
While tracking homebrew games for the Nintendo DS as part of a series on adult-themed games,
DS Fanboy ran across
RanAway, a crudely-made title which challenges the user to avoid gay "blobs".
The game seems to play more like an 11-year-old's bad dream than anything specifically designed to promote anti-gay hatred. Rather, it takes the path of plain old ignorance and basic intolerance. With 8-bit graphics, the protagonist (a small naked stick figure, anatomically complete), attempts to avoid a bunch of pink blobs.
If your character comes into contact with the blobs, you are treated to the statement "You got hit by a gay person, Game Over" and a screenshot from the anime
Naruto that shows two boys kissing (the scene portrays the usual slapstick of "tried to kiss the girl but missed"). The game praises you if you avoid the "gay mob".
The description from the author's website sums up the game's sophomoric ignorance:
They are out to get you! Run away to avoid the kiss of death! Use the stylus to move the little boy and try to avoid getting hit.
RanAway seems to promote the idea that gangs of homosexuals are roaming the streets looking to prey on, er, kiss, young, innocent boys.
GayGamer wonders what's next:
[W]hat if Huntercool's next project is a game in which you not only avoid the gay blobs, but also kill them? At what point does this go from offensive to scary?
The whole thing would be comical if it wasn't so sad and unfortunate. Sub-8-bit graphics aside, we have a ’little boy’ running away from gay men and their ’kiss of death.’ Sigh.
CM: Considering the game's simplicity and crudeness, and the author's description, it's likely not a social commentary, but rather just a badly made game created as part of someone's first attempt at programming for the DS, with a dash of offensiveness thrown in to get attention.
- Reporting from Canada, GP Correspondent Colin "Jabrwock" McInnes
Comments
Correction on that, in that scene the characters, Naruto and sasuke were glaring at each other at a close distance when someone accidentally bumped Naruto, instigating the kiss.
In any case, this sounds like what the point was behind V tech rampage, none, it was meant to insult people, nothing more, nothing less.
Also I wish to make the following Disclaimer.
I'm a striaght male, and personally don't agree with Homosexuallity.
That being said, i was raised to respect the idea of tolerance to different ideas, and while your ideals my not be something I agree with, I don't think it's fair for me to tell you not to have them. As a matter of fact, I have had a few friends over they years who were openly gay and we never had issues so long as they understood that I wasn't and didn't push the issue.
I think this whole "Gay rights" thing is being blown out of all propoprtion, but not by the Gay rights people themselves, but by there opponents.
If you let them be, and not try to make social paraiahs out of them ,theres no big deal. I think thats the problem these days.
Leave them do what they do, so long as they leave the straight folk do what they do.
Sound good?
August 23, 2007
Prayer— Battle in "The Secret Place"
http://www.rbc.org/utmost/index.php
GP: Several paragraphs of scripture deleted. Stay at least somewhat on topic, please.
Now go tell Fred Phelps.
But I agree, with some of the before mentioned that this is a first attempt at programming and wanting to get attention.
My friend, FUCK Fred PHELPS and his whole damn group.
Thats all I gotta say about him.
Sounds like 4channers would love it. Hell, they ate up V tech rampage
Most people have either learned to accept, to ignore, or something inbetween.
There are many sensible people who, even understand that homosexuals are are born the way they are. They did not chose to turn out that way, because it is not a choice you can make. If in doubt, you just go ahead and try to be attracted to the same sex for 5 minutes, I dare you.
If that was done to stir up some interest in the game ... that worked out pretty well.
Is that "gay sex" on GP? Oh my!
:: Buy new sarcasm mop (the old one could no longer be cleaned) and mops up the mess of sarcasm I made on GP's nice floor. ::
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
It would be funny if someone made a a game of dodge or asteroids and called the things you dodge or shoot gaye, as in the diss,the reason why I would find it interesting is to see who comes out of the wood work to dissmiss the game and who would defend it.
There is always something underneath the underneath but that dose not mean it can not in fact be in front of you,as it seems with this.
AND ANOTHER AMERICAN FAMILY IS DESTROYED!
Honestly, I hear rednecks talk about this huge gay agenda all the time. Apparently, homosexuals want to get married and adopt kids to make them gay, then start some sort of civil war. They justify this statement by saying "If a kid is raised by two gays, how will they NOT turn out gay?"
My rebuttal.
If you sexuality is based on your parents, how can gay people exist? If heterosexuals can birth a homosexual, doesn't that blow the theory out of the water?
There are many many reasons to be morally opposed to Ebaums world.
As for the game, I kind of agree with some guy here, this wouldn't really be a story if GayGamer didn't comment on it and make it into a story, there's a slew of racist and homophobic games accross the interenet that no one knows or talks about because they're made by Little Jimmy "i know flash" Douchebag and posted on random sites where about 3 people play them. That being said, the whole thing sounds like a joke a 5th grader would find funny after learning what homosexuality is three days ago.
just think of the red neck agenda 0-o
that will blow everything out of the water 0-o
in the time it takes for females to evolve that way, the human race would go extinct. Oh and you do have your biology wrong, if the chromosone is truly shrinking, then men may (I say may because i don't know if this true) live shorter, but that doesn't mean they will be severly outnumbered by women, because the odds of having a male baby will always be 50:50, and you need a male to make a female (it's a catch 22 that keeps them in check).
Hawt. I'd love to be a part of THAT civilization.
Don't /b/elieve everything you read on /b/.
IIAB, and I can tell you that it's not going to happen.
"Correction on that, in that scene the characters, Naruto and sasuke were glaring at each other at a close distance when someone accidentally bumped Naruto, instigating the kiss."
Ack! My bad. I was thinking of another episode... I've been watching a bunch of different shows lately. I got them confused.
This sounds like it should be the plotline for bad dojinji....
For that matter, I think I HAVE seen plenty of plotlines like that if you swap the genders...
@JT
.....and this has to do with the article... how?
The species of lizard you're thinking of is gecko.
What an obnoxious game. I agree with Jabrwock in that it doesn't seem like an actual piece of social commentary. It feels like an eleven year-old who decided to make a game instead of start a flame war on an online BBS.
Wow.. way to abuse Matthew 6:6... you DO realize that passage basically means 'keep you religion to yourself' and a condemnation of 'church' buildings?
I guess it has to do with the hidden fact that Jesus was gay (see http://englishatheist.org/indexh.shtml )
Heck, if anybody was in my "secret place", I'd file charges for rape.
@JT
Prayer does not work. See http://englishatheist.org/zprayer.shtml
Anyone who has been following it over the years have seen grossly negligent uses of the medium of either rom hacking or homebrew dev.
Its dispicable to say the least but I don't see any way to curtail it effectively.
please knock it off. i don't want to see this thread go south.
The "game" as it stands is just gross immaturity. People don't need to get bent out of shape over it.
If we are to defend games as speech we have to realize that there will be (and also required to be) unpopular games that deal with unpopular subject matter.
I get kind of irked when I hear arguments of "What if ____ comes next?". In this story GayGamer asks "[W]hat if Huntercool’s next project is a game in which you not only avoid the gay blobs, but also kill them? At what point does this go from offensive to scary?". Well, what if Huntercool's next game is an RPG that shows the Columbine Massacre from Derek Harris and Eric Klebold's point of view - That would be offensive AND scary. Oh wait...
Anyway, i just think this "game" is immature garbage, same thought i had when i first saw this on GayGamer last week.
Bisexuality and homosexuality are sins. God says so.
Such behavior is a choice then, not a biological mandate. I appreciate your view on it, but it doesn't happen to square with either the Bible or with science.
I'm a sinner, too, but I don't run around proclaiming my sins to be some sort of genetic imperative.
This is the great lie at the center of the radical homosexual/bisexual movement--that we were "born" that way. Nonsense. Then why are there identical twins with different sexual preferences?
On the other hand, I think Naruto itself is extremely gay.
No, it's a sad when people don't understand the utter correlation between homosexuality and religion.
From a gaming perspective it is a very good first attempt at programming a game for the DS: areas that "auto kill" you while using a stylus for input to move.
Can JT be banned again? He is already starting his trolling and off topic discussions.
@GP
Seconded about the JT banning- that post was 100% usless.
Is that really our Jack bashing Gay rights, or another imposter attempting to tarnish him? O.o Cause if that's Jack, what miniscule respect I had for him as a human being just died.
@JT, real or not:
So, because 'God Said So' you get to treat bi- or homosexual human beings as dirt? Great justification there, old man. The bible also asked you to stone your son to death the first time he disobeyed you and wants you pay double your fines whenyou lose a case in court. It's astounding which pieces of Scripture people try to forget when it's convenient.
