Confirmed: ESA's Doug Lowenstein Stepping Down

Confirmed: ESA's Doug Lowenstein Stepping Down

December 15, 2006
Kotaku editor Brian Crecente has posted a story that says ESA boss Doug Lowenstein may be stepping down as early as today.

Big news, if it's true.

Lowenstein has been the guiding hand of the industry for more than a decade, but not everyone in the video game business has been as supportive in recent times. GP has heard rumblings before, but nothing so public as this.

UPDATE:  Although the Kotaku piece suggested Lowenstein might be joining the Entertainment Consumers Association, GP has confirmed with ECA head man Hal Halpin that such a move is not in the works.

UPDATE 2: GameSpot has reported the Lowenstein story as fact:
According to sources, Lowenstein has accepted the top position with a still-forming trade organization that would represent a consortium of retail investment firms. Lowenstein is expected to remain with the ESA through at least February 2007.

Comments

theliberal
Let me put ti another way he dose not have the tact for the job,for people like JT using libel,slander and the truth to just make the stain go away,however its all in how they do it,Doug dose not use it and finding someone with a pair and a brain to match will be hard to find.

In any case whats done is done if hes gone then hes gone and I just hope someone like him or smarter than him replaces him ,because all we need is a sue happy elitist to destroy what has been made so far...
It's kind of sad that he is steping down. But to all the people that say he didn't have a spine it seems that your not thinking this through. If he attacked everything then the video game industry would be hard pressed to find sympathy and politicians would use it as a backdrop to battle the mean-old-video game industry. Doug knew the best way to beat them was play the defensive and now Joe liberman and Hillary are going on the side of the ESRB. You have to admit he did do something right.
My question is who they are going to replace him with. I'm asking because I find it rather odd that this is announced conveniently around a time when Hillary Clinton is using the "protect the children from evil, violent games" bit to claw her way to a possible presidential seat as well as the battles against violent games are heating up as the bills get repeatedly shot down.

Somehow I can sense that this could be something going on behind the scenes where possibly someone of political power could encourage someone to be put into that same position of power as Doug was that is now less against game censorship.

Call me paranoid if you will, but due to the fact that more politicians are trying to use the keep-games-from-kids crap as a vote earner is heating up at coincidentally the same time as Doug Lowenstein stepping down, I can't help but think that there may be some sort of radical change in the game industry and community as a result of whomever the hell they put in his place.
According to sources, Lowenstein has accepted the top position with a still-forming trade organization that would represent a consortium of retail investment firms.

Moving on to bigger things and more money is my guess.

Afterall, those games need to be sold somewhere. And what better way to help the gaming industry than to invest in firms that don't treat games like a kids-only market.

I can't see JT calling this a victory in that light. That would be like claiming victory if the CEO of Take Two stepped down to become the VP of purchasing for Walmart's electronics division. ;)
Sigh.

The person who had his job because of the distant relative of my math teacher is finally stepping down.

Although he was overly dismissive of critics, we should look back on his career in a positive light.
I personally don't really know what to make of this, though it will be intresting to see if his replacement is harder on people like JT...
Oh damn, I can just imagine JT saying "Huzzah! I made him quit!" Please god don't let this be true.
Hmmmmm, perhaps the ESA has finally realized what we've (mostly Yuki) have been saying: If they're going to win this culture war, they need to get more aggressive against the political rhetoric and bald-faced lies spread by the anti-gamers. Perhaps they are taking the opinions of us gamers seriously, after all.
Terminator

It's wrong to say that I think Doug hasn't done a good job. I like that he stood firm and fought well in court. But thats not enough, we need to make the media, and losers like Jack thompson know that if they lie, we will make them pay. And Doug might have finally reached a point where the industry said "Etiher grow a spine or find someone who has one" and he chose to do the later.

We'll wait and see.
...or perhaps Doug is simply moving to a less high powered job so he can spend more time with his family or fishing or playing on the Wii or whatever.

Not everything needs to have a political cause. Indeed, the industry is in a reasonably strong position right now - its two most dangerous critics are working with the ESRB and the latest slew of anti-gaming legislation has been ruled unconstitutional (or is in seemingly permanent limbo awaiting a final decision - is the judge ever going to rule on the California law?). All that remains is for the ESA to pick up the legal fees from the various state governments - Doug doesnt need to sit around waiting for that to happen, he can leave knowing that the industry isnt currently in any mortal danger.
If this isn't going to happen, all's well I suppose. He HAS done a fairly decent job from what I've read. And let's face it, who of us would put up with JT and others for 10 years without punching someone?

But if this is true and he does step down; Dear GOD don't let the next president be an idiot. The last thing we need is a moron in the ESA
I wouldn't be surprised if this is true, but since it's coming from Kotaku, I'll wait until I see the press release from the ESA.
I'm reserving judgement on the whole thing being good or bad until I get feel for his replacement.
Daniel

It's not likely that lowenstien is stepping down due to thompson, if any pressure came at all it came from the industry. Jack should be pissing his pants, cause if someone takes his place that isn't gonna put up with Jacks shit, then jack could be facing a nightmare of lawsuits and retaliation.

So this is probably just dougs retirement and he's taking a long overdue vacation.
@Daniel

Wow once again you demonstrate a complete inability to understand the situation.
I've been wanting Doug to step down or get fired for a while simply because he doesn't have the balls to combat the Hillary Clintons of the world who try to dictate what people can watch, play, etc. If he does step down, I can only hope that he is replaced with someone who has spine.
I hope that Doug Lowenstein doesn't step down, like Jack Thompson wants him to. Mr. Lowenstein, don't do what Jack Thompson wants you to do that would be giving in to the video game industry's worst enemy!!
@Zerodash

It takes "Balls" not to lash out and react, possibly hurting the industry.
I say good riddance. Get someone with some balls to run the ESA.
I don't know, we did break the story about the ESA and Hillary Clinton. ;)
Whoa. This is big news.
Copypasta'd from kotaku.

"Z-Word says:
He Who Cannot Be Named (Smack Top John) must be wetting himself with glee right now."
It's over. Jack's sanity's finished.
With all due respect to Doug Lowenstein, the head of the ESA needs someone far more outgoing. Games are under fire far now more than ever, and we need someone to nip this in the butt right now.
Hmmm...I'm not sure how I feel about this. I think I'll have to reserve judgement until I find out if this really comes to fruition, and what the reasons behind it were. Oh, and who will succeed him if it happens.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/08/09 at 01:07am
Austin_Lewis: Health insurance, brought to you by the same kind of bureacrats who couldn't, in timely fashion, investigate the comments of any of the men Obama appointed Czars. Or their past. Or their history of not paying taxes.
Posted 11/08/09 at 01:06am
Austin_Lewis: Yes, and what a piece of crap it was. Arresting and fining people just because they don't make a personal choice to buy healh insurance, creating over a hundred new bureacracies, and worse.
Posted 11/08/09 at 12:24am
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:the only trouble is a bunch of witless hacks wrote it....its going to be a train wreck....
Posted 11/07/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: In a photo-finish at the wire, House passes health care reform bill. Relatedly, in a fit of pique, Austin Lewis kicks innocent dog.
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am
JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am
chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:56am
JDKJ: But if it turns out that they actually did, they'll have Hell to pay.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:45am
JDKJ: And I'd tend to rule out the possibilty of FN Herstal supplying restricted ammunition to someone merely because they're ordering it from a military base.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:37am
JDKJ: I know you don't leave your gated community and get around much in dark alleys, so you may be surprised to learn that there's this thing called "the black market" where, if you've got enough money, ain't too much of anything which can't be bought.
Login or register to post shouts