"Killing Monsters" Author Dishes on Game Censorship

"Killing Monsters" Author Dishes on Game Censorship

December 27, 2006
Perhaps you've read Gerard Jones' excellent 2003 book Killing Monsters: Why Children Need Fantasy, Super Heroes and Make-Believe Violence.

Even if you haven't, check out Bonnie Ruberg's insightful Gamasutra interview with Jones, who dishes on the politics of video games, comic books, sex and violence.

Some highlights:
Video games have been so much under attack recently... I think anyone who’s a decent person but who finds himself or herself attracted to aggressive or violent imagery is a little troubled...  People in the games business are particularly inclined that way, being, for the most part, a gentle group in a medium where violence has become so prominent.

Jones offers a quick history lesson in censorship:
The first big attack in the United States was against popular novels, dime novels... there was a huge outcry driven by teachers and doctors, bought into by parents and politicians - who saw a way to generate votes. This outcry was probably more virulent and widespread than the attacks on video games now...

You find it again about movies in the late 20's and early 30's when they got sexier. You find it again about movies in the early 90's when gore was coming up. And certainly music too... Whenever there’s a new medium, or there’s a distinct new style, there will be this.

Could the recent wave of video game legislation actually signal the beginning of end of the culture against video games? Jones thinks so:
What happens is, bills get written. So you start to see legislation popping up late in the cycle...  So it’s not unlikely that during the flurry of legislation, which might be when the industry is most frightened, that might actually be when it’s about to stop.

What about GTA and Hot Coffee?
There is a certain absurdity that parents make peace with Grand Theft Auto, until naked women appear in it. It has something to do with the fact that it was snuck in... With violent games, we’re learning to accept it. Your kids’ friends have these games too. But then our threshold for violence has always been higher than for sex.

Catch the rest of the Gerard Jones interview at Gamasutra. For more info on Jones, check his Wikipedia entry. Jones, by the way, is currently listed as Jack Thompson's opponent in a proposed college debate tour. No dates for the tour have yet been scheduled, however, according to word GP received from Jones last evening.

Comments

Daniel:

I believe this is more along the lines of 'If you are attracted to these kinds of games, the amount of attack they've been under probably troubles you' rather than 'If you are attracted to these kinds of games, you're probably troubled in the head'. 'Troubled' as in worried, not tetched. Though, yeah, I had to reread that part a bit to make sure of what I was seeing.
Liking violent imagery in video games and movies doesn't make a person troubled. I like it and I'm not troubled at all. However, I saw one thing there that I would like to discuss. VOTES is the key word there. We need to vote so that politicians will see being against violent games as a negative, not a positive.
ash2dust- not true not true! I seem to remember a statement he made saying the ps2 is like the pearl habour bombing....Everytime he opens his mouth theres a chance of him inserting his foot. And in a debate situation the chances double at the least.
But he doesn't really do that kind of stuff unless he's responding to gamers directly out of the public eye.
Yeah, but he still dishes out plenty of BS. Remember the Nightline interview?
@ KotatsuNeko

Thanks for clearing that up. That's a good analysis of that part of the article. Also register to vote to make your voice heard on this issue. The politicians will stop attacking these games if we turn it into a negative for their re-election campaigns. We have to vote, so they will come after our votes and stop attacking our games.
JT is gonna spew TONS of quotable & hilarious statements during these debates. In 2007, I can't wait to hear such statements as "Gerard Jones is a hired lackey of the videogame industry" or "Mr. Jones is akin to Hitler".

Fun, fun, fun.
"Anyway, i agree that the legislation period is almost over."

I agree. If we do see more legislation, it will probably be for educational purposes such as a media awareness campaign on the ESRB rating system so parents know what games might or might not be approriate for their children. We are also starting to see media awareness groups such as NIMF and others pointing the fingers at parents rather then the retailers and game makers, which is also a good sign.
He's not going to debate him, he's going to grandstand. This will be especially useful if he's on national television. But either way, JT doesn't stand a chance in a debate, and knows it.

Anyway, i agree that the legislation period is almost over.
All I have to say is good luck to Jack if he's debating against Mr. Jones here, he's going to need it.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/22/09 at 12:06am
JDKJ: You should get Phil McCraken to help you spackle those banisters.
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:57pm
ZippyDSMlee: Oh in the pirate hunter article I need my song ieda heckled DS,JD,Beemon sic im !!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:56pm
ZippyDSMlee: JD:no I am tried from prepping the banisters for painting , worked on them from 12 to 4 and 6 to 8...after I got back from the store...got up early got ready...blah...been up all day..I need a nap...
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:42pm
JDKJ: No. You gonna stay up late tonight soldering?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:41pm
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:Don't you mean Mctite?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: @Zip: Neil, Bob, and Lik McTaint. The McTaint brothers. LOL!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:44pm
Flamespeak: I still think military personell, killing other military personell, on a military complex should be handled by military courts.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I could see this a mixture of the two charges rather than just one or the other.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I think this was mainly a person who snapped, but evidence is showing he definitely had strong inlinations to islamic-extremism.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:41pm
Flamespeak: People are trying to claim that Hasan's actions were not terrorism. I don't jump on the 'terror train' like others, however
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:38pm
mentor07825: Britain certainly does deserve it! And the French! God damn it, it was a hand ball!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: mentor07825:Well Brittan dose deserve it....
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:33pm
ZippyDSMlee: Alyric:I don;t hasliburton having to pay back billoins... don;t you love it when the rich roll over the goverment without a care?
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:32pm
mentor07825: I say we nuke the whales, for the benefit of both mankind and the environment.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:28pm
Austin_Lewis: I say we try Al Gore too. I always said he was in on the racket.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:16pm
Alyric: The leaked information proves these organizations knowingly defrauded governments (i.e., taxpayers) out of billions of dollars. Yet there will probably never be a trial.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:15pm
Flamespeak: working on other things makes me angry. I might have had a jet pack by now. :p
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:14pm
Flamespeak: Just thinking of all the time and manpower wasted to try and make things emit less CO2 emmision that could have been spent
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:07pm
Alyric: @Zip: FYI, the construction of solar panels puts out more pollution than any form of energy production. To say nothing of the toxic components of the panels that cannot be recycled.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:04pm
ZippyDSMlee: I know I know not the point.
Login or register to post shouts