Congressman Stresses Parental Role in Game Choices

Congressman Stresses Parental Role in Game Choices

March 13, 2007
Gamers are becoming increasingly politically aware and some politicians seem to be paying attention. Witness the interaction between a game blog and Rep. James Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican.

Generation: Gamerz reports that Sensenbrenner took the trouble to respond to a letter generated via the Video Game Voters Network website. The Congressman's follow-up snail mail displays a clear grasp of the issues involved:
I understand that you enjoy playing video games and do not wish to see attempts to regulate them. As you know, some states have attempted to limit the distribution of particularly violent video games to minors. Such legislation raises First Amendment issues. Courts have held that video games are forms of expression deserving the same First Amendment protections as television or books...

I believe that parents have a responsibility to monitor the video games that their children play. Parents, not the government, are in the best position to educate children and restrict harmful material from them.

Comments

All of the posters praising James Sensenbrenner seem to have forgotten that this is the same guy who just a couple of years ago said that if anybody violated FCC decency rules they should be sent to PRISON. This guy would have sent Bono to jail because he accidently said f**k on a live broadcast. He was the most extreme voice out of alot of extreme voices in the decency debate after the Janet Jackson incident. I don't trust this guy as a supporter of the 1st amendment.
I have to also say that I trust Democrats way more than Republicans in 1st amendment issues. Yes Hillary Clinton and Joe Liberman made a big deal out of the Hot Coffee thing, but any one who reads GP regularly knows that just a few weeks ago that came out in praise of the ESRB and its efforts to to do a better job rating games. Meanwhile, shortly after that, Christian Right Republican Sam Brownback introduced legislation that would require the ESRB to play games to 100% completion before giving them a rating. If this passes, wouldn;t this eliminate open-ended games like WoW? Those of you who think that the Republican party is going to go back to it's small gov't roots are deluding yourselves. As long as the Christian Right remains prominent in the GOP, Republicans will continue to act like old-time Southern Democrats who support big govt solutions. Hillary Clinton may have made a big deal out of Hot Coffee, but notice she worked it out with the ESRB.
I'm happy this guy actually made a little sense, but I'm very skeptical. When one of those stupid "watchdog" organizations starts to raise hell, sometimes people suddenly flip-flop.
It's nice to see a story here that has a politician supporting games rather than censoring them for a change. Three Cheers for Congressman Sensenbrenner!

@ Brokenscope
Preach on Brother!
Parties don't tell you enough about a politician anymore. Parties are not always what they were 10, 20, or 30 years ago. Calling yourself a Conservative or a Liberal has no bearing on what you do anymore. What you do determines what you are.

Anyways, his party doesn't matter at this point. His ability to respect the constitution is all that is important. We would all be better off if more of our pols, left, right, center, top, bottom, back, front, black, white, inverted, Technicolor, smart, stupid, fat, thin, bald, touped, whatever would respect it.

Its also nice when a pol manages to be well informed about something, even if they disagree with you.
A tip o' the hat to Rep. James Sensenbrenner, a wag o' the finger if he doesn't practice what he preaches.

(Yes, I stole that style from Colbert)
@ GoodRobotUs

Just another piece of proof that the liberals in America ain't liberal for shit. But then again, the US conservatives aren't all that regressive, either.
finally, a politician who actually knows their shit
@GoodRobotUs

I agree, but especially due to the fact that they keep trying. In the end, it's going to really hurt. But I do think there will also be the "you tried to censore" kind of thought, but not necessarily in that way, but rather, as a question to their understand of free speech, or in a more direct wording, First Amendment protections, and a question of their reasonability.
A Republican talking about personal responsibility?! I can't remember if this is a return to core values or not...
Apologies, I meant 'Democrat House' in the last post, not 'Republican House'.
Personally, I think the Democrats are digging their own graves by targetting modern culture as an 'evil thing'. It is neither good nor evil, it simply is what it is used for.

Certainly, it's never going to be a serious factor in 2008, but, in the case of computer games, the Republican house is simply for what it can grab in the next election, and not realising the kind of debts they are running up from people who are children now, the government will have to answer to those 'brain-addled teens' as adults at some point.

