clicked to start the game the first time, it asked for my name and email address. I simply entered a fake name "James Kirk" and gave them my bondage.com email address... what? I never use it. Really. :)

I'll try the first mission in a little and see how difficult it is.

My big dislike though, is the camera. A bit of a pain to get it properly moved into position.

nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Ok, after playing the first 2 levels in the Storyline part of the demo... I got bored.

True, RTS games usually start out pretty boring. Simple get from Point A to Point B without dying.

Still, the camera is a pain having to swing it around manually.

And the demo has a flaw in Mission 2, not sure if it is in the real game or not. A secondary objective appears to have been placed in an unreachable position outside the accessible map area. At least it wasn't a required objective.

Despite the background of the storyline (The Rapture), I would think that a government would come up with a more plausable excuse for a good deal of the population around the world disappearing. However, a claim that a significant portion of the world's population disappeared because of an EMP wave seems very difficult for even me to believe. And supposedly claiming that the government's excuse that some disappeared while others didn't because those who did were "weak" is, frankly, a pretty "weak" storypoint.

Will this game promote violence? Only out of the aggrevation of the camera difficulties or the need to sit through a reload time to restart a mission. Will it promote bigotry? No more so than the book series or any particular religious belief in general.

As RTSs(es? ies?) go, in general, you'll be looking at the quality of an RTS from around 2001-2003.

If you're a follower of the book series, it might be worth it. If you're open minded enough to treat this as an alternate reality possibility, it may not be high on your list based on plausible excuses given by the government, but it may be an acceptable diversion.

If I were to give it a 1-10 rating like Gamespot, then I might say around 7.4. Demo is decent enough. But overall, nothing spectacular.

nightwng2000
NW2K Software
There seems to be a lot of very tongue in cheek political comment in this game from what I'm reading. 'Global Community Peacekeepers' in particular is hilarious.
Okay maybe I was wrong. First of all, by hysterical Christians, I mean people who think they're above everyone else and think that everything is bad and a sin. I have been around people like that all my life. I have also really been hated for no reason by holier than thou type people and there was a time in my life, in particular, when I really felt hated by some Christians and I was very mad about that. Quake and Unreal Tournament helped me out tremendously in getting over it. Anyway I was slandered by people who I consider to be people who think they're perfect. However, I have also been treated very nicely by other Christians, but the difference is that Christians who don't think they're perfect and holier than everyone else, are generally nicer. I didn't mean to attack all Christians. I only have a problem with the ones who think they're perfect and go around being mean to people. Now about the game, I have read about it on other websites and I got the impression that it was suppose to somehow say that virtual violence is bad, but you're right I also read that many conservative holier than thou type Christians are against it and I was just guessing about Jack Thompson's view on it and I only really thought that because I have read, on other sites, that he even proposed a violent video game to somehow convince people that it's bad. I didn't get it all that well myself. However, if Jack Thompson is agianst it, as you claim, then I guess I really was wrong about it. The Christian theme just led me to believe that it was an attack on violent video games maybe I was wrong, but you're wrong, Arion, that Christians don't care about video games. Most web sites that condemn violent video games are Christian based. I can further prove it by saying that I was once a hysterical Protestant who thought everything was bad and I hate that time in my life. It was an uphill battle with my parents, when I decided it wasn't bad, to get these games because, naturally, they thought they were satanic, especially my mother, and we got into a lot of arguments over it.

Also I've heard that conservative Christians tried to get a game called 25 to Life banned. Also please think about this. Why would Gamepolitics.com exist if no one was making a stink about banning some games and how do politicians, or even Jack Thompson for that matter, know so much about these games and attack them so much? Who is it that brings these games to their attention and calls for them to ban these violent video games? Anti-game activists don't pull their ideas out of the air. They must come from someplace. I personally believe that politicians like Leland Yee woudn't be trying to pass anti-game laws if it weren't for the fact that somebody is bringing it to their attention. I think it's Christians, more than anyone else. Now I don't want you to think that I'm condemning Christianity because I am not. I have also been around Christian gamers who love gore fest games as much as I do and I have absolutely nothing against them. Christianity is a good religion and it's not that I'm against.

One more thing I'd like to add is that years ago, when I was hated by some Christians for no reason, these games were my only real escape and I started to realize that not everything is bad. I then got completely into the games and it was one thing to say negative things about me, but saying negative things about the only escape I had was more than I could stand. I sometimes get overzealous about defending violent video games, just as Jack Thompson does at attacking them, maybe you're right and it wasn't made for the purpose I initially thought it was. However, everything I said about coming agianst all game legislation stands firm. I sent an email to my representative urging her not to support the Family Entertainment Protection Act. I may have been wrong about somethings, but I'm not wrong about this. It says in the web site of the Video Game Voters Network that this act would dramatically decrease the number of violent video games out there. Maybe many Christians aren't against violent video games, but someone is and that someone won't give up without a fight. I'm sorry if I offended anyone, that certainly wasn't my intention. My sole purpose in posting things is to defend violent video games that's my sole purpose. Just for the record, I might still be against violent media and would probably be on the other side of the issue had it not been for a Christian. Very early in my life, I had a friend who was a Christian who got me interested a little bit in violent video games, but my mother kept saying they were evil and the last time I saw him, we played a game called Ares 51 and Mortal Kombat. After playing Mortal Kombat with him on that Tuesday in May of 1998, when I was eleven, I couldn't stop talking about how much I wanted violent video games and I finally conviced my father to let me have them because my mother never would have allowed it in a billion years, so a Christian friend of mine got me interested and I didn't mean to stereotype Christians many of them are good. I only have a problem with the bad ones that made me feel inferior for many years and attack the best thing I ever had in my childhood and my life.

Thank You,
A Concerned Video Gamer
I am so sick of Christians trying to hurt the violent video game industry. These hysterical Christians, who believe everything is bad, are just trying to make this game probably for money, fame, to hurt the violent video game industry and to say that good killing video games are bad. Jack Thompson probably loves this because it will hurt the violent video game industry and I hate this idea and I hope it doesn't sell many copies. I wouldn't be caught dead playing this game that clearly, in my opinion, attacks the good games in the violent video game industry. This game is a disgrace and a mockery to games like Quake, Unreal Tournament, Reservoir Dogs, Blood and Doom. It is trying to say that these games are bad that is the point that they are trying to make and they, and all other people who hate violent video games need to give it up.

These people need to shut up and one way to help is to protest the Family Entertainment Protection Act. I urge all of you gamers out there to contact your local representative and tell him or her to oppose this act in Congress that would severely limit our access to the games we love. Our games are under attack by Christian groups, politicians and even lawyers. We must fight back and make them shut up by voting against them and helping to attack the anti-game legislation that no one has any right to pass. Game legislation is totally communistic because in a communistic government, the government says, "We don't like this, so no one should have it." Fight back and please don't buy this mockery of a video game. Please don't support anybody who is against violent video games and join the Video Game Voter's Network. I could be wrong, but I really think that this game was created to attack the violent video game industry and if I'm right, I hope no one buys it. Please, fellow gamers, don't fall into the trap of hysterical Christians. I am almost certain that Jack Thompson is in favor of this game because he is in favor of anything that attacks the innocent violent video game industry. This game was created for a very bad purpose and should be destroyed. Please don't buy it because that would support the hysterical Christians who want to mock the good video games.

Thank You,
A Concerned Video Gamer
@ Daniel

Please dont generalize or stereotype christians. Not even a tenth of the Chrisitan majority nor thier leaders give a damn about video games. They are misunderstood enough thanks to a very small, but loud group of hard right rich fatcat evangelicals warping an otherwise great misunderstood religion.

And I am not sure what sort of evil purpose Left behind was created for. The novels they are based on (really just fan fiction for Revelations enthusiests) sold quiet well. Its just a game for a different audience, nothing more.

And Jack Thompson doesnt like this game at all. GP has an article on the that in the past.
@Daniel

Dude, what? Seriously, what? Hysterical Christians are attacking this game, not supporting it! And it's no more of an attack on the games industry than any other peace-nik game, e.g. The Sims. It's PART of the industry! It can't attack itself! You want to talk about generalizations and unfounded attacks, look at your own post!
"Christianity is assuredly the most ridiculous, the most absurd and the most bloody religion which has ever infected this world." Voltaire

"Christianity demands the crucifixion of the intellect." Søren Kierkegaard

"I call Christianity the one great curse, the one great intrinsic depravity, the one great instinct of revenge, for which no means are venomous enough, or secret, subterranean and small enough -- I call it the one immortal blemish upon the human race." -

"In Christianity neither morality nor religion come into contact with reality at any point."

Friedrich Nietzsche

"If Christ existed today there is one thing he wouldn't be...a Christian"

Go on call Voltaire and Nietzsche satanists,sinners,evil and devils. The rest of the planet calls them geniuses... No wonder why...

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 01/06/09 at 04:12pm
DeepThorn: Dero, I swear she told me she was 18.
Posted 01/06/09 at 03:07pm
HarmlessBunny: @PHX Corp: No surprise. Jack's favorite desperation move: Image-laden filings that make zero sense! Guarunteed to piss someone off, and provide hilarity to us
Posted 01/06/09 at 01:54pm
Derovius: What did you call my little sister?
Posted 01/06/09 at 01:38pm
DeepThorn: 'Security' additions, which means it protects the music, which you bought, and have the right to use. It doesnt stop illegal activity, and even copying the music onto 2 back up CDs isnt illegal. Giving one to your little sister is border line.
Posted 01/06/09 at 01:36pm
CK20XX: What's it gonna take for JT to get arrested? It'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Posted 01/06/09 at 12:12pm
PHX Corp: Look on JAABLOG at his recent court filings he's starting to post pictures again http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DB5ODRNE
Posted 01/06/09 at 11:51am
CMiner: It's the same as the controversy over Sony's rootkits in their music CDs, as far as a separation of the issues of cd content and the security additions.
Posted 01/06/09 at 11:27am
Vake Xeacons: But there does need to be a limit on DRM. I mean, CD check's okay, but spyware? That's an invasion of privacy!
Posted 01/06/09 at 11:00am
Krono: @insanejedi: DRM isn't an aspect of the game. Unless you can make an argument that Securom is an intregal part of Spore that the game would be an incomplete experience without.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:57am
insanejedi: It's asking the government to regulate aspects of a game. Their just going to use this as a backdoor to regulate other aspects.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:53am
Krono: @insanejedi: DRM = trade practice, Violence in games = speech. I'm not seeing the similarity here.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:40am
insanejedi: Guys, Regulation of DRM is fudementally the same as regulating violence in games...
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:13am
sortableturnip: He's in full swing now, asking for all expenses paid by the Florida Bar.
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:51am
sortableturnip: @ Simonbob: isn't it better to read the comments, LOL wise?
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:41am
SimonBob: You could've mentioned it's close to the bottom, although it's good to know he's actually got an okay golf swing.
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:41am
PHX Corp: @Sourtable T JT's brain acts like a cookoo clock, It never stops Cookooing
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:23am
sortableturnip: In his latest filing, JT claims he is still admitted to practice as an attorney in the Southern District of Florida: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2007/09/04/pardon-our-appearance.aspx?pg=3&view=threaded
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:13am
SimonBob: Or the falsified usernames of gaming company CEOs. :P
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:07am
Alevan: Yeah, he doesn't use the shoutbox... then again, he doesn't like to confront his problems head on. He hides behind the "law"
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:05am
SimonBob: It's funny, Alevan, I've never seen him respond to anything in the shoutbox. I think he's got tunnel vision.
Login or register to post shouts