Rockstar Leeds Founder Calls for Game Industry to Rally Behind Manhunt 2

Rockstar Leeds Founder Calls for Game Industry to Rally Behind Manhunt 2

August 17, 2007
Earlier this week, European news site Develop sat down for a chat with Gordon Hall, founder of Rockstar Leeds (GTA: Liberty City Stories, GTA: Vice City Stories). 

Of particular interest to GamePolitics readers are Hall’s comments on the recent Manhunt 2 brouhaha:
I like the game for what it is – and I was a big fan of Manhunt before we joined Rockstar... I like where it placed you in the world and the questions it asked of the world.

Manhunt 2 is no different to the first in terms of content, it’s just that times seem to have changed and they’ve changed against this type of game. But if you look at a film like Man Bites Dog, it makes Manhunt look tame in comparison, but that film can be bought by anyone aged 18.

Asked if Rockstar feels it is being singled out by critics, Hall replied:
I don’t think Rockstar specifically has been picked on, but I do think that the wider issue attacks our entire industry. We need to teach people that games are an art form – they are more artistic than film.

I think the games industry should rally behind us, because there will come a time when we’ll all have an idea that’s a little edgy, and we need to have the freedoms to express it.

We are an adult entertainment industry – we may have started out with child-like technology making games solely for a younger audience, but it’s just not like that anymore. It might take legislature a little while to catch up, but if the industry sticks together hopefully we can change people’s attitudes quicker.

-Reporting from San Diego, GP Correspondent Andrew Eisen

Comments

Why dosent Rockstar take the bull by the balls and post pics/videos of the content of the game that will end all this right now, one way or another..
"...they are more artistic than film."

"We are an adult entertainment industry"

Have you ever found yourself in a situation defending what you believe in? Ever seem to be making some headway when another person joins your side and begins spouting comments that you really wish weren't be said, despite the INTENDED message?

During my 25 years on this planet, any time I've heard the words "Adult Entertainment" my mind immediately made the connection to pornography, which is a word being used a lot in reference to game content lately.

I know what he was trying to say, and while I understand his intentions, I think he could have chosen his words more carefully.
Another problem is, Mich, that even "pornography" has been taken by many individuals and organizations to be used to describe pretty much anything they don't want other people to look at or read. Even "community standards" has become misused to the point where its original intent is clouded by personal, religious, and/or political dictates upon others.

It's gotten to the point that if you aren't watching Sesame Street (and even that has been questioned once or twice) or reading the community approved religious text, then you must be a pervert two seconds away from raping a goat. Adults simply cannot be adults in this society without having a stigma tattooed (oh dear, there's another perversity) on their foreheads.

Nightwng2000
NW2K software
No, I'm not going to play Manhunt 2 and No, I don't like being told I what and can and cannot play either. If they called it Saw or Hostel: The Game, would anyone raise such a fuss given what they get away with in the films?
CyberSkull,
Probably.

After all, the claim is that video games are interactive and that makes them, in effect, "Satan's Playground".

:: Rolls eyes ::

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
I mean I hope R* gets the game out eventually, just on the grounds that this might actually bring the double standard of our ratings systems to a head. Will I ever play the game? nah
@Mich

'Adult Entertainment' may have been poorly worded but it had to be said in some way and even using the word adult would have gained the frown from some people.

I mean if he said 'These are games for adults' or some other construct, some people cannot get past the connection so for better or worse its best its said rather than unsaid.

While I dont think manhunt would be art, its social implications in the high level of violence and making somone play from that persective are more valid that they at first seems, the guy raises the good point about the slippery slope.

Heres hoping the BBFC appeal works out....
I hope they appeal to the ESRB as well.
"I think the games industry should rally behind us, because there will come a time when we’ll all have an idea that’s a little edgy, and we need to have the freedoms to express it."

