Submitted by ZippyDSMlee - December 17, 2006 at 9:57 am -0500
The problem with school shottings and bullies is the "system" ignores kid and teen social issues and lets them develop to a unhealthy stage,I myself suffered from bulling and took things internal instead of lashing out...I still cant stand people much >
Submitted by ZippyDSMlee - December 17, 2006 at 9:57 am -0500
(stupid smileis...)
The problem with school shottings and bullies is the "system" ignores kid and teen social issues and lets them develop to a unhealthy stage,I myself suffered from bulling and took things internal instead of lashing out...I still cant stand people much 0_o,
Submitted by Tom "The Game Attorney" Buscaglia - December 16, 2006 at 7:31 pm -0500
This one was a hoot...Wacky Jackie looks like a goofball...especially thse buggie eyes. More on my thoughs about this interview on my blog... http://gameattorney.com/blog/?p=48
Submitted by Beacon - December 14, 2006 at 2:59 pm -0500
I found the interviewer to be surprisingly unbiased. He has to be polite and professional, so he never called Jack too directly on anything, but I definitely got the feeling he didn't see eye-to-eye with Jack at points.
Did anyone else notice that JT had to pause before he could say the word "homosexual"?
Submitted by Maxamegalon2000 - December 14, 2006 at 2:59 pm -0500
I thought it was a fair piece. Thompson didn't go unchallenged on many points, and I really don't think we should expect him to get grilled as much as we would prefer on national television. I would have liked them to mention the donation to charity that he claimed was satire and didn't pay, but that they even mentioned the incident at all impressed me.
Submitted by Howell2751 - December 14, 2006 at 3:03 pm -0500
yea he did hesitate on the "homosexual" line. Also glad someone else got the feeling that JT and the reporter weren't exactly on the same pageas far as opinions go. Unbiased, yes i say, it was conducted fairly well i say. The court cases were mentioned as well as the general denial of the studies done on video games. Kinda interesting that the reporter was playing the games himself during parts of the interview. For what reason i dont know, probably to keep the unbias going or to prove a subtle point.
Submitted by Howell2751 - December 14, 2006 at 3:07 pm -0500
*we really need an edit button here, so sorry for the double post*
another thing that kinda suprised me was they mentioned JT's Mortal Kombat, despite what happened with that, he almost seemed to smile at it a little (not much)
Submitted by Jabrwock - December 14, 2006 at 3:12 pm -0500
Though the FBI reports that the number of teenagers arrested for violent crimes fell by half between 1994 and 2004, Thompson attributes it not to reduced violence but reduced reportage.
Yep, it's all a conspiracy.
"The murder rate is down because now the emergency response of emergency medical teams is so rapid that people aren't dying like they used to."
But I thought gamers were being taught how to do perfect head shots? I guess CPR really CAN treat head wounds. ;)
Submitted by Jabrwock - December 14, 2006 at 3:18 pm -0500
"poor me, I'm just a poor Jesus fan in the heart of Satan-ville. oh, those horrible horrible companies, mentally masturbating into the hearts of our sweet and innocent children. I'll keep fighting the good fight, no matter how many times they try to put me away for being so Christian... they eat puppies too you know"
Submitted by Thompson looked foolish - December 14, 2006 at 3:37 pm -0500
I liked how Jacky paused for a while when asked how anyone can claim reportage is down after Columbine. It seemed like he didn't have an answer so he made up some phony excuse.
"Kids have gotten in trouble for bringing Aspirin to school" the reporter stated.
Yeah Jack, reportage must be way down if kids are getting in trouble for bringing aspirin to school (sarcasm)
Submitted by Marshie - December 14, 2006 at 3:40 pm -0500
@Jabrwock
Of course, silly! You just need to modify the process so that you're sucking on the head wound! With the heart being manually pumped the slug will just pop right out!
I'm glad JT got grilled on TV. I'm glad that reporters and the mainstream media are starting to pay attention to his lies.
