Another Game-legislating Politician Eyes White House Run in 2008

December 4, 2006

Early contenders for the 2008 presidential campaign include several candidates with a track record of attempting to legislate video games.

There's Hillary Clinton (D-NY), of course, sponsor of the Family Entertainment Protection Act (FEPA). She hasn't announced yet, but her candidacy seems a given.

GamePolitics reported recently on the presidential aspirations of conservative Sam Brownback (R-KS). He is co-sponsor (with Clinton and others) of the Children & Media Research Advancement Act (CAMRA), recently passed by the Senate.

Add one more game legislating pol to the list. The Associated Press reports Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh (D) may launch his presidential campaign as early as this week. Bayh cosponsored FEPA with Senate colleague Clinton. Considered a centrist, he is the former governor of Indiana.

Likely candidates who haven't weighed in the video game issue include Republicans John McCain, Mit Romney and Rudy Guiliani as well as Democrats John Edwards, John Kerry (GP: OMG, not again, please...), Tom Vilsack and Joe Biden.

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, another possible candidate, hasn't introduced any game legislation, but the Washington Post reported earlier this year that he snubbed Doug Lowenstein by returning a $500 campaign contribution made by the ESA boss. That's obviously a bad sign for the video game industry.

Posted in

Comments

Submitted by Jabrwock on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 07:52.

Although considering how most would have lit the cheque on fire in public, while stuffing movie company cheques in their back pocket, I guess Obama's reaction was showy, but not altogether controvertial. UNLESS he did accept a cheque from the movie industry...

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Submitted by Siftr (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 07:54.

he co-sponsored FEPA?
I wouldn't worry about him. he's just a bandwagon whore.

Submitted by BlitzFitness on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 08:07.

As a resident of Illinois, I must remind people the real problem with Obama. HE HASN'T FREAKING DONE ANYTHING YET!!! Can we please vote for people to the office of presidency that have more qualifications than A) is an American, B) is a politician, C) is old enough, and D) speaks with a good voice?

I'm gonna turn from angry to sad now, because last night I learned that of all the presidential hopefuls combined, it seems that I have a lot more in common with Lieberman and Bayh, and I can't really stand either one. This may turn in to a "King of the Cosmos, Prince of the Cosmos: 2008" write-in from me.

Submitted by Benji (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 09:33.

Is it possible to see who has contributed to Obama's war chest? I'm honestly all for pols not taking money from corporate interests, but if he's specifically snubbing the video game industry rather than corporations as a whole, then it certainly begs some questions.
Also, @BlitzFitness: Part of me wants to think that people other than career politicians have a shot at the presidency, and that Obama's relative novelty shouldn't be that big a problem. But part of me agrees with you - he hasn't really done ANYTHING aside from be a highly eloquent senator that I know of. For that reason I sometimes think his campaign will run out of steam way too quickly for him to get the nod as Democratic candidate.

Submitted by Jabrwock on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 10:34.

@Benji

Depends how your campaign contribution laws work down there. Up here it's only required during election time, if it's for something like a party leadership race, it's not required, unless it's a large contribution...

-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

Submitted by Gamer81 (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 11:23.

I don't know if Obama returning the money to Lowenstein is something bad. It could be that he is against government regulation of video games, but doesn't want to take any contribution from the video game industry. This way, no one can claim that he was "bought" off by the video game industry if he votes against video game bills, the way other lawmakers have been bought off by the movie industry like Liar Leland Yee. So Obama returning the money can actually be a good thing afterall.

Submitted by RaZor (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 11:36.

I'm going to be spending a lot of time over break tearing apart a couple political books, first to better analyze my own understanding of politics and then to see whether Obama would make a good presidential choice. Obama is definitely green, but he has charisma and can talk the talk. I agree with Gamer81 about the campaign contribution thing. This could just be a wise political move more than a statement on his personal convictions.

I'm still greatly interested in whether Obama can walk the walk.

And whether he can be nominated for President and avoid getting a crapload of death threats from stupid white supremacists.

Submitted by Brer (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 11:57.

@Benji

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00009638&cycle=2006

(all numbers are for the most recent election cycle)

Like most congressmen in the US, the vast majority of funds come from rich individual donors (yes, Democrats too,). The top twenty contributors are in that URL above. As for money from other entertainment sources:

RIAA: $2,000
Jim Beam: $1,000
Best Buy: $2,000

I'm not going to count the $9,500 he got from various Telcos.

While I'm on the site, Evan Bayh:

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00003762&cycle=2006

His top contributors.

As for entertainment money it looks like it's mainly Comcast for $500 and the National Assoc. of Broadcasters for $2,000. Again (for those of you interested in net neutrality from the other thread) Telcos and/or ISPs are very heavily represented.

Submitted by Brer (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 12:02.

A side note, BTW, for the people who talk about how Big Business (whether it's Big Telcos, Big Banks, or Big anything else) buys Washington. Of the ten biggest contributing organizations, only #2 (AT&T) and #9 (Goldman Sachs) are businesses. ALL the rest are Trade and Labor Unions. And to demonstrate the recursive nature of all political power, the -biggest- Union contributing to politicians' campaigns? AFSCME.

Submitted by BlitzFitness on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 14:36.

@Benji:

I understand what you mean. I'm in no way an Obama-basher (I voted for him), but I'm beginning to worry that we have too many chickens and not enough eggs.

@Brer: Interesting find. *Bookmarks*

Submitted by Grahamr (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 15:12.

Bah! Brownback. Screw him, Mr. Destroytheesrbwithcraftybill man.

Submitted by yuki (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 15:33.

Hey grahamr

Relax dude, Brownbacks bill is DOA. No judge on earth would back that bill. Aside from 1st and 14th amendment, it runs afoul of any number of laws regarding government take over of private industry.

So, no worries, brownbacks to stupid.

Submitted by Darth_Toxic (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 16:39.

After reading more stuff about him and all of his agendas and goals, I've decided that if Brownback wins, I'm moving to the freakin' UK.

Submitted by Arion (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 17:32.

@ BlitzFitness and @Benji

Obama has done PLENTY to earn his respect.

but don't take my word for it..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama

or you can ask anyone thats better informed.

plus his books are pretty good reads, too.

And video game legislation is not even close to his priorities, so I don't think he will waste time and money trying.

Submitted by Daniel (not verified) on Mon, 12/04/2006 - 18:47.

This is bad. People keep supporting politicians who are in favor of video game legislation. The video game industry needs to fight back against this threat. We need to show politicians that being in favor of legislation against video games is a bad thing, not a good thing.If they start to see it as a minus, instead of a plus, they will stop trying to get games banned and make unfair laws regulating the sale of violent video games. Every body should be able to play these games. The part that really is amazing is that if you go to other web sites, you will see that Jack Thompson is very abusive and mean to anyone who doesn't totally agree with him. He's not a nice guy and he's saying gamers are nasty? If he wants to talk about nastiness, he should look at his own responses to gamers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poll

Shout box

DorthLous: Pwahahahha http://www.destructoid.com/wii-u-sales-drastically-spike-after-xbox-one-presentation-254449.phtml#LlG8HEYbQj2krql5.0105/24/2013 - 2:23pm

james_fudge: she gets no credit until she employs some common sense. - 2 credits for her.05/24/2013 - 11:22am

Andrew Eisen: To Stender's credit, she did unmoderate my most recent comment within a day's time. There's even a couple other replies. None from her though.05/24/2013 - 11:18am

james_fudge: apparently gamers are all 14 - 21 years-olds living in basements according to her way of thinking...05/24/2013 - 11:11am

ZippyDSMlee: EZK: 0_o thier video card chipset is at the very least 3 versions behind the top PC video card.......05/24/2013 - 7:38am

MechaTama31: "You just wouldn't understand how my parenting preferences are more important than everybody else's freedoms."05/24/2013 - 7:37am

DorthLous: I love how she plays the "I'm a parent, you're a gamer, you couldn't understand" card... I'm a parent and I find her position despicable...05/23/2013 - 4:16pm

E. Zachary Knight: She didn't address your questions because she doesn't have any answers.05/23/2013 - 3:38pm

Andrew Eisen: I replied to her comment. Maybe in a few weeks I'll get a reply.05/23/2013 - 3:24pm

Thomas Riordan: @Andrew Eisen To what bowling alley does she go that puts sexual images in the faces of 6 year olds?05/23/2013 - 3:17pm

Andrew Eisen: Well, it took a month but Linda Stender finally replied to me... and didn't address a single one of my questions. http://aswlindastender.com/2013/04/23/follow-up-video-games-and-their-effect-on-children/05/23/2013 - 3:13pm

Imautobot: Also, from a tech perspective the PS4 is apparently already winning. http://bgr.com/2013/05/22/xbox-one-vs-playstation-4-specs/05/23/2013 - 3:12pm

Imautobot: Sony's PS4 motto should be "We play games." Microsoft's should be "We play games, when we're not rewinding your tapes."05/23/2013 - 3:11pm

Andrew Eisen: Oh look, Dying Light was just announced For Everything But Wii U. That's 73.05/23/2013 - 2:06pm

james_fudge: Zippy: they said the same thing about Cell. How did that turn out.05/23/2013 - 1:28pm

Andrew Eisen: Need for Speed Rivals is coming out For Everything But Wii U - PS3, 360, PC, PS4 and Xbox One. That brings the grand total up to 72.05/23/2013 - 12:55pm

PHX Corp: http://wiiudaily.com/2013/05/microsoft-is-selling-the-wii-u-better-than-nintendo/ Wii U daily Opinion: Microsoft is selling the Wii U better than Nintendo05/23/2013 - 12:23pm

E. Zachary Knight: Zippy, they very well may be. But that will only last until they are released. At that time, they will be two generations behind.05/23/2013 - 11:14am

ZippyDSMlee: for a good luagh, http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/124288-EA-Exec-Xbox-One-and-PS4-Are-A-Generation-Ahead-Of-PC05/23/2013 - 10:55am

james_fudge: It's about time! I need W805/23/2013 - 10:49am

All shouts

<< Return To Top

Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :