
A commission of the European Union is hoping to spark debate among member countries on video game content issues.
As reported by
Reuters, EU Justice and Security Commissioner Franco Frattini said:
Such partnership could for instance explore the usefulness of and necessity for a voluntary code of conduct on the production of interactive games for children.
Frattini added that the EU should explore standarizing a labeling system for game content as well as blocking sales of some games to minors. A spokesman said Frattini was not seeking a ban on violent video games but wanted to pressure the industry to police itself. Frattini's comments included outrage over PS2 title
Rule of Rose
:
One of the latest games recently available on the European market relates to a young girl who becomes submitted to psychological and physical violence. This has shocked me profoundly for its obscene cruelty and brutality.
These types of "recreational games" are dreadful examples for our children and may provoke or encourage violence or bully(ing) behaviour ... or suggest this is a normal behaviour.
Rule of Rose, published by Atlus, is rated "M" in North America, for purchase by those over 17. According to a sales listing on
Amazon UK, the game is due for release Nov. 24th and carries an ELSPA rating for buyers 11 and older.
The issue could be addressed by the EU in early December.
More here, including word that the mayor of Rome wants to ban sales of Rule of Rose.
Comments
If you were being serious... thanks for a nice wall of text. Your whole rant is pretty much wrong. You represent the dumb side of gaming.
Frankly not all games are appropriate for all ages, but that is not for me to decide, except in the case of my children.
Frankly though, I find some obscure japanese titles like "Battle Raper" a bit....... disturbing?
Babus
PS: Conflict will draw the EU together into an actual country very soon. Maybe the game controversy is just credibility bait.
That assertion regarding socialism is boggling. For one thing, it was Eastern Europe, and for another I don't think that the general European populace affected were especially *comfortable* with it...
Italy - from whence this controversy originates - is a particularly right-wing (and like the US has become, quite religiously dogmatic) governed nation. This is why free-speech is, according to Frattini's logic, a lesser issue than "protecting the children".
Actually Atlus are only the US publishers.
505 Games - a small esoteric outfit that prides itself on publishing small esoteric games in Europe that no one else thinks there's a market for - are responsible for its European release.
'mon the 505.
I heard Euronews about this and they showed some footage of kids playing on a Sega Megadrive. Whenever 'normal' news picks stuff like this up they manage to portray games in the least relevant way possible, it seems.
Regardless, I geniunly believe that this measure will pass or at least get strong public support. As some posters have pointed out, Western Europe isn't as defensive about free speech as the U.S. is. This probably coincides with the stubborn presence that socialism has had there for almost half a century. People there seem to put far too much faith in their governments to decide what's best for them.
It looked REALLY FUCKED UP!
Now, Rule of The Rose is not an interactive game for children, so it wouldn't be affected.
So it's okay for boys, grown men, and for that matter, grown women to be submitted to psychological and physical violence, but girls are off limits?That seems a bit... off. Specially when people don't seem to have a problem with little Timmy going off to fight the horribly f-up.
RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!
Obviously he hasnt looked at any game packaging recently. PEGI anyone?
Seems the industry are taking cetain steps to at least educate their customers on the type of content in the games. Now, perhaps this could be improved, and as such I support the commisioner's position, but I feel more recognition could be made of the fact that the industry is willing to do this.
Stupidity, thy name is Franco Frattini...
Seriously, the claim alone that Rule of the Rose is (per default) a "childrens game", is practically a mockery of all that the videogame industry stands for today. Perhaps Franco needs a lecture about how and when videogaming in general ceased to be exclusively "for kids".
As a european myself, I now find this guy's mere Existence offensive!
I am an adult, and if I choose to play a violent game I should be able to. It is ridiculous for them to assume that Humans can't see the difference between fantasy and real violence. Even other animals can see this difference, so why do they think that Humans can't? Do they really think that we are less intelligent than most mammals and that we can't see what is real?
I am fear this news because Europe hardly has any protection against idiots such as this politician. We don't have a strong constitution that will protect us from hawks like that. I can't believe that they think games are such a threat to society, when they most likely aren't at all. Violence isn't something new caused by videogames. Humans have been violent throughout the entire history of mankind. And why does politician act as if people learn from videogames alone? When you are old enough and your parents have taught you the difference between right and wrong, this shouldn't at all change you to be someone else. I have played violence videogames since I was 12 (I am 30 now) and I have never beated someone up.
I hardly have any words for how I feel right now. All I can say is that I am severly pissed off at people who think they should decide for us how we should live our own lives. I didn't get born to be told exactly what I can and can't do, 24/7. I would love to have at least some freedom into deciding how to live my own life. But no, videogames are teh evilz!!
"Censorship is telling a man he cannot eat a steak becuase a baby cannot chew it."
Ocar Wilde (?)
- Warren Lewis
PEGI, then?
/b
Play.com (who tend to be less... intensely stupid than Amazon) have a preliminary boxshot of the game with a PEGI 18+ certificate, but 16+ for violence is the recent confirmation.
http://www.play.com/Games/PlayStation2/4-/1099163/Rule_Of_Rose/Product.h...
Rule of Rose is also not the most publicized game approaching the European market, with only Horror game aficionados aware of its existence anyway.
Also, off topic slightly, it's worth noting that despite what dear Mr Thompson keeps claiming, in the UK it is *only* BBFC ratings that are supported by law, and they are themselves voluntary, with publishers *submitting* games which they believe require the wider understood film classifications.
And BBFC ratings are not enforced a tremendous amount, with parents still ultimately determining what their children consume.
PEGI is the primary system, and like the ESRB it is merely a guideline.
So what he means is he wants the EU to be able to censor content that they think breaks this "Code of Conduct".
YAY FOR CENSORSHIP.
Huh? What's the ESRB for? Making sandwiches? Although, I suppose that if they are letting an M rated game be sold to 11-year olds, maybe they are the ones who ought to have a look at their system.
I believe we, europeans, have found our very own Jack Thompson.
*Slams his head into the nearest wall... Repeatedly....*
Wait, I'm not the one that needs to have some sense pounded into them......
If you ask politicians or anti-game activists sure. Unfortunately they have no common sense-- that, or I'm just imagining the bold black "M" on the cover art pictured at the top of the page.
Really irritates me when people in the media/governments pull the "marketing violent games to kids" crap, without realizing that ratings are actually enforced on the retail end (sometimes) and that the problem lies with the parents. Just several days ago, when I bought F.E.A.R: Extraction Point at my local EBGames, they actually asked for ID to confirm I was 17+. I actually congratulated the guy at the counter for being so responsible.
Actually, if you did your research, you'll find that, up until recently, socialism (and its lesser form, Keynesianism) were quite prevalent in Western Europe (to be fair, of course, Keynesianism was equally popular in the States until Reagan came to Power). No where is this more true than your own country (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_socialism_in_Great_Britain#The_2...). Yes, they were not nearly as oppressive as Eastern Europe (keep in mind that Socialism does not equal Communism), but the attitude that almost all decisions (especially economic ones) are best made by the state was still the order of the day in most of Western Europe.
As for your statement that those affected by Socialsm didn't care for it, how do you explain the staunch resistance of some to Margret Thatcher's free market policies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_miners%27_strike_%281984-1985%29)?
Admittingly, I was a bit foolish to decry an economic system as the primary cause of this nonsense. For that, I apologize. But still, having most of Europe grow up with the idea of -at least- a moderate sense of collectivism for so long, as opposed to the more individualistic beliefs of many U.S. citizens, has lead to a profound difference on how each country tackles free-speech issues. There's no denying that.
"Italy - from whence this controversy originates - is a particularly right-wing (and like the US has become, quite religiously dogmatic) governed nation. This is why free-speech is, according to Frattini’s logic, a lesser issue than “protecting the children."
I see. Having a group of extreme rightists in control could definatly lead to that kind of behavior. However, having extreme leftists would likely have the same effect, just for different reasons. That's why I believe having competitive political parties and the like was one of the biggest mistakes made in the development of democracy, but that's a debate for another day ;).
A+++ Story
F--- gameplay
I'll probably give it a rent to see if I like it.
When it comes to survival horror, I dont' mind bad controls as long as he story/atmosphere is done well.
Hell, the Silent Hill series is my favorite series, despite the broken controls in the first three games.
thats because lesbians rule,put acoupel of strapping young males in it and there will be no end to the flaming.
The suggestion of a standardized pan-European game ratings system is not as silly as it sounds. PEGI, despite the name, is not actually pan-European, covering only 16 countries, basically the "old" 15 countries of the EU minus Germany, but including Switzerland and Norway. I assume most German gamers would be happy to have their system replaced by PEGI, as the German USK has recently refused classification for Gears of War and Dead Rising, making it impossible to distribute them in Germany.
About Italian politics: The Italian government is not far-right these days, but center-left. Berlusconi lost the last election and was replaced by Romano Prodi as prime minister.
I was being serious, but I wasn't defending pornography or rape. I believe that's wrong. Notice I didn't mention GTA in my post! I would love to play that game except that it has too much sex and partial nudity. I only meant to defend violent content in video games. I believe that there should be no sex, or anything like the hot coffee mod in GTA San Andreas. However, violent content in video games should be pumped up to the sky. I hope that clears my views and I think the stupid side of gaming is the side that says video game legislation is a good thing. They're the morons. Violent content in video games should never be restricted to anyone.
That was Mark Twain.
505 Games released a statement on this whole controversy thing.
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=70127
"505 Games has announced that it will be inviting politicians and journalists to the game for themselves by attending a preview presentation, to be held on November 23 in Milan."
Good on 'em.
there is literally a fight scene in the game where you fight a girl who barfs radioactive vomit on you....im not kidding...she barfs at you and if you stand it in your character takes damage.. its retarded sh-it like this that ruins the game and there are many more stupid examples.
its a stupid and shi-tty game but its trying to sell alot of copies by being controversial