Surprise! Denver Transit Authority Votes to Allow M-rated Game Ads

March 28, 2007 -
GTA ads can remain on buses and trains in the Denver area.

As reported by the Rocky Mountain News, directors of the Regional Transportation District (RTD) rejected a campaign led by the Parents Television Council and the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood to ban ads for games rated M and above.

Similar bans are already in place in Boston and Portland, Oregon. As in Boston, it was a series of ads for GTA: Vice City Stories which prompted the call for future restrictions. Currently the RTD only excludes advertising for tobacco products.

According to the Rocky Mountain News, the Operations, Customer Service and Marketing Committee of the RRD recommended the ban. But the board, after meeting with an attorney in private, voted 12-3 to allow the game ads. Said board member John Tayer:
It was a tough decision because I think our hearts as a board were with trying to limit exposure to advertisements that promote violence. But the overwhelming weight of the legal advice was that if we pursued this, we would face an uphill battle in court.

ESA representative Peggi O'Keefe spoke to the RTD board, calling the ban:
...both unnecessary and unconstitutional. This proposal . . . would restrict fully protected expression on the basis of content," she said. "Such restrictions are constitutionally impermissible.

Comments

Denver has always been one of the coolest cities.

Now if only the other cities in Colorado would follow suit...

This is a victory, against those who would care about the children.

Wait, Correction: victory against those who would look like they care about the children.

@Gatz

Don't get your hopes up. The Denver DA has said that he still intends to prosecute any and all possession of marijuana under the State statute, which still stands as of the last election.

As for the article itself: "Similar bans are already in place in Boston and Portland, Oregon"...Ahhh, Portland. You can burn US soldiers in effigy, defecate in public...but you better not display ads for mature video games on public transit...Portland, one of the few cities able to make Boulder, CO look boringly normal.

dude Denver is the shit first they legalize marijuana now they are saying yes to M-Rated games. Now all they need is a law that says "who so ever bitches about the last two things listed in this comment shall be flogged" and then I'd move there.

I'm very pleased to see them stand up and put their foot down on the PTC and their ilk. They are a disgusting group of out of touch lazy parents who want to force thier moral beliefs on the rest of us. Hopefully more will follow this great example.

WoW you mean some people still have brains and commen sense!

kinda feels like the twilight zone

My opinion on this is that if you ban M rated games from being displayed on buses, then you have to ban R rated movies as well. But no one wants to ban R rated movies from being advertised on buses and subways.

Someone said no to the PTC!? UNTHINKABlE!!!!!!

Seriously, hooray for common sense.

It's a goverment organization. THey can't restrict things by content. If they have to let the Nazis use the park Pavilliosn and the KKK adopt a section of highway, surely they have to take ad revenue for relatively tame ads.

"It was a tough decision because I think our hearts as a board were with trying to limit exposure to advertisements that promote violence."

Someone explain that one to me. I'd expect an advertisement that promotes violence to some something like, "Go out and shoot someone today! Buy a gun!" not an ad that shows a few illustrations and some text. Because, if I'm not mistaken, box art does not promote violence.

I think this entire situation would've never happened if the transit authorities didn't believe the hype that videogames cause violence (even though teen crime rates and violence in general is incredibly low compared to years passed).

At least they made the smart choice here for a couple of the right reasons, but honestly, they shouldn't even nbe considering violent content. It's not something you can debate and yet several other states have already cut themselves off from a major source of revenue because they can't take the 2 seconds to rationalize the choices.

@squigs

yes, but they weren't being consistant nor fair about it.
an M-rated game is equivalent to an R rated movie.

or to put it better: why can't you advertise a Sopranos game, but you can advertise the Sopranos TV show? that's inconsistant.

I'm a little angry that they didn't explain in their statement that the ads we put on our mass transit will be E for Everyone. The ban, if enacted, would not be unconstitutional, because refusing an ad is not censorship as we use the word. They currently pick-and-chose ads on a case-by-case basis.

It's obvious the real reason here is money. They don't want to restrict ads for the best-selling games. Successful games mean continued ad revenue. M-games are the best selling, for the most part, and something the PTC doesn't realize is that it indicates that general consensus is PRO-Mature-rated games. God of War II would be terrible if they made the content fit "T" for example.

So in summary, read beyond the public statements as they boil down to:
1) Game ads are a major source of ad dollars
2) Our riders are mostly adults
3) The ads themselves are not M-rated (see the cover of Vice City Stories, it has NO violent or overtly sexual content)
4) The PTC does not represent our best interests.

The PTC drives me bonkers. It goes like this: if you agree with the PTC as an individual, use their advice. If you don't agree, ignore them. Recognize the PTC is a very small percentage of a minority of Americans (which can be proven statistically).

YAY for freedom of speech!!! ^_^

Good govt can work sometimes

It wasn't the government. It was a public transportation organization. I am glad to see them continue advertising. They realized after talking to an inteligent lawer, that if they went through with the ban, protecting that decision would take up time and money that could be spent on more important matters.

Now if we could get the governments to do the same.

At the end of the day, the game may be violent, but the advert is not. They are employed as watchdog for the quality of the ads on their system, not to act as unofficial judges of society who not only judge the content of the adverts, but also the product itself.

It's like saying ban all adverts for cars because they might be dangerous in the wrong hands (a lot more dangerous than a computer game in fact).

So, yes, this is a good decision.

I agree this is a good decision, but I'm surprised about the reasoning.

Surely they're allowed to have policies on what is and isn't permitted as long as they're consitent and fair.

But, as we've seen, these bans aren't always consistent and fair. I'll use one of Dennis' old examples. These bans would put a ban on ads for the Sopranos video game, but not ads for the Sopranos show on HBO, and neither would a potential book, soundtrack album, or movie ads, just video games.

[...] In a move sure to land on Jack Thompson’s blunt “to do” spindle, Denver transit directors voted to allow M-rated games to be advertised on public transportation around the city. The vote was prompted by that pesky GTA series, namely ads for Vice City Stories that already earned a ban in Boston. [...]

Good morning! I was surfing the internet Tuesday afternoon during my break, and found your blog by searching MSN for marijuana games. This is a topic I have great interest in, and follow it closely. I liked your insight on Surprise! Denver Transit Authority Votes to Allow M-rated Game Ads, and it made for good reading. Keep up the good work...
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
Goth_SkunkWell clearly we're diametrically opposed about that.07/01/2015 - 9:03pm
Andrew EisenNot even remotely true.07/01/2015 - 8:59pm
Goth_SkunkIt is, if the suggestion involves taking something away from a product in order to make it better.07/01/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOffering suggestions for improvement does not mean that the work in question is garbage or not doing fine.07/01/2015 - 8:21pm
Goth_SkunkIf their products were garbage, they wouldn't be as praiseworthy as they are.07/01/2015 - 8:08pm
Goth_SkunkAnd Andrew, I really don't think GRRM or the producers of the Game of Thrones TV show need anyone to tell them what to do to make their products better.They appear to be doing just fine on their own.07/01/2015 - 8:07pm
Goth_SkunkThe only thing not worth talking about, is what shouldn't be talked about.07/01/2015 - 7:47pm
Goth_Skunk@Infophile: It could be a reason, if I were wrong. I'm not.07/01/2015 - 7:44pm
PHX Corphttp://kotaku.com/steam-players-take-justice-into-their-own-hands-virtua-1715215648 anyone seen this, Steam Players Make Their Own Justice, Virtually Imprison Troll07/01/2015 - 7:17pm
Andrew EisenHeh, just had our (IGN's) journalistic integrity called into question over two typos on one of the Wikis (which are editable by the readers).07/01/2015 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilson@tech this isnt the only stupid tax in recent months though. they were adding a commuter tax as well. if they continue doing crap like this, they will run in to the same issues as Detroit.07/01/2015 - 5:34pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician