11 videos in 3 days... impressive!
Since the Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA) announced its campaign to foster gamer participation in the upcoming CNN/YouTube Republican Presidential Debate, 11 gamer-created videos have been uploaded to YouTube.
The number and quality of the videos increases the chances that a gamer-centric video question might actually make it into the debate, thus raising mainstream awareness of video game issues. So - keep 'em coming!
Due to the large number of new videos, GP will link them all from a single post rather than creating an individual story for each.
Today we have
, a gamer who will vote for the first time in the 2008 presidential election; Dustin, who frames the debate around Grand Theft Auto; Kevin from Sterling Heights, Michigan, who thinks parents should be allowed to choose their kids's games; and Kevin from Detroit, who wonders how future game legislation will be any more effective than the failed efforts of the past.
Comments
not to mention your license in alabama was revoked, and with the bull that you have already tried to do there, I doubt that the judge will let you back to begin with.
You seem to think that your going to win no matter what. Insomnia does that to you.
Using the first comment to front your own agenda is really fucked up. Dennis you really need to trace his IP and obtain proof that these posts were originating from John Boy himself.
What a psycho.
I don't think that's supposed to be JT. Notice the "THE LOVELY, THE IRREPRESSABLE, THE INCREDIBLY SANE" and "SUPERCOOL AWESOME SUPERMAN-IN-DISGUISE". Also, note what site the name links to. Let's face it, not even JT can be that stupid, but damnit he's trying.
Anyway back to the point, I've played a lot of violent games, but never used a gun, I'd say any intuition gained on the operation of a firearm would be from film and telivision vastly more than videogames. For one in a game your focus is on the thing your shooting, so the animation of the gun is often ignored, and for one using a different control mechanism is akin to conditioning you to use a completely different system than the one for a firearm making it worse. On TV however the information is passive, you get the dramatic gun-cocking and the old hardcore guy teaching the other guy to use a gun.
You spelled SMART wrong in your title.
Immediate News Release – August 12, 2007
Hearing to Be Held for Preliminary Injunction against The Florida Bar
SUPERCOOL AWESOME SUPERMAN-IN-DISGUISE Miami attorney Jack Thompson is pleased to announce that United States District Court Judge Adalberto Jordan will, within the next three weeks, convene a hearing in his Southern District courtroom
The purpose of the hearing is to decide whether a preliminary injunction should be granted against The Florida Bar and Judge/Referee Dava Tunis (
ANYHOO, being on-topic, I'm really loving these videos that everyone is putting out. They all ask really good questions and really show what the true gamer is. I just may make my own soon. :P
Dy
I know that the plastic guns in House of the dead, Time Crisis et al will not train people in the use of firearms. I have played many of them (had the highest Time Crisis score in college for 3 years) and used to own House of the Dead 2 on the Dreamcast with the gun controller. To this day, I have only ever fired a real gun once, and that was with the gun owner holding it for me and bracing my shoulder against it. For all my knowledge of the light gun games, I do not know how to load, reload or correctly operate a firearm.
The point I was trying to make is that Thompson blames games like Halo, Counter-Strike, GTA and Bully for teen violence, all games controlled via a joypad or keyboard/mouse combo. There has been expert opinion on these boards from a person who has trained people in the use of guns that the nearest anyone will get to "training" for violence through video games is through the use of these gun interfaces. He said that to insinuate that people were to learn firearm skills through using a joypad or keyboard and mouse was ridiculous.
"it strikes me as truly outlandish that someone should say that we must ban fake guns and stop any restrictions on real guns."
This is true in my opinion. In Ireland we play all the same violent games that Jack Thompson has blamed for teen violence. How many school shootings has there been in Ireland? None. But according to Jack Thompson's "experts", there should have been several killings already, as apparently violent games lead to violent behaviour. In the USA there have been many school shooting, and America is one of the countries in the world where it is easiest to get a firearm. I understand that the gun control debate is one that will go on and on, but the facts remain:
Ireland: Illegal to own firearms outside of special circumstances (farms, sporting guns), people play Doom, GTA, Halo, etc. - No school shootings.