So yes, in the technophobia department, and regardless of my own personal politics, which are English anyway, it seems to me that the Democrats may be planting a seed of discontent among the youth, and that seed will be harvested one day, not as a direct 'You tried to censor computer games' kind of way but more a 'You don't have a clue about any culture under 50 years old' kind of way.
Damn right, here's something that support parental responsibility (see Lawrence Rosenkoetter):
http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/newsarch/2002/Aug02/violent.htm
http://oregonstate.edu/cla/psychology/research/
It's sad that we no longer expect to hear such truthful summarisation from a politician anymore. I guess my political beliefs make me a little shocked to see a Republican actually being the one to say it, but all credit to him. Nice to see someone clued in before making a soundbite.
@ James Jones -

Firstly, I'm about as far away from republican as you can get :)

However, I respect some of the conservative ideals of lesser government regulation and personal responsibility. I also think that some of the older conservatives, being bought out by the neo-con movement to legislate morality are getting further from the ideas and principals of conservatism.

This congressman gets it right. It's a free speech issue, its a constitutional issue and it's a personal responsibility issue. While I may disagree with him on tax law or foreign relations, it's always good to see that there is some common ground for responsible action.
I love it when we have intelligent politicians. Too bad not all are like this.
whys it got to be republicans, a group that would stop just short of calling you a terrorist if you didn't agree with them(sometimes not even that), that deside to take the constitutional approach to video games?
With so few politicians openly against this anti-game legislation, anyone who can be counted on this list is welcome.

Thanks for getting it right, Sensenbrenner.
its about friggin time.
Woah, now. Did someone slip me acid or some shrooms while I was asleep? Am I just really trippin out right now, and this story is a fragment of my hallucinating imagination?
This is a very nice piece of information, that parents actually HAVE a responsibility with their kids. However, since the end result is not "video games are the sole problem in the world today", there's a good chance no one's going to take it seriously.

But good for them, saying that parents have a responsibility to parent their kids, rather than having the government do it for them.
Keep to this train of thought and we voters wont have to slam your balls to the wall.

Censoring games is the same as censoring any over the counter media,this leads to bad things.....
All hail pod people! Are we really sure a politician said this?

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 10/08/08 at 05:15am
gamepolitics: er... pass.
Posted 10/07/08 at 10:09pm
C. Aaron Browbowski Jr.: @ Dennis: You need to be smoking a dimebag if you want to enjoy games on facebook, and stomach crappy movies at the matinee
Posted 10/07/08 at 09:00pm
HalfShadow: FACEBOOK sucks. What were you expecting?
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:56pm
gamepolitics: is it just me or do those little facebook games all suck?
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:45pm
Alteffor: @JustChris - Some people have an offensive sense of humour. Some people take it a bit too far, and they offend people. It's life. Also, spreading what they do around the internet is not the best response, its what they want.
Posted 10/07/08 at 05:24pm
gamepolitics: ST, there are way too many...
Posted 10/07/08 at 04:06pm
JustChris: LittleBigPlanet and 9/11...wow http://www.ripten.com/2008/10/07/jackass-remakes-911-with-littlebigplanet-flys-sackb
Posted 10/07/08 at 03:52pm
sortableturnip: Yeah girl in glasses...ever hear of a Nintendo DS?
Posted 10/07/08 at 03:20pm
Freyar: nobody sasses a girl in glasses.. except when she's being stupid.
Posted 10/07/08 at 02:51pm
sortableturnip: @GP: Any emails/faxes that JT sends
Posted 10/07/08 at 01:32pm
DarkSaber: lol, guess it was a matter of time! They even madea Doom one! But you can't beat a game of FRAG!
Posted 10/07/08 at 01:30pm
gamepolitics: Halo board game showed up here today? Didn't even know there was one.
Posted 10/07/08 at 01:30pm
gamepolitics: u mean the ones in the countdown thread? they are verbatim...
Posted 10/07/08 at 12:12pm
sortableturnip: GP, can you post JT's emails into the JT thread over at the eca forums...I love a good laugh :D
Posted 10/07/08 at 11:31am
E. Zachary Knight: No, the link is the same
Posted 10/07/08 at 11:18am
gamepolitics: should the link be changed in the article, EZK?
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:56am
E. Zachary Knight: http://www.ezknight.net/jtdisbar_ext.php
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:56am
E. Zachary Knight: The JT Disbar add-on has been updated to version 0.7.5
Posted 10/07/08 at 07:33am
ZippyDSMlee: Dark Sovereign: the proper reply would be So you want a quick dry rub with cloths on? ba dum dum bish!
Posted 10/07/08 at 04:58am
gamepolitics: GP is on Twitter. Follow gamepolitics for Twitter updates.
Login or register to post shouts