Parents Television Council Weighs in on Indiana Video Game Bill

Parents Television Council Weighs in on Indiana Video Game Bill

February 21, 2007
Yesterday, GamePolitics reported on a new piece of video game legislation working its way through the Indiana State Senate.The measure, SB0238, would restrict sales of M- and AO-rated games to underage buyers. Clerks who sell such games to kids would be subject to fines of up to $1,000.

Today's Indianapolis Star carries an op-ed by Tim Winter (left), president of the Parents Television Council. Winter, who supports the measure, writes:
It is no exaggeration to say that video games can help create killers... Currently, a 10-year-old could purchase a Mature (M-rated) or Adult Only (AO-rated) video game. Voluntary guidelines tell retailers not to sell these products to children, but they have been a failure...

The evidence is conclusive: Countless independent studies confirm that repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term affect on children...

If these games are marketed to and manufactured for adults, as the industry insists, then their sale to minors should be restricted. This solution protects our children without interfering with the rights of adults...

Video game stores have failed to police themselves.

Comments

""It is no exaggeration to say that video games can help create killers… Currently, a 10-year-old could purchase a Mature (M-rated) or Adult Only (AO-rated) video game. Voluntary guidelines tell retailers not to sell these products to children, but they have been a failure…"""

no exaggeration? of course it's an exageration. and bulls--t in the fullest.

"""The evidence is conclusive: Countless independent studies confirm that repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term affect on children…"""

Show me ONE.


"""If these games are marketed to and manufactured for adults, as the industry insists, then their sale to minors should be restricted. This solution protects our children without interfering with the rights of adults…"""

No, it doesn't, because it simply turns them into a black market-ish item, and turns game stores into adult stores, which is disgusting.


"""Video game stores have failed to police themselves."""

Would you like some truth with those lies sir?
@ GoodRobotUs

There is already such a word: "bullsh*t". There was a segment on the daily show a few months ago about it.
hydrocodone online...

news...
"People in the PTC are the kind of people who would get into an argument with their Rice Crispies because they thought they heard “snap, crackle, @#$@ you!”."

No, they vaguely hear is and try to ban Rice Krispies just in case another fragile kid heard it.

As for this, I can imagine the PTC hearign soemthing in court that they probably never heard before" No.
Did anyone check out the blog for the Indy Star? Winter doesn't have a single supporter on the comments.
Mysticgamer:

When HotCoffee hit, it was rerated as AO. They would supply stickers to stores, but most stores simply sent it back. GameStop had signs in the windows and standup ads but still refused to sell it to me.

My description of what happened then
What I can't understand is how anybody can take ego-centric, dellusional, elitest, knee-jerk, reactionary, crackpot, moralist blowhards like this seriously. This guy is just spewing out the same ignorant bulls*** that has been thrown out in every single court. If these "studies" are so convincing than why haven't any of the courts ruled in their favor yet. People like Tim Winter need to be exposed for what they are which are Evil, disgusting, freedom hating pigs with a sinister agenda.
Where can they get an AO game? I had trouble finding GTA:SA after it was rerated.

I heard about this happening but to be honest I've never seen GTA: SA with
an AO rating anywhere...even when they rereleased it as a greatest hit.
@Muetank
That is an insult, equating George Carlin to the PTC, especially when they have diametrically opposing views. Carlin specifically says "@#$% the children. This is Mr. Conductor talking; I know what I'm talking about!". We as a society dote over children too much and turn the world into a nanny state. "What happened to, 'the kid who swallows too many marbles doesn't grow up to have kids of his own'?"

Winter sounds like he might be a good golfing buddy for Laddy Jack. They both have the same skewed perception of reality and the same regard for the facts (ie: none). Too bad no one is filing suit against agenda-pushing, ego-stroking braggarts like these.
I don't know how people can take the PTC seriously. People in the PTC are the kind of people who would get into an argument with their Rice Crispies because they thought they heard "snap, crackle, @#$@ you!". It's absolutly astounding that they have "Evidence" that video games cause violence. When I haven't found any conclusive evedence in my life EVER!
Well, I for one wanted to buy GTA:SA AO and being 21, I could not find a single store that would even order it for me unless bought it online. So I for one can not belive that a 10 year old can walk into a store and buy an AO game. After reading into this artical a little more I came to the conclusion that this guy is full of ****. People like him should not be in the public spot light, due to their shear ignorance.
They always leave a little off that statement about how a kid can buy an AO game.

