Rhode Island Attorney General Partners with ESRB in Ad Campaign

Rhode Island Attorney General Partners with ESRB in Ad Campaign

August 10, 2007
lynch.jpg

Another state attorney general has expressed support for the video game industry's rating system.

Rhode Island's Patrick Lynch (D, left) announced yesterday that he would participate in a public service announcement (PSA) campaign designed to raise parental awareness of video game content issues. The campaign, which begins this month, will feature radio and TV spots. Lynch, who will appear along with his daughter, 12, and son, 11, said:
Before children and teenagers grab the controls to play a video game, we’re asking parents to control the types of games their kids play by checking the game’s rating. Most parents routinely check the ratings of movies before taking or allowing their children to see films, and I’m honored to join with ESRB to ask parents to use that same level of vigilance concerning video games. It’s up to us, as parents, to take every measure possible to increase protections for our children. Using the excellent ESRB rating system is an extremely important and positive step.

ESRB president Patricia Vance, who joined Lynch for the announcement, said:
We are very proud to have the support of Attorney General Lynch in reaching out to Rhode Island’s parents to raise awareness of the ratings and urge parents to use them when buying or renting games.

In 2006 the ESRB worked out similar arrangement with the attorneys general of Utah (Mark Shurtleff) and Georgia (Thurbert Baker). Pennsylvania A.G. Tom Corbett has also expressed support for the ESRB as well as for built-in parental controls in game consoles.
Posted in

Comments

Submitted by GamersRyno - August 11, 2007 at 9:31 pm -0500
THIS is what politics should be! Indivualism, government is there to educate and not restrict, and fundamental appreciation for parental rights!
Submitted by terrible tom - August 10, 2007 at 4:28 pm -0500
Many of us realize the significance and implications of the ESRB and the ratings they have in place, however, some individuals wish for those ratings to not only reflect the opinions of parents but the the opinions of all gamers. Some people just don't like organizations that serve parents to have so much power over how the entertainment they purchased is rated. But I digress.

Overall this is a good step in the right direction. The industry does need this badly. This needs to continue and then there are a couple other issues that the industry needs to take care of for the consumers. Issues such as those surrounding Consoles, Retailers and the ESRB. To me those issues are what really matter and this just makes me say thats nice and move on.
Submitted by DragonBomber - August 10, 2007 at 2:15 pm -0500
Bravo for the balls to actually educate rather than push for wasteful legislation. We can dispute the motives of the ESRB all we want, but government working within the system of ratings to educate parents on game content is what the industry needs right now. The ESRB is what allows us to have games without laws telling us what we may choose. It just would be nice if more people took the effort to be aware of the implications and significance of the organization and its ratings.
Submitted by Terrible Tom - August 10, 2007 at 1:05 pm -0500
would = should. I need to start screening my posts before I press the enter key. Sorry.
Submitted by Terrible Tom - August 10, 2007 at 1:04 pm -0500
I think the ESRB plays into the "protect the children" garbage we hear so often. Sure its slightly better than legislation but only by so much. The ESRB is unwilling to listen to consumer demands where as legislation wouldn't really have a choice and would pretty much HAVE to listen to consumers. But regardless of that fact the ESRB is still better than legislation. I hope for the day the ESRB wakes up and starts serving all video game consumers rather than just the ones with children. Also for the day people to understand why they would be serving all video game consumers instead of just children. Wake up.
Submitted by Zigs - August 10, 2007 at 9:30 am -0500
I dunno, personally I think the ESRB is horribly flawed. I don't really see this as a good thing. Yes, it beats legislation, but he's not really taking an anti legislation stance either.
Submitted by jonc2006 - August 10, 2007 at 8:34 am -0500
nothing against him but this whole "protect the children" thing is really starting to make my ears bleed.
Submitted by rdeegvainl - August 10, 2007 at 8:37 am -0500
It seems as though it the legislative branch that wants to legislate, ignorantly might i add, while the judicial branch is seeming pretty competent on this issue. hope they keep judiciating correctly in the future.
Submitted by upgray3dd - August 10, 2007 at 8:15 am -0500
Now that's what I like to see. Bravo, Lynch :)
Submitted by kurisu7885 - August 10, 2007 at 7:03 am -0500
@hayabusa75

I didn't consider that, but looking it is quite possible.
Submitted by Chibi Sylphe - August 10, 2007 at 8:00 am -0500
I like the fact that he's actually trying to set the example as a parent. Kudos to you, Mr. Lynch.
Submitted by BmK - August 10, 2007 at 7:33 am -0500
This is good. Another politician who believes education rather then legislation is the answer.
Submitted by E. Zachary Knight - August 10, 2007 at 6:50 am -0500
I really need to contact my state's attorney general and convince him to do this. This would so help to get rid of the stigma here. I'm Oklahoma by the way. We currently have one law in court and the other may never get voted on. But such a step for the AG would help a lot.
Submitted by CyberSkull - August 10, 2007 at 6:21 am -0500
Now if we could only get lawmakers to endorse it.
Submitted by hayabusa75 - August 10, 2007 at 5:29 am -0500
@kurisu7885:

More than his name, I think it's noteworthy how young he appears to be. Maybe he's a gamer himself?
Submitted by Shoehorn O'Plenty - August 10, 2007 at 4:41 am -0500
"Before children and teenagers grab the controls to play a video game, we’re asking parents to control the types of games their kids play by checking the game’s rating."

It's an unfortunate thing that they have to ask the parents to do this, when they should be doing it already.
Submitted by kurisu7885 - August 10, 2007 at 3:59 am -0500
And another note, does anyone find the name Lynch ironic for someone who is trying to help? It seems to be the word for what some try to do to the industry :P
Submitted by kurisu7885 - August 10, 2007 at 3:50 am -0500
sweet, chalk up another one for the good guys.
Submitted by Harlan Townsend - October 9, 2007 at 5:36 pm -0500
unwindowed romancing achromobacter diastatically squally echeneididae shrike expendability
pheasant
http://www.freewebs.com/hzmcjr/1.html

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 12/01/08 at 03:56pm
ZippyDSMlee: sqlrob:console=nofixes,control options,no choices=fail
Posted 12/01/08 at 03:24pm
sqlrob: @DeepThorn: That's why I went to console years ago. Steam was the final straw. Windows = offline for my computers
Posted 12/01/08 at 03:23pm
ZippyDSMlee: DeepThorn: KAspersky is all that I sue now, the rest suck,norton has its points but is a system hog.
Posted 12/01/08 at 03:18pm
DeepThorn: yeah... I need to get rid of McFly or whatever it is called
Posted 12/01/08 at 03:17pm
ZippyDSMlee: DeepThorn: I turn of file scanign while I paly a game,still ahve networking protection and whatnot on.
Posted 12/01/08 at 03:16pm
ZippyDSMlee: DeepThorn:Take out 2nd hand thier goes thier bigest custmer in EB...
Posted 12/01/08 at 03:10pm
nelttab: @Deepthorn even then there are pirates out there that can get around that... the online thing anyway
Posted 12/01/08 at 03:08pm
DeepThorn: So much for me wanting a gaming PC offline with no security software...
Posted 12/01/08 at 03:04pm
E. Zachary Knight: But it may require an internet connection to install.
Posted 12/01/08 at 03:03pm
E. Zachary Knight: From the sound of it, it seems that once the disk is activated, it is activated forever.
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:57pm
DeepThorn: EZK - Is the main focus secretly second hand market again, or do they just hate their legit consumers that much?
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:56pm
NovaBlack: yeah i said earlier.. gtaIV available literally the day they announced officially it had securom lol. ITs so pointless its untru
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:54pm
DeepThorn: And justifies pirating it in more people's minds. (and the crackers know it will tick off the publishers more)
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:53pm
ZippyDSMlee: Zevorick: Correction Sicrom makes owning software inconvenant.....
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:50pm
Zevorick: Does it honestly surprise you pin? It's not like SecuRom has EVER stopped Piracy before. It just makes it slightly inconvenient
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:47pm
JDKJ: SeanB: There's been plenty new content and off-topic shouts. Ain't nobody ever get called out before for doing it. Relax.
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:47pm
nelttab: @JDJK aye, i could see that... and you know what... im glad i found this site a coupla months ago
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:45pm
E. Zachary Knight: EMA is getting in on the anti-piracy racket: http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=21306
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:40pm
JDKJ: @nelttab: My interpretation was "Do what you want on the outside, just don't bring it back to my doorstep."
Posted 12/01/08 at 02:40pm
DeepThorn: The ESA is onto you Pin, shhh
Login or register to post shouts