Nuclear Detonation: Latest Scene from the Class Struggle in Second Life

Nuclear Detonation: Latest Scene from the Class Struggle in Second Life

February 26, 2007
Is it virtual terrorism, or just part of the game?

The Los Angeles Times reports on growing tensions in the popular Second Life MMO as old school inhabitants confront with an influx of new players and corporate inhabitants.

One angry player decided to express his frustration by detonating a vitual nuke:
Like any pioneer, Marshal Cahill arrived in a new world curious and eager to sample its diversions. Over time, though, he saw an elite few grabbing more than their share. They bought up all the plum real estate. They awarded building contracts to friends. They stifled free speech.

Cahill saw a bleak future, but he felt powerless to stop them. So he detonated an atomic bomb outside an American Apparel outlet. Then another outside a Reebok store.

Cahill is described as the political officer for the Second Life Liberation Army, which maintains its own website.  The SLLA is pressuring Second Life publisher Linden Lab to give residents greater say in how the game operates.

The recent nuclear detonations were only the latest act of defiance by SLLA members. In 2006 they shot customers outside American Apparel and Reebok stores - in the game, of course. No one got hurt, but the virtual shootings and nukings do have the effect of disrupting the user experience.

Said University of Michigan professor - and Second Life resident - Peter Ludlow:
The utopian age has passed. You're seeing these little indigenous communities and fantastical creatures being forced out by 20th century corporations coming in.

Added frustrated SL player Catherine Fitzpatrick:
One day, the elves were banging on their drums and making elf tunics. And the next thing you know, Nissan comes in and starts giving away free cars.

Comments

I found it so sad... Internet drama is totally uncalled for.
Never played Second Life. So would detonating a "nuke" actually cause "property" damage? Would it wreck the Reebok store in question? Or is nothing more than a temporary strain on the server and player video cards?

A nuke, huh? Now I'm almost considering getting an account just so I can make an Orbital Particle Cannon of Doom script.
I find it highly interesting and re-assuring that in an online "game" like SL people protest the actions of the admin in a way that utilizes in game functionality. it would also be interesting if the admins responded in game as well. theres nothing, from a gamer's prosepctive, more grand then a game where people protest within their roles, about whats going on in the game world
@Doctor Proctor

Agreed. The problem is that it is a catch 22 situation, it is a cycle that media consistently passes through, in fact, I'd almost say it's a defining factor of popular media. The cycle works something like...

1. New idea is created.
2. People discover and spread new idea as something different.
3. New Idea is commercialised.
4. Idea is now just another mainstream commercial product with associated Junk mail, Club Card and prolific advertising.
5. Return to 1.
This just in: Second Life gets more free publicity from the media.

Anytime anything interesting happens in SL, Linden Lab sends out press releases to all of their media tools to make sure they get as much publicity out of it as possible. This isn't politics in games, this is free marketing hype.

LL should be paying GP for this article.
o_O?

Virtual oppression and virtual terrorism? What's next? Virtual divorce court and virtual custody suits if someone virtually adopts one of the younger residents? What is the virtual world coming to??? I thought that the whole point was for it to BETTER than this one...not just some crappy knockoff that you have to pay monthly fees for.
Biggest.

Losers.

Ever.
@cyde weys

"better because it's politically motivated"- So, it's ok to behave like an immature jack@$$ if you're doing so for "The Cause"?
Considering how these things seem to normally play out on SL, I am surprised that a phallus was not somehow intigrated.
...................................
i....
....

wtf. o_O
@PanicButton42

I hope it doesn't come to that in this situation. Weapons of Mass Destruction are bad enough, the last thing needed would be Weapons of Mass Ejaculation.
To me, SL is just a visual chat forum with graphic, animation, and good clothing. I go there because I'm a part of the fury community- and not in the sense of the people who dress up in fursuits, just the guys who draw stuff like Bugs Bunny and similar things. I just talk. That someone gets riled up over virtual economy and real estate, just doesn't seem logical.
...
Incidently, I did see a homage to the Phlying-Phallus incident playing out at Rainbow Tiger Canyon. I laughed hard.
Now that's my kind of griefing!
Some of these people seem to take the game much more seriously than reality.
This is an excellent example of why SL is not anywhere near a real-world model. It can be done in the game? Then it's the game. Knowing that major disruptions in the game are getting more frequent and grand, I'd really consider how much of my own money is placed in this thing.
SL if nothing more then a giant cpu eating version of MSN messenger. Though i still like my Chief aramaki Avataur. Perhaps i should finish my section 9 team and then mobilize them.
Gee. Sociology professors could learn a lot from MMOs.
Foundation's Edge anyone?
Second Life was a terrible community to begin with. The biggest three staples are dance clubs, casinos, and stores. Now count in that about 3/ths of all of those are sex-related. Not to say that there aren't cool places to see, but to do anything in SL you either need money to buy the stuff, or time to learn how to make it.
The best you can do is find a niche community and stick with them and only them.
If you like to shop, you'd better pump money into the game because the economy is retarded. If you like to roleplay, well you'll probably end up in a Gorean RP area where it's pretty much a BDSM heavy Lord of the Rings (I shit you not).
If you just want to shoot people, well you're in luck. there's freebie weapons and crap all over the place and then you just head to a weapons sandbox and go crazy.

The only redeeming quality of the game is building.

I'll tell you now, the worst a nuke could do is lag some people who are trying to walk around. If it was really bad the sim (chunk of land) would crash for a few minutes and come back. On very rare cases will a sim crash cause any damage at all. Maybe a few objects will be gone but they can be respawned.
I dunno, this feels like the elitist hipsters getting all pissed off because there are all these new people who are being fans of their thing, and they want it all to themselves, without all those young punks.

And, frankly, I hate hipsters with the Fires Of a Thousand Suns (tm).
Maybe these people should stick with their first life, and not even get a second life. Why pay for clothes you will never wear :S
lol, internet drama
Wow thats cool! Its like V for Vendetta! SL doesnt look that appealing to me, but it does look like you can do whatever you want.

Isnt that cool though? On one side you have the elitest players that are unfair to everyone else, and on the other side, the rebels!! So cooooool!!!

At least you can do something about it though. How often are you treated unfairly on forums and other areas that have elitests in them? Now you get to fight back.

Viva La Reistance!
MMO Providers walk a very thin line in many ways, pushing the rules too far in any particular direction can ruin the experience. The whole point of an MMO is to be able to exist and experiment in a fantasy world.

People need to remember that a 'Nuke' in Second Life is purely a collection of instructions, it's not a real explosive device or anything like that. Yes, it seems extreme, but you can be certain that the four letters n-u-k-e will attract far more attention than it ought to.

What this person did is an act of disruption bought about by frustration, and some would argue that the frustration, at least, is valid, but describing what this person did as a 'Nuke' in official news sources is more or less the same as describing a computer virus as 'The next bubonic plague', it's a great sound-bite, but, strictly speaking, it could never be true.
I dunno, I took a look at this issue and I didn't find it to be a big deal at all. Specifically, calling terrorism is really misusing that word. All we're talking about is people goofing around in an online game. It could be described as griefing, at worst, but it's actually better than that because it's politically motivated (rather than being done just to disrupt others' gameplay experience).
@Phoenixzero. I have never played SL and I never intend to. I think the virtual world is being overhyped all over the internet and even in newspapers. It is basically in the news every day now. The only reason why they have an influx of players is because people want to check what the fuss is all about. If I wanted to replay real life, I would step outside instead.

I must say that Linden Labs are playing their marketing card very well lately, since a lot of the media is falling all over it. I also think that this "game" will eventually lead to taxation of in-game money. I certainly hope that the IRS or whatever organization will realize the difference between games such as SL and EQ, DAoC, WoW, etc. They can't allow to miss out on tax money forever. There are plenty of people who make money through games only but yet they don't pay any taxes. Eventhough taxes can be annoying, they are a necessary evil and everyone who makes money has to pay his/her share.
Nuke Detonation: Latest Sign of the Class Struggle in Second Life...

...
Wow, talk about biting the hand that feeds you. This is absolutely shocking to me, but not in that disgusting way, more in that utter shock kinda way. What I'm not to clear on is why the game company continues to put up with these characters.
Anyone here played SL? I did for a couple days, I wish I could get that time back. Talk about absolute boredom. On top of that it loaded extremely slowly (not my computer or connection's fault) and half the time textures didn't even bother showing up.
The worst it would do is lag or a game crash. I've messed around in Second Life, and I love my Blue Falcon and Delorean time machinw vehicles I can zoom around in.
The 21st century may be a bright generation, but question is, will we live to the day we see futuristic products and weapons being made, not I doubt not (unless if we can live older and older enough).
The world's first 100% online Freedom Fighters? The 21st century is going to be a bright one indeed.
[...] SLLA a été fondé et dirigé par Marshal Cahill. SLLA a mené de nombreuses actions plus ou moins violentes “in world”. [...]
It was less terrorism than a politically motivated light show. The worst it could do was to cause lag. Other than that it's just pretty to look at.

I mean. If someone in a major city had an obcenely powerful spotlight. That would be the equivilent to what happened.
Interesting to me. I hope someone is studying the behavior of perople in the game, because I'm sure we could learn a great deal from how people 'live' in SL. I don't feel it matters what what 'real' damage this act causes, but the fact that the SLLA used a reality-modeled response to oppression (a real-world dilemma). Fascinating!
@Stetsonblade:

You need to get a sense of perspective. Screwing around in an online game isn't terrorism. At the worst, it's griefing.
@Cyde

It is terrorism, that isn't too strong of a word. The only reason you don't see it as terrorism is because people aren't dying, but the goal of these people is to cause terror. You said it is “better because it’s politically motivated", but you do realize that is what terrorism is all about? I find it surprising how many people do not really understand what terrorism is (not that you don't, I'm just stating a feeling here). Those same people are the ones who actually think we can win the "war agaisnt terror". That is so silly. I saw someone mention V for Vendetta in these comments earlier, and while that may be a movie or comic, depending on who you are and what you like more, there is a good point in it. Terrorism, for good or bad (yea i said good, it is a prespective thing, depending what side of the terror you're on) it is an idea. And you can never kill an idea. So as long as people are around, you'll have terrorism. So I am not surprised this is appearing in SL. But hey....SL sucks...so whatever :)
@james jones

I can just see it now... A nuke goes off in the city and the SLLA claims responsibility. The game admins respond by getting out the SWAT skins, shields, tear gas and automatic weapons in order to storm the SLLA headquarters...
BOO YAH serves those greedy corps right. thats some kick ass griefing
Re: Nuclear Detonation: Latest Scene from the Class Struggle in

At that moment she felt the proof of his rampant passion against her milky thighs...

Re: Nuclear Detonation: Latest Scene from the Class Struggle in

Stockholm was awsome! The coach of the Netherlands snowboard team is Swedish and from Stockholm.

Post new comment

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 09/05/08 at 06:11am
Flamespeak: Jade from Beyond Good and Evil is a good one. Too bad it didn't sell too good. Here's to the sequel.
Posted 09/05/08 at 06:10am
Flamespeak: Lara Croft = Sex object, Fat Princess = making fun of overweight women, Cooking Mama = women belong in kitchen.
Posted 09/05/08 at 06:09am
Flamespeak: You can't please feminists with any representation of women in video games, it seems.
Posted 09/05/08 at 05:47am
gamepolitics: he works on his crusade from home. I expect he will be disbarred, but will continue his crusade
Posted 09/05/08 at 05:46am
gamepolitics: I'm surprised people are taking that story so seriously... one of those oddball things. my choice of graphic is my commentary
Posted 09/05/08 at 01:50am
Flamespeak: To be fair, if you dismiss video games as contributors to violence in youth, it is hypocritical to say they cause heroism.
Posted 09/04/08 at 09:21pm
Tarosan: @gamepolitics has he actually lost his job or is on the verge of being disgraced forever?
Posted 09/04/08 at 09:21pm
HalfShadow: If either of you waste good music on him, I swear I will kill you.
Posted 09/04/08 at 09:19pm
Tarosan: I shall blare out "We are Champions" as soon as he gets sacked and post a celebration video on Youtube :P
Posted 09/04/08 at 07:45pm
King of Fiji: @Austin: Go try "I'm Going Slightly Mad" it describes Jack 's mind greatly. xD
Posted 09/04/08 at 07:25pm
Austin_Lewis: @King and Grizzam: I'm going to stand on my mansion's front porch with my Les Paul and Marshall half stack and play both.
Posted 09/04/08 at 07:17pm
ZippyDSMlee: gamepolitics: loseign the bar dose. mostly, hecan still sit in with other lawyers tho..
Posted 09/04/08 at 06:51pm
gamepolitics: He has no job to lose...
Posted 09/04/08 at 06:16pm
King of Fiji: @GRIZZAM PRIME: Instead of the standard "We Are the Champions" might I suggest trying "Hammer to Fall" instead? :D
Posted 09/04/08 at 05:49pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Jack's disbarment...I already have the giant speakers and the Queen CD rigged up...
Posted 09/04/08 at 04:40pm
Tarosan: I'm hoping Jack loses his job in two weeks... the stupidity in his posts is just well DUMB
Posted 09/04/08 at 03:18pm
ZippyDSMlee: Bannign is stupid,but regulating things for the use by the..er.. "mature" is not so bad.
Posted 09/04/08 at 03:01pm
ZippyDSMlee: SimonBob:and if he was drunk he would be a bad shot, at least at range(8+feet). 20+ proof needs to be reserved for 25ish+ year old while 5-12% beer and wine be approved for 18+.
Posted 09/04/08 at 02:59pm
ZippyDSMlee: SimonBob: why? a 6 pack or 2 would be enough to get anyone drunk, theres no point is banning the harder stuff. sipping the harder stuff in small shot glasses having about. 15oz of it is alot better than drinking 10 12oz cans in a row..... and if he wa
Posted 09/04/08 at 02:53pm
SimonBob: You guys suck at this. The article says Gill drank "2 to 7 drinks a day, including the day of the shooting" and not one of you
Login or register to post shouts