ESA Lauds Free Trade Deal Between USA & South Korea

July 5, 2007 -
For the ESA, selling more games is good and software piracy is bad.

No wonder then that the organization, which represents U.S. game publishers, has jumped on board with the recently-signed USA-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. Said ESA boss Mike Gallagher:
The U.S.– Korea FTA will provide enhanced intellectual property protections and more favorable trade treatment for a range of digital products, including computer and video games.

The ESA expects the deal to result in:
...non-discriminatory and duty-free treatment for all digital products, including computer and video games, whether imported in physical form or over the Internet.

Game publishers expect the deal will help in their battle against pirates, as well: 
Recognizing South Korea’s high broadband penetration, the FTA includes additional commitments to augment enforcement efforts against Internet piracy.

South Korean publishers are widely-regarded as innovators in the entertainment software industry, particularly with respect to online games. Industry experts believe that this treaty will promote additional opportunities for U.S. and South Korean game publishers with regard to sales, investment and future collaboration.

Comments

GoodRobotUs
DOn't forget the whole 100 year IP thign they want to do,since they rarely support a game after2 much less 5 years its free to trade electronically(after 5),selling it however is not :P

Ya blame piracy for bad games,shotty bug work or polish,bad ports computer crashing protection schemes and high prices games have not really been games of late, I been repairing PS2s of late and reading up on the history of it,the DREs were nasty hell even the slim lines got a bad case of bad lens it happens but sheesh the 360 problem is more than the lens issues ever were.

I bought a copy of GalCiv 2 as well, and remember the whole Starforce shenanigans.

Trade agreements are good, even stopping piracy is good, BUT, there will have to come a point where the ESA and ECA are going to collide on this, and that is retail prices over purchaser rights. Why, for example, should I pay $30-$40 for a DVD, which has a life expectancy of 2-3 years, and then be denied the right to either return the goods or to make a copy for when my DVD eventually wears out.

I'm all for Industry having the right to protect it's own IP, but not at the cost of legitimate customer rights. As people have argued before, just as taking away guns from legitimate users doesn't stop killing, taking away Rights from legitimate customers will not stop Piracy.

Hell, do I need to pull up the StarForce/Stardock Gal Civ2 scandal?

Which part?

Where Starforce got angry at Stardock for releasing their game without copy protection? (I own a retail copy of it, by the way.)

Or where employees of Starforce actually posted links to pirated torrents of GalCiv2 on the Starforce message boards?

Fights against piracy have been shown time and time again to be little more than crude potshots at the legit consumer base in the phantom dream of 'earning lost profit'.

Relic Entertainment knows this.


Hell, do I need to pull up the StarForce/Stardock Gal Civ2 scandal?

Although I'm all for free trade, something tells me the game industry's interpretation of the document is simply being an excuse to impose more and more unesscesary safeguards and firewalls that hackers will easily penetrate.

"Recognizing South Korea’s high broadband penetration, the FTA includes additional commitments to augment enforcement efforts against Internet piracy."

That's what I would be concerned about. Fights against internet piracy tend to have collateral damage.

This could be a good step to help the game industry continue to grow.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteOK, so my brief research looking at GameFAQs forums (protip, don't do that if you wish to keep your sanity intact.), the 3DS doesn't have the power to run anything more powerful than the NES/GBC/GG AND run the 3DS system in the background.07/28/2014 - 11:01am
ZenMatthew, the 3DS already has GBA games in the form of the ambassador tittles. And I an just as curious about them not releasing them on there like they did the NES ones. I do like them on the Wii U as well, but seems weird. And where are the N64 games?07/28/2014 - 10:40am
james_fudgeNo. They already cut the price. Unless they release a new version that has a higher price point.07/28/2014 - 10:19am
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, It most likely is. The question is whether Nintendo wants to do it.07/28/2014 - 10:12am
Matthew WilsonI am sure the 3ds im more then powerful enough to emulate a GBA game.07/28/2014 - 9:54am
Sleaker@IanC - while the processor is effectively the same or very similar, the issue is how they setup the peripheral hardware. It would probably require creating some kind of emulation for the 3DS to handle interfacing with the audio and input methods for GBA07/28/2014 - 9:30am
Sleaker@EZK - hmmm, that makes sense. I could have sworn I had played GB/GBC games on it too though (emud of course)07/28/2014 - 9:23am
E. Zachary KnightSleaker, the DS has a built in GBA chipset in the system. That is why it played GBA games. The GBA had a seperate chipset for GB and GBColor games. The DS did not have that GB/GBC chipset and that is why the DS could not play GB and GBC games.07/28/2014 - 7:25am
IanCI dont think Nintendo ever gave reason why GBA games a reason why GBA games aren't on the 3DS eshop. The 3DS uses chips that are backwards compatable with the GBA ob GBA processor, after all.07/28/2014 - 6:46am
Sleakerhmmm that's odd I could play GBA games natively in my original DS.07/28/2014 - 1:39am
Matthew Wilsonbasically "we do not want to put these games on a system more then 10 people own" just joking07/27/2014 - 8:13pm
MaskedPixelanteSomething, something, the 3DS can't properly emulate GBA games and it was a massive struggle to get the ambassador games running properly.07/27/2014 - 8:06pm
Andrew EisenIdeally, you'd be able to play such games on either platform but until that time, I think Nintendo's using the exclusivity in an attempt to further drive Wii U sales.07/27/2014 - 7:21pm
Matthew WilsonI am kind of surprised games like battle network are not out on the 3ds.07/27/2014 - 7:01pm
Andrew EisenWell, Mega Man 1 - 4, X and X2 are already on there and the first Battle Network is due out July 31st.07/27/2014 - 6:16pm
MaskedPixelanteDid Capcom ever give us a timeline for when they planned on putting the Megaman stuff on Wii U?07/27/2014 - 2:23pm
MaskedPixelanteIf by "distance themselves from Google Plus" you mean "forcing Google Plus integration in everything", then yes, they are distancing themselves from Google Plus.07/26/2014 - 12:20pm
MechaTama31I wish they would distance G+ from the Play Store, so I could leave reviews and comments again.07/26/2014 - 11:03am
Matthew Wilson@pm I doubt it. Google seems to be distancing themselves from G+07/25/2014 - 9:31pm
Papa MidnightGoogle+ Integration is coming to Twitch!07/25/2014 - 8:41pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician