"Rule of Rose" Ruled Out in U.K.

"Rule of Rose" Ruled Out in U.K.

November 24, 2006
It looks as if the recent political outcry in Italy and elsewhere has killed Rule of Rose in the European market.

The horror-RPG was originally scheduled for release today in the U.K. However, Eurogamer is reporting that the game has been canceled by publisher 505 Games in the wake of the controversy.

Rule of Rose remains available in the North American market where it is published by Atlus.

GP: A dual shout-out to Danzuke of Bits, Bytes, Pixels & Sprites and longtime GP reader Joel Atkinson for the tip!

Comments

Thank you Mt Rome mayor and friends. Thanks ALOT.
How sad, it's coming to the point where a controversy will stop a developer/publisher? how dissappointing. I'm not sure who's wore though, the officials for misreporting it or the publisher for dropping it.
At least it was the publishers choice to drop it but still, thats a bad sign for us poor old europeans. I don't think it would have mattered to the UK audience if it had been released as its only really Italy and Germany throwing a wobbly but still...disappointing and potentialy terrible for future releases.
*rolls his eyes* The really sad part is that RoR is actually less graphic/gruesome than most games in its genre from what I've seen and played of it. It focuses more on psychological horror, or tries to.
Wow, they refused to publish a game that had been supported by Atlus? That group hasn't published a lot of really racey games. That should be a clue that the game might not be as bad as implied by some...

On a side-note, Atlus did also publish Steambot Chronicles in North America, which does parody Hot Coffee at one point...
We push and push and push for Japanese games that are out of the ordinary to get localizations and then look what happens... no wonder us western gamers tend to get shafted.
...any word from the publishers as to the rest of Europe?

/b
To the best of my knowlege 505 were publishing it for the whole of europe - which means it will have been canned everywhere right?

I still don't get why they bowed to the pressure. we've had far more controvertial games released in the UK - hell Clock Tower 3 has a girl getting smashed with a giant hammer and that got released!
"To the best of my knowlege 505 were publishing it for the whole of europe - which means it will have been canned everywhere right?"

While they do have the rights for all of Europe, evidence seems to suggest that the UK is the only place they've pulled it (thus far anyway). I've had a look on some French and Italian sites which reckon they have the PAL version in stock and available (and not at an inflated price, unlike our dear friend eBay).
Ah, shit! It's the chilling effect!
On a slighly related note:

X-Play has recently reviewed the game, and gave it a two out of five. Normally I don't watch their show much, but they had footage of gameplay, and boy, did it look bad. The graphics looked like something Resident Evil 3 threw up, you get a load screen every time you go through a door, and the game just doens't seem that scary. So if you plan to buy the game because of the controversy, it might be better not to. This one looks like a stinker.
It's only really got attack because they caught wind that you can see two underage girls kissing in it. That's the only reason most likely since I've seen far worse in other games, and most likely since it's a mediocre game anyway not too many people would be playing it anyway. It's just an illusion, a magic trick if you will, they do stuff like this to distract us from their own inadequacies and short comings in their profession.
If this game sucks, then maybe it would be best no to buy it, but there is a much bigger issue here. These games are being attacked across the globe. It has to stop. When will the madness stop?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Personally I'm annoyed at the company itself, they are inviting further persecution of the video game industry by showing, quite frankly, a complete lack of bollocks.

I know people don't start a gaming company to deal with small minded, prejudiced idiots like Sun journalists, but to simply bow out of the fight merely means that they've allowed that prejudice to win.

I'm not looking forward to seeing the Sun tomorrow, 'The Sun defeats 'evil' video game! Turn to page 5 once you've finished leering at Belinda (19) from Newcastles tits!'
I can't even begin to word my anger. Mass hysteria is amusing, until it starts to actually affect what you do and don't get access to.
This is what eBay is for.
What makes this even more bizarre is that 505 themselves published arthouse developer Grasshopper Manufacture's Michigan in Europe. This is a game in which you are actually scored for the amount of time you spend staring at a woman's polygonal arse (like, *actually*, literally), as well as giving you moral decisions between saving lives or filming brutal deaths for a news scoop (likely inspiring Dead Rising in the process, but I digress). Would they have canned this if the Daily Mail had caught wind?

I used to respect 505 for their willing to bring over games that no other publishers believe there is a European market for, but this has just inverted my opinion of them. As soon as I read they they chickened out on no less than the street date I went and ordered myself a Canadian import.

Stick it to the man!
"You fools, you must CENSOR TELEVISION!!"

I am constantly reminded of that quote from Family Guy episode PTV...It's so relevant.
This is fucking ridiculous.
There you have it. Moral conservatives at their finest oy.
Paracelsus -

You say you've seen some French and Italian sites selling the PAL version of the game - could you let me know which ones please?

Thanks, Hazel
I'm from NZ, and the game has been banned in Australia too, so the chance of me getting it (thanks to those idiots) is as slim as an anorexic toothpick.

Do any of you know Elfen Lied? That doesn't hint at sexual abuse of an underage girl, it fully STATES it and get's very, very close to showing it. It's rated R16 here.

Therefore, they cannot expect me to be quite about this.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am
JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am
chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:56am
JDKJ: But if it turns out that they actually did, they'll have Hell to pay.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:45am
JDKJ: And I'd tend to rule out the possibilty of FN Herstal supplying restricted ammunition to someone merely because they're ordering it from a military base.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:37am
JDKJ: I know you don't leave your gated community and get around much in dark alleys, so you may be surprised to learn that there's this thing called "the black market" where, if you've got enough money, ain't too much of anything which can't be bought.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:36am
Austin_Lewis: Or, maybe he or someone else at the base ordered the SS190 from FN Herstal.
Login or register to post shouts