Super Columbine Creator Speaks about Upcoming Film

Super Columbine Creator Speaks about Upcoming Film

August 14, 2007
Last month, Super Columbine Massacre RPG (SCMRPG) creator Danny Ledonne released a trailer to his upcoming documentary, Playing Columbine.

Keith Stuart at Guardian Unlimited caught up with Ledonne for some Q&A about the film. Among Ledonne's comments:
I am fully candid in saying that 'Playing Columbine' makes no attempt to be 'objective' and remain neutral; it has arguments to make and while it includes counter-arguments, the film (much like the game) has a perspective and a thesis to convey...

There is ultimately no way to "justify" SCMRPG in the minds of those who find it deplorable but I believe even the game's detractors will find that the film fleshes out the controversy to better understand the future of games as a medium. The film is essentially a challenge to game developers to rethink the limits of their medium and a challenge to the general public to expect (demand!) more from games than mere entertainment...

No one really knows where games are headed; indeed there are so many potential directions that it may soon be superfluous to attempt to call all these diverse creations "videogames" whatsoever.

Comments

We are at total hax now.
Hey!

Who deleted my post?!
I will always suspect the timing and context of the release of this "game" as being oportunistic no matter how well intentioned its creator.

Sometimes common sense and compassion for the victims and thier families is more imprtant than the rest of us "understanding" through interactive media or film.
"First"

Ledonne Rocks. Comment wipes do not.
@Grahamr

Spam Karma 2 went all Chinese Newspaper on GP and had to be let go... the exact number of snarks lost in the ensuing secretarian violence will probably never be known.
@The Central Scrutinzer: What do you mean timing and context? It was almost seven years after the shooting.
As I said earlier, he's STILL an attention whore.
I got to admit, I do not like his methods of argument, but I do like his ideals. He is right in that people need to stop fearing scrutiny and toning down their games just because some persons might find it deplorable. It is in that sense that he has my support. I do plan to see this film of his. As for SCM? Never played it nor do I intend to just for the reason that I have no real interest in doing so.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 12/01/08 at 12:56pm
nelttab: oh right... sorry... so do those guys for the desert bus thing have to play continusuly(sp) depending on how much is donated?
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:55pm
JDKJ: @anyonewhoknows: What is the purpose of the Shoutbox and is there some sort of shouting policy that governs its use?
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:53pm
nelttab: @Michael ROFL i remember that one
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:53pm
JDKJ: Austin_Lewis: See gamepolitics shout below.
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:52pm
nelttab: wow... and on another topic i didnt know that the desert bus thing was still going... cool
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:52pm
Michael Chandra: It ain't libel if it's true. Oh and http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2005/10/14/
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:48pm
SeanB: I posted my full name at humanevents, i wanted to see if he'd try to get me. I jsut got another call, but it was a hangup.......
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:47pm
SeanB: His Quote: "Sean? 'Yes this is Sean' Listen sean, if you continue to libel me, i'm going to reach across canadian lines and ...something about legal mumbo.. but i was laughing to hard, and he hung up!
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:46pm
nelttab: que? how did he get your number?
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:43pm
SeanB: HOLY SHIT! JT Just called me on the PHONE! NO SHIT! I'm nto lying! He threatened to sue me!
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:39pm
Michael Chandra: o_O at the current driver of the Desert Bus.
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:26pm
Flamespeak: I can't plug the website I contribute to here? Aw, phooey :(
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:19pm
Austin_Lewis: @JDKJ: uh.. what?
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:18pm
Michael Chandra: You can actually type past that 255 while editing but it gets cut off afterwards. I guess FF as limit isn't that strange.
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:14pm
E. Zachary Knight: I noticed that myself. I think it has to do with the different boxes being set to different max lengths.
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:06pm
Michael Chandra: To repeat myself from the forum: Sir yes sir! Anyway, question, why is the shout-limit 128 but edit-limit 255?
Posted 12/01/08 at 12:05pm
gamepolitics: Folks, let's confine the discussion in Shoutbox to GamePolitics stories, NOT stories from other websites. Thanks.
Posted 12/01/08 at 11:52am
SeanB: nova, they crashed at least once already.
Posted 12/01/08 at 11:44am
JDKJ: @ankaranakliye: Huh?
Posted 12/01/08 at 11:42am
JDKJ: @Austin: I think you're being asked by EZK to scrub your most recent shout.
Login or register to post shouts