Exactly. The last thing we want to do is give anybody precident for restricting controversial games. While Manhunt 2 is no Mario, if that is banned (both de jure and de facto), will other games be next?
***But if you look at a film like Man Bites Dog, it makes Manhunt look tame in comparison, but that film can be bought by anyone aged 18.***

And the Illinois governor's study that claims that a child can purchase an M rated game 69% of the time will tell you that they can get R rated movies about 80% of the time...or more. I can't remember.

But then, neither can the politicians since it would ruin their ability to pander.
Hall needs to think before he speaks. "We are an adult entertainment industry"? That's the most idiotic thing he could have said, it only perpetuates the same stigma as AO since the porn industry is already refered to as the "Adult Entertainment Industry".

That quote is going to be grabbed up by detractors and it will come back to bite us on the ass, or that very least annoy us. I get what he was trying to say. He was trying to say that, like films, we are an industry with a diverse audience which includes a multitude of tastes and ages, and like films, some games are geared toward certain demographics more than others. Even though we started out as an industry that was geared toward kids, we have grown beyond that to include everybody.
Given Rockstar have done more to the detriment of the games industry than any other, asking everyone to rally round them is unlikely to be met with enthusiasm. Don't get me wrong, I love most of their games, but the management badly need a kick up the arse.
The thing is, the concept that 'Adult Entertainment' is mostly 'Porn' is a pretty American view, purely because it's the 'Forbidden Fruit' that America is utterly paranoid about, and the only form of entertainment restricted by law there. Remember, Leeds is in the UK, where the system works a little differently.

Certainly, the banning in the UK was incredible, both for the fact that it was only a few days after Hostel 3 had been rated 18, and partly because Media like Manhunt was what the 18 certificate was created FOR. It's difficult to say because, even with the appeal, much of Europe has also jumped on the ban-wagon (though most of those are countries that are also trying to push through 'blame' laws.

I don't think the BBFC were politically 'pushed' to ban the game, but I do think they put too much weight on 'current opinion' and 'protecting the children' and didn't actually give nearly enough weight on the game.

Now, I'll admit, I don't want Manhunt 2, sorry Rockstar, not my kind of game, I played GTA 3 and it was fun, but I get the feeling that Manhunt 2 is an intense experience, like playing through Doom 3 the first time. Anyone who tries pulling out that 'heart rate' bullshit that was spouted after VT would do well to try playing a 'Horror-Thriller' game late at night ;) I can usually only play games like that for 20-30 mins before RollerCoaster Tycoon or Children of the Nile gets booted for some relaxation :)

Rockstars Rights should be defended, I know their previous management only held gamers slightly higher than the anti-gaming crowd did, that much is certain, they tried to divert blame for Hot Coffee onto Gamers, and got bitten hard for it. However, they should still be defended.

It's not about ManHunt 2, it's not about Hot Coffee, it's not even about RockStar, it's about something said a long time ago, about not agreeing with someone's point of view, but being willing to fight to allow them to have it.
Uh-huh, and let's rally behind Jeffrey Dahmer's memory, too. Great idea, Gordon.
I just can't bring myself to get behind R*. They are the ones who put the industry in this situation in the first place and now they want everyone to forget all the STUPID things they've done and said all in the name of "art"?

I don't want them censored, I don't want them gone but I wish that people would just stop focusing on them because they would then be marginalized by their own actions [and games] and not those of politicians and the anti-game lobby.

I'm sorry but I will NOT fight for R*'s right to say or do anything, its not about principals its about PICKING YOUR BATTLES. This is not the battle for me.

It seems to me the fight is with the incongruence between the rating systems of movies and that of games and the way in which those ratings are interpreted and reacted to.
Rockstar is like the kid who pulls the fire alarm and expects his friends to bail him out when he's in trouble after pinning the blame on some other kid.

Protecting freedom is one thing, but defending Rockstar is another thing. Yes, Hot Coffee was blown out of proportion, but they're the ones who denied everything about its existence and tried to pin the blame on "modders". As a result, this mess.
There is nothing keeping Rockstar from publishing this game. They will just have to port it to the PC, since Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft refuse to allow AO rated games on their systems.

Rockstar could tone the game down to make the M rating, but they don't want to go that route. That is their prerogative and their decision to make, but they will also have to deal with the consequences of that decision. Life is like that.
"Adult Entertainment Industry"? Yeah that's ammunition for Jackie and politicians to use. I don't know the implications of the phrase in the UK, but in the US, it's definitely linked to porn.
And if I know news channels, this will be the headlines:
"Game Industry Links Itself to Porn"
"Game Publisher Admits He Targets Porn to Children"
etc., etc....
"Uh-huh, and let’s rally behind Jeffrey Dahmer’s memory, too. Great idea, Gordon."


You fail at logic Jr.


Jeffrey Dahmer was a real life killer who killed real life people. Are you with me so far?


Now Manhunt 2 is a work of fiction. As much as any violent Shakespeare play that people still "rally behind". Get your head out of your ass and get a life.
I believe that there should be as much support for the full version of Manhunt 2 as possible. I believe that the esrb is violating the constitutonal rights of America by having it set where if you put a certain amount of violence in a game it would get an AO rating that would make it difficult to play the game the way the game was originally made.
I read this story a couple days ago, Dennis was a little slow on this one.
@Jack

That doesn't even make any sense. Not even in any context I can think off. What? He's dead, just that, a memory. It'd hard enough just trying to think of something decent to say, it's so ludicrous. And any how, Manhunt 2 is merely fiction. Dahmer was an insane murderer who was a bit cannibalistic, tried to make zombies, and kept organs in his fridge. That's real. That happened. Manhunt 2, has not.
John Bruce,
Dahmer was a real, living person. The characters in a video game such as Manhunt 2 are fictional.

Once again, you are showing signs of being incapable of telling the difference between the two. I told you before that if you continued to show signs of mental instability that I felt might be a danger to yourself or others and didn't seek treatment for that problem, that i would contact appropriate authorities regarding my concerns. Since it appears you have done nothing to rectify this situation, I must follow through in the hopes that your apparent inability to tell the difference between reality and fiction will not lead to you harming yourself or others.

Nightwng2000
NW2K software
Ok here's the skinny folks. Rockstar has every right to make whatever kind of game they want. Stores have every right to say "We won't sell this." Hardware developers also have every right to say, "We don't want this kind of material on our systems."

The break comes in at the ESRB. What's the point of an AO rating? It's the exact same as any other rating. To say this is what the game rates as based on content. Not based on interactiveness. Not based on how this will affect the games sales. ESRB is NOT there to help companies make money in any shape, way, or form.

Now I see all of you yelling about Hostel and Saw III as examples of things getting past ratings. Take it up with the MPAA they are the ones that rated those not the ESRB. Considering what I've heard of Manhunt 2 and its predecessor. AO sounds completely and perfectly spot on as a rating.
Honestly, if the ESRB thinks Manhunt 2 deserves an AO, I'll believe them. What needs to be changed is the refusal of Sony and Nintendo to allow AO games to be published for their consoles. It just shows a narrow perception on their part. I imagine Manhunt 2 is violent, grotesque, and disgusting to watch, and perhaps it deserves the AO. But the stigma surrounding the AO rating needs to go, and allowing AO games to actually be made might actually do the ratings system some good. The ESRB probably doesn't like to dole out AO's because it has the stigma of being porn or otherwise disgusting and unworthy of being played. If instead the AO rating denoted a class of games that was unusually violent beyond even the M rated norm, it allows the rating system to have two distinct sets of 'mature' games. Halo was rated M, and I can see it being unfair to say that Halo and Manhunt are in the same class of appropriateness.
I agree with Rockstar 100%. The game industry really disgusts me, they deserve a nice kick in the pants. I love video games but the game industry is getting dirty. It is upsetting.
As Voltaire said, "I don't like your crappy game, but I will defend to the death your right to distribute it......unless you're Uwe Boll."
"Rockstar has every right to make whatever kind of game they want. Stores have every right to say “We won’t sell this.” Hardware developers also have every right to say, “We don’t want this kind of material on our systems.”