Submitted by Brokenscope - December 14, 2006 at 3:46 pm -0500
....
....
He just mis quoted Churchill, now I am mad.
I hate how he paints himself as a Christian Crusader. He isn't, his utter lack of empathy for people has proven that to me. He made fun of someone who killed himself. He mocked the mans friends.
Submitted by mechboy - December 14, 2006 at 3:50 pm -0500
Sounded like the same old song and dance to me. "Rockstar bad, blah blah blah, murder simulator, blah blah blah, trained to kil on Doom, blah blah blah." Someone please change the record.
And when it comes to crime statistics I'm willing to believe the FBI as opposed to Thompson and these experts that apparently no one has ever seen.
Submitted by Fizzlefist - December 14, 2006 at 3:52 pm -0500
Very unbiased. I was honestly surprised when the reporter brought up all the flaws in JT's thinking. Huzzah to Nightline for showing some spine. 'Course, JT will prolly sue them soon for slander as they didn't put him in the best light possible.
Submitted by Awol - December 14, 2006 at 4:00 pm -0500
News Alert "Fights Happen in Schools and the School doesn't call the police!"..
Thats basically what happened when I went to high school. Guess the FBI is wrong and schools don't care about violence. I would have to believe schools report any and everything now a days. Why would they care about how people view them when all they can say is we care about the children and take violence seriously in our school.
Submitted by OldschoolVgamer - December 14, 2006 at 4:05 pm -0500
I smiled and even came a little close to laughing when watching this. That reporter seemed to put JT on the spot on a lot of points.
The only thing I didn't like was how much it seemed to be free publicity for him. Case in point, when they started talking about the character in MKA modeled after him, he started smiling and chuckling a little bit, contradictory to his actions towards Midway Entertainment in the whole ordeal.
What I'm saying is that JT follows the same route Eminem and numerous gangsta rappers have taken. The whole mentality of knowing that they have a bad rep that they can use to garner attention and potentially money. JT realizes that the fact that people hate him can garner him attention as more people get curious as to who he is and why gamers hate him so much. Basically we are giving Jack exactly what he wants. Like I have said time and time again, don't give him the satisfaction of feeding his cause by constantly paying attention to the things he does. He's like a spoiled child that acts out specifically to get attention from the people who feed him.
Anyways, I think the reporter should have grilled him more. Namely his mocking of the gamer suicide, giving out rude emails and letters to gamers and industry officials telling them to go smoke pot or for us computer nerds to get out from behind our computers or whatever else he dreams up. One exchange he had told a guy to f*** off twice. I forgot where I found that though.
Submitted by Kharne - December 14, 2006 at 4:12 pm -0500
Fair? I'm not sure about that really. On one had they pretty much just said the facts and I never had the feeling that they were with either side of the argument. "There's violent games the there, Someone's fighting against them, here's the details." That was great!
On the other had, I can't place my finger on it, but something about that report feel little off. At a couple points it just felt like the reporter just wanted to ask "Can you beleive this crap?" They didn't have a bias in the core argument itself, but it felt like they viewed the situation around that argument as stupid.
Submitted by Shoehorn O'Plenty - December 14, 2006 at 4:14 pm -0500
Instead of the righteous firebrand who crusades against the corruption of the children that this man purports himself to be, this article seems to portray him as a silly, unfortunate and harmless figure.
The interviewer has fun with him about the Janet Reno incident, about violence in the Bible, and regarding the reduction in teen violence and in each case it's like he stumbles to come up with an answer that doesn't make him seem as ridiculous as he is.
Even at the end when the news anchor refers to him as the "Virtue Vigilante", it's like tailing off at the end of any feel-good, unimportant news story that's used for filler on a slow news day. You can imagine her saying in the same tone of voice "So that kitten will "paws" before climbing a tree that high again!".
From his press releases clamouring to inform everyone about this appearance, you would think they were going to praise him from the heavens. This seems to be nothing more than a novelty "Look what this crazy guy is up to!" piece. Next week it'll be the guy with the biggest rubber band collection in the world, after that, the oldest athlete in the world, etc. He's the latest in a line of "curious characters" highlight by news networks when they are clutching at straws for stories.
Submitted by Terminator44 - December 14, 2006 at 4:16 pm -0500
@Thompson looked foolish
Actually, having a school try to keep a felony on their grounds under wraps isn't unheard of, at least not in my state.
Around a year back, there was an incident all over the news here in which two boys sexually abused a handicapped student in a well-to-do Columbus(?) high school, and no staff members where around to help her. It's so sickening because it was during an assembly and the entire student body saw it happen and did nothing. Afterwards, the school urged the parents not to call 911.
Don't get me wrong. I don't believe that this is enough to validate JT's point. And I certainly don't think he has a leg to stand on in that theory if he doesn't mention any specific examples or who exactly his "experts" are. However, we shouldn't outright dismiss the issue. I for one would like to see an investigation of administrative policy at schools across the country.
Submitted by nightwng2000 - December 14, 2006 at 4:35 pm -0500
Terminator,
There's a lot of that going around. And just as John Bruce once tried to limit people shooting others in the face to hitmen and video gamers, so too does he limit violence by teens to be caused by video games.
Truth is, schools by and large cover up a great many crimes. Not all are sexual assaults or even physical assaults, but a great many hate crimes are brought about mental and verbal abuse that is ignored or even advocated and encouraged by authority figures in the school who agree with the abusers' attitudes. School officials are notorious for covering up abuse in schools for a great many reasons. Fear of lawsuits, approval of the acts due to common personal, religious, and/or political beliefs, fear of media, lack of understanding how to deal with certain situations, and many others.
John Bruce, as always, wants everything to be about him and his agendas and everything else not even come in 10th, let alone second.
Submitted by Beacon - December 14, 2006 at 4:44 pm -0500
@nightwng2000
While that's true, I hardly think that this is a new thing, which is the lynchpin in JT's argument. It seems these numbers would be hard to get, but I think it would be interesting to see how much unreported school violence has gone up or down in the past 10 years.
Submitted by Thompson looked foolish - December 14, 2006 at 5:49 pm -0500
@ Terminator44
My point was there is no reason to think that schools are NOW all of a sudden leaving things unreported, especially after Columbine, and especially after students are getting in trouble for the dumbest reasons - like aspirin.
What makes JT so sure that schools in the past reported everything, and only today are under-reporting incidents? My point: If schools are possibly not reporting all incidents today, they may just as easily not have reported them in the past either, which would in turn make the number of incidents that were documented in the past a lot lower than what they really were.
There's nothing to suggest that schools are NOW under-reporting things that they would have reported in the past, but quite the opposite.
Submitted by Spicyragnatz - December 14, 2006 at 6:17 pm -0500
He does know that the crusaders of The Crusade are often considered the bad guys of the time for genocide, right?
But I think it's funny that most of the game clips were of Rockstar games. I just wish they showed Rockstar Table Tennis too.
Also I'm surprised that he goes on arguing that because MRIs show that violent video games stimulate the "animal" part of the brain (making children revel in the feelings of violence) no one ever talks about what that part of the brain is there for. If we have a part of the brain that has only the job to make us violent, doesn't that kind of say something about human nature?
He really does look foolish... especially when he doesn't have the press eating out of his hands. Ah well...
Submitted by hayabusa75 - December 14, 2006 at 8:26 pm -0500
Two things:
"The pioneers take all the arrows..." Jack's way past the pioneer stage. He's been at it for years and if anything he's less successful than ever. I like how he never gave a real answer as to why he can't win.
Which family was the correspondent talking about that disassociated itself from him?
All in all, I was pleasantly surprised how it all turned out. It wasn't the asskissing session I feared it might be.
Submitted by Shoehorn O'Plenty - December 14, 2006 at 10:07 pm -0500
I found it very funny when he started talking about the brain scans. He makes it sound as if video games are the only things that can stimulate this activity in the primitive/animal part of the brain.
I wonder what the results would be if a similar sample of teens were scanned after taking part in competitive sports. I would like for these researchers to repeat the experiment, but instead substitute a half hour spent playing basketball or football against each other, in place of the video games.
I imagine it's the drive to succeed and overcome a challenge that stimulates this brain activity, and the same results would be seen whether you've been trying to get headshots in Counter-Strike, or trying to weave past the opposition players in a game of football.
Sports seem to increase aggression a lot more than video games in my opinion. I've seen an huge amounts of clips of fights starting during games of soccer, GAA sports, basketball, etc. As someone who has played video games for most of my adult life, including as part of my job, the most violent behaviour I have ever witnessed is a punch on the arm delivered to someone who wouldn't stop being a cheesy player in Soul Calibur.
Submitted by Johan - December 14, 2006 at 10:18 pm -0500
I think it is extremely amusing to see how somebody that is SO against violence and agression, openly states that one of his biggest "examples" is a wartime leader :-) ( The quote he uses even comes from during the War, i mean, come on, that's just ridiculous...
Submitted by Sigma 7 - December 15, 2006 at 9:51 pm -0500
“[My] most favorite story in the Bible is David and Goliath,” Thompson said.
This story involves David using a single stone in a sling to hit Goliath in a weak point in the armor. (The rational was faith in God managed to guide the stone, although immense skill and accurracy can have the same result.)
The message of the story somehow fell on deaf ears. In this case, it looks like attempts to inaccurratly throw rubber balls in a general direction of a target, with the hopes that it would actually inflict damage (which it won't.)
Really, I thought it would’ve been that little story in the Bible about a guy called Jesus,
Depends on the Bible. There's two testaments involved - the Old Testament and the New Testament. Judaism places its focus on the Old Testament (specifically the first five books), while Christianity focuses on the New Testament (specifically the four books of the apostles.) Not that it matters, since there's ~6 billion religions on the planet.
Submitted by Zento - December 15, 2006 at 10:56 am -0500
"[My] most favorite story in the Bible is David and Goliath," Thompson said.
Really, I thought it would've been that little story in the Bible about a guy called Jesus, but hey, I'm a gamer, so maybe my priorities aren't straight.
Submitted by Yuenglingdragon - December 15, 2006 at 12:31 am -0500
I can't believepeople are still citing those brain scan studies. They're such bullshit. I wonder when this was filmed, though. He seemed like video game legislation was a new thing, not shot down nearly a dozen times.
I leave you with this quote from British psychologist Guy Cumberbatch criticized the study noting, "[F]inding that people who enjoy violent media may also be aggressive is tantamount to observing that those who play football also enjoy watching it on television. The correlational nature of [this] study means that causal statements are risky at best,' the authors admit. ...All in all, Anderson and Dill's new evidence is exceptionally weak, and in its one-sided approach it has a depressingly familiar ring to it. ...[S]tudies to date have been notably biased towards seeking evidence of harm. This 'blame game' may be fun for some researchers to play, and knee-jerk reactions such as the APA's press release may be media-friendly. But we deserve better."
Submitted by vellocet - December 15, 2006 at 6:44 am -0500
I think the tide is beginning to turn in our favour... over the last month or so, the negative press about the game industry seems to be waning. In its place, senators, other public figures (even the NIMF), etc seem to be somewhat positive or at the very least fair about games... Anyone else notice that? Anyone wonder why?
Submitted by DARYL - January 24, 2007 at 9:51 pm -0500
Thompson is so great, having sacrificed so much for what he believes in; you have all been corrupted by the evils of videogames, and for that you will butrn in the firey pits of hell when you face Him, the supreme being, in the high halls of heavan following the endtimes. I decree that you should stop acting like the beasdts of the field you think you asre and get back to being men, who go to church, get married, have children, work, grow old and live forever with Him. PEACE AND UNITY TO ALL MANKIND and deathto all non believers!
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:56am JDKJ: But if it turns out that they actually did, they'll have Hell to pay.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:45am JDKJ: And I'd tend to rule out the possibilty of FN Herstal supplying restricted ammunition to someone merely because they're ordering it from a military base.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:37am JDKJ: I know you don't leave your gated community and get around much in dark alleys, so you may be surprised to learn that there's this thing called "the black market" where, if you've got enough money, ain't too much of anything which can't be bought.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:36am Austin_Lewis: Or, maybe he or someone else at the base ordered the SS190 from FN Herstal.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:32am Austin_Lewis: the hands of private owners. They run about 300 dollars minimum for a box of 50, and boxes of AP 5.7 are extremely scarce, mainly residing in the hands of Class III stores or individuals who for one reason or another got a demo box of it.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:30am Austin_Lewis: There are other firearms that fire the 5.7. However, I too would like to know where he got the ammo and what kind was used. Maybe Hasan, planning not to live through this, went out and bought one the boxes of SS190 that are floating around in
Posted 11/07/09 at 08:44am JDKJ: And it isn't yet clear what type of ammunition Hasan used. It's strange that he purchased a gun but didn't purchase ammunition for it at the same place and time. Especially because the calibre required is peculiar to the actual gun.
Comments
The problem with school shottings and bullies is the "system" ignores kid and teen social issues and lets them develop to a unhealthy stage,I myself suffered from bulling and took things internal instead of lashing out...I still cant stand people much 0_o,
heres a 50 year old collage bully case,the shotter is now a collage prof
http://www.gamepoliticsforums.com/showthread.php?t=887
has the system for adults or kids evolved any since then...
http://gameattorney.com/blog/?p=48
Tom Buscaglia - The Game Attorney
Did anyone else notice that JT had to pause before he could say the word "homosexual"?
another thing that kinda suprised me was they mentioned JT's Mortal Kombat, despite what happened with that, he almost seemed to smile at it a little (not much)
Yep, it's all a conspiracy.
"The murder rate is down because now the emergency response of emergency medical teams is so rapid that people aren't dying like they used to."
But I thought gamers were being taught how to do perfect head shots? I guess CPR really CAN treat head wounds. ;)
/barf
"Kids have gotten in trouble for bringing Aspirin to school" the reporter stated.
Yeah Jack, reportage must be way down if kids are getting in trouble for bringing aspirin to school (sarcasm)
Of course, silly! You just need to modify the process so that you're sucking on the head wound! With the heart being manually pumped the slug will just pop right out!
I'm glad JT got grilled on TV. I'm glad that reporters and the mainstream media are starting to pay attention to his lies.
....
He just mis quoted Churchill, now I am mad.
I hate how he paints himself as a Christian Crusader. He isn't, his utter lack of empathy for people has proven that to me. He made fun of someone who killed himself. He mocked the mans friends.
And when it comes to crime statistics I'm willing to believe the FBI as opposed to Thompson and these experts that apparently no one has ever seen.
Notice that althought Jack says reporting of crime is down, it actually it is gone up.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance.html
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance.htm
Thats basically what happened when I went to high school. Guess the FBI is wrong and schools don't care about violence. I would have to believe schools report any and everything now a days. Why would they care about how people view them when all they can say is we care about the children and take violence seriously in our school.
The only thing I didn't like was how much it seemed to be free publicity for him. Case in point, when they started talking about the character in MKA modeled after him, he started smiling and chuckling a little bit, contradictory to his actions towards Midway Entertainment in the whole ordeal.
