Sony Apologizes, Vows to Never Again Create An Alternate Reality FPS PS3 Game Set in Manchester Cathedral

Sony Apologizes, Vows to Never Again Create An Alternate Reality FPS PS3 Game Set in Manchester Cathedral

July 6, 2007
In Sony's mind, at least, the flap over PS3 hit Resistance: Fall of Man is over.

It's not clear whether officials of the Church of England or Manchester Cathedral would agree.

As reported by Sky News, Sony issued an apology today. SCEE boss Dr. David Reeves said in a letter to church officials:
It is clear to us that the connection between the congregation and the cathedral is a deeply personal and spiritual one. As a result, it is also clear that we have offended some of the congregation by using the cathedral in our science fiction game.

It was never our intention to offend anyone in the making of this game, and we would like to apologise unreservedly to them for causing that offence, and to all parts of the wider community who we might also have offended.

Furthermore, we will ensure that Manchester Cathedral is never used as a setting in any future Sony Computer Entertainment video game.

MSNBC reports that Sony did not address demands by church officials that Resistance be withdrawn from sale. Church officials have not yet commented.

The Manchester Evening News reports that:
In an attempt to clean up the [video game] industry, the cathedral has released a set of `sacred digital guidelines' aimed at manufacturers and retailers, and has urged firms to avoid making violent games.

The newspaper quotes the Dean of Manchester Cathedral, the Very Rev Rogers Govender, as saying:
We still fear that the next buildings to be cloned for virtual desecration could be a mosque, synagogue, temple or other church.

Comments

Really all they did was say sorry and we wont be using your church in anythign anytime soon if we do we will be sure to pay you with a contract to say if you say anything we will get our money back + 10%.
Hah, I wouldn't have minded if they used my church XD

Erik: please do know that not all of us are a bunch of dim-witted brainfailures.
@ ZombieHunter
""those fools won’t be happy until everyone is on their knees in church begging for forgiveness from the magical invisible sky wizard""

I LoL'ed irl.
"Oh, Sony! How can you give up that easily!?

To Lard,

“Manchester Cathedral should be burned to the ground.”

I agree! Those fucking idiotic Christians thinks that their holy building is protected by God! Let us show them that God doesn’t care about his own home by burning it! "


Bah, I had my fill of this type of rhetoric from Schutzstaffel.
@Clyde Wyman

How exactly did Sony "give up"? All they've done is apologize for unintended offense, and promise to avoid doing the exact same thing that caused offense in the future.
Oh, Sony! How can you give up that easily!?

To Lard,

"Manchester Cathedral should be burned to the ground."

I agree! Those fucking idiotic Christians thinks that their holy building is protected by God! Let us show them that God doesn't care about his own home by burning it!
That is the best headline EVER.

Manchester Cathedral should be burned to the ground.

They want to be intolerant? *I'LL* show them intolerance!
Here's my translation of what Sony said:

"We're sincerely sorry we hit a nerve with our work of fiction. We're trying to entertain here, not offend. We'll make it a point to avoid that particular nerve in the future."

Or if you're feeling more cynical:

"We're sorry you've gotten all offended due to screwball reasoning. We'll make a point of never having to deal with you nut jobs again."
Next time aliens attack we'll try and avoid hiding in a church so we don't desecrate it. We'll be sure to leave a note to the aliens so they don't blow it up too. I'm sure they'd understand.
I can see it now.

"Mmmm, yeah, Sony, that wasn't a true apology, was it. If you could jsut put a check behind that that would be greeeaaat. Just call it a donation"

I'd rather it be liek this scene from South Park

"Ahem, Sony Computer entertainment has issued this statement addressing you concerns.... *ahem* Fuck you"
Terminator44 said:
"You know, it’s funny, I recall Battlefield 2 getting in some trouble by including a mosque in one of its maps. The arguments the CoE puts up here are pretty much the same as the ones against the mosque’s inclusions. And it’s not just them,either. The mayors of Juarez and Las Vegas spoke out against GRAW 2 and R6:Vegas, respectively for the inclusion of their home cities in a game *gasp*. Heaven forbid games depict their environments in a realistic manner (Manchester with its Cathedral, a Middle Eastern environment with a mosque). No, its only generic urban environments for you, beacause we said so.

Why can’t these pompous religous and political types accept that games are not “kids’ stuff” anymore? It’s completely riduculous."

First people complained about video games using fictional locations, so companies make games using real-world locations. Then they do it, and catch flak for that. They just can't win...
Cue the Manchester Cathedral Counter Strike Map!
"We still fear that the next buildings to be cloned for virtual desecration could be a mosque, synagogue, temple or other church"

last time i checked, this has already happened
"When is GTA:Manchester coming out? Now THAT would be bad taste."

1999's Grand Theft Auto Mission Pack #2: London, 1961 had a deathmatch map based on Manchester; so it's already been done, in a way. :-P
So if Sony cannot reference Christianity for fear of reprimand, does that mean that all of their games will represent an Aetheistic future?

Soldier 1: Man we've been killing a lot of these aliens. I'd almost feel conflicted about that if there were a set of moral guidlines handed down by a higher-power.

Soldier 2: Shaaa..right. Are you trying to get us sued?
Sony apologizes.

The church does not forgive.

So much for penetance.
I'm annoyed with this. I'm glad Sony didn't pay to bend over for them. I'm still surprised Sony is taking the fall for it, when Insomniac made it, I guess they really want to keep Insomniac with them.

Now, I rather see a group of coders use XNA to recreate this church with guns ablazing and see how much the church bitches over it.
There just is a HUGE gap between the law and the modern world. There are no standards for this, and there are definitely no international ones. I can see how the church is slightly offended. However, if it were a movie I'm sure they would not be as offended, if at all. It seems to me that the church is just knee-jerking to all the video-games are evil knee-jerking. Ugh. Anyway, I suppose in the perfect video-game companies world, they could have said eff off, it's a bloody game you idiots. But this is the real world, full of superficialities upon superficialities. So, Sony gives an "honest" apology, just what the CE what expecting, and nothing more. Seems fair enough to me.

It's sad though... that video games have done little innovation in terms of violence. That appears to be real life's role. A big player in that, is, not coincidentally, religions... but that's another story.
Lots of harsh statements coming up here. Remember, the real reason they were upset wasn't because the cathedral was used or that it was shown to be damaged; that was just their stance to be all legal about it. Their complaint, and quite a legitimate one really, was that Resistance allows you to fire guns and kill things in a virtual recreation of a real-world place of worship in a location suffering from gun crime.

Sony's statement is really rather nice in my opinion. "Yeah, sorry, that might have been a little close to the knuckle. We promise we'll never again do that exact same thing."
Just more evidence that modern Christianity has no idea what a 'church' is in the first place. It has just become a business. Ok, there is no 'become' here, the various religious organizations have been little more the shadow governments and corporations for a long time..

I always laugh when I see some major group like the CoE claim they are going to 'clean someone up'.
There are plenty of parties to be upset with in this instance.

Organized religion, but not so much because they are upset with a gun fight in their place of worship, but more because of the double standard that is held with regards to movies vs games. I've seen countless firefights held in places of worship in movies. Maybe the guys over at Manchester Cathedral are a little more touchy about it, who knows.

People who are unable to differentiate between fiction and non-fiction. The people who cannot distinguish between the two are the ones most likely to end up in the clock tower raining death on people, you know why? Everyone else can tell the difference between playing a game and going on a killing spree! I list this separately because while organized religion is prone to bouts of lack of differentiation, they're hardly the only people with their heads up their asses.

Sony comes in at third, mainly because they're spineless. This is reminiscent of Doug Lowenstein's rant when he left the ESA about how the ESA was willing to defend a publisher's content and creativity, but that the publishers need to show some backbone and stand up for their own damn products.

The game industry is on the verge of collapse, much like the problematic eras of the media that came before it. We are being tested with fire and steel, and we can only hope that when this is over, we will be all the better for it.
Well done sony you've now sent a message out that you can make up any bullshit about the industry and video games and get away with it.

They've apologised already so why do it again??

There's no point trying to appese the CoE cos those fools won't be happy until everyone is on their knees in church begging for forgiveness from themagical invisible sky wizard, so why waste your time??
You know, it's funny, I recall Battlefield 2 getting in some trouble by including a mosque in one of its maps. The arguments the CoE puts up here are pretty much the same as the ones against the mosque's inclusions. And it's not just them,either. The mayors of Juarez and Las Vegas spoke out against GRAW 2 and R6:Vegas, respectively for the inclusion of their home cities in a game *gasp*. Heaven forbid games depict their environments in a realistic manner (Manchester with its Cathedral, a Middle Eastern environment with a mosque). No, its only generic urban environments for you, beacause we said so.

Why can't these pompous religous and political types accept that games are not "kids' stuff" anymore? It's completely riduculous.
The only thing Rogers Govender has a strong spiritual link to is his pocket.
Ctrl+Alt+Del has a great storyline up right now that basically runs along the same lines as this little story. I love the bit at the end of the most recent comic.
Those of you who think this was the decent, nice thing to do need to realize: The church demanded an apology. You don't demand an apology like you're some compass on honor.
Guys, all they did was apologize. As of yet, they still have not removed the game from shelves and such.
You know what? Fuck Sony! You heard me. I'm not siding with the church on this one, but this really fucking makes me sick. They have the nerve to tell gamers, their own fan base, to get a second job to buy their monstrosity of a console, telling us we should be paying more, and that we're stupid enough to buy it even if it didn't have any games, etc. But they don't have the balls to stand up for themselves against a bunch of money grabbing pieces of shit veiling themselves in their religion and church. Fuck the Church of England, fuck the Manchester Cathedral, and fuck Sony!
I think Sony should have never apologized...If church officals can't distinguish fiction from non-fiction than they're just stupid end of story. IMHO if someone is going to protest a game or movie for having a holy structure or building in it they should have done that a long time ago when movies we first filmed and when games we first getting more mainstream since thats been ages/centuries ago i think that they need to keep their mouths shut for now and in the future...
Holy fucking shit, Sony. Way to lay down and take it in the ass. That's just pathetic.
You know what's going to happen from now on? Video game designers are going to have every church in every game completely decimated as part of the story so it can no longer be 'virtually desecrated' by the likes of fictional aliens or soldiers. That oughta make those idiots happy.

Honestly though, I think we really need to remove the politics from religion and the Religion from politics. The only thing making that building 'sacred' is some religious history. Take a look in your history books, kids, and you'll find that churches often have more to do with war and suffering than salvation just about every time.

I'm sorry to offend all the religious types out there and on here, but, seriously, F*** the stupid church. The only worth it has is as a historical artifact and the people who run it obviously don't have the values they preach. Demanding charity and attempting to blackmail? I don't think you can get any more covetous and greedy than that.
I dont see anything wrong with Sony appologizing. They offended a group of people. Said they were sorry. Seems like normal civilized behavior to me. No one cut the church a check. IMO that would be caving in.
As long as this is as far as Sony goes I don't have a problem with it. It's not like an apology costs them anything.
*Sigh* poor Sony. Getting beat up on by church officials. And here I thought they'd refuse to apologize. After all they said it themselves: The game was set in a "Science-FICTION game".

"oh noes! How DARE the big bad gaming company try and use our precious STONE BUILDING in teh gamez. SUE THEM! Er... I mean. Ask nicely for a tidy little donation"

It's days like these when I hate religion the most.
Sony, you are stupid.
way to throw the floodgates open sony.
"We still fear that the next buildings to be cloned for virtual desecration could be a mosque, synagogue, temple or other church."

=O_o=

Virtual desecration? I can't express just how out-of-their-minds that statement is. It isn't desecration to make a popsicle-stick mock-up of the church and smash it; desecration is doing things to the actual holy place. This isn't even close.

I knew that clergy could be technophobic, but this is ridiculous.
"Furthermore, we will ensure that Manchester Cathedral is never used as a setting in any future Sony Computer Entertainment video game."

anytime i read those statements, I can only read it in a sarcastic way. i laughed, but as long as sony doesn't stop the sale of the game i'm ok with what they have said. Truthfully, that game is what is making me want the ps3 the most at the moment. hopefully it will be for sale still when i finally have the money for a ps3.
knowing the church the will try to get the game banned. Damn you sony why can't you just say no.
I wonder what would have been said had it been a mosque or a synagogue? i bet it would be as quiet as this has been .this is the diference between our religions the christians do things nice and peaceful .others should take notes on how to get along toghether without fighting or threats...I hope sony put some money in our christian coffers.
some douch from the news site.
"In an attempt to clean up the [video game] industry, the cathedral has released a set of `sacred digital guidelines’ aimed at manufacturers and retailers, and has urged firms to avoid making violent games."

After the priests added the following to the book of Leviticus:
Leviticus 1:18 "And the Lord said "Thou shalt not make fiction, it is an abomination."
they were publicly reprimanded by God for adding text to the bible.

In all seriousness, they will have absolutely NO success in the future. The only reason they "won" is so Sony doesn't have to hear their whining anymore.
There are guns and a scuffle in Westminister Abbey in the Divinci Code. They were forbidden from filming in the actual cathedral, but they filmed in a Cathedral nonetheless. They did ask permission, and I'm sure they paid something to CoE. Still, the film violated the very ethics they're citing here.

Translation: Ca$h Money, Ca$h-Ca$h-Ca$h Money Money!

When is GTA:Manchester coming out? Now THAT would be bad taste.
Way to wuss out Sony.


Now just how many movies have showcased churches, synagogues, temples, etc in a violent manner? Yeah, a lot.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/07/09 at 04:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: man I got alot of junk and dup files too >< god I need orginization...and no not the knee capping media mafia kind :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:26pm
ZippyDSMlee: replaced :P
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: beemoh:hey its like 60GB porn,400GB anime 100GB games and crap I have took from all my DVDs, I hate waiting on dvds to install stuff..... oh and 40GB of my porn was in the found.000 folder...mostly corrupted.... least I got names of wut needs to be repa
Posted 11/07/09 at 04:18pm
beemoh: @Zip: ...and you'd have to spend all that time re-downloading that porn?
Posted 11/07/09 at 03:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: ggrrrrr......vista lost one of my hard drives and I had a heart attack thinking I lost 1TB of data....
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:58am
JDKJ: Which could be explained by both (a) and (b).
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:56am
Austin_Lewis: JDKJ: You forgot C) the fact that, for some reason, every time he did something that would suggest he shouldn't be in the military, let alone an officer, higher ups ignored it or let it slide.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:51am
JDKJ: Part of the problem is, I believe, that (a) the Army had a lot of time and money already invested in him and which they were unwilling to simply write-off and (b) an increasing need for the type of skills and services he provided.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:48am
JDKJ: And that even if he was begging not to get cut loose, he was apparently a real good candidate for being cut loose, anyway.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:11am
JDKJ: @chada: And while Kennedy once noted that there's usually more than enough blame for everyone to get a slice, the possibility that the Army was unwilling to cut loose someone who was asking to get cut loose could be a factor.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:07am
ZippyDSMlee: *noms on his feet*..nomnomnomnom*droooll* ...wuuutttttt uuu looking at?
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:05am
JDKJ: I'm no psychologist, but I'm told that crazy people have a tendency to do crazy things.
Posted 11/07/09 at 10:03am
chadachada321: Whoops, was out of the convo for awhile. I do wonder what type of ammo he used etc, but the real issue is WHY he did it, not HOW
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:56am
JDKJ: But if it turns out that they actually did, they'll have Hell to pay.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:45am
JDKJ: And I'd tend to rule out the possibilty of FN Herstal supplying restricted ammunition to someone merely because they're ordering it from a military base.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:37am
JDKJ: I know you don't leave your gated community and get around much in dark alleys, so you may be surprised to learn that there's this thing called "the black market" where, if you've got enough money, ain't too much of anything which can't be bought.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:36am
Austin_Lewis: Or, maybe he or someone else at the base ordered the SS190 from FN Herstal.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:32am
Austin_Lewis: the hands of private owners. They run about 300 dollars minimum for a box of 50, and boxes of AP 5.7 are extremely scarce, mainly residing in the hands of Class III stores or individuals who for one reason or another got a demo box of it.
Posted 11/07/09 at 09:30am
Austin_Lewis: There are other firearms that fire the 5.7. However, I too would like to know where he got the ammo and what kind was used. Maybe Hasan, planning not to live through this, went out and bought one the boxes of SS190 that are floating around in
Posted 11/07/09 at 08:44am
JDKJ: And it isn't yet clear what type of ammunition Hasan used. It's strange that he purchased a gun but didn't purchase ammunition for it at the same place and time. Especially because the calibre required is peculiar to the actual gun.
Login or register to post shouts