Yes on the first one, likely on the second one. The third one is a bit more problematic from a market dominance/anti trust perspective. But that is for another argument which may come up if Sony and N keep to that line.

As I have been saying for months - this is not about R*, Manhunt, Hot Coffee, AO or other minutiae. This is about the ability of a government to interfere in business relations by arbitrarily banning a product they 'deem' is inappropriate. There really are only 2 positions to take:

1) The government is in place to aid individuals and business by upholding the rule of law and by providing a forum for the expression of ideas.

2) The government is in place to replace the rights of individuals to choose what expression to listen to.

It really can't be any simpler than that. This is a product which contains computer code that instructs a microporcessor to disply various pixelated colours on the screen depending on the manipulations of the end user. There is nothing 'immoral' or 'dangerous' about it. It is as rediculous as saying that the internet, microsoft office or television cable boxes should be 'banned'.

As a taxpayer and citizen that will be eternally vigilent of the government's servants never ending desire to extend dominance, I am angry that no one seems to mind this terrific waste of resources while other more important issues or matters go unfunded or ignored.
Rockstar can still publish Manhunt 2 on the PC. They don't even have to submit it for a rating if they don't want to (at least that is how it would work in the US). The ESRB is a voluntary rating system. If they don't like the rating they get, then they can always publish it on the PC with or without the ESRB rating.

My sympathy for Rockstar only goes so far, since they have been responsible for bringing more negative attention to gaming than any other publisher. Plus, they are scumbag weasels for trying to blame the Hot Coffee thing on the mod community, when it was entirely their own fault, and may have even been a deliberate marketing ploy on their part.

However, I agree with Benji though, that a console manufacturer should not be able to prevent AO-rated games from being published for their console. Rockstar should not whine about the AO rating, but they have every right to complain about console makers refusing to allow them to even publish a game because has an AO rating. If Rockstar is really serious about concern about censorship as opposed to just being concerned about their own bottom line as a company, what they should do is tell the console manufacturers that they will publish GTA IV on the PC only unless they allow AO-rated games like Manhunt 2 to be published on their consoles.
orangekrush, are you referring to the British ban?

What you just wrote almost sound slik you are implying that the US government banned Manhunt 2, when it did no such thing.
What exactly does Hall want? The implication here is that some "outside force" is responsible for the problem, and that the game industry should fight it. What really happened is that they created a game with graphic content, and the major console manufacturers refused to publish it on their systems. If you want them to accept AO games, then say that, don't invent an enemy the game industry must rally against.
@Jack Thompson,

I don't accept Dahmer's right to kill people, but if someone wanted to make a movie, a book or a game that analysed the mentaility, then I would not deny them the right to do so.

I recall you claiming that 'Love Me Tender' was different to modern day music styles in one of your interviews, that proves how vastly you miss the point, and I really can't be bothered to point it out to you. You might bear in mind that once upon a time 'Love Me Tender' was claimed to be 'nothing like Real Music'.

I don't see 'as long as it doesn't offend Jack Thompson' being tagged onto the First Amendment any time soon.
Sorry R*, it's hard to rally behind a shady company ... art or no. I agree with the sentiment, but as I told my mother, "I hate having to defend a company like Rockstar just to defend my hobby of choice."

She then said in reply, "Jeff, you don't have to defend every game company to defend your views. Just like I condem the wackos that murder abortion clinic workers, but I am Pro-life." (I am paraphrasing)

It's easier if we as pro-gaming folks know when to draw our own line, so it's not drawn for us. Manhunt 2 crossed the "a little edgy" line and then shat upon it.

Perhaps the weeks stress has me being alittle melodramatic, but I hope you get my drift.
~the1jeffy
rockstar is not that bad, I separate the stock scandal from the manigment and game scandals LOL

anyway despite their issues the point they bring to the table is that AO has been changed from NC17 to a porn label and there needs to be a real NC 17 level for gaming.
"We are an adult entertainment industry"

That comment makes me feel indifferent....very comfertable.

We have many games that cater for kids as well as adults....we are not just for adults...sure the industry grew up with us a bit...but still many games are out there that are for kids and games are out there for mature players.

They make it sounds we are "adults only"...just like their games are half the time...just because Rockstar caters to the adults DOES NOT MEAN "We are an adult entertainment industry."

YOUR company is "adult entertainment"...

That comment cheeses me off.
The thing is, everyone already knows there are games for kids, most of our argument has been based around the fact that no-one accepts that adults play video games too, now someone does that, it seems like everyone is leery of it because of what the wording might 'mean' to one country that Rockstar Leeds isn't even based in.

I myself, as I said before, am not interested in owning the game, but I'm also not interested in watching Soap Operas or Politically Motivated talk-shows, I, to put it simply, don't like them, I'm sure Rockstar won't deny me my right not to buy something I don't like or approve of, and I don't deny them the right to make it.
"Uh-huh, and let’s rally behind Jeffrey Dahmer’s memory, too. Great idea, Gordon."

Mr. Thompson, you seem to be under the false impression that making a video game about someone who kills (in self defense or not, no-one knows enough about the plot to say) is somehow celebrating the killing. This is not true.

But let's play devil's advocate for a second and pretend that you are right. In this video game fictional people kill each other, sometimes mutilating them. Jeffrey Dahmer killed people and mutilated their bodies. Therefore, the game is celebrating what he and other people like him have done and should be banned.

If this is the case, then every single thriller/detective/horror novel that features a serial killer should be banned, as they are obviously also celebrating people like Dahmer. Every single thriller/detective/horror film that contains a serial killer should be banned.

You complained before about how in Bully it was possible "to stick an african-american kids head in the toilet" and called for it's banning. If that is the case then ever book and movie featuring any kind of racism should be banned also. Let's see how far you get trying to convince anyone to ban "To Kill a Mockingbird".

You cannot just pick and choose which media, and which example of that media to ban. If you want something banned for whatever reason, then that reason must apply across the board.
"Rally behind this:"

Yeah like thats going to happen.
"On this Friday’s night’s 8 pm Eastern time airing of WWE’s wrestling program “Smackdown,” there were repeated ads for Take-Two/Rockstar Game’s Mature-rated, incredibly violent BioShock set to be released on August 21."

BTW, Rockstar didn't make Bioshock.
@Shoehorn

One thing Carlos Mencia said "If I can't tell a joke in front of the peopel it talks about, if I can't tell a jew joke in front of jews, if I can't tell an asian joke i nfrotn of asians, if I cant' tell a black joke in front of blacks, then I can't tell that joke to ANYONE, ever"
I played the first game, and when it comes out. Ill play the second. The problem with people now a days is they worry to much about protecting eachother from things that honestly is none of thier business. I will say that these games are not for kids, but they are games. Not real. Never have i known a real case of a kid going berserk and killing people because of a game. I ve heard people use the excuse that a game made their child shoot someone. Im a dad, and if my son ever kills a person (with the exception of self defense) i am not gonna stand behind him and say it was because of a game. Stupid people do not take the blame for their failings. Ive watched countless violent movies, played countless violent games. Im normal, never killed an animal, hurt a person just to do it, or thought about killing people to see what its like. Video games are just another art form, and the last pure one on earth. Give me the abilty to play someone elses story. Manhunt 2 is the work of very talented people, and anyone who doesnt want to play it doesnt have to. Parents need to learn what the ESRB does and follow the guidelines. Parents should also not be stupid enough to let a 10 year old play games that could be a detriment to his still forming brain and ethics. People need to take some responsibility. Im behind Rockstar all the way.
I STILL say it should be released as an unlicensed video game. Madcatz did it with their GameShark. No reason Rockstar can't do it for the PS2 and possibly the Wii.
Aww Jack, you're just so funny when you ever act like your middle-schooler self, oy. XD
Rally behind this:

