
Thursday is going to be one of those days for Take Two Interactive CEO Paul Eibeler.
The game publisher's annual shareholders meeting will take place that day. By the time it ends Eibeler will likely be out of a job, thanks to a widespread
revolt led by several major stockholders.
There's also the prospect that T2-hatin' shareholder Jack
"RICO" Thompson may gain access to the microphone and spew his particular brand of vitriol at Eibeler and Take Two management.
Take Two had postponed Thursday's meeting from its original March 23rd date in order to explore offers from unnamed prospective buyers. However, a company
press release issued late yesterday said that no deals were forthcoming and that the shareholders meeting would proceed as planned this week.
Why no buyers? Consider Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter's comments:
This is crazy… I can’t see a sale happening, unless there is truly a ‘greater fool’ out there.
Comments
I'm not quite sure what you mean actually, you decide to decry the boards ignorance, and yet aren't actually specific on what it is we are suppposedly 'ignorant' about.
I'll assume you mean the financial situation of Take 2, I'll admit to not knowing it in depth, but that isn't really what the subject is here. After all, there are several companies that have been caught doing 'illegal things' who have still made themselves more financially sound than Take 2, despite those scandals.
*Plans to stage a coup and gain control of T2.*
Following that, Jack Thompson is involved in a lawsuit against Take-Two over a matter that has very little to do with what the meeting is about. If the shareholders are unaware that Take Two owns Rockstar and thus publishes GTA, Manhunt, Bully etc. then they are complete idiots. Asumming they aren't idiots they would know about the controversal games take-two publishes, and if that offended them or made them weary of getting shares in take-two they would've ssold them a long time ago. Therefore hearing jack thompson's mindless rants won't change any of their minds.
Taking it a step further if Jack succeeds with the lawsuit it will undoubtedly mean big losses for Take Two and thus lower stock shares. Why should a man who is attempting to destroy the company be allowed any say on how said company should handle losses?
Also if take two has to sell out, i guarantee Sony or Microsoft (maybe even nintendo), would but ouy Take Two (or at least rockstar) without a second thought.
lET duffy in Let duffy in!
so are they really gonna let wacko jacko in there?
The such a wonderful typo... when it comes to Take Two, JT really is impotent.
Actually, the way i see it, the impotance of share holders should be directly related to how many shares they have in the company. In other words, the most important person would be the person with the most shares and Jack, who probably has the bare minimum, placing at the very bottom of the list of importance (just like in life). It makes sence seeing as the top shareholders have far more to both loose and gain based on how the company is run.
Whether or not anybody listens to him is a completely different story. There will be alot of chuckles, that's for sure.
if you do get it put me in the quality control depot,games needs more polish :P
Surely that should be brought up as exhibit 296 in the list of reasons why this man is crazy.
nightwng2000
NW2K Software
JT: [points] Look, a profitable net venture!
Investors: Where? [Shuffle away]
JT: Muahaha! The mike is mine!
The reason Jack Thompson gets to be there is because he owns shares. Why he gets to speak? Knowing Jack, he'll probably threaten, cajole, persuade, and brow-beat anyone who gets between him and the microphone, attention-whore that he is.
That's always the problems with scams like that, it's like trying to fix a dam by moving other bricks in the dam, and suddenly realising that now money is just gushing from a different hole. In a way, I'm glad that Take Two's management got caught out, for two reasons, one, I don't like rich people who have to lie and manipulate to get richer, whether that is a paranoid lawyer or the manager of a game studio, and, two, it actually, finally means that they can plug up the leak and, hopefully, start to get themselves on the road to recovery.
Ironically enough, much of that recovery depends on GTA 4, hence the lawsuit, I don't think this was done out of spite by T2, I think it was actually done to show the shareholders that the lynchpin of restoring T2's reputation professionally and financially is going to be protected, the shareholders will continue to want that dedication to protecting their investment regardless of who is in charge.
Finally, with regards to JT, I wonder where things stand as far as having someone at the Shareholder meeting who is levelling criminal charges at them, we're not talking about someone with a financial or civil suit, the Organised Crime claim it a very serious criminal charge, I'm not certain it would actually be legally appropriate for Jack to attend, though I'm by no means certain on that.
All the money went to the pockets of the board of directors and the CEO. You can't make a profit when your board's salaries are greater than the company's anual earnings ;)
But yeah, that is why they are overthrowing the current management, because they lost all the profits.
I still would love to know where the hell all the $$ GTA sales produced went. How can you have one of the top franchises in gaming and not turn a profit, let alone break even?
Why would this fool get to speak? His insane "crusade" against video game content he doesn't approve of has nothing to do with this situation, which has been caused by financial wrongdoings by people who have nothing to do with the games. Is he going to offer financial advice? Or is he worried about his "investment"?
Even if he does get to speak, how interested are the other shareholders going to be in what will just turn into a rant about the baby-eating-murder-teaching-gay-making-columbine-simulators?
Post new comment