Despite Bad Reviews & Controversy, Analyst Sees Gold in Left Behind Game

January 5, 2007 -
The controversial Left Behind Eternal Forces may not be a very good game (GameSpot gave it a 3.4), but a leading financial analyst expects it to turn a profit and generate a sequel.

Michael Pachter, Managing Director of Research for Wedbush Morgan  Securities, told GamePolitics that it's tougher than normal to track Left Behind's numbers due to its unusual sales channel:
Tough to answer on Left Behind (sales figures), since the developers relied heavily on distribution through Christian bookstores, and my guess is that most of them don't report to the NPD Group.

I'd venture a guess that the game sold quite well (at least 200,000 units), and that it will continue to sell well, particularly overseas. I don't think that the controversy had any impact on consumers who frequent Christian bookstores...

And I think that there will be a sequel if the developers broke even or generated a profit (they should have been profitable at 200,000 units), since the book series is so deep.

Comments

@ JasonTerminator
He's right about both Bully and this. Bully cost a bunch to make and according to the numbers isn't selling well despite being a good game in many peoples opinion, and because of this, it probably won't get a sequel. Left Behind here didn't cost that much to make and to break even needs a lot less to sell, plus these guys are more likely to make another one if they only break even. In addition, just because it's crappy doesn't mean another won't be made, have you seen all the crappy Christian movies and music, while some are good (Veggietales, Third Day, etc.) the vast majority is crap by mainstream standards yet still sells.

"I’d venture a guess that the game sold quite well (at least 200,000 units), and that it will continue to sell well, particularly overseas."

How did he come across these figures? "I'm guessing the game sold really well and made lots of money, because that's what I think and I'm right because this is the case. I know it because it happened, and I'm certain of that. I think." o0?

There's a mistake in the headline: It should be "because of", not "despite".
Remember, there is no such thing as bad press. Controversy = Sales, it's an old formula.

Chuck Jeffe seems to a better anaylst than Michael Pachter. http://gamepolitics.com/2006/09/12/left-behind-bad-investment-says-analyst/

Of course there's gold here. Just take a look at the amount of people who listen to Jerry Falwell's drivel. And I won't even begin to count the followers of his fellow retards.

They're sitting on a goldmine!

Is this the same analyst that said Bully would be a critical failure, or that said the PS3 would be the winner of this console generation?

Gah, this only encourages more yahoos to base bad games off bad book series... blech...

Successfull books, it's the new cheap-ass movie-to-game crossover.
-- If your wiimote goes snicker-snack, check your wrist-strap...

A quick look back to the Bully article shows that it is the same guy making these predictions.

I love how he thinks a terrible Christian game has a higher chance of getting a sequel than a great satire about school life from Rockstar.

I should get into that business, since it's obvious you don't need actual prediction skills in order to succeed.

I figured it had to be one or the other. Both made such wild claims that this third claim had to be one of theirs. One said Bully wouldn't sell well, and the other said that the PS3 would win this console generation.

So...tired...of...Left...Behind...stories...don't...care...

Is this the same analyst who is convinced Bully won't have a sequel? I personally do not think that sales from Christian bookstores would amount to enough to propel a sequel, but then again I'm neither a devout Christian nor an economic analyst. With the controversy surrounding the title I think it might be ignored, people do tend to want to politically correct and all, the Convert-or-Die™ gameplay just might not click with buyers. Still, I'm no expert, just highschooler with an opinion.

Well, the game is acutally fun once you get into it and some of the reviews talk about that. Most of the reviews, including the 3.4 from Gamespot didn't go into the gameplay. They simply couldn't get past the Christian element.

It's not like the reviews are going to hurt the sales for this game because most of the gamers who would buy it don't visit or trust those reviewing sites. Especially those with an agenda - like Game Reveolution. Anyone who starts off their review of a game with "if you beleive in any religion you're an idiot" is not going to have any credibility.

Well, maybe with a 15 year old, but the audience buying this game is much older and eductated.

Unforantely they are not treating this as a game and handicapping alot of gameplay and story elements,they probably will make another one it wont be any better unless they wise up make a full game out of it.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Ok, my internal debate was short-lived. If Win10 is still a year out, I'm not waiting that long for an SSD, so on Win7 I will remain.09/30/2014 - 7:52pm
Matthew Wilsonits called windows 10, and I am happy to get the start menu back.09/30/2014 - 7:18pm
Jessy HartIs this stuff about Windows 10 legit? Is it actually called Windows 10 or is it just some stupid joke?09/30/2014 - 6:57pm
ZippyDSMleeSo I been trying to play Bioshock Infinite I got all the DLC,ect but do not want the extras to make your charatcer over powered from the start.....they force you to take them which is quite annoying......09/30/2014 - 6:45pm
Craig R.I need to upgrade to an SSD, still seriously debating moving to Win8.1 from 7 at the same time09/30/2014 - 6:07pm
Craig R.Win10 is probably Win8.1 with more cleanup and the Start button back.09/30/2014 - 6:06pm
Sora-ChanAhh, it's just weird seeing someone's post all of a sudden have replies from days prior before it was posted due to that.09/30/2014 - 5:49pm
MechaTama31sora: I broke the ordering intentionally, as AE's and my conversation had squeezed the text boxes down to be quite slim. I replied to an earlier post of his instead of the one I was actually replying to.09/30/2014 - 5:46pm
MechaTama31So, 9 would have been the good one, but they are skipping it to do two crap ones in a row?09/30/2014 - 5:41pm
Sora-ChanSo, judging from the poll post for #gamergate, it looks like too many thread replies breaks the ordering of posts, as seen with the recent post from Infophile.09/30/2014 - 5:31pm
Andrew EisenOr no! It wasn't Y3K compliant. Microsoft thought it best to super future proof its OS and skipped straight to 10 which is Y3K compliant!09/30/2014 - 5:01pm
Andrew EisenJust tell them it wasn't Y2K compliant.09/30/2014 - 5:00pm
Craig R.Looking forward to having to explain to coworkers down the road what ever happened to 9 *sigh*09/30/2014 - 4:57pm
Craig R.2k was crap. XP was solid, 7 is good, 8.1 is actually really good once you make it look like 7 :)09/30/2014 - 4:52pm
Sora-Chan@MP As someone who has used each version of windows since 3.1... I prefer Vista over 7 for various reasons. The only thing I give 7 over Vista is preformance. They really screwed up a bunch of things when making 7. Also, XP was a pain. 2k was better.09/30/2014 - 4:13pm
Jessy Hart@E. Zachary Knight Is that show called Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures?09/30/2014 - 3:34pm
IanCWin 8 isn't bad, it just can't decide whether to be a desktop OS or a tablet OS.09/30/2014 - 2:40pm
IanCI think its a way of getting round giving it free to Win 8 users...09/30/2014 - 2:39pm
MaskedPixelanteWindows alternates between bad and good versions. XP was good, Vista sucked, 7 was good, 8 sucked, therefore 10 will suck, QED.09/30/2014 - 2:18pm
E. Zachary KnightPerhaps they are calling it "10" because on a scale of 1-10 of how awesome it is, it is a clear 10.09/30/2014 - 2:06pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician