Will Wright: "Toys Can Change the World"

Will Wright: "Toys Can Change the World"

March 14, 2007
...and by toys, he means video games.

As reported by Cnet, Will Wright spoke last week at the Technology, Entertainment and Design Conference in Monterey. The famed designer expressed hope that his upcoming (and much anticipated) Spore will inspire young people to consider how their actions can have lasting effects on humanity and the environment. Players whose virtual species generate too much carbon dioxide, for example, will destroy their planet with the effects of global warming. Said Wright:
By giving kids toys like this, I hope to give them some sense of what it might be like to (live on Earth) in 100 years. That's why I think toys can change the world.

Comments

I would imagine they would have volcanoes and natural causes to help contribute as well, it is after all round 85% of the damage. Why is this on game politics? leave Global warming to the SCIENTIST to prove and not just the left/right average people.
^ Yes, I've also heard rumors the creature editor will come out earlier for free.
I think there might be a demo coming out in April, may, or june. THe game comes out Q3 or Q4 I think. Its the creature editor only though.
@Serpilian

"I probably should clarify my whole “Toys with political messages” bit. It’s not necessarily that toys shouldn’t be made with political messages, as some people do like them. Freedom and all that. I don’t, however, like them aimed at children with the goal of “changing the world”. Can we just teach them to think for themselves instead and let them make up their own minds? Or is that too dangerous?"

Like what they did with Happy Feet? It was all fun and games 'till the evil humans came.
When's Spore coming out? I want to see Sam Brownback play it to completion.
@ Kommisar

More Scientific consensus than evolution... please.

remove religious interference and you will see both the scientific consensus and evidence is stronger for evolution than global warming (given that we have been researching it for many more years).
I like the idea of games like this but I would hope the makers take the time to fully research anything they add, by using it as an educational tool they have to avoid as much subjectivity as possible.
Too bad the game him and his people want to make can't be fun and easily accessible anymore. If they were, then system hardware wouldn't 100% utilized resulting in 'Shit'.
@Gil:

Seems like the majority of climate scientists supports the idea of man-made gobal warming:

---

Statistical analysis of consensus


Is there really "consensus" in the scientific community on the reality of anthropogenic climate change? As N. Oreskes points out in a recent article in Science, that is itself a question that can be addressed scientificially. Oreskes took a sampling of 928 articles on climate change, selected objectively (using the key phrase "climate change") from the published peer-reviewed scientific literature. Oreskes concluded that of those articles (about 75% of them) that deal with the question at all, 100% (all of them) support the consensus view that a significant fraction of recent climate change is due to human activities. Of course, there are undoubtedly some articles that have been published in the peer-reviewed literature that disagree with this position and that Oreskes's survey missed, but the fact that her sample didn't find them indicates that the number of them is very very small. One could debate whether overwhelming consensus is adequate grounds for action on climate change, but there are no grounds for debating whether such consensus actually exists.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=80
Yes, GoodRobotUs, that pretty much sums up my point on "Global Warming", especially the "Those who support Global Warming are the same ones who went on about an imminent Ice Age in the 80’s’" part. Heck I've read findings that other planets in our solar system are also experiencing warming trends. Did our CO2 leak out there too? ;)

As for the toys part, yes, I oppose toys that teach political messages. Global warming, like it or not, is a very political topic, not an absolute science.
I probably should clarify my whole "Toys with political messages" bit. It's not necessarily that toys shouldn't be made with political messages, as some people do like them. Freedom and all that. I don't, however, like them aimed at children with the goal of "changing the world". Can we just teach them to think for themselves instead and let them make up their own minds? Or is that too dangerous?
I've always liked what Will Wright has brought us.

You know this game is going to be revered by all just because it's one of the most complicated games and most interesting.

THe whole Global Warming thing is a political science, but I think that Wright is just trying to make a point of Cause and Effect, not neccessarily stating facts.
Heh, I know what you mean, Spore is just a game, just to clarify, I'm not saying that Will Wright should write full atmospheric modelling into the game or anything, from the looks of things he's done an incredible enough job already
What's the general consensus these days? From what I heard, all but the most fringe believed it was just a natural cycle (as did I), the opposite of an Ice Age, but most seem to believe it's man-made these days.

What do the majority (not just the most vocal) of scientists believe now?
Currently it's being more and more accepted that the Environmental impact of humanity IS detectable in global warming and is influencing it.

For example, in the year 2000, the North Pole melted. Entirely. Something that hasn't happened in 50 million years.

Modern research suggests that now Antartica is melting faster than is expected and is being corroded from both above and below.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=1678441&page=1

Worse still, not only are more scientists accepting it, but even the doubters are quite concerned at how quickly it is taking place.
Frankly, they should have called it 'Global Drowning', it would have at least got more attention ;)

It's like these people who walk around saying things like 'Those who support Global Warming are the same ones who went on about an imminent Ice Age in the 80's', they tend to forget 2 things. 1. It's all part of the same thing, and, 2. 'Soon' in Geological terms is somewhat longer than the 20 years that have passed so far,
@GoodRobotUs

"It more likely a combination of Man-made actions AND natural cycles."

Which of course makes it infinitely harder to explain to the common man... because when it gets complicated, they get all glazed over and ignore the rest of the explanation, followed by a "well why did they call it global warming then?"
I remember as far back as Sim Ant and Sim Farm, in the manual of those games they were described as Toys because there isn't a goal and there is no winning and losing, you define success on your own.

Of course, Hecker would say those Toys are crap because they don't have photorealistic graphics and super-advanced AI.
I think what Serpilian means is that whilst the act of 'Global Warming' (which is a very poor choice of words anyway, since not just warming is involved) is a fact, it's far far more complex than simply 'Too much CO2', that particular belief was spread around by the media, not the Scientific community. It more likely a combination of Man-made actions AND natural cycles.
@Serpilian:

Too much carbon dioxide causing global warming is "junk science"? So... 90% of the scientific community on the planet are "junk scientists"?

Putting something in a game that has more scientific consensus than the theory of relativity or evolution is not what I would call "junk"...

As for "toys being toys"... are you opposed to toys that teach in general, or just when they put something into your world view that is inconvenient to you? How do you feel about Speak-n-Spell?
@jonc2006

When they talk about games as toys, they are referring to specific open ended games like SimCity, Sims etc. GTA and HALO are not toys in that aspect.

I like the idea of experimenting with the lives of a colony. I can't wait for it to be released. This topic goes quite well with the othe next one about the Canadian town's web game. If a game can make learning politics and social implications of your actions, then I say That's the best news I have heard so far.
That reminds me of when I played Alpha Centauri years ago and through a little aggressive negotiation.. ok a few nukes.. I managed to raise the sea levels 2000 meters (!!) over the course of 20 years. Of course most of the globe was under water, but *I* had domed cities haha. ;) anyway...

Now as a game mechanic, I can understand it as a trade off for extreme environmental abuse of power (even though I found it very annoying), but as a teaching tool? I think we have enough junk science floating around in actual discourse affecting our real lives, I don't think we need extreme scenarios built in as a balancing factor of a game being presented as 'fact' to try to 'change the world.' Let toys be toys please.
[...] Original post by GamePolitics and powered by Img Fly   [...]
He has a good point. Entertainment is an excellent teaching tool. The late author and psychologist Robert Anton Wilson often commented that Back to the Future probably did more to educate the general public on notions of chaos theory and quantum physics (specifically the ideas that reality is not fixed or objective and that relatively small actions can have ripple effects and create major consequences) than a textbook ever could.

As other posters have noted, this isn't new territory for Wright -- he's always been big on showing players the consequences of their choices, and this isn't exactly his first foray into exploring man's effect on the environment.
@Blitz
SimAnt was an awsome game. He should make a sequal to it.
And I can't wait for Spore. I have also learned a lot from his games like Sim City. We need more games like that.
[...] Original post by GamePolitics and a wordpress plugin by Elliott [...]
i wish people would stop referring video games as "toys". people who are outside of the gaming community get seriously distorted or exxagerated meanings of games when it is put into that context. some games can be considered to be like that but its easy for the uninformed to generalize that all games are like that.
"“Players whose virtual species generate too much carbon dioxide, for example, will destroy their planet with the effects of global warming.”"

Is he talking about Spore? I had no idea the civilization phase would be that complex.

*will starve his planet of resources then colonize the moon!*
Whoa... i think I just ODed on nostalgia.
You guys are forgetting one of the 'bestest' games evar!!!!1!! SimAnts. We need a sequel.

But basically, I agree with everyone. I honestly can't think of any game he's made that can't be attributed as a large factor to learn about something extra. As an example, I follow construction and city planning developments more closely now thanks to simcity and the sims have made me take a look at how my own day to day life is structured and whether or not I could be more efficient (in short: I can).
Will Wright... shit, to be able to think like he does.

Sim city was an amazing game. It gave me my first look at infrastructure. I was so proud the first time I payed back a savings bond........ then my power plant exploded because it wore out and I was going to fast so for 2 years my town had no power and everyone left. Im not going to lie, I hadn't saved, couldn't get it quite right again.... i cried.... a little bit. Then got back to building a huge map with arcos and everything.
He's right, of course. I learned a lot from Sim City when I was a teen, and not just that it's fun to unleash tornados on hapless citizenry. I learned cause and effect, infrastructure, and zoning. Not completely, but I can hum a few bars and understand local city news now that it affects me as a homeowner.

Wright has been a visionary on this topic for a long, long time.
"Players whose virtual species generate too much carbon dioxide, for example, will destroy their planet with the effects of global warming."

We all know that global warming was a myth created by socialist countries to justify destroying western economies through Kyoto... - Canadian Prime Minister Steven Harper, Conservative

Nice idea though. Reminds me a bit of "SimEarth"... :)
The more I hear about this game the more interested I become.

Do video games teach? I'd say so. Not in the way he-who-shall-be-named thinks though. As previous posters have stated, they have learned from games. There are too many possibilities to list. Be it a deeper understanding of zoning, chaos theory, strategic thinking, etc; we can all learn from games and that includes video games. How many times in your life has someone taught you through a game?

As far as Global Warming is concerned, I understand that the Earth has moved closer to the Sun and that the Moon has moved further from us. Just tossing that out there.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 01/06/09 at 10:46pm
Derovius: There was a "before LJ" GP? I thought this place started on LJ.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:42pm
Brokenscope: Man, I remember GP BEFORE it was all popular..... Actually what is the cut off for being able to say that? LJ days or before?
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:30pm
HarmlessBunny: Some of the debaters here are just fine in my opinion.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:21pm
Derovius: This place needs better debaters, everyone cries like a little girl around here. Must be something in the water.
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:33pm
beemoh: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7813637.stm
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:33pm
beemoh: Tetris helps trauma, aparrently. Just wait until the nightmares about the S-shape start.
Posted 01/06/09 at 09:24pm
Shadow D. Darkman: Okay, this one merits it. *facepalm*
Posted 01/06/09 at 07:34pm
DeepThorn: Okay, was my comment that out of line that I scared everyone?
Posted 01/06/09 at 04:12pm
DeepThorn: Dero, I swear she told me she was 18.
Posted 01/06/09 at 03:07pm
HarmlessBunny: @PHX Corp: No surprise. Jack's favorite desperation move: Image-laden filings that make zero sense! Guarunteed to piss someone off, and provide hilarity to us
Posted 01/06/09 at 01:54pm
Derovius: What did you call my little sister?
Posted 01/06/09 at 01:38pm
DeepThorn: 'Security' additions, which means it protects the music, which you bought, and have the right to use. It doesnt stop illegal activity, and even copying the music onto 2 back up CDs isnt illegal. Giving one to your little sister is border line.
Posted 01/06/09 at 01:36pm
CK20XX: What's it gonna take for JT to get arrested? It'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Posted 01/06/09 at 12:12pm
PHX Corp: Look on JAABLOG at his recent court filings he's starting to post pictures again http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DB5ODRNE
Posted 01/06/09 at 11:51am
CMiner: It's the same as the controversy over Sony's rootkits in their music CDs, as far as a separation of the issues of cd content and the security additions.
Posted 01/06/09 at 11:27am
Vake Xeacons: But there does need to be a limit on DRM. I mean, CD check's okay, but spyware? That's an invasion of privacy!
Posted 01/06/09 at 11:00am
Krono: @insanejedi: DRM isn't an aspect of the game. Unless you can make an argument that Securom is an intregal part of Spore that the game would be an incomplete experience without.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:57am
insanejedi: It's asking the government to regulate aspects of a game. Their just going to use this as a backdoor to regulate other aspects.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:53am
Krono: @insanejedi: DRM = trade practice, Violence in games = speech. I'm not seeing the similarity here.
Posted 01/06/09 at 10:40am
insanejedi: Guys, Regulation of DRM is fudementally the same as regulating violence in games...
Login or register to post shouts