German School Shooting Renews Calls For Violent Game Regulation

German School Shooting Renews Calls For Violent Game Regulation

November 21, 2006
A school shooting in the German town of Emsdetten has sparked renewed government concerns about violent video games in the European nation.

As reported by CNN, an unnamed 18-year-old man (seen at left) stormed his former junior high school on Monday. Armed with a variety of weapons, the shooter wounded a number of staff and pupils before taking his own life.

The English language version of Spiegel Online has more, including word that the suspect, who referred to himself as a "loser" on a personal website, had a troubled background. He was scheduled to be in court today to answer to a weapons charge. His web page, now taken down by German authorities, contained the words "I loathe people" and  "I am gone."

According to Spiegel, he listened to death metal music and spent his days playing computer games. German language site tagesschau.de reports that the Emsdetten shooter played the first-person shooter Counter-strike and details the renewed calls for violent game regulation by German politicians.

During a news conference, prosecutor Wolfgang Schwer said:
Based on the note, he appears to have acted out of general frustration and a feeling his life had lost all meaning.

A 2002 school shooting in Erfurt prompted calls for violent game bans in Germany after it was learned the shooter was also a fan of Counter-strike.

GP: Many thanks to several of our European readers who helped pull this story together, including Lazy Otaku and Soldat Louis.

Comments

German politicians are going insane right now about the issue.
Günther Beckstein (the guy who invented the word "Killergame") arrogated today, that "Killergames should be classified in the dimensions of child-pornography, so that there are sensible punishments".
I guess he's talking about selling and distributing them.
No joke - sadly.
By the way: he is one of the most conservative assholes in a party of conservative assholes (who wouldn't have guessed...).
And what these so called "Killergames" exactly are and how they should be defined and classified remains unsettled... of course.
I know it's wrong to say this but i think oy, that the ringleader(s) behind the scapegoat must have survived the nuremburg trials "in a controversial decision to clear him of all charges" oy. "Let's just hope those missing witnesses turn up safe and sound"(got it from GTA 3 radio oy.just started playing it months ago.

P.S. I'm acting contradictory from the Rule of Rose comment and being all prejudist just like the conservatives oy, but we can fight fire with fire ,can't we oy?
It's red herring again.
Hmmm... it couldn't be his self image, could it? Someone who referrs to himself as a loser and has what looks like suicidal tendencies...


...


nawww... lets blame the games!
Oh no... TWO school shooters in Germany within a four-year period played Counter-Stike? Well then, it had to be the game, right?

Ugh. How completely ridiculous.
Odd how different games in different countries have the 'same effect', not one American School shooter was 'influenced by Counter Strike'.

Which just goes to show how much of a scapegoat they are being made into.
And thank The Trenchcoat Chronicles ( http://www.thetrenchcoat.com/ ) because I learnt the school shooting from them.
Also note that the debate about violent games in Germany is far beyond regulation : it's about a ban of violent games, pure and simple.
Perhaps playing too much Counter-Strike was SYMPTOMATIC of an already troubled background?

People should really ask questions before they assert answers.
I play CS 1.6 & CS:S all the time and i safely say that i have never had the urge to bring a gun to school. It's so sad we have to keep reading this same kind of story over and over. It's like they have some sort of mad lib for these kind of storys. "name" went on a rampage in "state/country" at "school name" and (killed/wounded) "#of people" people. Now we ban "name of game" because we know it had something to do with it.

"not one American School shooter was ‘influenced by Counter Strike’."

I think thats because no one who attacks videogames in america has ever heard of CS. And if they have, they dont know what it is and don't care. Untill they can pin it on a killing that is.
I wonder how many "influences" will need to be banned before scapegoatists realise that sometimes people just flip.
Counter-strike = depression?
Well if you suck at it it can be pretty depressing to play for a few rounds.
Hitler totally played Counter Strike. That's the only logical explanation.
So, Germany wants to become even more restrictive toward games? How much further can they go?
Quote, "Armed with a variety of weapons..."

Nope, guns didn't kill people. Video games killed people. Why aren't THEY regulated more strictly?
Comment read on a French gaming forum :

"Tha guy killed no one (except himself), it's a proof that video games produce bad shooters"

LOL... although I shouldn't
And another comment on the same forum :

"It proves that 'Counter-Strike : Source' is for nOObs. An 'America's Army' player would have killed 17 people"
Scapegoat convention!!!!
Wow, someone is disturbed and shoots people because no one will help him, blame the video games, he killed people and was disturbed and was clearing breaking into “insane” but yet, video games made him do it. Wow, what fucking retards

But every single one of those millions of people who played Counterstrike has gone on a killing spree! It must be the games!



Until someone can make the above statement while being 100% honest (with whatever video game applies in place of Counterstrike), I will never, ever understand these people's logic...
Note to self: GP makes fake HTML tags like "/sarcasmoff" disappear.
Wow, someone is disturbed and shoots people because no one will help him, blame the video games, he killed people and was disturbed and was clearing breaking into "insane" but yet, video games made him do it. Wow, what fucking retards
Oh, he was so totally influenced by CounterStrike. I mean, he used SMOKE BOMBS and wore a ski mask and everything! (he actually managed to injure 16 police officers when he released the smoke bombs, due to smoke inhalation...)

Maybe he was trying to rely on his aimbot, and got frustrated when it didn't work as intended.

Oddly enough, he reportedly had pipebombs strapped to his chest, but didn't use them.
before taking his own life

Actually, there's some confusion on that from what I've heard. The police aren't talking, and an autopsy is scheduled to determine if he killed himself with his saw-off rifle, or if one of his home-made smoke bombs blew up in his face.

Considering how long he was in the school, for someone who "literally trained" on a first person shooter, which we all know turns you into a marksman who can outshoot goverment agents (or was that 3rd person shooters... ;)) he had terrible aim.
"Maybe he was trying to rely on his aimbot, and got frustrated when it didn’t work as intended."

He should have turned on his wall hacks and bought a ton of flash nades to blind his team at the start of the round. Then spray pron all over the walls, then it would be more like CS. Any way, i guess for me it's time to play the waiting game and see how this goes down. It will eather be dismissed and it will die off. Or be picked up by an anti-videogame person and this story gets milked for all it's worth.
I thought it was strange that he attacked his junior high school and not his high school, but then I realized that in Germany some junior high schools go up to the tenth grade.

"During a news conference, prosecutor Wolfgang Schwer said:

Based on the note, he appears to have acted out of general frustration and a feeling his life had lost all meaning."

It's so great to have experts to break this stuff down for us!
Any word on where the guns came from and if they were owned legally? I honestly don't know if an 18-year-old in Germany can legally purchase firearms. If yes, then this seems similar to the recent Montreal shooting, committed by a legal adult with legally owned weapons.
It does raise the question of what to do, though. Let's agree, for the sake of argument, that violent video games do not incite violence but that violent people, by their nature, play violent games. It's not much of a stretch that such violent people might also be fascinated with guns. Crying for gun control or game legislation is treating the symptoms - when more than anything we need to find the root of the disease if we want to keep these tragedies from happening. But that is a much more complicated solution - and policymakers have made it clear that they prefer a solution that's quick and looks nice in the papers.
I recall a quote, though the source of it eludes me, that is something to the effect of: "Every problem has a solution that is simple, obvious, and completely wrong."
If you would take the subject at hand a little more seriously, you could easily know that CS is one of the most (if not the most) played FPS game online.
"In 2004, GameSpy statistics showed over 85,000 players simultaneously playing Counter-Strike at any point in time, and in 2006, Steam regularly shows over 200,000 players for Counter-Strike".
If Counter-Strike was indeed responsible for teens becoming killers, the effect would certainly be felt globally and certainly more often.
I wonder where the logic here is. They have a guy armed to the teeth (as far as I can tell) and manically depressed, and the first thing that comes to mind is the regulation of video games? They're just looking for excuses to ban games.
It's obvious why he didn't kill anybody. In the German version of CSS, when you "kill" someone they just lay down on the ground and put their hands behind their head. So when he shot his victims and they fell to the floor, he thought he was done.