John B. Thompson, Attorney at Law
1172 S. Dixie Hwy., Suite 111
Coral Gables, Florida 33146

August 19, 2007

The Honorable Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20580 Via Fax and e-mails

Re: Television Ad for Mature-Rated Video Game on Program with Huge Teen Audience

Dear Chairman Majoras:

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., the maker of the hyper-violent Grand Theft Auto games and whose Manhunt 2 has been banned worldwide for sale not only by governments but by Sony and Nintendo as well, is aggressively marketing its newest Mature-rated video game to kids under 17 years of age. This predatory corporate practice was supposed to stop in the wake of “Columbine” and industry promises made to parents.

On this Friday’s night’s 8 pm Eastern time airing of WWE’s wrestling program “Smackdown,” there were repeated ads for Take-Two/Rockstar Game’s Mature-rated, incredibly violent BioShock set to be released on August 21.

A check of the demographics of the audience of that program reveals that teens under 17 years of age watch that program in huge numbers. The live audience in the arena containing thousands of pre-17 teens. That is precisely why Take-Two’s new chairman, Strauss Zelnick, who was recently called by Fox News’ Neil Cavuto a “marketing genius” is outlandishly marketing BioShock to kids.

The FTC has continued to express concerns about the continued marketing of Mature-rated video games to children, especially by Take-Two, as indicated by the FTC’s news release found at http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/06/videogames.shtm.

If there is any doubt as to the inappropriateness of BioShock for kids under 17 and thus the harmfulness of tv ads pitching it to them, you can see the content of the game for yourself at Take-Two’s site at http://www.2kgames.com/bioshock/bioshock.html. Video game enthusiast, web-based sites are thrilled with how violent the game is.

Remarkably, the video game industry is running ads for games like BioShock on teen-intensive television programs while at the same time its industry-captured “watchdog,” the ESRB, is running a self-congratulatory ad campaign to assure parents that the video game ratings system is working and that the industry can be trusted not to target their kids with these Mature-rated games. It is all a lie, as the BioShock ads prove.

This mendacious sleight of hand helps explain recent FTC findings that roughly 40% of the time kids under 17 can still buy Mature-rated games at major retailers with no parent in sight. The industry aggressively creates in kids a high demand for “Mature” games and then tells Congress and anyone else who will listen that they are doing “all we can to keep Mature games out of the hands of kids.”

This rampant fraudulent trade practice is precisely what “Big Tobacco” did with its “Joe Camel” and other teen-targeting ads, while at the same time lying to Congress that it was not marketing its adult product to kids.

Enough already. The Federal Trade Commission must act, finally, to stop the video game industry from routinely marketing Mature-rated video games to kids under 17, just as Take-Two is presently doing with BioShock.

Regards, Jack Thompson

Copies: Media
Governor Mitt Romney
Senator Hillary Clinton
"On this Friday’s night’s 8 pm Eastern time airing of WWE’s wrestling program “Smackdown,” there were repeated ads for Take-Two/Rockstar Game’s Mature-rated, incredibly violent BioShock set to be released on August 21."

"The live audience in the arena containing thousands of pre-17 teens."
So the live audience can see the tv ads as well? Are they all carrying portable tvs?



In the interest of fairness you should have described it as "WWE's VIOLENT wrestling program which often has content of a sexually suggestive nature". If parents are happy to let their children watch WWE (in which there have been storylines about necrophilia, sex, disrupting funerals, etc.) then I don't think they are going to be bothered that they see an advert for a violent game.

"the industry can be trusted not to target their kids with these Mature-rated games. It is all a lie, as the BioShock ads prove."

The industry in this case is targetting fans of a already very violent and mature (in terms of content) television programme, which as you have said was shown late in the evening. If the parents let their kids watch it then it is likely that same parent will buy the game for their kid anyway, neatly taking any blame away from Take 2, the ESRB, etc.


"This mendacious sleight of hand helps explain recent FTC findings that roughly 40% of the time kids under 17 can still buy Mature-rated games at major retailers with no parent in sight."

So an ad on the tv explains the failure of retailers to enforce their voluntary policy?

"This rampant fraudulent trade practice is precisely what “Big Tobacco” did with its “Joe Camel” and other teen-targeting ads, while at the same time lying to Congress that it was not marketing its adult product to kids."

You said yourself, the ad was aired after 8pm. That is late enough in my opinion. The Joe Camel ads could be seen everywhere, magazines, billboards, etc.

"Enough already. The Federal Trade Commission must act, finally, to stop the video game industry from routinely marketing Mature-rated video games to kids under 17, just as Take-Two is presently doing with BioShock."

Enough alread. No video game publisher is marketing mature rated games to children.

Dennis, this letter seems to have been spammed around the other threads as well, grounds for a ban maybe?
"Rally behind this"

What the fuck are you? An eighth grader?
I was looking forward to a challenging videogame like Manhunt 2 for awhile. Thanks, ESRB!
Watch horny women do live cam show, free chat...

...

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/23/09 at 07:56am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yl2vfw6 Here's the link, good for conspiracy theories.
Posted 11/23/09 at 07:42am
JDKJ: Leaders never follow. Followers never lead.
Posted 11/23/09 at 06:48am
DarkSaber: Anyone been following this Hadley Climatic Research Centre server hack story?
Posted 11/22/09 at 11:48pm
ZippyDSMlee: AE:they feeding you well? I am enjoying win7 and heading to bed...uhg I need to get up early and start back to cleaning/painting blahg >< need tog et stuff done befor thanksgiving....
Posted 11/22/09 at 11:41pm
Andrew Eisen: Just got home from an eight hour recording session at Capitol Records. A lot of fun but damn exhausting.
Posted 11/22/09 at 08:44pm
BearDogg-X: 10 N. O. Who Dat?
Posted 11/22/09 at 09:45am
ZippyDSMlee: JD:I think doc phill is still sout about the break up with his wife he dose not fill holes as much as make them bigger these day
Posted 11/22/09 at 12:06am
JDKJ: You should get Phil McCraken to help you spackle those banisters.
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:57pm
ZippyDSMlee: Oh in the pirate hunter article I need my song ieda heckled DS,JD,Beemon sic im !!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:56pm
ZippyDSMlee: JD:no I am tried from prepping the banisters for painting , worked on them from 12 to 4 and 6 to 8...after I got back from the store...got up early got ready...blah...been up all day..I need a nap...
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:42pm
JDKJ: No. You gonna stay up late tonight soldering?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:41pm
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:Don't you mean Mctite?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: @Zip: Neil, Bob, and Lik McTaint. The McTaint brothers. LOL!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:44pm
Flamespeak: I still think military personell, killing other military personell, on a military complex should be handled by military courts.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I could see this a mixture of the two charges rather than just one or the other.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I think this was mainly a person who snapped, but evidence is showing he definitely had strong inlinations to islamic-extremism.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:41pm
Flamespeak: People are trying to claim that Hasan's actions were not terrorism. I don't jump on the 'terror train' like others, however
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:38pm
mentor07825: Britain certainly does deserve it! And the French! God damn it, it was a hand ball!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:34pm
ZippyDSMlee: mentor07825:Well Brittan dose deserve it....
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:33pm
ZippyDSMlee: Alyric:I don;t hasliburton having to pay back billoins... don;t you love it when the rich roll over the goverment without a care?
Login or register to post shouts