What I'm saying is that JT follows the same route Eminem and numerous gangsta rappers have taken. The whole mentality of knowing that they have a bad rep that they can use to garner attention and potentially money. JT realizes that the fact that people hate him can garner him attention as more people get curious as to who he is and why gamers hate him so much. Basically we are giving Jack exactly what he wants. Like I have said time and time again, don't give him the satisfaction of feeding his cause by constantly paying attention to the things he does. He's like a spoiled child that acts out specifically to get attention from the people who feed him.
Anyways, I think the reporter should have grilled him more. Namely his mocking of the gamer suicide, giving out rude emails and letters to gamers and industry officials telling them to go smoke pot or for us computer nerds to get out from behind our computers or whatever else he dreams up. One exchange he had told a guy to f*** off twice. I forgot where I found that though.
On the other had, I can't place my finger on it, but something about that report feel little off. At a couple points it just felt like the reporter just wanted to ask "Can you beleive this crap?" They didn't have a bias in the core argument itself, but it felt like they viewed the situation around that argument as stupid.
The interviewer has fun with him about the Janet Reno incident, about violence in the Bible, and regarding the reduction in teen violence and in each case it's like he stumbles to come up with an answer that doesn't make him seem as ridiculous as he is.
Even at the end when the news anchor refers to him as the "Virtue Vigilante", it's like tailing off at the end of any feel-good, unimportant news story that's used for filler on a slow news day. You can imagine her saying in the same tone of voice "So that kitten will "paws" before climbing a tree that high again!".
From his press releases clamouring to inform everyone about this appearance, you would think they were going to praise him from the heavens. This seems to be nothing more than a novelty "Look what this crazy guy is up to!" piece. Next week it'll be the guy with the biggest rubber band collection in the world, after that, the oldest athlete in the world, etc. He's the latest in a line of "curious characters" highlight by news networks when they are clutching at straws for stories.
Actually, having a school try to keep a felony on their grounds under wraps isn't unheard of, at least not in my state.
Around a year back, there was an incident all over the news here in which two boys sexually abused a handicapped student in a well-to-do Columbus(?) high school, and no staff members where around to help her. It's so sickening because it was during an assembly and the entire student body saw it happen and did nothing. Afterwards, the school urged the parents not to call 911.
Don't get me wrong. I don't believe that this is enough to validate JT's point. And I certainly don't think he has a leg to stand on in that theory if he doesn't mention any specific examples or who exactly his "experts" are. However, we shouldn't outright dismiss the issue. I for one would like to see an investigation of administrative policy at schools across the country.
There's a lot of that going around. And just as John Bruce once tried to limit people shooting others in the face to hitmen and video gamers, so too does he limit violence by teens to be caused by video games.
Truth is, schools by and large cover up a great many crimes. Not all are sexual assaults or even physical assaults, but a great many hate crimes are brought about mental and verbal abuse that is ignored or even advocated and encouraged by authority figures in the school who agree with the abusers' attitudes. School officials are notorious for covering up abuse in schools for a great many reasons. Fear of lawsuits, approval of the acts due to common personal, religious, and/or political beliefs, fear of media, lack of understanding how to deal with certain situations, and many others.
John Bruce, as always, wants everything to be about him and his agendas and everything else not even come in 10th, let alone second.
nightwng2000
NW2K Software
While that's true, I hardly think that this is a new thing, which is the lynchpin in JT's argument. It seems these numbers would be hard to get, but I think it would be interesting to see how much unreported school violence has gone up or down in the past 10 years.
"The violence, and the mayhem that we saw in those lines, I think, is somewhat indicative of the mentality," Jack Thompson said. "
.... Tickle me Elmo?
""The murder rate is down because now the emergency response of emergency medical teams is so rapid that people aren't dying like they used to.""
Oh, so THAT'S why so many attempted murders are so far up. *cough*
My point was there is no reason to think that schools are NOW all of a sudden leaving things unreported, especially after Columbine, and especially after students are getting in trouble for the dumbest reasons - like aspirin.
What makes JT so sure that schools in the past reported everything, and only today are under-reporting incidents? My point: If schools are possibly not reporting all incidents today, they may just as easily not have reported them in the past either, which would in turn make the number of incidents that were documented in the past a lot lower than what they really were.
There's nothing to suggest that schools are NOW under-reporting things that they would have reported in the past, but quite the opposite.
Though they left out certain aspects about his Modest propesal, they were quite fair overall, which for those who know me, is high praise.
Still, Is it just me, or does the jack thompson on tv seem highly different from the one we used to deal with.
But I think it's funny that most of the game clips were of Rockstar games. I just wish they showed Rockstar Table Tennis too.
Also I'm surprised that he goes on arguing that because MRIs show that violent video games stimulate the "animal" part of the brain (making children revel in the feelings of violence) no one ever talks about what that part of the brain is there for. If we have a part of the brain that has only the job to make us violent, doesn't that kind of say something about human nature?
He really does look foolish... especially when he doesn't have the press eating out of his hands. Ah well...
CAPSLOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL!
"The pioneers take all the arrows..." Jack's way past the pioneer stage. He's been at it for years and if anything he's less successful than ever. I like how he never gave a real answer as to why he can't win.
Which family was the correspondent talking about that disassociated itself from him?
All in all, I was pleasantly surprised how it all turned out. It wasn't the asskissing session I feared it might be.
I just...don't get why this man still has a career.
I wonder what the results would be if a similar sample of teens were scanned after taking part in competitive sports. I would like for these researchers to repeat the experiment, but instead substitute a half hour spent playing basketball or football against each other, in place of the video games.
I imagine it's the drive to succeed and overcome a challenge that stimulates this brain activity, and the same results would be seen whether you've been trying to get headshots in Counter-Strike, or trying to weave past the opposition players in a game of football.
Sports seem to increase aggression a lot more than video games in my opinion. I've seen an huge amounts of clips of fights starting during games of soccer, GAA sports, basketball, etc. As someone who has played video games for most of my adult life, including as part of my job, the most violent behaviour I have ever witnessed is a punch on the arm delivered to someone who wouldn't stop being a cheesy player in Soul Calibur.
But J.T. broke relations with them because of the Left Behind video games.
So NIMF does sounds a lot like what Weir was referring too.
On a side note, the video is also on iTunes if any of you guys subscribe to the Nightline podcast.
This story involves David using a single stone in a sling to hit Goliath in a weak point in the armor. (The rational was faith in God managed to guide the stone, although immense skill and accurracy can have the same result.)
The message of the story somehow fell on deaf ears. In this case, it looks like attempts to inaccurratly throw rubber balls in a general direction of a target, with the hopes that it would actually inflict damage (which it won't.)
Depends on the Bible. There's two testaments involved - the Old Testament and the New Testament. Judaism places its focus on the Old Testament (specifically the first five books), while Christianity focuses on the New Testament (specifically the four books of the apostles.) Not that it matters, since there's ~6 billion religions on the planet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cM7cwLTSnkQ
@Zento: He said the most popular story as I recall, not his favorite.
Really, I thought it would've been that little story in the Bible about a guy called Jesus, but hey, I'm a gamer, so maybe my priorities aren't straight.
I leave you with this quote from British psychologist Guy Cumberbatch criticized the study noting, "[F]inding that people who enjoy violent media may also be aggressive is tantamount to observing that those who play football also enjoy watching it on television. The correlational nature of [this] study means that causal statements are risky at best,' the authors admit. ...All in all, Anderson and Dill's new evidence is exceptionally weak, and in its one-sided approach it has a depressingly familiar ring to it. ...[S]tudies to date have been notably biased towards seeking evidence of harm. This 'blame game' may be fun for some researchers to play, and knee-jerk reactions such as the APA's press release may be media-friendly. But we deserve better."