Rhode Island Attorney General Partners with ESRB in Ad Campaign

Rhode Island Attorney General Partners with ESRB in Ad Campaign

August 10, 2007
lynch.jpg

Another state attorney general has expressed support for the video game industry's rating system.

Rhode Island's Patrick Lynch (D, left) announced yesterday that he would participate in a public service announcement (PSA) campaign designed to raise parental awareness of video game content issues. The campaign, which begins this month, will feature radio and TV spots. Lynch, who will appear along with his daughter, 12, and son, 11, said:
Before children and teenagers grab the controls to play a video game, we’re asking parents to control the types of games their kids play by checking the game’s rating. Most parents routinely check the ratings of movies before taking or allowing their children to see films, and I’m honored to join with ESRB to ask parents to use that same level of vigilance concerning video games. It’s up to us, as parents, to take every measure possible to increase protections for our children. Using the excellent ESRB rating system is an extremely important and positive step.

ESRB president Patricia Vance, who joined Lynch for the announcement, said:
We are very proud to have the support of Attorney General Lynch in reaching out to Rhode Island’s parents to raise awareness of the ratings and urge parents to use them when buying or renting games.

In 2006 the ESRB worked out similar arrangement with the attorneys general of Utah (Mark Shurtleff) and Georgia (Thurbert Baker). Pennsylvania A.G. Tom Corbett has also expressed support for the ESRB as well as for built-in parental controls in game consoles.
Posted in

Comments

Submitted by GamersRyno - August 11, 2007 at 9:31 pm -0500
THIS is what politics should be! Indivualism, government is there to educate and not restrict, and fundamental appreciation for parental rights!
Submitted by terrible tom - August 10, 2007 at 4:28 pm -0500
Many of us realize the significance and implications of the ESRB and the ratings they have in place, however, some individuals wish for those ratings to not only reflect the opinions of parents but the the opinions of all gamers. Some people just don't like organizations that serve parents to have so much power over how the entertainment they purchased is rated. But I digress.

Overall this is a good step in the right direction. The industry does need this badly. This needs to continue and then there are a couple other issues that the industry needs to take care of for the consumers. Issues such as those surrounding Consoles, Retailers and the ESRB. To me those issues are what really matter and this just makes me say thats nice and move on.
Submitted by DragonBomber - August 10, 2007 at 2:15 pm -0500
Bravo for the balls to actually educate rather than push for wasteful legislation. We can dispute the motives of the ESRB all we want, but government working within the system of ratings to educate parents on game content is what the industry needs right now. The ESRB is what allows us to have games without laws telling us what we may choose. It just would be nice if more people took the effort to be aware of the implications and significance of the organization and its ratings.
Submitted by Terrible Tom - August 10, 2007 at 1:05 pm -0500
would = should. I need to start screening my posts before I press the enter key. Sorry.
Submitted by Terrible Tom - August 10, 2007 at 1:04 pm -0500
I think the ESRB plays into the "protect the children" garbage we hear so often. Sure its slightly better than legislation but only by so much. The ESRB is unwilling to listen to consumer demands where as legislation wouldn't really have a choice and would pretty much HAVE to listen to consumers. But regardless of that fact the ESRB is still better than legislation. I hope for the day the ESRB wakes up and starts serving all video game consumers rather than just the ones with children. Also for the day people to understand why they would be serving all video game consumers instead of just children. Wake up.
Submitted by Zigs - August 10, 2007 at 9:30 am -0500
I dunno, personally I think the ESRB is horribly flawed. I don't really see this as a good thing. Yes, it beats legislation, but he's not really taking an anti legislation stance either.
Submitted by jonc2006 - August 10, 2007 at 8:34 am -0500
nothing against him but this whole "protect the children" thing is really starting to make my ears bleed.
Submitted by rdeegvainl - August 10, 2007 at 8:37 am -0500
It seems as though it the legislative branch that wants to legislate, ignorantly might i add, while the judicial branch is seeming pretty competent on this issue. hope they keep judiciating correctly in the future.
Submitted by upgray3dd - August 10, 2007 at 8:15 am -0500
Now that's what I like to see. Bravo, Lynch :)
Submitted by kurisu7885 - August 10, 2007 at 7:03 am -0500
@hayabusa75

I didn't consider that, but looking it is quite possible.
Submitted by Chibi Sylphe - August 10, 2007 at 8:00 am -0500
I like the fact that he's actually trying to set the example as a parent. Kudos to you, Mr. Lynch.
Submitted by BmK - August 10, 2007 at 7:33 am -0500
This is good. Another politician who believes education rather then legislation is the answer.
Submitted by E. Zachary Knight - August 10, 2007 at 6:50 am -0500
I really need to contact my state's attorney general and convince him to do this. This would so help to get rid of the stigma here. I'm Oklahoma by the way. We currently have one law in court and the other may never get voted on. But such a step for the AG would help a lot.
Submitted by CyberSkull - August 10, 2007 at 6:21 am -0500
Now if we could only get lawmakers to endorse it.
Submitted by hayabusa75 - August 10, 2007 at 5:29 am -0500
@kurisu7885:

More than his name, I think it's noteworthy how young he appears to be. Maybe he's a gamer himself?
Submitted by Shoehorn O'Plenty - August 10, 2007 at 4:41 am -0500
"Before children and teenagers grab the controls to play a video game, we’re asking parents to control the types of games their kids play by checking the game’s rating."

It's an unfortunate thing that they have to ask the parents to do this, when they should be doing it already.
Submitted by kurisu7885 - August 10, 2007 at 3:59 am -0500
And another note, does anyone find the name Lynch ironic for someone who is trying to help? It seems to be the word for what some try to do to the industry :P
Submitted by kurisu7885 - August 10, 2007 at 3:50 am -0500
sweet, chalk up another one for the good guys.
Submitted by Harlan Townsend - October 9, 2007 at 5:36 pm -0500
unwindowed romancing achromobacter diastatically squally echeneididae shrike expendability
pheasant
http://www.freewebs.com/hzmcjr/1.html

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 01/07/09 at 11:37pm
Mattie: I know Im way late to this, but brawls online SUCKS!e
Posted 01/07/09 at 10:59pm
Derovius: I said no Grizzam, don't make me scream rape.
Posted 01/07/09 at 10:55pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: What's all this about rebuffing advancements? A question is an advancement to you?
Posted 01/07/09 at 10:53pm
Derovius: I was unaware that rebuffing advancements was to overreact. You'd do better to insult my intelligence if you wanted to agitate me.
Posted 01/07/09 at 10:51pm
Brokenscope: Overacting with accusations of homosexuality? Man you must be deep in the closet.
Posted 01/07/09 at 10:49pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: The reason I asked is because I kind of enjoy your posts.
Posted 01/07/09 at 10:48pm
Derovius: Oh of course, you care so little you had to ask. I get it, really, but I don't swing that way thanks.
Posted 01/07/09 at 10:40pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: I really don't care if you get banned, I was just curious.
Posted 01/07/09 at 10:37pm
Derovius: Why would I be banned? All anyone has against me is a difference of opinion. I find your lofty dreams amusing, none the less.
Posted 01/07/09 at 10:22pm
GRIZZAM PRIME: Did devorius get banned or something? It seems like he would have responded quite harshly to Andrew's words by now.
Posted 01/07/09 at 09:15pm
DarkTetsuya: SDD: yeah that guy was asking for a heaping helping of STFU...
Posted 01/07/09 at 09:13pm
Brokenscope: Hmm I think I should have stopped before I mentioned Dresden.
Posted 01/07/09 at 07:14pm
beemoh: \o/
Posted 01/07/09 at 07:12pm
Andrew Eisen: beemoh - Oddly enough, I'm typing up that story right now.
Posted 01/07/09 at 07:10pm
beemoh: http://www.edge-online.com/news/psych-games-teach-kids-empathy
Posted 01/07/09 at 07:10pm
beemoh: Games "teach empathy", says psychologist
Posted 01/07/09 at 05:31pm
ZippyDSMlee: zel/JDKJ:And I haz still not learned to watch mew feet....
Posted 01/07/09 at 05:07pm
zel: I don't predict the future as much as i dig holes and watch people fall in :)
Posted 01/07/09 at 05:04pm
Shadow D. Darkman: Yay! Andrew just scolded DeoVIRUS in the GTA thread!
Posted 01/07/09 at 04:13pm
JDKJ: zel: True. Can't nobody say you didn't predict the future on that one. Experience does teach wisdom.
Login or register to post shouts