Xbox Issues Global Warming Game Challenge

Xbox Issues Global Warming Game Challenge

June 13, 2007
An inconvenient game? Perhaps...

Microsoft and Games for Change (G4C) have come together for a socially-aware gaming design competition. The  Xbox 360 Games for Change Challenge, open to college students worldwide, will launch this summer. Participants can submit game designs based on the theme of global warming. Submissions must be based on Microsoft's XNA Game Studio Express software.

The best entries will receive cash prizes, which can be used for education. Winners will also be invited to present their game to Microsoft game execs who will evaluate the designs as possible future download offerings on Xbox LIVE. The first-place winner gets a chance to apprentice with MS.

Said Suzanne Seggerman, co-founder and president of Games for Change:
The current generation of gamers is among the most socially conscious in history. We know from experience that young people are looking for ways to help make the world a better place...

Microsoft exec Jeff Bell added:
Microsoft is very happy to work with Games for Change... We are passionate about the potential games have in expanding horizons, creating networks, and helping design real-world solutions.

Former Nebraska Senator Bob Kerrey (left) was on hand for the announcement. Now if we can just persuade President Bush to check out the winning global warming game...

Comments

When I want to help with global warming i usually do it by turning my 360 OFF. That thing heats my whole bedroom up, not to mention the sound of my power meter screaming as it spins.


Yeah, sounds interesting, wish I had learned .net and C# already ect ect ect.
I was about to say the exact same thing lol. Even though the new one is quieter, if I want to save the planet everyone could just turn off their 360s ;)
Politicians have been taking a dump on video games for decades and now they want to use them to push their politicized pseudo-science bullshit on younger audiences. Forget it.
You know, the funny thing is, my major project for University was a game about climate change, in C# and XNA, using XNA Game Studio Express.

I am now entirely convinced that Microsoft are stealing my thoughts.

/b
@ Mechadon
100% agreed my friend.
@Mechadon

Saying that "Politicians ... want to use them to push their politicized pseudo-science bullshit on younger audiences" is a bit much. G4C consists of many groups, not just politicians.

From their website:

Our members represent hundreds of organizations and include partners in the games industry, academia, nonprofits, local and state governments, foundations, the UN and artists.

Also, how is climate modeling pseudo science?
You know I have always wondered, if a natural climate cycle threatened to destroy human civilization, and we had the means to slow or prevent the change, would we do it? or would we waffle wondering if we have the right or if we would destroy the environment.
Microsoft announces global competition for youth to develop climate change game for XBOX360...

On Saturday evening, the non-profit Games for Change and Microsoft announced at the G4C Festival at Parsons Design School that they were launching together a new initiative to around the theme of climate change. Entitled The XBox360 Games for Change...
@Mechadon (and Dexee)
I assume you're calling "bullshit" on the growing belief than human activity is contributing to global warming, and that you do not dispute records which show the "globe" has indeed been "warming" (by less than one degree) over the last century.

As far as I can tell, the contest doesn't require that submitted games promote any particular political message, only that they have a "global warming theme." Why not make an XNA game that demonstrates your point of view?

@Brokenscope: Your first post was the best chuckle I had all morning and your second post gave me something to think about on the way home. Thanks.
@ Kevin
I'm not necessarily calling 100% BS on this. The human activity does have a small impact, I can understand that. But the fact is, we've only really STARTED collecting data on this because we've only done so for about 100 years now, give or take a score. But because it is very limited data, I say its inconclusive evidence to approximately say. Aside from that, the Earth has been in a slow warming trend since the last Ice Age about 14,000 years ago, and Sol is showing increased activity as of the past several years.
That and it hasn't been warming for the past 100 years, it started warm in the early 1900s, then there was a cool off which IIRC was called the "Little Ice Age" which "Global Cooling" was spawned from and but then it started warming up again and now BOOM we've been in "Global Warming" mode for around three decades.

I'm sure when the temperatures start to decrease again our politicians and "scientist" will be back with warning of the dangers of Global Cooling.
@Dexee

Scientist have various means of collecting data, even far beyond the beginning of temperature recordings.

For example, ice core drillings in the Antartica give very good data about green house gases in the past 650.00 years.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/11/650000-years-of-gr...

The recent rapid warming trends are not caused by sun activity:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/08/did-the-sun-hit-re...

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/10/how-not-to-attribu...

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/03/solar-variability-...

@PHOENIXZERO

Here's something about the Global Cooling Myth:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/01/the-global-cooling...
Thanks Dexee! Actually, I also have some familiarity with the currently prevailing theories. I've done my own research and formed my own opinions.

My point was that there are informed and educated people whose opinions differ, and I think it could be beneficial for everyone interested if those differing opinions were expressed through games, as the contest (sort of) suggests. Possibly even more beneficial than expressing them here.

I hope it's not too optimistic to think that's the idea behind G4C, above and beyond the ambitions of any "politicized pseudo-science...."
Great..a game initiative to push a scientific theory that can be argued on either side of the fence.

Microsoft: Hey, let's make the news by promoting a design initiative that jumps on the bandwagon of current events fueled by political dogma....great idea.

Stinking Kevin - Sure, the globe is warming, but it might all be a natural process that we have no grasp of yet..read Phoenixzero's remarks.
We just launched our game, Venture Arctic, which is an animal ecosystem simulator set in the arctic. Rather than having difficulty levels in the game, the player can choose to turn on and off global warming, extinction, and deforestation.

You can download or buy it at:

www.venturearctic.com

We're a very small company and we don't have an advertising budget, which is why some might not have heard of the game. It's the follow up to the 2006 IGF finalist, Venture Africa, which we donated 4% of the revenue to the WILD Foundation, an org that protects wild spaces in Africa.

My point here is, we've done it. We made an important, fun, informative, and influential game that just needs its' audience to know about it.
I don't believe it when they say there's manmade global warming. I live in Iowa. 10,000 years ago, it was completely covered by ice. How did all that melt when there wasn't one car around to send carbon emissions into the air?
I think it would be fun to see a global warming game where you have all these inputs into the system that you can control, as well as several other inputs that you can't control. After playing the game for hours and hours, trying to minimize your carbon footprint or whatever, suddenly this australia sized-island appears in the middle of the atlantic, made completely of smokestacks.

Seriously though, this topic is highly political and it seems the selection of the winner will be unavoidably political as well. There are a lot of interesting statements that a developer can make about this topic, none of them relating directly to their techinical or game design skill. What are their criteria anyway?
@Stinkin kevin

Your welcome, it is a a question I have posed to during every environment debate that has arisen in my various classes since I started college. The reactions are varied and many.

Best response was "no, if nature kills us so be it"

"what if a comet was going to hit earth? Should be ignore that? even if we could stop it?"

"No of course not comets aren't part of nature...."


Yeah.. it took him a few minutes to realize what he said.

Of course in a philosophy class it goes into natural rights ect ect ect what allows us to change our environment vs natural drive to survive.
To those who dispute global warming:

The fact that the earth is warming up really isn't the problem -- as others have pointed out, the earth has been slowly warming up ever since the last ice age. What scares scientists is the unprecedented RATE of warming that just happened to start around the time of the industrial revolution. Could that be a coincidence? Of course.... but no matter who or what's been causing climate change, it WILL affect us, and for that reason, it's worth looking into.

Besides, environmentally-based edutainment games are fun. When I was a kid, I loved games like "Lost Secret of the Rainforest" and "Lion."
"Now if we can just persuade President Bush to check out the winning global warming game…"

I joined the ECA with the understanding that they would be political in only one regard—games. First they slandered firearms owners by equating firearms with narcotics in a recent ad campaign, and now they are taking sides on the 'global warming' issue.

That is two strikes, ECA.

Matt Lohr
Spring, TX
I see my comment stirred things up a bit. I should elaborate on what I meant. I don't deny that climate change is happening. People should be taught everything about climate change and the history of climate change. But, please, let's stick to REAL science. Teach people how to properly read a graph and distinguish between correlation and causation.

It would be funny if Al Gore started claiming that he's a hard-core gamer and tried to push "An Inconvenient Game" as a title.
global warming is becoming such a obvious problem that someone somewhere other than Al Gore needs to step up to help drive the bus!
woopwoop :)

Post new comment

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/04/08 at 08:47pm
eraserheadthelynch: as much as we hate thompson hes only human and he looked happy accepting tha t award
Posted 07/04/08 at 03:38pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : (I know that was late but better late than never.)
Posted 07/04/08 at 03:38pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of : Everyone! Quick! Repent! The Apocalypse approaches! Jack Thompson has been honored for his deeds! *screams and faints*
Posted 07/04/08 at 03:12pm
JustChris: The parade was a false hope for jack...an ego boost is an ego boost.
Posted 07/04/08 at 02:33pm
Silencets: Read the comments in the Editorial...JT himself in all of his asinine glory was there, as well as details on the parade
Posted 07/04/08 at 02:24pm
BlackIce: What?
Posted 07/04/08 at 01:59pm
Silencets: I still can't believe JT was in a parade...
Posted 07/04/08 at 11:01am
BlackIce: Frank, I watch that when contemplating armed robbery.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:49am
ZippyDSM: Monolith: get a name yet? *yawns* was no on much yestersday.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:45am
Frank: To prepare myself for the agony of writing a long reply I'm watching that clip from FOX news about the torture game 2.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:43am
Frank: After reading Jack's reply I think that at some point today I'm gonna have to give him my own reply.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:42am
eraserheadthelynch: i think noel was on super skunk [cannabis] himself when he made that comment
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:24am
Jack Wessels: Haha, Thompson finally replied to the edatorial. Much lulz.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:20am
gamepolitics: heh... GP is like a shark. Can never stop.
Posted 07/04/08 at 10:19am
Belgarion89: @GP Dude, they made you work on the 4th? That's harsh!
Posted 07/04/08 at 09:24am
eraserheadthelynch: GOD BLESS AMERICA HAPPY 4TH[even though England is better
Posted 07/04/08 at 07:48am
beemoh: @ConstantNeophyte: Of course! It's not games that turn people into killers, it's kills that turn people into gamers!
Posted 07/04/08 at 05:47am
GRIZZAM PRIME: Happy 4th of July!!!
Posted 07/04/08 at 12:56am
eraserheadthelynch: @ConstantNeophyte i thought it was a parady when i read that wow thats so dumb
Posted 07/04/08 at 12:04am
Frank: I figured out something more "horrible" then the tortue game two. First read about Jack Thompson then watch Fox news.
Login or register to post shouts