
Yesterday's
GamePolitics story concerning a 13-year-old who stabbed his brother to death over a video game lacked one critical piece of information:
What game was being played?
If the brothers were playing
Grand Theft Auto, for example, the game violence backlash would be inevitable. While we still don't know the precise game being played, the
Philadelphia Inquirer is now reporting that it was a sports game.
We'll report more details as they become available.
Comments
One of them was probably playing as Pac-Man Jones. The video game connections just never end!!!
I kind of hope this little tidbit is true. It would be the best case scenario for the game industry. No one can claim the game was mis-rated by the ESRB, or that Kratos told him to do it.
Still, I wonder how the parents are reacting to this..? I hope they make it through this.
@ Papa Midnight
Lol. Yea, that would go over real well. You know, seeing how the video game is based on an actual sport that airs on TV regularly.
That just means they need to tone down real football to two hand touch. and they must be wearing a suit that would protect them from a grizzly bear attack.
something tells me this kid was bi-polar. its just a real shame that the parents had to find out this way.
More seriously, I am not surpised it's a sports game. Ultimately it will probably turn out this kid had mental problems or was in a gang or something.
If he never had contact with games outside of his age level in the rating system, this provides good news towards the, "games do not make you want to kill someone" argument. But the fact that someone had to die to help this along the way is a terrible thing. It's a price that just shouldn't be paid just to prove something one side knows, and the other side refuses to accept.
So while I'm glad that people who often jump on the backs of game developers and lash out at them for making death simulators won't be able to ignore this flaw in their logic system. It sucks plain and simple that someone lost their life to do it.
If it does turn out to be a sports game, I'm sure that part will be conveniently be omitted where necessary to ensure all games remain to be seen as bad.
Its good to see that you feel bad. Um... I don't mean that like it sounds. We all feel bad. The point I'm trying to make is that no video game critic ever seems to feel bad for the victims. They never express condolences towards the statistics they state. In this way, we are far more human than they can imagine.
Interesting to note that it was bent.
True, you have a point there, it seems like whenever someone dies as a "result" of video game violence. You don't even hear about the person who died, just the evils of the game company, and how the poor killer was mentally abused and twisted by a sick game.
The game critics forget someone died, and move on to using a death as nothing more than ammo against games.
Something to ponder.
I hate football, but I never hated it that much.
Bipolar? How would being bipolar have anything to do with obvious anger management issues?
That's an interesting point, but in our case I think the feeling is closer to "relief" than "celebration" which makes all the difference. Thompson is in the business of hoping people are killed in incidents where video games can be associated. Though we may have our own selfish motives, we're conversely disappointed and angered when such an association is made. And truly, there is nothing positive to take out of what happened here. A person is dead which is the worst part, and more selfishly, sports game or not, other games in the home are still going to be evaluated and the news can only get worse from here.
Ideally we shouldn't have to sit here and talk about our own freedom being threatened when an unrelated tragedy occurs, but that's the time we live in right now and I accept that part of the culture for what it is.
There have been murders over sports for thousands of years.
cause i know people who are bi-polar, and a situation like this occurred with one of them, only it didn't lead to someones death and it wasn't over a video game, but did involve a knife.
We're supposed to take seriously someone who uses that name?
Secondly, I'm in the business of trying to save lives lost at the hands of future minor gamers who are sold mature violent games. I get it. Doctors who treat lung cancer are actually thrilled when someone comes to them with the disease right? How pathetic, how self-righteously deluded you are.
Says it all really.
What proven extended effects? Your masturbation fantasies do not count. You may be able to fool soccer moms with a ten second sound bite on CNN and not have to back it up, but once again, don't expect us to buy into that shit. Back up what you say or don't bother to comment at all. No one here is buying what you are selling.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blitz_The_League#.22Campaign_Mode.22
Then why don't you go out and inform the parents to not purchase such entertainment for their children?
I'm not going to argue over whether violent video games have an effect on minors. That's a debate best settled by experts in child psychology. And I also am not going to argue that all aspects of this incident should be thoroughly investigated, including video games if need be. The only thing I object to is jumping to the conclusion that ALL youth violence is a result of violent video game play. It would be ludicrous to argue that ALL youth violence is a result of video game play since we've had violent young people as long as we've had violent adults.
Let us all not make assumptions as to what the cause of this incident may or may not be.
Or it could be indicative of a different other mental disorder with the symptom of poor control of violent impulses. It could be depression, stress, hormones. It could be genetic or induced by something he was taking. You can diagnose a disorder from a handful of news stories?
The best can be done right now is to rule out what didn't cause it. Was the knife in the kitchen or near the tv? Did he feel threatened (rationally or irrationally) or was he just pissed off because he lost?
so then it could be a hand full of mental illnesses, I was pointing out that the actions taken by this child was very extreme, therefor pointing to some type of metal illness. I based it off of my own experiences. I am not claiming to be an expert on Bi-polar disease, nor am i trying to make a connection between said disease and stabbings.
We don't even know if the intent was to kill. The chest is the biggest target and it may have been a matter of whichever body part was easiest to hurt.
Is there any better coverage out right now?
"Secondly, I’m in the business of trying to save lives lost at the hands of future minor gamers who are sold mature violent games."
The help the ESRB inform parents about what games their kids shouldn't be playing.
The important part now is not deciding whether the Government should raise our children for us, or whether the Game Industry should be descriminated against because of the delusional fantasies of one laughable practitioner of law, it's finding why, every once in a while, this happens, and has happened over hundreds of years. To say a 13-year old wouldn't normally kill is only accurate for the last few hundred years, and only in Western countries for the main part. A 13-year old boy in Ancient Greece was considered a man and expected to fight in a war. Since that point, society has focussed on trying to remove that aggressive urge, but it can never be done completely, it's part of who we are, it's the prime method for survival.
Take a look at Thompson and how he wants to 'destroy' Rockstar, he doesn't just want to get them to tone down their games he wants to destroy them. How is that any less a violent impulse? Thompson is an incredibly violent person, and will always be so. Violence takes lots of different forms and is as old as humanity itself. It's that which we are up against, not some kind of digital bogeyman.
..... because everyones first thought when they are angry is to pick up a knife and start stabbing the first thing they see....
you can't possibly be serious. No one thinks .o0O(hey, I'm gonna stab someone, but I don't want to kill them, just teach them a lesson. Yeah, thats the ticket!)
Yeah, I'm stereotyping, but come on, how many gamers do you know tip cars, trash stores, and riot through the night because they lost/won?
Are you kidding me? In a perfect world you'd use the same percentage of your brain as the average individual. Too bad the world will never be close to perfect.
Jabrwock, yea your partially right but you are doing the same thing that JT is doing. I'm a avid sports fan, I don't miss a week of NFL football. I've never tipped over cars because my favorite team lost. I've never known anyone that tipped over a car because my team lost. I've never known anyone that got into a fight because their favorite team lost. I dunno sounds like your taking the hypocritical stance.
He probably does have some sort of mental imbalance, but I doubt it can be diagnosed through a news story.
You *have* had violent outbursts, yes? I've thrown a game controller at my brother's head (cause: killing me too many times in Goldeneye), punched someone across a kitchen table in the jaw (cause: making lewd jokes in my direction all evening), and taken a swing at my boyfriend (cause: he bit a hole in my t-shirt). Three shots to the head, and it was never "Oh, I'm going to kill you." It was always "I've told you to stop, you haven't stopped, and you still aren't stopping, so I'm going to hurt you until you do." I can easily imagine grabbing something nearby if I paused for a second. If I had a knife in my hand, I can imagine still taking a swing.
Am I psychotic? No. Bipolar? No. Clinically depressed? No. I'm what teachers refer to as "overly sensitive."
It doesn't excuse his actions, but I can easily see how it would happen because he wasn't thinking rationally.
My only outbursts were during high school and mostly damaging to myself. I got pissed off I punched a locker until it wouldn't close some other inanimate object. I've only purposely injured other people who physically attacked me first. And I have never, ever injured someone other a video game, just because someone is better than you at a video game or uses cheap tactics to get a win is never a cause for physically harming them. PERIOD. it is just a game and thats all it is ever going to be.
"...I got pissed off I punched a locker until it wouldn’t close, OR PUNCH some other inanimate object."
"...And I have never, ever injured someone OVER a video game."
Did I say that my responses were reasonable or rational? I'll be the first to admit that they weren't. However, I happen to be hardwired that way and those are my experiences.
On a lighter note, I'm willing to bet this kid forget his meds. Or at the very least NEEDED to be medicated. No one, gamer or not, stabs someone over who's turn it is. There's some other factor in the mix.
well if thats how you want to rationalized it fine. whatever, it doesn't change the fact that the kid killed his bother because the bother wouldn't give up the controller.
I'm pretty sure that doesn't fly in court, if it does then i have my excuse if I kill someone.