The part they drop look like this

"under law. However it would be unconstitutional to restrict it under law. We also would like you to disregard the fact that 99% of retailers do not carry AO games, there are less than 30 AO rated games in the ESRB history, and most retailers have policies in place that say you have to be 17+ to buy an M rated game."

But hey! Thats a mouthful to say. Its also pretty inconvenient when you have an agenda you want to push. Sure your point is moot too but hey, the people don't need worry their pretty little heads, you got your best... I mean their best interests at heart.
"- Its no exaggeration to say that dinner can help create killers.

Lets stop feeding our kids dinner (or any other meals), and i can guarantee they wont go on to become killers"


It's no exaggeration to say that sex creates killers. If people stopped copulating, killers would stop being born.
I know it is best to open with a joke, but really it would be a good idea to make sure the content that follows isn't in the same tone. Seriously, leave the truthiness to Stephen Colbert.
@Rubix

I wouldn't trust them at all, just as I doubt their sincerity. So, they're not as bad, but in the core of it, their interests are probably all the same between all similar organizations.
"All the uproar, and the complaints to the FCC about indecency on TV? 90% of that is the PTC."

Actually, FCC statistics put it closer to 99.8% of all complaints filed are by PTC members.
And here I was, proud of my state for having not attempted to draft ridiculous legislation in some time.
"If these games are marketed to and manufactured for adults, as the industry insists, then their sale to minors should be restricted."

M-rated games are marketed to and manufactured for 17-year olds as well, and last time I checked, they were considered minors. PTC fails.
"It is no exaggeration to say that video games can help create killers… Currently, a 10-year-old could purchase a Mature (M-rated) or Adult Only (AO-rated) video game. Voluntary guidelines tell retailers not to sell these products to children, but they have been a failure…"

Tim Winter likes to use what I call the "Fibonacci Kool-Aid Approach". First, make one claim that's dubious at best (e.g. "video games create killers") and use it as your major premise. Next, create a bunch of increasingly unfounded claims, either express or implied, that sprout from the original premise (e.g. "since the game industry has failed to regulate sales to minors, our children are in grave danger"). There's no need to verify anything because you are your own primary reference point. Bill O'Reilly, for one, has mastered this art.
"It is no exaggeration to say that video games can help create killers"

*sigh*
I should start all my ill-informed opinions with the phrase "It is no exaggeration to say..."
'It is no exaggeration to say that video games can help create killers'

- Its no exaggeration to say that dinner can help create killers.

Lets stop feeding our kids dinner (or any other meals), and i can guarantee they wont go on to become killers

@GoodRobotUs: The technical term for that is sophistry, which is what this is.
The UCLU, PTC, the NIMF... these are just some of the groups that are a thorn in the side of the game industry. The NIMF isn't nearly as bad as the first two groups however, though the UCLU hasn't done much but support controversial topics in fairly bad ways. The PTC is about as credible as the Western Baptist guys.
"That’s a bit shy of the 65% in the reports I read."

Remember, i nthe mind of a psycho conservative anything below 200% is considered a completl failure. If it's below 100, that means 100% are getting these games


And all this coming from known users of lies adn bully tactics. Shouldn't they be busy tryign to ban half the Discovery network's programming?
@wolf

"If these guys are anything like NIMF, then bloody hell…not another psycho-conservative group."

Like NIMF? No, the PTC is much worse. NIMF from what I've gathered is more about informing parents, letting them make their own decisions.

