Minnesota Highway Officials Puzzled by Pac-Man

December 22, 2006 -
Highway officials in Minnesota had a pre-holiday visit from Pac-Man recently.

As reported by the Associated Press, someone added an unauthorized painting of the classic video game character to the state's Highway 55.

We haven't seen a photo so far, but here's how the AP describes Pac-Man's unofficial role in the traffic flow: 
Pac-Man is back. Only this time, he's bigger — and he's gobbling up dots on Highway 55.


Large white dots painted on the highway to deter motorists from tailgating have been joined by a giant, yellow image of the video game icon.



The image of Pac-Man was placed on the road surface last month, and its creators have snuck back at least once to touch it up. Traffic engineer Tom Dumont was not pleased:




I'd hate to say positive things because I don't want to encourage people to try to paint something on a busy highway. But at least it's made the project a little more noteworthy.



Highway engineer Wayne Fingalson saw some humor in the situation:




It's kind of comical. Somebody really did a good job of meticulously putting that (Pac-Man) in the dots.



The 7-foot anti-tailgating dots are spaced 225 feet apart and signs along the highway advise motorists to maintain two dots between their car and the one in front. That's the distance needed to stop in three seconds at 55 MPH


UPDATE: GP reader Dave Mooney sent in a pic of the dot-gobbling Route 55 Pac-Man. Thanks, Dave!

Posted in

Comments

Oh what a shock, not.

Life in Minnesota is so uninspired especially in the dead of winter. Gives people a lot of time to think up stuff like this.

@Ryan F.

Pac-man painted on road = video game related state vandalism/civil disobedience. State politics involved, due to it being a state-run construction project. Therefore games & politics. ;)
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

@Vladimir

In some counties, they now have a radar gun that can check the distance between cars, to let the officer know if someone's tailgating. Could be coordinated with photo-radar, and red-light cameras, to automatically ticket you if you drive like a retard. Nothing smartens people up but hitting them in their wallets...
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

@Ryan F.

God forbid GP ever puts up a story that might be remotely funny.

Games and culture. Things like this are examples of how games are affecting our culture and the depth at which they have penetrated. Don't take the name quite so literally.

@ Hexar

No. You can't. I suggest you research it. 450 feet is just over 5 seconds at 55 MPH. Assuming around 2 seconds for reaction time, leaves only 274 feet to stop in 3seconds. So, yes, your car can stop in that amount of distance, but I don't care how 'spectacular' your brakes are, you're not going to come to a dead stop in 'much less than' 450 feet. The dots on the road are well designed and researched. It always shocks me just how little most people seem to know about the physics of driving a car.

The dots are designed to take into account alertness levels, reaction times, brake effectiveness, and mediocre road conditions. So, they give a 3 second cushion to the bare minimum of 185 stopping feet (all things being perfect).

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

What does this have to do with video game politics?

That is cool. hahaha.
but that dot stuff won't work in CA.

That's cute, but I can imagine there will be some increased traffic with people going to see the Pac-Man painting, which will lead to increased traffic accidents as people take their eyes off the road. :)

Anyway, those white dots sound like a good idea. Of course, retards who like to stay two inches behind the vehicle in front of them will still do it, regardless of anything the authorities put up to remind them not to.

XD Thats great, thats just great. Lol, I can see ol' Jack Thompson now. "Pac-Man causes traffic accidents" or better yet. "Pac-Man encourges people to play in the streets" or something similar to that.

@Hexar, they're factoring in reaction time I assume, not to mention its minnesota.. snow and ice anyone? Keep in mind the pic is of a different state.

But yeah, I gotta see this I live in minnesota too, this is fucking hilarious.

I don't know about you, but I can come to a dead stop in three seconds at 55 MPH in much less than 450 feet. My brakes must be spectacular.

Hmm, I've never heard of these white dots before. I've never heard of them being used here in Ohio, anyway.

Still, if you're going to put a row of white dots somewhere, you should know that someone is going to connect it to Pac-Man, considering how iconic he is. Those highway engineers should have seen this coming a mile away.