So, now I said it was a valid excuse? It may be a reason, but it's certainly no excuse.
If it turns out they so much as owned a violent game, he'll probably try and make something of it though, that's just Jack for you.
Oh so you're telling me the games transmit a disease that wil eventuallyl make them kill people, even if they play it only once? Ok then why do we not have a huge epidemic of violence and murders? Why haven't the MAKERS of violent games gone out and kill people, I mean if you can blame virginia tech solely on games (never mind the fact that's he's insane and over 18) then you must be saying it can effect adults so therefore shouldn't the developers who are not only exposed to, but play and make the games on a daily basis be effected by this? Or maybe the answers aren't that simple.
Come on jack we both know you can do better than this.
Does it matter? Its a dumbass either way.
But this is sibling rivalry at its worst, me tinks.
With the new release of Bomberman LIVE, it's certainly coming more frequent (at least in the sense we are arguing alot more :D)
I haven't heard anything on whether he's the real deal or not, but my technique is the same. Ignore him.
It'd be funny if it was Rockstar Table Tennis though. That'd be ironic in so many levels.
....if video games make violent killers, don't you think YOU would have several thousand people wanting your immediate assassination? just saying
hayabusa75, not a wannabe-attorney and you are
"Konami under legal fire for upcoming Pro-Evo Soccer 2008 launch - critics predict increased reports in home stabbings"
@ Jack Thompson the massacre Chaser
No, your in the business of creating scapegoats so you can forward your own selfish agenda, just like all lawyers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ8kraRzE7A
We can only wish...
"We’re supposed to take seriously someone who uses that name?"
There was a time when someone used his real name and you refused to talk to him based on his name alone. See http://jackdouche.ytmnd.com/
Somewhat exciting being called out by the man himself. Though I can understand how you could misinterpret my comments to be blanketing your profession and indeed all professions that are indirectly associated with human suffering to some degree, I assure you my comments were personally directed towards you, Jack Thompson, and not everyone who takes issues with the violence in video games.
I have no doubt that some people are simply misinformed about the affects of video games and honestly have the best interests of society in mind when they combat such issues. Such people are well-meaning and exhibit genuine concern for children and indeed all of society. You are not one of these people. You have proven time and time again through your constant lies and hyperbole that truth is an inconvenience you can't afford when there is a profit to be made.
And we're supposed to take you seriously? You've made prostitution a more noble profession than your own.
Go back to chasing hearses to the funeral homes since you can't practice what you preach.
“We’re supposed to take seriously someone who uses that name?”
So says the person who, when this site was on LiveJournal, concocted over 50 screen names, many of which were verbal attacks to Dennis McCauley, Patricia Vance, Hal Halpin, etc.
(Did he create a screen name to badmouth Doug Lowenstein too? I don't remember...)
And that was because SOMEBODY couldn't -- and STILL can't -- take a hint from getting banned over and over again because of all the insults he'd tried to drown us in...
Not to mention completely derailing topics, or attempting to, spamming with multiple press releases, personal attacks on readers, trying to over ride Dennis' authority, the aforementioned ban evasion, and the final straw, blackmail, by demanding people's personal information, which would have exposed us to huge amounts of danger, and since he believes us all to be little children, that COMPLETELY contradicts what he says he is out to do.
You sure of this? Dennis say anything about this?
I've been ingoring him but I want to know why Dennis hasn't banned him again yet. I'm sure Dennis won't do anything but if possable can't anything be done about him sence he's back to harras us? I really don't feel comfertable now that he's back.
Alot of people begged for Dennis to let him back...and now he's back and everyone's getting into a big fight with him again. Trying to agure your points with Jack is like talking to a wall......a waste of time.
I don't understand this at all.
At least a wall has a higher IQ.
But that doesn't mean that he can troll around this site. Internet trolling is not tolerated and it's just plain childish and immature and I bet after the 90 day suspension of his license, he would be happily jumping back to the media about Rockstar and then, gets into jail.
I will be happy to wait for that day.
Plus the wall doesn't say anything at all. That means no lies, no insults, no "hooah", no "direct causal link", no "put down the controller and get a life", etc., etc., etc., etc.
A jar of mayonnaise has a higher IQ than Jack Thompson, then again so does every inanimate object.
"No, the issue is whether they played any of the violent games at any time, given the proven extended effects of such violent game play. "
You mean the effects that have never actually been proven?
Also, you might not take carbonatedgravy seriously based on his name, but most of us dont take you seriously because of your record of bizarre antics that seem to border on severe paranoia and a very bad temper.