Disgraced Ex-Take Two CEO Agrees to Testify, Will Colleagues Do the Perp Walk?

Disgraced Ex-Take Two CEO Agrees to Testify, Will Colleagues Do the Perp Walk?

February 15, 2007
Take Two Interactive stockholders couldn't trust Ryan Brant (left) with their money, but apparently they could trust him to spend it.

The former Take Two CEO plead guilty yesterday to manipulating millions worth of company stock options. He also agreed to a lifetime ban on holding corporate office.

Who knows where the money went, but a Zillow search on Brant's home address (as provided by the Manhattan District Attorney's office) reveals a 5,895 square foot residence on Manhattan's Upper West Side. The house has an estimated value of more than $2.1 million.

That's a long way from Liberty City.

The New York Post reports this morning that in exchange for a plea bargain that will prevent jail time, Brant has agreed to testify against others:
Sources close to the investigation told The Post that Brant will aid the Manhattan district attorney's office and the SEC in building a case that centers on Take-Two's finances and its relationship with several game distribution companies...

In the latest probe, regulators are apparently eyeing the SoHo-based Take-Two's shipment of games. Last year, The Post reported that the company's internal distribution unit, Jack of All Games, had been extending payments to suppliers and had rising accounts receivable reserves - a form of protection against sharply dropping prices.

Bloomberg has more on the case, including word that supermodel Stephanie Seymour is Brant's stepmother. We note that Bloomberg reports Brant as residing in Bedford Corners, NY, not the Manhattan location mentioned by the D.A.'s office.

Take-Two itself was not a defendant in the case, and shares of its stock (TTWO) jumped $1.61 on news of Brant's guilty plea, closing yesterday at $20.97. The stock is up 18% for the year. Company spokesman Jim Ankner told Bloomberg: 
Ryan Brant is no longer an employee of the company, and it would not be appropriate to comment on any action of a private individual.

Despite the market's Wednesday optimism, analyst Michael Pachter of Wedbush Morgan, expressed caution, noting that Take Two has not reported on its earnings for the last three quarters:
I think it's crazy to assume everything's wonderful at Take Two without having real tangible evidence of their performance.

On that score, the NY Post adds this quote from an unnamed source:
"Dealing with the [back-dated] options is easy - it's a straightforward accounting adjustment," the source said. "The reason they can't file, and that there is absolutely no guidance on when they will, is that [regulators have] doubts as to what is really there."

The Bloomberg report also raises questions as to whether further indictments may be pending in the Take Two case:
In his plea agreement, Brant, who appeared in court with a shaved head, promised to 'disclose all information' he has 'concerning any criminal conduct' and to testify, as the district attorney may require.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Ryan Brant DID NOT agree to testify against anyone, it's false reporting by the tabloidy NY POST and Take-Two longtime hater Roddy Boyd. This is from someone close to Ryan Brant himself.
There's a blog written by a guy named Mark Seremet who claims to be a Take 2 Co-Founder: markeseremet.blogspot.com. Does anyone know if this guy reallly was Brant's partner?
Sounds like typical corporate "hot potato" I hope this dose not damage take two theya re the foundation that holds up acouple worth while devs and I would hate to the devs go to some cookie cutter micro manage publisher that will destroy the dev because they only care about the IP's of the games they ahve..
This is definitely an interesting story and it appears as though the soap opera that is Take-Two is far from over yet. I am really curious as to how the company's earnings have been as in the period they have not been reporting, they've had a number of hit titles released. I'm very interested to hear who he names in this but I'm curious how severe these accusations will be. Much of this information is coming from the New York Post which is run by (and has as much credibility as) the company who owns Fox News. Needless to say it's a "news" organization that isn't a stranger to printing unconfirmed thigns as fact in order to stir up hype. Much as Take-Two has taken some stupid missteps lately, I hope they pull out of it and continue to thrive and more competition, not less is what this industry needs.
My main hope on this is that he who shall remain nameless will latch ont othis case like a lamprey.

I hope this pans out well for TT.
Crap, I worded that wrong, I'm actually hoping that doesn't happen. *curses the lack of an edit button*
Why do I keep imaging a giant mob case coming out of this?
You're not far off in that thinking. Ryan Brant has an interesting history of running companies in what can politely be described as "gray ways." Before founding Take-Two, he was among the many who ran GameTek into the ground (I believe he got the name Take-Two from it being his next attempt at running a game company.) He also is rumored to be the one responsible for a lot of the infighting on Take-Two's board and putting people in key places who also worked for questionable companies (Take-Two's current CEO Paul Eibeler was one of the executives in charge of Acclaim during their rapid plummet to the bottom.) He's also thought to be the one largely responsible for Take-Two's numerous financial scandals that have come to light in recent years (and obviously, he was the one behind the options backdating.) I see this getting more crazy from here.
Hey Dennis, Carl Icahn sold a portion of his holdings (900K shares), he didn't "dump" the stock. I believe he still owns 1.9 million shares.

George Soros just bought 1 million shares.

Steven Cohen (SAC Capital, one of the biggest and best hedge funds on Wall Street) bought 4 million shares.

