Minnesota Highway Officials Puzzled by Pac-Man

December 22, 2006 -
Highway officials in Minnesota had a pre-holiday visit from Pac-Man recently.

As reported by the Associated Press, someone added an unauthorized painting of the classic video game character to the state's Highway 55.

We haven't seen a photo so far, but here's how the AP describes Pac-Man's unofficial role in the traffic flow: 
Pac-Man is back. Only this time, he's bigger — and he's gobbling up dots on Highway 55.


Large white dots painted on the highway to deter motorists from tailgating have been joined by a giant, yellow image of the video game icon.



The image of Pac-Man was placed on the road surface last month, and its creators have snuck back at least once to touch it up. Traffic engineer Tom Dumont was not pleased:




I'd hate to say positive things because I don't want to encourage people to try to paint something on a busy highway. But at least it's made the project a little more noteworthy.



Highway engineer Wayne Fingalson saw some humor in the situation:




It's kind of comical. Somebody really did a good job of meticulously putting that (Pac-Man) in the dots.



The 7-foot anti-tailgating dots are spaced 225 feet apart and signs along the highway advise motorists to maintain two dots between their car and the one in front. That's the distance needed to stop in three seconds at 55 MPH


UPDATE: GP reader Dave Mooney sent in a pic of the dot-gobbling Route 55 Pac-Man. Thanks, Dave!

Posted in

Comments

Oh what a shock, not.

Life in Minnesota is so uninspired especially in the dead of winter. Gives people a lot of time to think up stuff like this.

@Ryan F.

Pac-man painted on road = video game related state vandalism/civil disobedience. State politics involved, due to it being a state-run construction project. Therefore games & politics. ;)
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

@Vladimir

In some counties, they now have a radar gun that can check the distance between cars, to let the officer know if someone's tailgating. Could be coordinated with photo-radar, and red-light cameras, to automatically ticket you if you drive like a retard. Nothing smartens people up but hitting them in their wallets...
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

@Ryan F.

God forbid GP ever puts up a story that might be remotely funny.

Games and culture. Things like this are examples of how games are affecting our culture and the depth at which they have penetrated. Don't take the name quite so literally.

@ Hexar

No. You can't. I suggest you research it. 450 feet is just over 5 seconds at 55 MPH. Assuming around 2 seconds for reaction time, leaves only 274 feet to stop in 3seconds. So, yes, your car can stop in that amount of distance, but I don't care how 'spectacular' your brakes are, you're not going to come to a dead stop in 'much less than' 450 feet. The dots on the road are well designed and researched. It always shocks me just how little most people seem to know about the physics of driving a car.

The dots are designed to take into account alertness levels, reaction times, brake effectiveness, and mediocre road conditions. So, they give a 3 second cushion to the bare minimum of 185 stopping feet (all things being perfect).

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

What does this have to do with video game politics?

That is cool. hahaha.
but that dot stuff won't work in CA.

That's cute, but I can imagine there will be some increased traffic with people going to see the Pac-Man painting, which will lead to increased traffic accidents as people take their eyes off the road. :)

Anyway, those white dots sound like a good idea. Of course, retards who like to stay two inches behind the vehicle in front of them will still do it, regardless of anything the authorities put up to remind them not to.

XD Thats great, thats just great. Lol, I can see ol' Jack Thompson now. "Pac-Man causes traffic accidents" or better yet. "Pac-Man encourges people to play in the streets" or something similar to that.

@Hexar, they're factoring in reaction time I assume, not to mention its minnesota.. snow and ice anyone? Keep in mind the pic is of a different state.

But yeah, I gotta see this I live in minnesota too, this is fucking hilarious.

I don't know about you, but I can come to a dead stop in three seconds at 55 MPH in much less than 450 feet. My brakes must be spectacular.

Hmm, I've never heard of these white dots before. I've never heard of them being used here in Ohio, anyway.

Still, if you're going to put a row of white dots somewhere, you should know that someone is going to connect it to Pac-Man, considering how iconic he is. Those highway engineers should have seen this coming a mile away.

Here is the Star-Tribune article with a picture.
http://www.startribune.com/462/story/889553.html

Now that is just comedy gold! 8)

I actually am from the town this is from and I personally know those responsible. It has worn away recently due to the weather and plowing but rumor has it Mrs. Pacman will be joining a new Mr. Pacman this spring as weather improves.

As a Minnesotan, I wish I could shake the hands of those responsible. It's nice to know there are still gamers out there who enjoy harmless, flying pecker-less pranks.

I'm not all that surprised. I'm just wondering how long it's going to take for these guys to "animate" Pacman eating the dots by painting repeated Pacmen on the road.

LMFAO that's fxing hillarious!

Sweet!!!

But where are the ghosts??


We probably don't want to know. 0.0

I go by this thing from time to time , and I still laugh at it. It seems to be fading away though. Earlier there was a blue one, but then it faded off.

djjghdwe

It seems like these dots don't help at all. I mean, people tailgate the whole frickin' time. They thing there just dots on a road where you can drive like an idiot!
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenSleaker - Who the heck are you reading that is claiming "all gamers are bad," we "need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers," that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem," or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"?09/20/2014 - 9:44pm
erthwjimhe swatted more than just krebs, I think he swatted 30 people http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/teen-arrested-for-30-swattings-bomb-threats/09/20/2014 - 9:31pm
Craig R.Btw, the guy who swatted security expert Brian Krebs? He got picked up recently. It can be done.09/20/2014 - 8:55pm
Craig R.Such things are not done in a vacuum... hence why the 4chan and other logs show what fools you've all been, tricked into doing the trolls' work09/20/2014 - 8:49pm
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
Andrew EisenNo one's crossed a line but I just want to remind you all to keep discussions civil.09/20/2014 - 1:54pm
Craig R.tldr: I'm a gamer, and imo those who support GamerGate should feel free to take a flying leap off a cliff.09/20/2014 - 1:27pm
Craig R.Not only that, I'm pretty sure that if actual studies were done, you'd still deny them, Sleaker. After all, it's not what you'd want to hear to support your rose-colored view of GamerGate.09/20/2014 - 1:18pm
Craig R.There IS an issue. Nor do we need a study to show that if you deny it then you're part of the problem.09/20/2014 - 1:17pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician