Did Take Two Exploit 9/11 Aftermath in Stock Option Scam?

Did Take Two Exploit 9/11 Aftermath in Stock Option Scam?

March 8, 2007
According to the Wall Street Journal, Grand Theft Auto publisher Take Two Interactive was one of several companies that may have used the post 9/11 stock market plunge to backdate stock options, thereby ensuring windfall profits for executives.

Citing the WSJ report, the Associated Press writes:
Several public companies have acknowledged backdating of stock options granted after Sept. 11, 2001, in the latest twist in the options-timing scandal that suggests some executives may have profited from Wall Street's plunge following the terror attacks...

Some companies recently have admitted to improperly dating options grants to executives and other employees to make it appear that they were awarded at low points in the companies' stock prices after Sept. 11...

Options can be made more lucrative by backdating their exercise price to a historically low point in the stock's value.

As reported by GamePolitics, former Take Two CEO Ryan Brant (left) recently plead guilty in the options scam.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
[...] Did Take Two Exploit 9/11 Aftermath in Stock Option Scam? Options can be made more lucrative by backdating their exercise price to a historically low point in the stock’s value. As reported by GamePolitics, former Take Two CEO Ryan Brant (left) recently plead guilty in the options scam. [...]
punishments should match the crime.

any less, or any more, is injustice. It should in itself be criminal.

making an example of someone is by definition punishing someone excessively to produce fear in others

permitting examples is permitting injustice.

which, by the way, doesn't do anything to deter crime.
how many people do you know that montor sentencing hearings?
honestly... if you get 'made an example of', no one but you will know about it.






in this case, the crime is hardly impressive. cheating the system...
if you can get 10 years for murder, then this deserves about 2 months jail.

think about it. no one was hurt. no *people* were even affected.
quite simply : *in case the company sold stock to people with these options*, it would make less money on the deal than it would have otherwise.

so really, unless they actually bought stock with their unlawful options, _nothing_ actaully changed.
if they did, the only thing affected was the corporate cash on hand. it grew by less than it would have otherwise.

unimpressive.
it amounts to stealing from the company... the company they are in charge of anyways.
meh'

the only people that would even remotely care are the regular stock holders. normal stock holders would be jealous, since they had to pay full price.

but still, normal stock holders weren't affected negatively. they just weren't affected positively like the executives. normal stock holders were still treated fairly. they just wish that they had been treated unfairly (in the positive sense) like the executives. pure emotion. no results.

just let the 'corporation' take the executives to court for attempt at theft.
would be funny having executives hire lawyers to take themselves to court. it tickles me.


-scheherazade
Congrats on not understanding anything about law.
I guess the SEC is just a buncha clueless noobs making things up as they go along.
Sheesh.
Pardon my lack of Shock-Horror, but as I've said before, if you are a company that gets caught doing this stuff, then you will be made an example of. Deterrence is a large factor in fraud cases, since there are very large expenditures involved in investigating.

The way a company is run is nothing to do whatsoever with the product it sells, however, sometimes I get annoyed that HC is mentioned in relation to this, even if, to be fair, they are only looking at its impact on TT's Stock Market presence.
Hmmm, taking advantage of a horrible tragedy in order to profit...

Why does that sound familiar? ;)
scheherazade
muders get set free daily so why are we hounding a poor rich guy...*rolls eyes*

I am sorry but it steal money from a company or harm it where investers lose money (Enron) then you need to be held to a HIGH standard and punished thusly,if you take a life in cold blood you should die as well.

then again....I see where you are going.....civilail suits can get far more nasty than criminal ones...mmmmm
Is it any worse than what Exxon, GE, or Halliburton have done?

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 07:00am
Austin_Lewis: That Alabama school shooting is supposedly gang related, according to the shooter's lawyer.
Posted 02/08/10 at 10:22pm
JDKJ: Landrieu. That's a good Cajun name. I ga-run-tee.
Posted 02/08/10 at 09:36pm
BearDogg-X: New Orleans elected Sen. Mary Landrieu's brother, Lt. Governor Mitch Landrieu as mayor Saturday night.
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:22pm
Valdearg: J/K, btw, with that last comment. Just in case anyone was confused.
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:21pm
Valdearg: This comes on the heels of Sarah Palin telling the Teaparty Convention to pray for Divine intervention to stop the Progressive tide. It seems she succeeded in recruiting the big man to offer some help. >.<
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:20pm
Valdearg: @A_L: I'm hearing that, as well.. It seems the dems aren't just losing seats via elections... :(
Posted 02/08/10 at 02:04pm
DarkSaber: Did he design Big Murtha Truckers 1 & 2?
Posted 02/08/10 at 01:50pm
Austin_Lewis: John Murtha reportedly deceased.
Posted 02/08/10 at 01:04pm
Shadow D. Darkman: DarkSaber: (EDIT) IDC really, it's just good to see some new stuff here.
Posted 02/08/10 at 01:02pm
DarkSaber: @Shadow If the on-going spat in China over WoW counts as "new" at least. Does anyone here REALLY give a shit about the state of chinas game industry anyway?
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:59pm
gellymatos: Oh, we pro-life advocates have our nutjuobs to (ie, guys who shoot up abortion clincs). We can have worse ones than yours.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:58pm
Shadow D. Darkman: Finally, new articles!
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:57pm
Valdearg: @Gelly: As much as I hate to admit it, it's because so many of us on the Left are utterly predictable with our outrage, LOL.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:57pm
gellymatos: Oh, and the boycotting didn't get that much attention to be a real blow to pro-choice advocates either.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:52pm
gellymatos: ...predict such a bad move by what is not considered a stupid group.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:50pm
gellymatos: How can you script someone boycotting the super bowl over such a trivial ad. An ad they must have seen before hand. You can't...
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:47pm
Valdearg: There are plenty of bright people in Marketing, and this struck me as too perfect, and too scripted to have been just a byproduct of some lucky stroke of luck on FotF's part.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:46pm
Valdearg: You are so quick to disqualify the possibility that it was planned. I'm not saying that it necessarily WAS as I describe it, but I certainly believe it a very real possibility.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:42pm
gellymatos: ...that. However, that doesn't strike me as something predictable. Was it a bonus? Yes. Was it planned to be so? No.
Posted 02/08/10 at 12:41pm
DarkSaber: Ah right here we go again, someone disagrees with Val therefore they don't know what they are talking about.
Login or register to post shouts