Sunday Editorial Roundup: Does PS3 Gaffe Make Edwards a Hypocrite?

Sunday Editorial Roundup: Does PS3 Gaffe Make Edwards a Hypocrite?

November 19, 2006
The unofficial campaign of presidential hopeful John Edwards (D) took a widely-reported misstep last week. Wal-Mart, a frequent Edwards target, revealed that an aide to the former senator lobbied one of its Raleigh locations for a hard-to-find PlayStation 3.

Pundit Jeff Taylor of Reason.com takes a dim view of Edwards' economic politics as well as his staffer's attempt to grab a PS3:
Everyone loves a good hypocrite; they make us feel superior just for being consistent, if not competent...


Aside from the staffer's positively insane decision to reach out to a Raleigh Wal-Mart given all of Edwards' repeated slams of the company, nothing too surprising here. Just garden variety American ruling class behavior...




...Contrary to the Edwards' pitch that labor-hostile companies are leaving American workers destitute, somebody is making some money out there in America. More importantly, they are making it in many, many cases without a union card.  This reality will very hard for union-funded Democrats like Edwards to ignore as the 2008 presidential campaign unfolds...


In any event, maybe the best thing for Wal-Mart to do is stop chortling and go ahead and give John Edwards a PS3 and a couple games. Throw in a flat-panel too. Maybe that way he'll reacquaint himself with American prosperity and abundance and be a better candidate for the experience.


Comments

I think it's good that Edwards went so far out of his way to try to get a PS3. That clearly shows that there's a politician gamer out there. If there are a lot of politician gamers, it will make it very hard for Jack Thompson to ban any games anywhere. Even though he tried to get it at a Wal Mart, I think it's awesome that there's a politician gamer out there.
I still stand by my statement that pundits are some of the worse people in the world.
Yikes.

I got a lot of respect for Dennis but unless I misread that, he was defending Wal-Mart in that last sentence.

As far as I'm concerned, there is no debate on how productive Wal-Mart is. It sucks for employees, and in the end, it sucks for consumers, as the amount of money Wal-Mart sucks out of the state (via paying their employees so little that they are forced to turn to welfare to survive) is then taken out of the tax dollars of the people - even the ones who don't shop at Wal-Mart.

And apart from that, there's how they're environmentally irresponsible, racist, sexist, right-wing (funny how all those things go together), and they're computer/video games are overpriced.

Edwards is a loser and he should know better than to run for President, but as noted, if he didn't tell the aide to get the PS3 he didn't do anything wrong, this is just the spin-machine at work, and the story is of questionable relevance - yes, it mentions games, but unlike most Game Politics stories has no effect on gaming itself.
Only if he actually asked the staffer to reserve it for him, which seems very unlikely given the stories that've been published so far. In other words, the "typical ruling-class behaviour" bit is misplaced. However, the larger point about Wal-Mart and the bought and paid for union rhetoric of certain politicians has a degree of merit to it.
Reason likes talking about how someone is making money but they apparently don't realize where it is actually going.

Someone is out of touch and I don't think it's Edwards...
@MechaCrash

Yep, someone: as in all the someones who were able to blow $600 of disposable income on a PS3. As in the average American wage-earner.
I'm a Republican and I really don't think this is a big deal. Why criticize Edwards for something this trivial when there's so much more?
How many of those things are in living rooms hooked up to TVs, and how many are sitting in a corner awaiting a winning eBay bid?
"This reality will very hard for..." and this guy is a writer?

Look, I am tried of the Republicans spinning useless info into big events. Here's a logical break down for anyone listening:

Lies

Blow job /= Weapons of Mass Destruction and/or War justification

I presonally think that the Republicans are grasping at straws for any little thing due to how big their faux paus cmoe across. When you put yourself on a high horse of "better" morals and "family values" anything that your party members do that is out of line with these (ie sleep with young pages or try to have homosexual encounters with them while trying to amend out gay marriages), then, you will get a harsh response to this.

Oh, and pundits are the worse people out there, right next to lobbist.
Reason isn't a Republican site. it's libertarian. Criticisms of Wal-Mart go far beyond them nto paying enough wages, though, there's also the issue of preferential treatment in emminent domain cases and illegally making their workers work off the clock, both things libertarians are normally opposed to.
only spinners of hate wil take this nit bit of info and try and make it into something...this is a non issue.
Wow, a laizes faire magazine ragging on a Democrat? Wonders never cease... Clearly, the fact that some people are willing to spend $600 on a video game system proves, without a doubt, that there is no widening poverty gap and everything is just perfectly hunky dory in America. After all, "somebody is making money in America."

And nevermind the fact that flat panel TV's are dropping below the $1000 mark because supply has outstripped demand, and companies can't afford to slow production and sit on excess parts...no, clearly Wal-Mart is "leading the way," fighting to provide flat-panel entertainment to a broader audience.

I'd be fine if they wanted to call Edwards a hypocrite for spending $600 on a PS3 instead of donating it to the poor...they'd sound like petty retards but that'd make more sense then using the PS3 to try and support a Libertarian's economic policy. Actually, since this whole thing happened because some idiot staffer made a valiant attempt to kiss his boss's ass...maybe they should have just kept their mouths shut.
Does this *really* belong on a blog devoted to game politics? This sounds more like politics, and frivilous politics at that.
@Dylan
The last line of that article wasn't written by Dennis. Everything in the grey text with the bar on the left is quoting the article by Jeff Taylor.
On the article itself, it's really trying to blame Edwards over nothing. I don't think Edwards having an apparently not too bright aide makes him a hypocrite.
Edwards is a poor excuse for a politician who pretty much lost Kerry the election

It's not suprising to hear that he is being a hypocrite as usual

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 01/06/09 at 07:34pm
DeepThorn: Okay, was my comment that out of line that I scared everyone?
Posted 01/06/09 at 04:12pm
DeepThorn: Dero, I swear she told me she was 18.
Posted 01/06/09 at 03:07pm
HarmlessBunny: @PHX Corp: No surprise. Jack's favorite desperation move: Image-laden filings that make zero sense! Guarunteed to piss someone off, and provide hilarity to us
Posted 01/06/09 at 01:54pm
Derovius: What did you call my little sister?
Posted 01/06/09 at 01:38pm
DeepThorn: 'Security' additions, which means it protects the music, which you bought, and have the right to use. It doesnt stop illegal activity, and even copying the music onto 2 back up CDs isnt illegal. Giving one to your little sister is border line.
Posted 01/06/09 at 01:36pm
CK20XX: What's it gonna take for JT to get arrested? It'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Posted 01/06/09 at 12:12pm
PHX Corp: Look on JAABLOG at his recent court filings he's starting to post pictures again http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DB5ODRNE
Posted 01/06/09 at 11:51am
CMiner: It's the same as the controversy over Sony's rootkits in their music CDs, as far as a separation of the issues of cd content and the security additions.
Posted 01/06/09 at 11:27am
Vake Xeacons: But there does need to be a limit on DRM. I mean, CD check's okay, but spyware? That's an invasion of privacy!
Posted 01/06/09 at 11:00am
Krono: @insanejedi: DRM isn't an aspect of the game. Unless you can make an argument that Securom is an intregal part of Spore that the game would be an incomplete experience without.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:57am
insanejedi: It's asking the government to regulate aspects of a game. Their just going to use this as a backdoor to regulate other aspects.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:53am
Krono: @insanejedi: DRM = trade practice, Violence in games = speech. I'm not seeing the similarity here.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:40am
insanejedi: Guys, Regulation of DRM is fudementally the same as regulating violence in games...
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:13am
sortableturnip: He's in full swing now, asking for all expenses paid by the Florida Bar.
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:51am
sortableturnip: @ Simonbob: isn't it better to read the comments, LOL wise?
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:41am
SimonBob: You could've mentioned it's close to the bottom, although it's good to know he's actually got an okay golf swing.
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:41am
PHX Corp: @Sourtable T JT's brain acts like a cookoo clock, It never stops Cookooing
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:23am
sortableturnip: In his latest filing, JT claims he is still admitted to practice as an attorney in the Southern District of Florida: http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2007/09/04/pardon-our-appearance.aspx?pg=3&view=threaded
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:13am
SimonBob: Or the falsified usernames of gaming company CEOs. :P
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:07am
Alevan: Yeah, he doesn't use the shoutbox... then again, he doesn't like to confront his problems head on. He hides behind the "law"
Login or register to post shouts