The PTC on the other hand would like nothing better then to shape media to what they think is right. Remember all that crap with Janet Jackson and her infamous nipple? All the uproar, and the complaints to the FCC about indecency on TV? 90% of that is the PTC.
The evidence is conclusive... None is the new Countless
Long-term, huh? So where are these studies that started at least ten years ago and recently re-examined the children? Or by long-term, do you mean that two minutes after playing the game, the child honked a horn a little louder than the one that was playing the Sims™. I'd bet money that a kid playing DDR, or football would also honk the horn louder.
The article also makes it sound like the stores have a 0% success rating. That any kid can buy an M-rated game at any time without fear of being carded. That's a bit shy of the 65% in the reports I read.
If these guys are anything like NIMF, then bloody hell...not another psycho-conservative group.

@Terminator44

Hey, now! I've done independant studies before! There's the one where I concluded that fatness is actually caused by alien bacteria which originates from the Andromeda galaxy. Then the one where I found out that porn/hentai can cure the common cold. Oh! My most memorable one is that it IS possible to create a elephant/pig hybrid. And I happen to know for a FACT! that the human race started on the SR388, stole ships from the Space Pirates, and crashlanded on Earth.
"And I am willing to argue this point until nothing makes sense anymore, and if that doesn't work, the hours upon hours of whining will." - Red Mage, 8Bit Theater

(excuse the double post)
wait wait.... profanity in video games has a lasting long term harm on children now too?

psycholinguistics aside, I find that bit even harder to swallow then the usual explitve. I could almost see the argument that video game violence desensitizes one to violence. And I guess the idea that sexual imagry in video games desensitizes minors to sex, which for reasons that baffle me is considered immoral,...

But language? Arbitrary symbols for strong messages is not going to damage anyone. The damager is done by people telling the children that these symbols are bad and evil and that they should not hear or use them.

Words are words, they have only the meaning and impact people assign to them. naughty language is only such because people have made it up as such. Thus the only harm is being done by the anti-profanity people taking their arbitrary take on language out on confused kids.

Ok, rant over ^_^
“Currently, a 10-year-old could purchase a Mature (M-rated) or Adult Only (AO-rated) video game.”

Where can they get an AO game? I had trouble finding GTA:SA after it was rerated.


Obviously, he must be referring to the army of ten year olds with credit cards ordering the uncensored version of Leisure Suit Larry: Magna Cum Laude off Amazon.com.
"Currently, a 10-year-old could purchase a Mature (M-rated) or Adult Only (AO-rated) video game."

Where can they get an AO game? I had trouble finding GTA:SA after it was rerated.
While Brent Bozell may no longer be head of the PTC (he stepped down last year), I see he did well in choosing a succussor. From this piece, I can see Tim Winter just as big a reactionary and delusional nut as he was!
“The evidence is conclusive: Countless independent studies confirm that repeated exposure to the parents television council has a harmful and long-term affect on children, adults and politicians…”
I'd love to hear someone put these politicians on the spot and ask *what* studies they're basing these accusations on. I've never seen them name a specific study; no doubt they don't even know whether such studies have been done, they've just been told that they have by some intern.

"It is no exaggeration to say that video games can help create killers…"

It's a HUGE exaggeration. Saying that it's not an exaggeration is pretty much a flat-out lie at best, and libel at worst.

"The evidence is conclusive"

No, it's not. Not by a long, long shot - and I have a long list of court judgements (and bills for legal fees) that back my position up. What've you got?

"Video game stores have failed to police themselves."

Maybe, but I'd submit that parents have failed their children by not making an effort to involve themselves in their child's life.
No, he's got a point. Video games CAN help create killers. They can also help create ice cream. Don't believe me? Well I have 15 scientific studies that conclusively prove that video games can create ice cream. If you argue this point you're obviously a spokesman for this corrupt and evil industry.
'Countless independent studies confirm that repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term affect on children…'

I think I'm going to coin a new phrase of 'anti-fact', it is a comment that is designed to do as much damage to the truth as possible, worse than a lie, which is simply not the truth and doesn't care what the truth is, an anti-fact is deliberately targetted to damage the truth itself.
And the idiots just keep on coming.