England: Illegal to own firearms outside of special circumstances, people play Doom, GTA, Halo, etc. - 1 school shooting (perpetrated by a pedophile with no social skills who has never been reported as playing a video game)
USA: Access to firearms ingrained in the constitution, very easy to obtain access to them via gun shows, basic background checks, people play Halo, GTA, Doom, etc. Many school shootings.
The only countries in which school shootings have occured have been ones with lax at best gun laws. Violent media is not the common denominator in these horrific events, it is violent and mentally disturbed people with access to guns.
Those laser guns used in stuff like House of the Dead or Duckhunt or whatever do not help you learn how to actually use a firearm in real life. They have no recoil and are extremely lightweight, and you also do not have to worry about drift like in the real world. There is no substitute for real training, the only way to train in how to use firearms is actually using firearms. You cannot train on any video game, you have to use the real thing. Interestingly, Jack Thompson has claimed to be a Republican, and the Republicans usually support the NRA. Don't get me wrong, I support the 2nd amendment and enjoy spending time on the range when I have the chance, but it strikes me as truly outlandish that someone should say that we must ban fake guns and stop any restrictions on real guns.
Serious question. I understand your desire to protect kids from violent video games. Not all kids are ready to handle all the material portrayed in some games. I get it. But, as a Republican, don't you believe in individual responsibility? I am fine if you personally want to make Take 2 or other companies look bad. Heck, I am fine with society frowning upon them. This is America, though. They do have the right to do this and we have the right to control their future with our dollars. Parents don't like Take 2's business practices...simply don't but from Take 2 and ensure your kids follow suit. However I think the government has no business in this and retailers should not be the people making decisions for the consumers. Don't you agree?
Damn my interweb skills! There is already someone who commented on posts here regarding video games training people to use firearms. An individual who has trained police officers and members of the public previously. His experisence and expertise led him to say something along the lines of "Sure, if it's a plastic replica gun like in House of The Dead, then maybe, but with a joypad? Don't make me laugh". This is someone who was involved in the training of law enforcement individuals, if anyone can be believed it is he.
Dennis, any chance you could drag out this individual's name and the corresponding article? Try as I might I couldn't find it.
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=12465
http://www.nintendo.com/consumer/systems/wii/en_na/settingsParentalContr...
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/support/familysettings/live/xbox360/xboxliveco...
This COMPLETELY and UTTERLY kills all of Jack's bitching. Even if a child does buy an M, or hell AO rated game if they have parents that are even vaguely active in their child's interests they will be unable to play said game.
Therefore children cannot play violent games on the new systems. But Jack has ignored this point thusfar, because intelligent, informed and active parents would crush his cash cow.
Jack I want to hear your take on these controls or frankly, don't bother posting here again. If you don't comment on this I will just assume that you really have no interest in keeping violent games out of the hands of children. Quite the contrary, by ignoring the steps already taken by the industry I think you want children to get their hands on these games. Like some kind of insidious doctor with no interest in curing the patient. Why not when you make so much money off the illness.
Those three links answer all your issues. Respond now or never again.
Hooah has multiple meanings to those of military background. It's not always a YES.
Or considered a lawyer for playing phoenix wainwright: attorney at law
Or heck, being able to fly an Airplane after playing Top gun or Mach4.
Or if there was video games back during the holy wars in the middle ages.
Then we take someone who knows how to use a gun like a police officer, but doesnt play videogames (preferrably one who doesnt even use a computer). If theyre such great murder simulators and training excercises, surely the guy wont even need to read the manual to play the game, since playing a game and using a gun, let alone shooting someone are the same thing....
then we watch as he tries and deciphers how to use the keyboard and we laugh at jack, thats if he hasnt been thrown from the courtroom for his usual antics by then
Or let Jack play DOOM for a few hours before having a real life game of paintball with some marines. Ones who may take offense to him using that word that he has not earned the right to use.
"Secondly, I have won most of my cases on these issues. Read my book, Ace."
through the almighty power of Lexus.com and my limited paralegal skill, I have deduced that you have won nothing that took place in a courtroom in the last 10 years.
So that sentence up there is the most blatant lie I have ever seen in 20 years of dealing with the insane, mundane, stupid, and other branches of our Judicial system.
Well reading Jack's stuff is generally more interesting ultimately. The stuff he spouts is logically flaws but still vaguely situated in reality. As such it is fun to poke holes in his arguments and tear them to shreds.
LaRouche stuff you can't even debate. Its so out of this world and completely batshit insane that you CAN'T debate it. Its to the level you can only responds, "What the fuck?"
i used to think this was a joke but honestly this guy claims to hate video games but ill bet hes here more than most people!
The same reason you'd read anything by Jack, for the lulz.
I love you too.
I've seen those. Those jokes are just sad, just shows how hard LaRouche and all of his followers fail art anything, be it humor or basic human decency and logic.
Christian logic states: Matthew 23:27-28 (27 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people's bones and all uncleanness. 28 So you also outwardly appear righteous to others, but within you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.)
My bad, sorry ,and actually, he's using crazy activist logic, like how PETA will throw blood on your for taking a bite of a burger but when they use pig insulin for am edical problem, it's all hunky dory.
http://www.larouchepub.com/lym/2007/3431spacewar_posthuman_era.html
http://www.larouchepub.com/lym/2007/3431videowars_future.html
Truly yours,
Joe F.
"Rumor has it that Rupert Murdoch got pregnant in MySpace."
"Yes, by the 29,000 sex offenders in there, too bad he didn't tie the Tubes!"
You'll find more, go on: www.larouchepac.com
You forget, he uses christian logic, it's perfectly ok when he does it, but if anyone else does, it's a vast conspiracy against him.
But going by his own warped logic wouldn't he be at fault for that and not the people who chose to call him?
When Penny-Arcade donated money, something he was not man enough to do and made a news post about it he said that Tycho and Gabe did so to force their readers into harassing Jack.
When Dennis posted a link to Jack's tepid book, it wasn't because it was relevant to what is discussed here, but rather to force us to "bookstorm" him.
And when Dennis made a news story about the heart condition of Jack's it wasn't to make a news story about that, but rather to force us to wish Jack ill, which most actually wished him well.
So by posting his number Jack is forcing people to harass him, therefore he should press charges against himself.
That's precisely why he keeps posting his phone number, he's trying to bait us.
Nothing I could say would make Jack think we're any less idiots. He blindly thinks we're all sadistic potential murderers just waiting for the right game to push us over the edge.
Also, I never said that I wished anything bad to happen to his house, kids, pets. Merely that I expect him to report said events. I wouldn't put it past him to make up statements like that just to make everyone feel sorry for him, and to incite a negative attitude toward gamers.
"The early bird destroys the gamer worms."
Did you call gamers "worms"? Please, Jack... gamers are human beings, okay?
And oh yes -- please stop posting that phone number here. You do realize, if one day you get swamped with prank collect calls, it's all your fault.
It's not like there's a shortage of "gamers as idiots" ammo to be had, sadly.
The big problem with defending attacks on gamers is that we can be anybody. For cryin' out loud, we're a group connected only by our affinity for an INCREDIBLY broad-spectrum hobby.
The only solace I take is the fact that those of us who grew up with video games and see them as a normal facet of life in this world are slowly taking over the world...
Y'know, the old fashioned way -- by growing up.
if you're wrong about his kids (and you might be) then you have given him more ammo for his 'gamers are idiots' belief. Having someone's house vandalized, pets raped etc. is a horrible thing to wish on anyone. Also even if he does get disbarred, that in no way prevents him from posting here (and if he's out of a job he'll have more time to spend here). Just ignore him. Imagine his rection if he posts something really long-winded and insulting and no one replies . . . EVER.
Oh crap, I just can't do it anymore.
So here's the real speech:
We know his brain's broke, he's clueless about games, the gaming industry, and his kids probably think he's as big of a joke as we do. I'll bet they go to their friends houses and play violent M-rated games, watch violent movies, and are perfectly well adjusted despite having an overbearing whack job for their dad.
I read this site daily expecting him to report that he's had his house vandalized, his kids beaten, and pets raped, all by gamers in an attempt to become a martyr to his misguided cause.
The only thing that this whole JT situation proves is that the legal system in our country is screwed up. That people like Jacko can still practice is a mockery of the legal profession. The Bar should ignore the psych evaluation and simply summarily disbar him, deem him a public nuisance and lock him up for his own safety.
@ Jack:
Seriously dude, all kidding aside, why are you so hesitant to submit to the psych test? Is it because you're worried that you won't get a fair examination? Worried you might fail? Know you'll fail? If you're as sane as you claim agree to the test but request an independent examiner. I would think you'd be anxious to prove you're not a loon.
actually your voice kind of struck me the wrong way, don't know why. If I were you i'd make your voice lower next time (and by lower I mean lower in pitch, not volume)
The three police officers that died at the hands of Devin Moore(and not Take-Two) are all spinning around in their graves because of Jack Thompson and their own families.
"I'm at the helm, you just don't know it"
I usually try to refrain from being rude to anyone, especially to Jack Thompson (he isn't worth it to me), but I have to say how a self-righteous and overall arrogant remark that is. It's statements like this Jack that questions your credability and overall sanity, you seem to have this strange belief that everything bad that happens against video games seems to be because of you even though all you have is opinions and beliefs. Hate me if you will, but I just had to say my fill.
Your argument reminds me of a comic book I read one time talking about a certain character. In that book, one character was talking about a recently deceased character about how he didn't simply disagree, but he would crazily disagree. He used this example that I made sure to memorize. someone can say "I like Turkey" and then he would snap back saying "Turkey sucks and you suck and who made you boss?!"
I gotta leave now, got to feed my dogs, maybe watch the baseball game with my family. Because, contrary to popular (meaning your) belief, i have a life. Oh, and i sleep too. You might want to consider that. It's what i hear humans do to give themselves more energy the next day. They get less cranky and less careless too. Hint, hint.
I tried that sorlion burger, but it was a little raw. The chibatta sandwiches are also horrible. But heck, i love your curly fries. So i keep coming back.
At least it isnt denny's. took dang near 4 hours for someone to say hi, would you like something to drink. I told them i wanted my time back. Course i didn't ever come back to denny's after that.
Oh and please dont get anymore plastic surgery or hang babies out windows please. I dont think they like it, and you might have dropped him and hurt the baby really bad.
I wish you would go back to making good music or counting to 21.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8GQPtlGAc8
not the jacktionary version."
You mean the same jacktionary that lists correlation and causality as synonyms?
allow me to explain, see your using the dictionary version of "fact"
not the jacktionary version.
Hard to say. Jack has been known to post here in the past, and one would think that Dennis would not abide someone impersonating him. Particularly not in this sort of drawn out debate.
However, this Jack's been surprisingly civil compared to some of his past behavior, so it does make one wonder.
I did the third video. Could everybody understand me okay? I probably could have looked more professional.
relax i know what you meant i just had to take a jab at the hack lol
Right...keep telling yourself that. Just don't let Judge Moore find out that you're claiming this, as you've already been admonished concerning your representation of the Stricklands (or rather, the Court-ordered lack thereof).
"Secondly, I’ll be a fact witness at the trial. That’s another thing you didn’t know. Hooah!"
Fact witness, eh? What, were you there when Devin Moore went on his rampage? Did you witness the event first-hand? Do you have anything to offer against the gaming-industry defendants other than inadmissible hearsay, speculation and conjecture? I think not. The only way you could possibly testify is as some kind of expert--and I'm betting dollars to donuts that there's no WAY Judge Moore lets you get on that stand, as an expert, lay witness or otherwise.
Also, note that once again, Jack ducks the question of summary judgment. I'm guessing that SJ for the defendants is still a great possibility, if not a certainty, given the wealth of case law that cuts against the Stricklands' position.
P.S. Jack, you're not a Marine--your repeated use of "Hooah!" is downright disrespectful, and your cheap imitation of Al Pacino is just sad.
much better example . that was a horrible accident that should not have been allowed to happen, just like jack thompsons birth
Dennis already confirmed that it is.
He is. Otherwise Dennis would of swiped the comments and marked his IP.
Ok, whoa whoa whoa, not what I meant. The Exxon Valdez incident was caused by a grave human error, in this case, we can jsut agree that if Jack was at the helm of that case, it's doomed.
So far your my 2nd favorite, third being the video directly above yours.
Only issue with the video is your statement/question is so long it forces you to talk faster. Also the reflection from your glasses are distracting(making it a bit harder to pay attention to you). I know you have a time limit but I would consider shortening the statement a little bit to slow things down and to make it more easily understood. Also maybe put a piece of paper over your monitor so there isn't a strong glare on your glasses. This will allow you to make a better connection with the viewer.
I have a big question for you - can Christians be gamers?
I had to speak fast to fit it into the 30s time limit.
Also, I suppose I should have made sure I was clear with my point that legislation has been useless thus far and that it seems most trivial to consider future laws on the matter. I thought my opening statement made that point for me.
I hope you don't mind me answering but as I happen to be both a Christian and a gamer I can state that the answer is emphatically yes. I like playing videogames and pen & paper rpgs. I've been playing videogames since the Atari 2600 and pen & paper rpgs since college. I've met a good number of people and have been able to talk about my faith and where I stand on the issues with them because I'm a gamer. Being both allows access to people that just being one or the other wouldn't allow.
Its important that we interact and talk with each other. Its the only way some people will ever hear about the Gospel. At least that's how I feel about the whole thing anyway. I'd be glad to talk more about it off list or over private messages through the forums if you'd like.
Not when there's violent vidya games to (attempt to) be banned!
@GP:
What about all his imaginary friends? Or the ghost of Dave Thomas? ... oh so they don't count? Nevermind then...
@Bear-Dogg:
I'm sure he'd have more luck on American Idol anyway, LOL
@ThadExMachina:
Apparently. (And yet, we're still here... imagine that. seems like his little 'mission' is failing thus far.)
I personally am going to try my best to ignore him and try to keep the discussion on the topic. Even though I do enjoy telling him why he is wrong the point is he doesn't listen he is just trying to get us all upset... and its working.
Lets just progress the topic so we can discuss ways to move the game industry forward and keeping people informed about the truth. We should spread the idea that we love freedom and liberty. Obviously It is upsetting to us all that Jack doesn't enjoy freedom as much as we do but there isn't anything we can do about that.
1. Practice your speech in front of a friend. A non-gamer friend is the best, since you're addressing this to non-gamers.
2. Use an even tone of voice. This is best helped by #1.
2. Don't stare at the camera from two feet away. This means you probably can't use your webcam.
And I don't care if he's famous, can we just ban Jacko's pointless trolling?
How much money is it going to take for you to change tail JT? You seem to be a lot about the money. I'm just asking. Honestly, if there was an amount to get you to shutup for the entirety of the rest of you life about video games, the industry, or the people who play them, how much is it? I'm ready to start a Paypal Account working towards this....
I was thinking Exxon Valdez
I really have to say E Zachary Knight has everyone else beat. Video and Sound quality(very important) are excellent. You can hear him clearly and his question sounds very intelligent.
I've personally written three, and I wouldn't doubt that a number of gamers out there have written some as well.
I searched and there's still no one else that google can find that has anything to say about Ben Kuehne being accused of money laundering.
I did, however, find out this Ben Juehne:
A lawyer’s lawyer and a champion for constitutional rights, Ben Kuehne is recognized in "The Best Lawyers in America", 2000-2006, and Chambers USA America's Leading Lawyers, 2004-2005. His many honors include "Best Lawyer in Miami," Miami New Times 2000, and "Lawyers of the Year" by the National Law Journal (2000). http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=21112
Yes, this guy is totally less reputable than Jacko.
It is funny what Jacko calls "winning." When's the last time he won a court case?
Oh, and how's that jackandgoliath.com website coming?
One last thing, found the source of that good beautiful or true quote yet? I'm still waiting for you to enlighten us.
Yeah I don't think it matters what time you get up. You might as well be sleeping.
Seriously, what have you ever done? Apart from harassing people.
"Marketing adult games to kids is not free speech."
What about marketing adult games to adults, such as Take Two does with their Grand Theft Auto and Manhunt line of games. What about those?
1. Why do you continue to use this site, which you continually defame and whose visitors you insult, as a platform for your "Press Releases" within the context of a story which has NOTHING to do with you or the cases you're involved with directly? You tell us to get our noses out of our cheat codes and this "news" site yet you're here ... hell you're a "regular". Its an insult to us when you ignore the story and post diatribes and press releases.
2. When did Dennis ever wish you to have a heart attack? Your post above accusing him of this is unfounded. Yes, hundreds of others have wished it upon you but those of us who actually read the stories, discuss things rationally and even TRY to engage in healthy debate with you are all lumped in to the same lot in your eyes. Is ANYONE worthy to you Jack? Anyone? your mom maybe? Your poor wife?
3. I refuse to defend the game industry. They can do that themselves. This site is not about the industry, it is about the PEOPLE who play games and the laws and issues that surround them. Companies big and small in any area of business or entertainment do stupid ugly things and people like you should spare no expense at going after them for those things, but PLEASE for the love of God and the children STOP this incessant and continually attack on US, the gamers, the people. We're human, we're not some company, we're gamers yes, but PEOPLE first. All ages, all sexes, all religions... give US a break Jack. for once!
Seriously? He actually wrote that?
...
Wow.
"JACK THOMPSON, ATTORNEY AND YOU'RE NOT Says:"
I reply with
Proverbs 16:5 "Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the LORD: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished."
Your tendency for lies and narcissistic self-promotion is pathetic. I don't know why you even bother coming here anymore, because everyone here is too intelligent to fall for them. You have no credibility here, and you clearly don't have much in the legal community either. If you did, you wouldn't have so much free time to post here during the day. You'd be busy actually working on cases for clients other than yourself.
That's a stupid custom, and no one seems to complain when someone opens the topic with something other than first. Jack feel free to ignore the "custom".
Anyway, some nice videos, i don't think we need much more.
I didn't bother looking. I was after a copy of The Sims complete collection
When I said see you tomorrow, I meant it.
How is this game ANY different than what is preached on Sundays and Saturdays and Wednesdays and such in some churches with a thumping palm against the bible and lung-wrenching calls of hellfire and brimstone? Was it too close to election time? Did homosexuals somehow get selected out in the game as enemies to kill? How is the supposed bigotry of that game any different than the nonsense the 700 Club and others push down peoples' throats? If I were Christian and had liked the books I would be very upset about the double-standard initiated by my Christian overlords. Much like how I am disturbed over the double-standard videogames face that movies and other medium now escape. I guess it's a good thing I'm pagan then. I treat all faiths the same, and learn what I can from each filtering the BS a good deal as needed. It is the organized application of the beliefs that really turns me off though. Maybe they attacked the game so that it WOULD sell more? I know I bought the Bible Game for PS2 just to see how bad/strange it would be.
I'm not going to waste my time being nice to a person who is a massacre chaser, tells people to commit suicide, wishes cancer on people, and mocks suicides. I'm not above sinking to their level, and don't think he doesn't have crap like this coming to him. Its like I said in a previous thread; I don't show compassion to these people, whether it be Jack Thompson, Fred Phelps, Dick Cheney, etc
Producers of the Left Behind videogame were faced with a storm of controversy after Christian blogger Jonathan Hutson exposed its eliminationist overtones in a series of posts on the website Talk2Action. Statements by the Anti-Defamation League, the Conference on American Islamic Relations, the Christian Alliance for Progress, and others condemned the game and demanded that Walmart pull it from its shelves. Even Marvin Olasky, the evangelical publisher, intellectual author of "compassionate conservatism," and a force behind the George W. Bush Administration's White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives," denounced the Left Behind videogame. In a blog post on the website of his World Magazine, Olasky described the game's content as akin to "the way homicidal Muslims think." As a result of the fallout, Left Behind Games fired its senior VP and released three board members.
No, I'm at the helm. You just don't know it.
Secondly, I'll be a fact witness at the trial. That's another thing you didn't know. Hooah!
If any were even remotely true, we'd have heard about it by now via this site.
and again, didn't you say you were done for the day?
I spotted several copies for sale at a local Meijer, stock was full, of course
Jack actually reminded me to pick up a copy of the game, squarely because he didn't like the game. how cheap were they in your area? they were still $20 over here.
For the record, the WalMart near me had two copies in stock last week, so I guess you didn't win anything, as it wasn't banned like you wanted, and wasn't even completely pulled like you wanted to settle for.
A) It sucks that people are still dumb enough to wish physical harm on you, but it's the Internet - there are dumb people all over and now they can say whatever they want to everyone around the world. So ignore all of these people who say stuff like "have a heart attack" or whatever.
B) If you're making the first comment on a blog post, it's customary to just write "First!"
Does that mean he gets to say,"Yippee-ki-yay motherf**r!!!" to the judge? ;)
"As to whether I’m insane. I’m not The Bar says so. Norm Kent pulled that stunt and it backfired. Go ask him about it."
Hey, and we all know how much you think of the Bar, so which one are we going with, theyre okay and thus are right in saying your sane, or theyre all corrupt and wrong? I keep seeing your incredible ability to disregard your own opinions when they come back to bite you in the ass
A prime example isL
"Nobody said people can’t criticize me. It’s protected by the First Amendment. I don’t know what you think you read that would indicate I’m opposed to free speech. Marketing adult games to kids is not free speech. Neither is filing Bar complaints and lawsuits as the video game industry does to shut down my speech. That’s the hypocrisy you need to consider. Don’t make this stuff up. It isn’t true. Got it?"
Why dont we ask scott ramsoomair of VG cats who you threatened to sue because he was 'harassing' you based on an email correspondence you started?
Or how about penny arcade? and youre attempt to shut down their 'extortion factory' (your words) because they chose to disagree with you and gave money to charity on your behalf.
Ah the modest proposal, your backtracking at its finest, of course you do contest its seriousness, so you're either a horrible human being for rescinding promises to charity or a horrible human being for making an offer to charity as a joke/satirical method. Either way doesnt spell good things for Jack.
And wake up, GTA4 was delayed for technical reasons, games often get delayed because of their complexity, especially this generation, of course for someone who hates without reason or knowledge we wouldnt expect you to know the details of the very field your opposed to.
“and he’s headed to trial in Alabama in January with all of his company’s assets on the line.”
again, YOU WERE KICKED OFF THAT CASE, YOU DID, BUT DO NOT AND WILL NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE'S OUT COME, LIVE WITH THAT ALREADY!!!!!
"Neither is filing Bar complaints and lawsuits as the video game industry does to shut down my speech."
With all you've done ,all the lies you spat out, why are you even surprised? The way you act, these people have every right to file such complaints. No one is trying to "shut down" your speech, you're doing it to yourself. It's not your speech they have issues with, it's your actions, and Jack, I don't think untruthful speech if protected, as that is hate speech at it's core, because you have to hate someone to want to tell lies about them, and you hate anyone who disagrees with you.
Face it Jack, you're trying to avoid that psych evaluation because you're scare,d scared of your baseball bat being tossed into the chipper.
You already lost Jack, deal with it.
WHEN DO WE WANT IT? NOW!
There Thompson, I corrected your username for you.
Now...
"I so much appreciate the wish that I have a heart attack. Thanks, Dennis."
That wasn't Dennis' fault, he's not completely responsible for the speech of "others. In fact he discourages such wishes against you.
"Nobody said people can’t criticize me. It’s protected by the First Amendment."