I think we need to take a look at his kill/death ratio on Counter-Strike. I think he was just an angry noob who got so frustrated at everyone pwning him that he decided to go shoot up a place, just like in all those CS-related Flash videos.
Isn't this evidence that the censorship of video game content doesn't make one iota of difference? You'll still have the wacko guy in the fatigues that wants to take revenge on someone for something. No amount of censorship will change that.
I think something far more dangerous then "games cause violence" is starting to form for the games industry.

It's that heavy gaming (especially with violent games) is a sign/symptom of people prone to violence... much as looking at various types of porn can be a sign of various sexual preferences.

Nobody is going to know the exact difference between how violent movies densensitize us to violence (which is proven), and how violent intereactive media pushes that further (and it's starting to pan out that it probably does).

My greatest fear is that people will start to take playing violent games as a sign that you might have an underlying problem which is part of the reason you're attracted to that type of entertainment.
That screenshot of him playing Counter-Strike looks awfully realistic. Alternatively, it's a photograph of him in combats which suggests he had a real-world fascination with the military and/or shooting things and that means he liked CS.
[...] ZDNet featured a news story titledViolent games blamed for German school attack. A man stormed his school, wounded 27 people, and then committed suicide. Due to this fascination with war simulation and video games, government officials are now calling for a ban on “killer games”. GamePolitics.com has also covered this news story. [...]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't every able bodied adult male german citizen have to do manditory work in the German army? Might explain the getup and the supply of weapons he had and why officials are quick to blame a dumb piece of fluff entertainment, perhaps to deflect attention from the military physical/psych screening process.
It’s obvious why he didn’t kill anybody. In the German version of CSS, when you “kill” someone they just lay down on the ground and put their hands behind their head. So when he shot his victims and they fell to the floor, he thought he was done.

Even when they get fragged? "Ow, I've been splodied, better take a nap..."
He would probably have been conscripted (unless he did social service instead), but he didn't serve yet. He just had an affinity for weapons and military stuff.
There are indications that he ordered his weapons over the internet, and I read that his father might be have been a hunter or sports shooter. Interstingly he was supposed to appear in court over an "illegal weapons posession" charge or something to that effect. Probably didn't have a license.

Anyways, it's always the same response by the politicians and most of the media. People are unable to deal with a complex reality and need simple answers. This will be forgotten in a few weeks and nothing will come from it.
There are also some sane opposition politicians who don't like the simpleminded scapegoating either
@Michael T

I can't speak in great detail about Bundeswehr SOP, but with a few rare exceptions like Switzerland and (in some caes) Israel soldiers are not allowed to keep their weapons at home. Also, psychiatric evaluation is expensive and time consuming and so not standard for soldiers unless they're pursuing a specific career path that A) involves high security clearance and there's some question raised during the standard BG checks and/or B) involves specialized training (In the US for example SF or SFOD-D selection, Sniper, etc require a basic MMPI/CPI evaluation).

Bundeswehr conscription is a 9-month term, the minimum age for which is 18, and 3 months of which are occupied by basic training. In other words, At -most- this guy qualified with the G-36 and perhaps a few other weapons in Basic, and -perhaps- had one or two days at the range in the six months of active duty -assuming- he's almost nineteen and had already served his entire commitment, and assuming that he even went to the Bundeswehr in the first place instead of the various civilian alternatives (less than one in five conscripts actually go military in Germany now, apparently).

His weapons were two muzzleloading rifles and a muzzleloading pistol, including the suicide weapon (15mm ball, which means about a .60 caliber ball if I'm doing my math right), and a Kleinkalibergewehr (small caliber rifle, but from a context search I'm tentatively translating it as "target rifle" as in the accurized .22LR rifles you see used in marksmanship competitions and the olympics).

In short, I don't think the military was involved in this one in any way.
He was 18 an he still went to school. So he hasn't served yet. He would have been conscripted right after he finished school (Gymnasium until grade 12 or 13). Generally, the basic medical evaluation is during the last year, but obviously people can finish their primary education first.
But as said, they only conscript a small percentage these days, which has to do with overall personell reductions and the greater need of better trained specialists.
But that has nothing whatsoever to do with the topic at hand.

The two antique muzzleloaders he had (one used for the suicide) were legal at the age of 18. For most other guns, the age limit is 25 I think
@Stefan

Interstingly he was supposed to appear in court over an “illegal weapons posession” charge or something to that effect. Probably didn’t have a license.

I believe it was for carrying a handgun in public, which is illegal in Germany.
This is what I'm talking about. One crazy derranged psychopath goes on a killing spree and now everyone only wants to look at he fact that he played Counter Strike. They all ignore the fact that he was a self proclaimed loser and that he didn't think his life had any value.

He wanted to kill himself, but suicide was not enough for him. He needed to get even with society. Violent video games have nothing to do with it. Those people, who think that they did, are retarded and completly DEE DEE DEE!!!!!! I think anti-game activists, who truly believe that an innocent game like Half Life Counter Strike had anything to do with that incident, should go get a DEE DEE DEE award from Carlos Mencia.

He was obviously depressed and nuts and he probably thought the world was responsible for his failings in life. He did it because, like Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, he was crazy!!!!!!! There have been many people that have gone on these kinds of mass killings where they kill everyone and then themselves and many of them haven't even been gamers.

Games have nothing to do with the mental state of the people who play them. Also think about this, If he was crazy enough to do that, then it's possible that he was also very angry and he probably took out his anger on these games and that delayed his madness from overflowing, but the notion that he wouldn't have done it, had it not been for these games, is ridiculous, as well as, retarded. The only person to blame for that is the killer himself not violent video games.
Correction:
He didn't go to a Gymansium, but one schooltype lower that goes to the 10th grade. But he just finished school and worked in unskilled jobs.
In that case it isn't unusual to be conscripted several years later (they can do that until 23) so that people have time for a 2.5-3.5 year apprenticeship.

As for the pictures. You can easily buy camoflage cloths in specialized shops or online. But most of them were more Matrix/Neo-like with long leather trenchcoats
"...had a troubled background." --> "for violent game bans in Germany after it was learned the shooter was also a fan of Counter-strike."

Exactly how does two shooters, one that we know had a troubled background, and both liking Counter-Strike make it the game's fault? That's like saying two people from different states, who happened to like Doom, both being violent and assualting someone close to them.

Wouldn't it just be a coincidence that they enjoyed a similar game? SIMPLE ANSWER: SCAPEGOATING
Okay, everyone. Please don't tell me where you are. I was checking on my hard drive and... Counter-Strike is on it. Now DON'T PANIC! Don't Panic. I think I can control myself for a few days but, just make sure that I can't find out where any of you live. I don't want to hurt anyone. If any of you have ever posted your address on the internet,please, RUN! I don't want to be able to find you... I don't want to hurt you.
After seeing so many articles about psycho video game killers, I know it's inevitable that I'm going to become a mass murderer.
Holy fucking damn. I was right.

This guy fits the stereotypical gun-slingin' school shooter: Mentally unstable, prone to suicidal tendancies, and has a fascination with anything that is violent. Of course, this type of issue sprouts up every now and again and the gamers put on a major persecution complex while the same slackjawed talking pundits share their skewed perception of the issue.

Sure, we could say "Games are not the cause" until we are blue in the face but in the end, only rational people will think of it as something else. For what it's worth, gaming blogs are quicker than the politicians themselves to point the finger at the videogame angle simply because we have been through this before.

Besides, it has become a spectator sport for censorists to point the blame on a inanimate piece of entertainment rather than the 10,000 variables that materliazed this guy's train of thought.

Same shit, different shooter.
It makes sense to me. If 3 million people play a game or watch a movie/show or listen to a song/band (let's face it, this isn't the first media people have tried to censor) and just two of them kill people it has got to be the fault of the game's/movie's/show's/song's/band's fault! We have got to ASSume that all the poeple who enjoy it will soon go on a bloody killing rampage that will end in suicide. We have got to protect the children! If that means we have to ban movies, games, music, and even sex, then so be it. You're only an adult your entire life. You're a kid for a few years!

Makes alot of sense eh? It's like Muetank said. They have a game of madlibs they play:

We must ban/regulate (noun) to protect the children from (verb). This kind of (adjective) entertainment will only lead to (verb) in our (adjective) (noun). We owe it to our future (noun) to (verb) this.

That sounds about right.

@ Daniel
Way to go man! You made a great point! People who are mentally unstable or violent maybe, and probably are, drawn to violent entertainment, but that doesnt mean that they, or anyone else, will behave in a violent and destructive manner. When we finally learn to find and treat the source not just the symptom society will be better off. Just hope we all grow up sooner rather than later. Besides what is recorded history if not violence and war? Maybe we should ban history?

I'm gonna say it again. Protect your children. Don't protect me.
@Stefan, Brer

Thanks for the corrections, whodathunk I'd learn a little more about the german military today!
A quote from an opposition Green's party member sounds quite sane compared to everything else.

Quote from Sydney Morning Herald (Australia):
"Volker Beck, a leading Greens member of parliament, said it would be better to focus the debate on the proper use of computers and not jump to conclusions before it was clear what motivated Bosse."
I'm just getting tired of all this shit. It's getting really old, blaming games and all. Maybe research money should start being spent on understanding what leads these kids to depression and thinking lives not worth it, other than the normal reasons...(government, stupid laws, and uniformed morons that try to control the world).
[...] As reported by GamePolitics,  an 18-year-old Counter-strike player assaulted his former middle school in November, wounding a reported 37 people before taking his own life. [...]
[...] Comments: 0 - Date: December 31st, 1969 - Categories: Wii News The Financial Times reports that the German states of Bavaria and Lower Saxony have drafted legislation the would lead to fines and jail time for developers, distributors and even players of games that involve "cruel violence on humans or human-looking characters." The proposed laws, which would affect nearly 19 million Germans, come in response to a recent school shooting by a masked, 18-year-old German Counter-Strike fan that has turned public sentiment in the country against violent games. Bavarian Interior Minister Gunther Beckstein is leading the effort to pass the legislation, arguing "it is absolutely beyond any doubt that such killer games desensitise [sic] unstable characters and can have a stimulating effect." Despite complaints by German gamers, 59 percent of Germans at large support such a ban, according to a poll cited by the Financial Times. Germany has a long history of tough restrictions on violent games from Doom to Gears of War, and an outright ban would likely affect high-profile PS3 launch games like Resistance: Fall of Man and Call of Duty 3. [...]
i think this it pathetake tat all is the fault of the game!

u also see lots of thing on TV like army movies


if they consider to banned those games they need to consider banning TV to

simple as that... or it never ends
Gee, what could make Germany such a violent place? Counter Strike must be pretty crazy.

Good thing video games didn't come around 'till 1948 or Nuremburg would have been about "Cathode-Ray Tube Amusement Device", a simple missile 'simulator'.

Did you check if he ate spaghetti? Almost 99 percent of school shooters were found to have eaten spaghetti at least once.
This story is really sad I hope that every thing is ok know
HERE A DIFFERENT OPINION...

if there is ANY connection between these games and youth violence, BAN THEM.

Video games in general are ANTI-SOCIAL (don't give me bullshit about meeting "friends" on Day of Defeat) and killer games (and other media) DESENSITIZE people to killing -- they do NOT create the killers, but could be an important step to pushing them over the edge... WHAT IS THE SOCIAL VALUE OF KEEPING THEM... I'm not saying dont' have fun... nor am I against video games... just play something else, and take out your aggression in a healthier way; how about: jogging, team sports, self-DEFENSE martial arts, writing, making art, creating music, going outside, meeting friends, working...

*sigh* I feel guilty and unsatisfied for just having wasted THIS time on the computer
Uh huh. I play almost all violent games. I read "War Dogs" by Nik-Urhenik, an extremely violent and sex-filled, over-the-top Vietnam war book. I look at porn. I shoot guns at paper and hills for fun.

And yet the most violent things I've brought to school were cap gun ammunition (by accident) and a Nerf dart (forgot I put it in my jacket pocket). I'm the one who's being ATTACKED by these kinds of crazy people. A kid who recently threatened to stab me in the neck was caught and arrested one morning at school, and apparently they're trying to keep what he had on him under wraps. I say he brought a switchblade in his pocket to make good on his threat.

And yet I have never known him to play video games. He's just a football player who resembles Steve Urkel.
Come chat with sexy cam girls...

...
ghhffduifxcghgererytyugfdvsdafsdfgkiouyiutiopoiuyhdfsdasfrgtyu8654321234t5y6uioiokjhgfdsfdgfghjouytreaewearetytuyuouifydsdsfgiuoiouytesaASaddgfjhkjmnbbvxsfgftyuhyhfdzsdsfdgfhjkhgfdasfgfhkjhgfdxdxfdgfuipiouydfghyjuiuhyddfghjjkhbxsetytuyuikjnmbd
"*sigh* I feel guilty and unsatisfied for just having wasted THIS time on the computer*"


Noob.

This is one of the problems, Millions and Millions of people play these games, and dont cause any trouble at all, the games should NOT be banned because of the sinisicm of 1 person. its ludacris, i play these games, and i have friends from college who play CS, well sit with our headphones on and have a laugh, so there is a social element to it. granted id rarther see them in person and hang out; much more fun, but not my point.
the actions of a few should not justify the punishment of the masses

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 10/07/08 at 07:56am
E. Zachary Knight: http://www.ezknight.net/jtdisbar_ext.php
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:56am
E. Zachary Knight: The JT Disbar add-on has been updated to version 0.7.5
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:33am
ZippyDSMlee: Dark Sovereign: the proper reply would be So you want a quick dry rub with cloths on? ba dum dum bish!
Posted 10/07/08 at 04:58am
gamepolitics: GP is on Twitter. Follow gamepolitics for Twitter updates.
Posted 10/06/08 at 07:06pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: @Dark Sovereign: Read "Countdown to JT's Disbarment"
Posted 10/06/08 at 07:00pm
Dark Sovereign: @Shadow: Say what now?
Posted 10/06/08 at 06:37pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: Hey, EZK! I saw what you did there! Great job!
Posted 10/06/08 at 06:28pm
Dark Sovereign: Just noticed: Nikko asks Michelle to go for "hot coffee". Michelle says people get hurt and end up in court.
Posted 10/06/08 at 05:22pm
gamepolitics: If you registered but did not get ur validation email, contact me: dennisATgamepolitics.com I can fix that
Posted 10/06/08 at 04:04pm
Austin_Lewis: well, what with the article about the protests recently, I think its interesting they're opening a large 'center' in a mall.
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:52pm
BlackIce: @Austin Lewis: Any specific parts?
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:41pm
Austin_Lewis: OI, GAMEPOLITICS! Just got this emailed to me, thought you'd like to hop in on it: http://www.thearmyexperience.com
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:21pm
NovaBlack: oops i meant 'unbanned' in uk
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:21pm
NovaBlack: BBFC lose the appeal to.. revoke ..original ..appeal. manhunt 2 bannd in uk. what a buunch of timewasters.
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:20pm
NovaBlack: @gp http://kotaku.com/5059455/uk-manhunt-2-+-the-long-struggle-is-at-an-end
Posted 10/06/08 at 08:43am
Paulrus: 1up.com just reported that MadWorld may not seee release in "censor-heavy" countries like Australia, Germany, and even Japan. http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3170362
Posted 10/06/08 at 07:28am
Austin_Lewis: they're all about a month old, but if they do it again, I'll be sure to post the link here
Posted 10/06/08 at 06:41am
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : Hold up, Austin. Can we have the link to that Yahoo! Story?
Posted 10/06/08 at 12:26am
Austin_Lewis: I've been reading on yahoo things I read on here three days earlier, nearly word for word. I've insulted the writers, too.
Posted 10/05/08 at 09:29pm
PHOENIXZERO: @Austin_Lewis Just watched the video, I like how they mention Australia banning violent games and then show a list of games that includes some that weren't violent. <_< Think they could have given GP a little more credit too.
Login or register to post shouts