ESA Lauds Free Trade Deal Between USA & South Korea

July 5, 2007 -
For the ESA, selling more games is good and software piracy is bad.

No wonder then that the organization, which represents U.S. game publishers, has jumped on board with the recently-signed USA-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. Said ESA boss Mike Gallagher:
The U.S.– Korea FTA will provide enhanced intellectual property protections and more favorable trade treatment for a range of digital products, including computer and video games.

The ESA expects the deal to result in:
...non-discriminatory and duty-free treatment for all digital products, including computer and video games, whether imported in physical form or over the Internet.

Game publishers expect the deal will help in their battle against pirates, as well: 
Recognizing South Korea’s high broadband penetration, the FTA includes additional commitments to augment enforcement efforts against Internet piracy.

South Korean publishers are widely-regarded as innovators in the entertainment software industry, particularly with respect to online games. Industry experts believe that this treaty will promote additional opportunities for U.S. and South Korean game publishers with regard to sales, investment and future collaboration.

Comments

GoodRobotUs
DOn't forget the whole 100 year IP thign they want to do,since they rarely support a game after2 much less 5 years its free to trade electronically(after 5),selling it however is not :P

Ya blame piracy for bad games,shotty bug work or polish,bad ports computer crashing protection schemes and high prices games have not really been games of late, I been repairing PS2s of late and reading up on the history of it,the DREs were nasty hell even the slim lines got a bad case of bad lens it happens but sheesh the 360 problem is more than the lens issues ever were.

I bought a copy of GalCiv 2 as well, and remember the whole Starforce shenanigans.

Trade agreements are good, even stopping piracy is good, BUT, there will have to come a point where the ESA and ECA are going to collide on this, and that is retail prices over purchaser rights. Why, for example, should I pay $30-$40 for a DVD, which has a life expectancy of 2-3 years, and then be denied the right to either return the goods or to make a copy for when my DVD eventually wears out.

I'm all for Industry having the right to protect it's own IP, but not at the cost of legitimate customer rights. As people have argued before, just as taking away guns from legitimate users doesn't stop killing, taking away Rights from legitimate customers will not stop Piracy.

Hell, do I need to pull up the StarForce/Stardock Gal Civ2 scandal?

Which part?

Where Starforce got angry at Stardock for releasing their game without copy protection? (I own a retail copy of it, by the way.)

Or where employees of Starforce actually posted links to pirated torrents of GalCiv2 on the Starforce message boards?

Fights against piracy have been shown time and time again to be little more than crude potshots at the legit consumer base in the phantom dream of 'earning lost profit'.

Relic Entertainment knows this.


Hell, do I need to pull up the StarForce/Stardock Gal Civ2 scandal?

Although I'm all for free trade, something tells me the game industry's interpretation of the document is simply being an excuse to impose more and more unesscesary safeguards and firewalls that hackers will easily penetrate.

"Recognizing South Korea’s high broadband penetration, the FTA includes additional commitments to augment enforcement efforts against Internet piracy."

That's what I would be concerned about. Fights against internet piracy tend to have collateral damage.

This could be a good step to help the game industry continue to grow.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you feel about Amazon buying Twitch?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
IanCBroke my EA boycott to pick up Plants vs Zombies Garden Warfare. Loving it. Still hate EA though. But i like Popcap. Gah.08/30/2014 - 6:01am
MaskedPixelantehttp://m.tickld.com/x/something-you-never-realized-about-guardians-of-the-galaxy Right in the feels.08/29/2014 - 6:56pm
AvalongodAgain I think we're conflating the issue of whether Sarkeesian's claims are beyond critique (no they're not) and whether its ever appropriate to use sexist language, let alone physical threats on a woman to intimidate her (no it isn't)08/29/2014 - 5:04pm
prh99Trolling her or trying to assail her integrity just draws more attention (Streisand effect?). Which is really not what the trolls want, so the only way to win (if there is a win to be had) is not to play/troll.08/29/2014 - 5:02pm
prh99Who cares, just don't watch the damn videos if you don't like her. Personally, I don't care as far as she is concerned as long there are interesting games to be played.08/29/2014 - 4:34pm
Andrew EisenZip - And yet, you can't cite a single, solitary example. (And no one said you hated anyone. Along those lines, no one claimed Sarkeesian was perfect either.)08/29/2014 - 3:51pm
Andrew EisenSaint's Row: Gat Out of Hell was just announced for PC, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360 and Xbox One making it the 150th game For Everything But Wii U! Congratulations Deep Silver!08/29/2014 - 3:49pm
ZippyDSMleeI do not hate them jsut think its mostly hyperlobe.08/29/2014 - 3:40pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - I'd say that's likely. From my experience, most who have a problem with Sarkeesian's videos either want to hate them in the first place (for whatever reason) or honestly misunderstand what they're about and what they're saying.08/29/2014 - 3:16pm
james_fudgeWe appreciate your support :)08/29/2014 - 2:55pm
TechnogeekIt gives me hope that maybe, just maybe, the gaming community is not statistically indistinguishable from consisting entirely of people that your average Xbox Live caricature would look at and go "maybe you should tone it down a little bit".08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
TechnogeekI just want to say that while I've disagreed with the staff of this site on several occasions, it's still good to see that they're not automatically dismissing Anita's videos as a "misandrist scam" or whatever the preferred dismissive term is these days.08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightZippy, So you can't find even one?08/29/2014 - 1:04pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen:Right because shes prefect and never exaggerates... *rolls eyes*08/29/2014 - 12:53pm
SleakerAnd honestly, nearly all of the games she references, or images she depicts I've always cringed at and wondered why they were included in games to begin with, from pinups through explicit sexual depictions or direct abuse. I think it's cheap storytelling.08/29/2014 - 12:35pm
Sleaker@AE - aren't most people fundamentally misunderstanding her at this point? haha.. On a related note I think a lot of the backlash is coming from males that think she is telling them their 'Generic Male Fantasy' is bad and wrong.08/29/2014 - 12:33pm
Andrew EisenAnd no, I don't think the female community would be upset over the performance of a case study in and of itself. Possibly the mostivations behind such a study, the methodology or conclusions but not the mere idea of a case study.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
Andrew EisenAmusingly, these videos aren't saying you can't/shouldn't use tropes or that sexual representations are inherently problematic so those are very silly things to have a problem with and indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of the series.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
SleakerDo you think the female community would get extremely angry over a male doing a case study on the negative impact of sex-novels and their unrealistic depiction of males and how widespread they are in american culture?08/29/2014 - 12:25pm
SleakerThe other thing that people might find problematic is that they see no problem with sexual representations of females (or males) in games. And realistically, why is there anything wrong with sexual representations in fiction?08/29/2014 - 12:24pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician