July 9, 2007 -
If you crash while playing Burnout Legends on your PSP, do you crash in real life?The question comes to mind as GamePolitics looks at some video game legislation that might actually make sense, for a change.
As reported by the Elimira Star-Gazette:
Proposed bills in 12 states, including New York and Pennsylvania, would forbid drivers from playing video games or using their computers and fax machines.
The legislation is a natural progression from outlawing the use of hand-held cell phones by drivers... The intent of the legislation... is to cut down on the distractions that drivers create for themselves when operating electronic devices...
The New York Senate... unanimously passed a bill outlawing such electronics just before adjourning. The Senate bill, S634-C, has been referred to the Assembly Codes Committee...
GP: While we generally think legislating video games is bad, so is distracted driving.



Comments
Impaired driving, as you know, is driving a vehicle with a disruptive visual, physical or mental impairment, whether it's alcohol or a buildup of snow on the windshield. While using cellphones is debatable and may require an explicit law, playing a game is an outright infraction since you are placing focus on the game rather than driving.
LOL! Well, at least this doesn't include printing documents or pictures in the car...hold on the printer cord fell out of the cigarette lighter when I inexplicably had to slam on brakes while editing my pictures for the email I'm going to send at the next red light.
I'm afraid I'll have to disagree with you on this one. Natural selectees that drive cars have a bad habit of taking innocent bystanders with them.
I stuck on the road a lot and on average an hour even though I'm only driving 17 miles, however I routinely see people texting, smoking a cig and driving. Since each one requires and arm I'd like to see their surgery bill for the third arm.
I think so to, imagine a law that only says "thou shall not drive distracted"
Just imagine if you where pulled over
Cop - Sir, I'm afraid I'm gona have to ticket you for driving distracted.
Person - Wha? what do you mean, I don't have a cell phone or even a radio here!
Cop - I'm afraid I saw you watch a girl as you drived, that's a $500 dlls ticket for being distracted.
Person - but the girl is on a poster on YOUR car!
Cop - Yes, it's an undercover op, suits you well, you crazy gamer.
Person - :(
Worse, "common sense" laws are often just a foothold for more drastic legislation. About ten years ago, my state's seatbelt legislation was introduced with the explicit condition that you would never be pulled over for not wearing your belt, and that you would only be fined for not wearing your belt if you'd already been stopped for an actual moving violation. Earlier this year, my state launched an ad campaign boasting how state cops will pull over and ticket anyone suspected to not have his or her seatbelt properly fastened, regardless of whether or not the car was being driven responsibly and legally.
Some states have paternalistic laws that presume to know my driving behavior better than I do. They make it illegal to use the particular little devices on their particular little lists. If some of these states now want to add some nebulous definition of "games" to their lists, I'm not surprised. The longer the list, the more behaviors can be ticketed and fined.
I'm generally against any law that presumes to dictate my private behavior, in-cab or otherwise. As long as I obey the rules of the road and drive safely, it's nobody else's business whether or not I'm wearing my seatbelt, or cranking up the radio, having a conversation, or daydreaming in silence.
Frankly if you need to be told that you shouldn't play games while piloting a ton of metal traveling at one tenth of the speed of sound, you shouldn't be allowed a licence.
It's kind of sad that driving under distractions doesn't just fall under common sense. Sure, we've seen all manner of idiotic behavior at 60 mph.
But rather than call out specific devices, maybe there should be a more general law about driving while clearly preoccupied with something else. If a person is drifting all over the road or seems restless in the front seat, police should just be able to pull them over. What does a law like this one accomplish? A cop encounters a distracted driver and says "Well, you're free to go. It was an Egg McMuffin, not a laptop"?
Don't use legislation to get in the way of Natural Selection.
DARWIN FTW!
Gameboy > It's honestly agreeable with what your saying. That reminds me of the commercials with All-State Insurance where the friends are all talking about the movie and WHAM!
The things people do to keep themselves entertained. It horribly reminds me of the pedophiles that use their own "Stylus" to stalk kids.
And I don't want to support this legislation because if common sense fails you, then you obviously shouldn't be driving.
They are banning using a fax machine in cars? Wait a minute, there are fax machines that could actually work in cars? When did this happen? I thought they had to be plugged into a phone line in order to work.
I don't really understand banning cellphones in cars. Personally, I drive 80% of the time with just one hand anyway. Beyond that, the only other excuse is that talking on the phone is a distraction. But by that logic, talking to friends/family that are in the car is a distraction. Talking to friends that are in the car with you is probably more of a distraction then talking to one over the phone. Want to ban driving with passengers? How about car-pooling?
@ Eli Mordino
It is better to ask for forgiveness than permission.
Just wish I remember who made that quote. It was near the birth of the US, during a time when people were arguing over how to interpret the Constitution. Long story short, one faction said "If its not in there that you can, you can't", and the other said "If its not in there that you can't, you can".
20 points to anyone that can help me remember who said it.
That's exactly what I was going to say. Saying it shouldn't be a law because it makes sense is utterly ridiculous.
"Why is it required to specifically ban anything? Isn’t it more sensible to outlaw consciously operating a distracting device, which is how my country and most EU ones do it?"
It's called "stacking". They bust you for driving while distracted, driving without due care, driving while on a cell, etc all at once. There's usually a max for most fines, but they can be stacked one on top of the other to allow them to fine you a larger amount, and make it harder to argue your way out of all of them. You may claim you weren't really distracted, but you were still driving while using a handset, so at least one fine still sticks.
One thing that I really feel is a distraction is Billboard ads. Visual distractions are the worst IMO.
Unrelated, but someone brought up the radio. I think they should consider a law about banning radio stations from playing siren sounds. There's this damn White Zombie song with a siren playing in the background that gets me looking around frantically every time.
But if there is little traffic, you're familiar with the area and you have the ability to stay focused on driving while kind of staying focused the road, the cars in front, beside you, and behind you and all pedestrians/animals/objects in front of you and beside you then I really don't see the problem. Some people can multi-task and others cannot.
I avoid quite a bit of accidents, especially in a town that doesn't require you to actually require you to drive to get your license. A written test is all that is required which I think is absolutely insane.
But anyway I think there are much worse things than cellphones. Like girls doing make up while driving, people having sex while driving, changing clothes, eating non finger foods or large finger foods, searching for a CD, yelling at your child, yelling at anyone, argueing, anything that requires you to look away from the road, lighting fire works(yea I've seen it before) and now video games/comptuers. Also if your going to do something while driving, do one. Don't smoke and talk on the phone, dont eat and talk on the phone, dont eat and smoke, don't smoke and drink ect.
Music and cellphones don't require visual aid and doesn't prevent you from moving your head to see if anything is in your blind spots. Cellphones can be hands free (either headset or speaker phone setting). So really I think there are many other things that harm your ability to drive much more than a cellphone and music. Obviously there should be limits you set on yourself like don't have an extremely important conversation while on a cellphone, don't argue or fight ect.
Someone playing a game while driving..... WTH? So these idiots are driving with a knee or their feet? There's a hundred possible distractions that can take place while behind the wheel. I'm still waiting on radio legislation.. BAN CAR RADIOS! They're even worse now with people and their "systems" where they play with the settings so they can be as annoyingly loud as possible.. Thankfully that is something that people can be stopped for...
Anyone who's playing a game, using a computer or some ****ing way using a FAX MACHINE while driving (not counting stopped at lights or whatever though it's still stupid) should get their license taken away for being an idiot. Then again, a lot of states give drunk drives multiple chances as it is....
What are the penalties for this??
ie: it is ALREADY illegal to play while driving here! >_
There is no reason to ban specific devices or activities, just everything.
I also thought it was a law in most states that said that DVD players had to be behind the driver seat.
I think perhaps the legislation is approaching this from the wrong direction, though. Rather than outlawing specific activities while driving, I think perhaps the legislation that's needed is that, while driving, you must not operate ANYTHING else but the car.
What I do know, is that when I eventually learn to drive, I'm sure as heck being careful so as not to end up in a crash like the ones seen in Burnout.
Having realistic crashes in a game can be fun, but it also serves as a reminder (at least to me) of how dangerous reckless driving can be.
Thanks, just got back from the Dentist and that comment cheered me up. :)
While common sense SHOULD indicate that most people wouldn't be dumb enough to not know that using a computer or game system while driving is completely stupid (not to mention a massive safety hazard/death trap), humanity has disproven any notion of having any common sense so often that this is a very welcome law, to me.
I did, however, just get this image of a PSP built right into the steering wheel. :)
The screen on the crossbar and the controls on the wheel part somewhere.
Imagine the coordination needed to play Burnout or some other driving game while driving down the freeway! :)
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
And, silly as it may be, it is true that more than a couple of people have been caught watching DVDs while driving. Even adult DVDs. So it's not too difficult to image someone playing a game of some sort or using a computer or portable fax at inappropriate times as well.
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
However, I find it hard to believe that they imagine legislation is needed to stop people from playing video games or using FAX MACHINES while driving. Picking up a cell phone, hitting ANSWER and starting to talk? Sure, I can see that happening, I've even done it once or twice myself when I shouldn't have. Using a fax machine? Or any kind of computer? That's just pure stupidity. That is like legislating against hitting yourself with a hammer, it's completely clear that using these things while driving is stupid and unsafe, whereas a cell phone seems acceptable.