ESA Lauds Free Trade Deal Between USA & South Korea

July 5, 2007 -
For the ESA, selling more games is good and software piracy is bad.

No wonder then that the organization, which represents U.S. game publishers, has jumped on board with the recently-signed USA-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. Said ESA boss Mike Gallagher:
The U.S.– Korea FTA will provide enhanced intellectual property protections and more favorable trade treatment for a range of digital products, including computer and video games.

The ESA expects the deal to result in:
...non-discriminatory and duty-free treatment for all digital products, including computer and video games, whether imported in physical form or over the Internet.

Game publishers expect the deal will help in their battle against pirates, as well: 
Recognizing South Korea’s high broadband penetration, the FTA includes additional commitments to augment enforcement efforts against Internet piracy.

South Korean publishers are widely-regarded as innovators in the entertainment software industry, particularly with respect to online games. Industry experts believe that this treaty will promote additional opportunities for U.S. and South Korean game publishers with regard to sales, investment and future collaboration.

Comments

GoodRobotUs
DOn't forget the whole 100 year IP thign they want to do,since they rarely support a game after2 much less 5 years its free to trade electronically(after 5),selling it however is not :P

Ya blame piracy for bad games,shotty bug work or polish,bad ports computer crashing protection schemes and high prices games have not really been games of late, I been repairing PS2s of late and reading up on the history of it,the DREs were nasty hell even the slim lines got a bad case of bad lens it happens but sheesh the 360 problem is more than the lens issues ever were.

I bought a copy of GalCiv 2 as well, and remember the whole Starforce shenanigans.

Trade agreements are good, even stopping piracy is good, BUT, there will have to come a point where the ESA and ECA are going to collide on this, and that is retail prices over purchaser rights. Why, for example, should I pay $30-$40 for a DVD, which has a life expectancy of 2-3 years, and then be denied the right to either return the goods or to make a copy for when my DVD eventually wears out.

I'm all for Industry having the right to protect it's own IP, but not at the cost of legitimate customer rights. As people have argued before, just as taking away guns from legitimate users doesn't stop killing, taking away Rights from legitimate customers will not stop Piracy.

Hell, do I need to pull up the StarForce/Stardock Gal Civ2 scandal?

Which part?

Where Starforce got angry at Stardock for releasing their game without copy protection? (I own a retail copy of it, by the way.)

Or where employees of Starforce actually posted links to pirated torrents of GalCiv2 on the Starforce message boards?

Fights against piracy have been shown time and time again to be little more than crude potshots at the legit consumer base in the phantom dream of 'earning lost profit'.

Relic Entertainment knows this.


Hell, do I need to pull up the StarForce/Stardock Gal Civ2 scandal?

Although I'm all for free trade, something tells me the game industry's interpretation of the document is simply being an excuse to impose more and more unesscesary safeguards and firewalls that hackers will easily penetrate.

"Recognizing South Korea’s high broadband penetration, the FTA includes additional commitments to augment enforcement efforts against Internet piracy."

That's what I would be concerned about. Fights against internet piracy tend to have collateral damage.

This could be a good step to help the game industry continue to grow.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameAs i said in my comment on the GG story, im hoping this both gets some of the media groups to take and unbiased look at gg and starts a path to reconciliation. Im tried of GG being a fight and not a discussion05/04/2015 - 6:05pm
Goth_SkunkI'm baffled speechless by that leap of logic.05/04/2015 - 5:48pm
Craig R.GG has done a great job making other people, such as Sarkeesian, relevant. But the nebulous group of hate and misogyny? Not so much.05/04/2015 - 5:45pm
Craig R.So every Twitch streamer who has been swatted is now incredibly relevant? Not buying it.05/04/2015 - 5:39pm
james_fudgeHopefully that will be the last update on that story. #tired05/04/2015 - 5:39pm
james_fudgeFYI We updated our story with comments from Arthur Chu and Christina Sommers.05/04/2015 - 5:38pm
Goth_Skunk@Craig: Your definition of 'safe' is peculiar then, because GG is anything but irrelevant. You don't call bomb threats on irrelevant groups of people, nor do you kick out pro-GG supporting expo exhibitors if they're irrelevant.05/04/2015 - 5:29pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/05/04/prime-minister-of-singapore-shares-his-c-code-for-sudoku-solver/ got to admit this is kinda cool.05/04/2015 - 5:24pm
Andrew EisenThe Mary Sue isn't speculating, it's reporting. Matthew is speculating but that's fine in the Shout box. Hell, it's also fine to add a bit of speculation and opinion within your reporting too!05/04/2015 - 5:18pm
Craig R.I think it's safey to say that whether GG is dormant is irrelevant, since GG itself quickly became irrelevant05/04/2015 - 5:14pm
Goth_SkunkLike I said, speculation. But evidently that's enough for a site like The Mary Sue.05/04/2015 - 5:09pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.themarysue.com/joss-whedon-deleted-twitter-account/ he seems to be tired off all the crap on twitter.05/04/2015 - 4:55pm
Andrew EisenWell, if something turns up that sounds like it would be worth reporting here, do let us know.05/04/2015 - 4:53pm
Goth_SkunkAFAIK, no one knows. It's all just speculation at this point.05/04/2015 - 4:50pm
Andrew EisenThat depends. Why did he shut it down?05/04/2015 - 4:48pm
Goth_SkunkNot sure if it's something this site would be interested in reporting, but Joss Whedon shut down his twitter account today.05/04/2015 - 4:46pm
Andrew EisenIt's a long-standing rule that heavy profanity (and anything that's just super gross) has no place in the Shout box. The community is pretty damn civil though so it rarely comes up so when it does, it's often a surprise to some.05/04/2015 - 4:45pm
Goth_SkunkI also noticed yesterday a concerted effort by this community to refrain from cursing. Is there a new rule? Or was that just coincidental?05/04/2015 - 4:41pm
Andrew EisenIt's certainly tacky but not to the point I feel it merits deletion or a ban warning.05/04/2015 - 4:38pm
Goth_Skunk@AE: Re: deletion of IanC's comment, you should probably extend that same courtesy towards Conster's comment about GG trolls pretending to be looters in Baltimore, too. Though to be fair, IanC's comment was deleted before I had a chance to read it.05/04/2015 - 4:35pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician