
Gamers are becoming increasingly politically aware and some politicians seem to be paying attention. Witness the interaction between a game blog and Rep. James Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican.
Generation: Gamerz reports that Sensenbrenner took the trouble to respond to a letter generated via the
Video Game Voters Network website. The Congressman's follow-up snail mail displays a clear grasp of the issues involved:
I understand that you enjoy playing video games and do not wish to see attempts to regulate them. As you know, some states have attempted to limit the distribution of particularly violent video games to minors. Such legislation raises First Amendment issues. Courts have held that video games are forms of expression deserving the same First Amendment protections as television or books...
I believe that parents have a responsibility to monitor the video games that their children play. Parents, not the government, are in the best position to educate children and restrict harmful material from them.
Comments
I have to also say that I trust Democrats way more than Republicans in 1st amendment issues. Yes Hillary Clinton and Joe Liberman made a big deal out of the Hot Coffee thing, but any one who reads GP regularly knows that just a few weeks ago that came out in praise of the ESRB and its efforts to to do a better job rating games. Meanwhile, shortly after that, Christian Right Republican Sam Brownback introduced legislation that would require the ESRB to play games to 100% completion before giving them a rating. If this passes, wouldn;t this eliminate open-ended games like WoW? Those of you who think that the Republican party is going to go back to it's small gov't roots are deluding yourselves. As long as the Christian Right remains prominent in the GOP, Republicans will continue to act like old-time Southern Democrats who support big govt solutions. Hillary Clinton may have made a big deal out of Hot Coffee, but notice she worked it out with the ESRB.
@ Brokenscope
Preach on Brother!
Anyways, his party doesn't matter at this point. His ability to respect the constitution is all that is important. We would all be better off if more of our pols, left, right, center, top, bottom, back, front, black, white, inverted, Technicolor, smart, stupid, fat, thin, bald, touped, whatever would respect it.
Its also nice when a pol manages to be well informed about something, even if they disagree with you.
(Yes, I stole that style from Colbert)
Just another piece of proof that the liberals in America ain't liberal for shit. But then again, the US conservatives aren't all that regressive, either.
I agree, but especially due to the fact that they keep trying. In the end, it's going to really hurt. But I do think there will also be the "you tried to censore" kind of thought, but not necessarily in that way, but rather, as a question to their understand of free speech, or in a more direct wording, First Amendment protections, and a question of their reasonability.
Certainly, it's never going to be a serious factor in 2008, but, in the case of computer games, the Republican house is simply for what it can grab in the next election, and not realising the kind of debts they are running up from people who are children now, the government will have to answer to those 'brain-addled teens' as adults at some point.
So yes, in the technophobia department, and regardless of my own personal politics, which are English anyway, it seems to me that the Democrats may be planting a seed of discontent among the youth, and that seed will be harvested one day, not as a direct 'You tried to censor computer games' kind of way but more a 'You don't have a clue about any culture under 50 years old' kind of way.
http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/newsarch/2002/Aug02/violent.htm
http://oregonstate.edu/cla/psychology/research/
Firstly, I'm about as far away from republican as you can get :)
However, I respect some of the conservative ideals of lesser government regulation and personal responsibility. I also think that some of the older conservatives, being bought out by the neo-con movement to legislate morality are getting further from the ideas and principals of conservatism.
This congressman gets it right. It's a free speech issue, its a constitutional issue and it's a personal responsibility issue. While I may disagree with him on tax law or foreign relations, it's always good to see that there is some common ground for responsible action.
Thanks for getting it right, Sensenbrenner.
But good for them, saying that parents have a responsibility to parent their kids, rather than having the government do it for them.
Censoring games is the same as censoring any over the counter media,this leads to bad things.....
Post new comment