Here is the Star-Tribune article with a picture.
http://www.startribune.com/462/story/889553.html

Now that is just comedy gold! 8)

I actually am from the town this is from and I personally know those responsible. It has worn away recently due to the weather and plowing but rumor has it Mrs. Pacman will be joining a new Mr. Pacman this spring as weather improves.

As a Minnesotan, I wish I could shake the hands of those responsible. It's nice to know there are still gamers out there who enjoy harmless, flying pecker-less pranks.

I'm not all that surprised. I'm just wondering how long it's going to take for these guys to "animate" Pacman eating the dots by painting repeated Pacmen on the road.

LMFAO that's fxing hillarious!

Sweet!!!

But where are the ghosts??


We probably don't want to know. 0.0

I go by this thing from time to time , and I still laugh at it. It seems to be fading away though. Earlier there was a blue one, but then it faded off.

djjghdwe

It seems like these dots don't help at all. I mean, people tailgate the whole frickin' time. They thing there just dots on a road where you can drive like an idiot!
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
InfophileAnd also, she said "anyone," but she also said "probably." This means there's a subset for whom the "you shouldn't write it" doesn't apply.07/01/2015 - 4:47pm
InfophileGoing back a bit: "As I believe there is no justification, there is no reason for me to continue reading." - One reason to read might be to find out if you're wrong about there being no justification for it.07/01/2015 - 4:45pm
Andrew EisenRead it here: http://www.zenofdesign.com/getting-diversity-to-speak/07/01/2015 - 4:42pm
Andrew EisenFormer Bioware dev, Damion Schubert, offers an interesting thought on diversity in the industry. Not only is it important to have, it's important to make sure they feel comfortable offering their perspective.07/01/2015 - 4:40pm
Andrew EisenHeh, I did consider it!07/01/2015 - 4:37pm
Craig R.Aww, video gamer players wasn't an option for the poll?07/01/2015 - 4:33pm
KaylaKazeI think the problem here is certain people don't know what "shouldn't" means, even after it's been explained to them half a dozen times.07/01/2015 - 4:19pm
Andrew EisenWhat if creators heard our feedback, agreed with it and then... oh god... made a better show? The HORROR!!!07/01/2015 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenI mean, next thing you know they'll make a YouTube video. A YOUTUBE VIDEO!!!07/01/2015 - 4:07pm
Andrew EisenHow DARE anyone write an opinion suggesting that people who suck at something might consider a better way to accomplish the same thing or improve so they suck less. The NERVE!07/01/2015 - 4:06pm
Goth_SkunkYes, but we complain about it amongst ourselves, we shake our heads, we sigh, shrug our shoulders and say 'oh well, what can you do?' We don't write articles for Wired and say 'Anyone can write about X, but should they? Probably not.'07/01/2015 - 3:57pm
Andrew EisenMy favorite is: "Zoom and enhance!"07/01/2015 - 3:55pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, you must not hang out with many technology experts. We complain about bad portrayals of tech all the time.07/01/2015 - 3:52pm
Andrew EisenPeople should be free to write about anything their little hearts desire. Even if they suck at it. Maybe not the most advisable thing to do, depending on their personal goals. But that's why you listen and learn and improve! Or try to, anyway.07/01/2015 - 3:50pm
Andrew EisenAnd you're straying from the path a bit but the sentiment in and of itself I agree with.07/01/2015 - 3:47pm
Goth_SkunkBut, as in the example I provided with call tracing and cell phone triangulation, the audience lets it slide, even the subject matter experts.07/01/2015 - 3:47pm
Andrew EisenGreat! Maybe you'd change your mind if you read her reasons for suggesting such a thing, maybe not. But at least now you're opining what she actually said!07/01/2015 - 3:46pm
Goth_SkunkFor the sake of entertainment, people write about things they shouldn't write about all the time. If they stopped, most things fiction would cease to exist.07/01/2015 - 3:46pm
Goth_SkunkAnd I think that's a despicable thing to suggest, worse than someone who sucks at writing a rape scene doing so. By all means, if the rape scene was poorly written, criticize it after the fact.07/01/2015 - 3:45pm
Andrew EisenYou're not wrong that she's suggesting that people who suck at writing rape scenes (which is who "anyone" refers to) probably shouldn't, yes.07/01/2015 - 3:42pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician