T2: Can't Find a Buyer, Will Face Shareholder Rebellion on Thursday

T2: Can't Find a Buyer, Will Face Shareholder Rebellion on Thursday

March 27, 2007
Thursday is going to be one of those days for Take Two Interactive CEO Paul Eibeler.

The game publisher's annual shareholders meeting will take place that day. By the time it ends Eibeler will likely be out of a job, thanks to a widespread revolt led by several major stockholders.

There's also the prospect that T2-hatin' shareholder Jack "RICO" Thompson may gain access to the microphone and spew his particular brand of vitriol at Eibeler and Take Two management.

Take Two had postponed Thursday's meeting from its original March 23rd date in order to explore offers from unnamed prospective buyers. However, a company press release issued late yesterday said that no deals were forthcoming and that the shareholders meeting would proceed as planned this week.

Why no buyers? Consider Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter's comments:
This is crazy… I can’t see a sale happening, unless there is truly a ‘greater fool’ out there.

Comments

If you mean that GTA made a profit, yes we all knew that, but the performance as a whole took a hit from the scandals.

I'm not quite sure what you mean actually, you decide to decry the boards ignorance, and yet aren't actually specific on what it is we are suppposedly 'ignorant' about.

I'll assume you mean the financial situation of Take 2, I'll admit to not knowing it in depth, but that isn't really what the subject is here. After all, there are several companies that have been caught doing 'illegal things' who have still made themselves more financially sound than Take 2, despite those scandals.
Level of ignorance on the board is astounding, if people want to make comments about profits and financial performance of said company, the information is all out there for them to read and educate themselves before they start making fools of themselves...
*Is offended he wasn't included....*

*Plans to stage a coup and gain control of T2.*
@monte

Following that, Jack Thompson is involved in a lawsuit against Take-Two over a matter that has very little to do with what the meeting is about. If the shareholders are unaware that Take Two owns Rockstar and thus publishes GTA, Manhunt, Bully etc. then they are complete idiots. Asumming they aren't idiots they would know about the controversal games take-two publishes, and if that offended them or made them weary of getting shares in take-two they would've ssold them a long time ago. Therefore hearing jack thompson's mindless rants won't change any of their minds.


Taking it a step further if Jack succeeds with the lawsuit it will undoubtedly mean big losses for Take Two and thus lower stock shares. Why should a man who is attempting to destroy the company be allowed any say on how said company should handle losses?

Also if take two has to sell out, i guarantee Sony or Microsoft (maybe even nintendo), would but ouy Take Two (or at least rockstar) without a second thought.
hey! I Wanna be a part of the new take two I'd be good at it!

lET duffy in Let duffy in!

so are they really gonna let wacko jacko in there?
"Actually, the way i see it, the impotance of share holders should be directly related to how many shares they have in the company."

The such a wonderful typo... when it comes to Take Two, JT really is impotent.
@Joe Bourrie

Actually, the way i see it, the impotance of share holders should be directly related to how many shares they have in the company. In other words, the most important person would be the person with the most shares and Jack, who probably has the bare minimum, placing at the very bottom of the list of importance (just like in life). It makes sence seeing as the top shareholders have far more to both loose and gain based on how the company is run.
Really, JT has every right to speak at this meeting. As a shareholder, his "opinion" is as important as any other T2 shareholder.

Whether or not anybody listens to him is a completely different story. There will be alot of chuckles, that's for sure.
nightwng2000
if you do get it put me in the quality control depot,games needs more polish :P
That just occured to me. Thompson is a shareholder in a company which allegedly is embroiled in a vast conspiracy against....Thompson...

Surely that should be brought up as exhibit 296 in the list of reasons why this man is crazy.
I'm tellin' ya, give me, Fremen, and GamerDad control over T2 and we'll turn it into something profitable, not afraid to stand up to critics, and something that could put out any type of game and they ALL be bestsellers.

nightwng2000
NW2K Software
The only thing I'm worried about is that Jack speaking up will make anybody who makes any kind of common cause with him (in this case, the dissatisfied stockholders) look tainted by association...
@Alexander Case

JT: [points] Look, a profitable net venture!
Investors: Where? [Shuffle away]
JT: Muahaha! The mike is mine!
GoodRobot you explained it better than I could have.
@Shoehorn:

The reason Jack Thompson gets to be there is because he owns shares. Why he gets to speak? Knowing Jack, he'll probably threaten, cajole, persuade, and brow-beat anyone who gets between him and the microphone, attention-whore that he is.
From the way I'm reading it, a lot of that money was lost settling up the problems involved with the Share-sales scam. It was settled out of court, so I don't know the figures involved, but I suspect a great deal of investors had to be refunded money in order to balance up the books.

That's always the problems with scams like that, it's like trying to fix a dam by moving other bricks in the dam, and suddenly realising that now money is just gushing from a different hole. In a way, I'm glad that Take Two's management got caught out, for two reasons, one, I don't like rich people who have to lie and manipulate to get richer, whether that is a paranoid lawyer or the manager of a game studio, and, two, it actually, finally means that they can plug up the leak and, hopefully, start to get themselves on the road to recovery.

Ironically enough, much of that recovery depends on GTA 4, hence the lawsuit, I don't think this was done out of spite by T2, I think it was actually done to show the shareholders that the lynchpin of restoring T2's reputation professionally and financially is going to be protected, the shareholders will continue to want that dedication to protecting their investment regardless of who is in charge.

Finally, with regards to JT, I wonder where things stand as far as having someone at the Shareholder meeting who is levelling criminal charges at them, we're not talking about someone with a financial or civil suit, the Organised Crime claim it a very serious criminal charge, I'm not certain it would actually be legally appropriate for Jack to attend, though I'm by no means certain on that.
@Zerodash

All the money went to the pockets of the board of directors and the CEO. You can't make a profit when your board's salaries are greater than the company's anual earnings ;)

But yeah, that is why they are overthrowing the current management, because they lost all the profits.
I'm sure that the shareholders of TT would just love to waste time listening to a man who wants to destroy the company they are trying to make profitable.

I still would love to know where the hell all the $$ GTA sales produced went. How can you have one of the top franchises in gaming and not turn a profit, let alone break even?
GTA4 trailer is coming out on thursday. Shareholders (at least the majority) would be happy to see it.
I got a few bucks can I have take-two?
"Jack “RICO” Thompson may gain access to the microphone and spew his particular brand of vitriol at Eibeler and Take Two management."

Why would this fool get to speak? His insane "crusade" against video game content he doesn't approve of has nothing to do with this situation, which has been caused by financial wrongdoings by people who have nothing to do with the games. Is he going to offer financial advice? Or is he worried about his "investment"?
Even if he does get to speak, how interested are the other shareholders going to be in what will just turn into a rant about the baby-eating-murder-teaching-gay-making-columbine-simulators?

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am
JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am
chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:56am
JDKJ: But if it turns out that they actually did, they'll have Hell to pay.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:45am
JDKJ: And I'd tend to rule out the possibilty of FN Herstal supplying restricted ammunition to someone merely because they're ordering it from a military base.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:37am
JDKJ: I know you don't leave your gated community and get around much in dark alleys, so you may be surprised to learn that there's this thing called "the black market" where, if you've got enough money, ain't too much of anything which can't be bought.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:36am
Austin_Lewis: Or, maybe he or someone else at the base ordered the SS190 from FN Herstal.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:32am
Austin_Lewis: the hands of private owners. They run about 300 dollars minimum for a box of 50, and boxes of AP 5.7 are extremely scarce, mainly residing in the hands of Class III stores or individuals who for one reason or another got a demo box of it.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:30am
Austin_Lewis: There are other firearms that fire the 5.7. However, I too would like to know where he got the ammo and what kind was used. Maybe Hasan, planning not to live through this, went out and bought one the boxes of SS190 that are floating around in
Posted 11/07/09 at 08:44am
JDKJ: And it isn't yet clear what type of ammunition Hasan used. It's strange that he purchased a gun but didn't purchase ammunition for it at the same place and time. Especially because the calibre required is peculiar to the actual gun.
Login or register to post shouts