http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/release/2007/0220.asp

As if Brownbacks bills has any prayer on earth.
"It is no exaggeration to say that video games can help create killers…"

Yes, yes it is. It is a MASSIVE exaggeration. This guy's opening line made me completely disregard the rest of the piece.
"The evidence is conclusive: Countless independent studies confirm that repeated exposure to graphic sexual, violent and profanity-laced video games has a harmful and long-term affect on children…"

You mean the same evidence that's been thrown out by the courts on every challenge to these kind of bills? Is that the "conclusive" evidence you're referring to? Well, genius, if the evidence is so overwhelming, how come it's never gotten a bill past a constitutional challenge?
best hyip...

making money from hyip business is doable, but high risk. How to...
Re:

They're not just fail. They're the fail of the century. No. EPIC fail.

Post new comment

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 09/05/08 at 06:11am
Flamespeak: Jade from Beyond Good and Evil is a good one. Too bad it didn't sell too good. Here's to the sequel.
Posted 09/05/08 at 06:10am
Flamespeak: Lara Croft = Sex object, Fat Princess = making fun of overweight women, Cooking Mama = women belong in kitchen.
Posted 09/05/08 at 06:09am
Flamespeak: You can't please feminists with any representation of women in video games, it seems.
Posted 09/05/08 at 05:47am
gamepolitics: he works on his crusade from home. I expect he will be disbarred, but will continue his crusade
Posted 09/05/08 at 05:46am
gamepolitics: I'm surprised people are taking that story so seriously... one of those oddball things. my choice of graphic is my commentary
Posted 09/05/08 at 01:50am
Flamespeak: To be fair, if you dismiss video games as contributors to violence in youth, it is hypocritical to say they cause heroism.
Posted 09/04/08 at 09:21pm
Tarosan: @gamepolitics has he actually lost his job or is on the verge of being disgraced forever?
Posted 09/04/08 at 09:21pm
HalfShadow: If either of you waste good music on him, I swear I will kill you.
Posted 09/04/08 at 09:19pm
Tarosan: I shall blare out "We are Champions" as soon as he gets sacked and post a celebration video on Youtube :P
Posted 09/04/08 at 07:45pm
King of Fiji: @Austin: Go try "I'm Going Slightly Mad" it describes Jack 's mind greatly. xD
Posted 09/04/08 at 07:25pm
Austin_Lewis: @King and Grizzam: I'm going to stand on my mansion's front porch with my Les Paul and Marshall half stack and play both.
Posted 09/04/08 at 07:17pm
ZippyDSMlee: gamepolitics: loseign the bar dose. mostly, hecan still sit in with other lawyers tho..
Posted 09/04/08 at 06:51pm
gamepolitics: He has no job to lose...
Posted 09/04/08 at 06:16pm
King of Fiji: @GRIZZAM PRIME: Instead of the standard "We Are the Champions" might I suggest trying "Hammer to Fall" instead? :D
Posted 09/04/08 at 05:49pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Jack's disbarment...I already have the giant speakers and the Queen CD rigged up...
Posted 09/04/08 at 04:40pm
Tarosan: I'm hoping Jack loses his job in two weeks... the stupidity in his posts is just well DUMB
Posted 09/04/08 at 03:18pm
ZippyDSMlee: Bannign is stupid,but regulating things for the use by the..er.. "mature" is not so bad.
Posted 09/04/08 at 03:01pm
ZippyDSMlee: SimonBob:and if he was drunk he would be a bad shot, at least at range(8+feet). 20+ proof needs to be reserved for 25ish+ year old while 5-12% beer and wine be approved for 18+.
Posted 09/04/08 at 02:59pm
ZippyDSMlee: SimonBob: why? a 6 pack or 2 would be enough to get anyone drunk, theres no point is banning the harder stuff. sipping the harder stuff in small shot glasses having about. 15oz of it is alot better than drinking 10 12oz cans in a row..... and if he wa
Posted 09/04/08 at 02:53pm
SimonBob: You guys suck at this. The article says Gill drank "2 to 7 drinks a day, including the day of the shooting" and not one of you
Login or register to post shouts