These are not dumb people Dennis, they wouldn't be buying a stock of a troubled company as Roddy Boyd would want us to believe. Roddy Boyd is the mouthpiece of Marc Cohodes, the hedge fund with known short position in Take-Two for years. Show me a single positive piece from Roddy Boyd, check out the title of his latest story on Ryan Brant. Roddy Boyd has a vendetta against Take-Two, he is one despicable individual!!!

The story about their distribution business has been investigated to death and the SEC settled with them in 2005, the people who were involved are long gone from Take-Two, and I doubt the current management team is stupid enough to do anything that would raise the SEC suspicions again. Note that the SEC and New York DA investigation have centered on issues prior to 2003.

I'll be emailing you soon
The NY Post is known to have connections to a short hedge fund that bets against the stock of the company, Rocker Partners, and anything they say should be taken with a grain of salt. Someone connected to the current CEO thinks Brant will be testifying against two former financial officers.

Take-Two will be fine, George Soros, Carl Icahn, and Steve Cohen have been buying its stock like crazy, people should follow the big money. The hedge fund that is spreading rumors to the NY Post is scared shitless they may lose big time money.
@Take Two Investor:

I assume you saw the news regarding Icahn dumping the stock?

I'd be happy to discuss this with you further. Why don't you e-mail me?
Daniel, it's hard to evaluate what you say since we don't know who you are. In any case, Mr. Brant should weigh in on that topic.

It is fairly common for convicted criminals to receive lesser sentences in return for their testimony, however.

Not just the NY Post, but the NY Times has reported on prosecutorial suspicions about T2's distribution partners:

http://gamepolitics.com/2006/10/30/new-york-times-paints-a-sleazy-picture-of-take-two/

Also, Daniel, Bloomberg is reporting on a "cooperation" agreement between Brant and prosecutors. To me, that would indicate that testimony is likely: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aV1QGFjhPY8s&refer=home

"Brant, who founded the company in 1993 at age 21, will help prosecutors continue the investigation of Take-Two, according to Morgenthau. In his plea agreement, Brant, who appeared in court with a shaved head, promised to "disclose all information'' he has ``concerning any criminal conduct'' and to testify, as the district attorney may require."

...only time will tell.
Yes.. Im sure you have no bias what so ever.


I hate George Soros. Filth.
That was directed at take-two investor.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 07:00am
Austin_Lewis: That Alabama school shooting is supposedly gang related, according to the shooter's lawyer.
Posted 02/08/10 at 10:22pm
JDKJ: Landrieu. That's a good Cajun name. I ga-run-tee.
Posted 02/08/10 at 09:36pm
BearDogg-X: New Orleans elected Sen. Mary Landrieu's brother, Lt. Governor Mitch Landrieu as mayor Saturday night.
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:22pm
Valdearg: J/K, btw, with that last comment. Just in case anyone was confused.
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:21pm
Valdearg: This comes on the heels of Sarah Palin telling the Teaparty Convention to pray for Divine intervention to stop the Progressive tide. It seems she succeeded in recruiting the big man to offer some help. >.<
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:20pm
Valdearg: @A_L: I'm hearing that, as well.. It seems the dems aren't just losing seats via elections... :(
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:04pm
DarkSaber: Did he design Big Murtha Truckers 1 & 2?
Posted 02/08/10 at 01:50pm
Austin_Lewis: John Murtha reportedly deceased.
Posted 02/08/10 at 01:04pm
Shadow D. Darkman: DarkSaber: (EDIT) IDC really, it's just good to see some new stuff here.
Posted 02/08/10 at 01:02pm
DarkSaber: @Shadow If the on-going spat in China over WoW counts as "new" at least. Does anyone here REALLY give a shit about the state of chinas game industry anyway?
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:59pm
gellymatos: Oh, we pro-life advocates have our nutjuobs to (ie, guys who shoot up abortion clincs). We can have worse ones than yours.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:58pm
Shadow D. Darkman: Finally, new articles!
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:57pm
Valdearg: @Gelly: As much as I hate to admit it, it's because so many of us on the Left are utterly predictable with our outrage, LOL.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:57pm
gellymatos: Oh, and the boycotting didn't get that much attention to be a real blow to pro-choice advocates either.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:52pm
gellymatos: ...predict such a bad move by what is not considered a stupid group.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:50pm
gellymatos: How can you script someone boycotting the super bowl over such a trivial ad. An ad they must have seen before hand. You can't...
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:47pm
Valdearg: There are plenty of bright people in Marketing, and this struck me as too perfect, and too scripted to have been just a byproduct of some lucky stroke of luck on FotF's part.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:46pm
Valdearg: You are so quick to disqualify the possibility that it was planned. I'm not saying that it necessarily WAS as I describe it, but I certainly believe it a very real possibility.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:42pm
gellymatos: ...that. However, that doesn't strike me as something predictable. Was it a bonus? Yes. Was it planned to be so? No.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:41pm
DarkSaber: Ah right here we go again, someone disagrees with Val therefore they don't know what they are talking about.
Login or register to post shouts