By the way, the tired old argument of "Thou shalt not sleep with another man, it's an abomination against god" (Little help on the chapter numbers, anyone?) is false. Study the original hebrew: "Thou shalt not layest with another man IN A WOMAN'S BED, it is ritually UNCLEAN". No sin here, just a few ritual clensings and tada, good as new.
College religion classes ftw. :D
So, how about that Homebrew DS game? :D
The sad thing is he might actually ask to hear those questions.
Regardless of whether that is Jack or not (if it's not, good job mimicing him), I must ask that you not judge Christianity as a whole based on that comment. Jack (or whoever he is) is filled with hatred towards other groups of people, something that Christianity DOES NOT teach at all. There are many misguided Christians out there of which Jack is among them, but there are many who are not as well. Just as we should not judge people on their sexuality, please don't judge people based on whether they are Christian or not.
On behalf of Christianity, I apologize for Jack/fake Jack's comments.
In any case, this sounds like what the point was behind V tech rampage, none, it was meant to insult people, nothing more, nothing less.
That's the first thing I thought of, in a narrator's voice, "from the same elementary school minded morons who brought you VTR comes this new crappy waste of time..."
There seems to be a lot more "JT" on these threads than usual.
As far as this article goes, slow news day? Seriously, all you're doing is bringing an otherwise worthless trashy homebrew game into public view. You're giving it free publicity. And by doing so, you're giving the opposition more fuel.
GP does this every once in a while, last time with VT Rampage, and I'm starting to think that it's a way to ensure people keep coming back to the site. Purposely incite trouble with the pixel-anti, then sit back and "report" on everything that's going on. It's a classic underhanded journalism technique, and every time GP employs it my respect for this site dies just a little.
GP, you do a good job most of the time, but what is more dangerous: a homebrew game that GayGamer (whom is being targeted by said game) decided to print a short blurb on? Or giving this unknown game massive exposure via GP and anybody who links here? (c'mon, now that it's on GP, Kotaku and Joystiq will likely report on it, and it will be on Digg if it hasn't already been posted. Huntercool thanks you for the free publicity, I'm sure.)
August 23rd, 2007 at 12:32 pm
To the above “bisexual gamer” above, please note:
Bisexuality and homosexuality are sins. God says so."
Clarification: YOUR God, ie that Demon Pretender To The Throne Of Heaven that you worship.
"Such behavior is a choice then, not a biological mandate. I appreciate your view on it, but it doesn’t happen to square with either the Bible or with science."
Actually, homosexuality is, and has been proven to be, a genetic trait. BIsexuality is also a genetic trait. HOWEVER, as a bisexual, an individual would then be left with the choice (as much as anyone is in "chosing") who to have a relationship with.
"I’m a sinner, too, but I don’t run around proclaiming my sins to be some sort of genetic imperative."
No, you either blame your God, ie that Demon Pretender To The Throne Of Heaven that you worship, or you blame others thereby not taking ANY responsibility for your own actions. Much in the same way you encourage others to do.
"This is the great lie at the center of the radical homosexual/bisexual movement–that we were “born” that way. Nonsense. Then why are there identical twins with different sexual preferences? "
Simple, logical answer:
They were born BISEXUAL. Therefore, each individual twin may very well be drawn to have relationships with individuals of different genders as much as they may be drawn to individuals with different hair color, different races, different social interests, or even different religions.
Society, in its desire to be "either/or", ignored the existance of those who could be both.
Individuals claiming to have "changed" from one to the other may have overlooked the possibility that they were BOTH but through verbal, mental, perhaps even physical or sexual abuse, that individual was forced, due to the bigotry of the abuser(s), to deny interest in one, and claim happiness with another.
There are some individuals who really are one or the other and are abused by dishonorable, unethical, corrupt bigots into BELIEVING they were "changed", and live unhappy lives, despite claims otherwise.
Whether you're the real John Bruce or not is irrelevant, these are clearly facts which have been ignored in the past and which should be looked into more closely.
Nightwng2000
NW2K software
Well done, old boy.
"Bisexuality and homosexuality are sins. God says so."
Wow, if it portrays violence, it's BAD! If it portrays sex, it's BAD! But if it portrays hating gays, it's OK because God hates them too!
I wait a moment for you to recover from your mind been blown...
Now, according to you just been a homosexual/bisexual is a sin? So unlike most of the other anti-gay Christians whom ive seen online you obviously don't believe in "love the sinner, hate the sin"?
Ban this clown.
That being said I still don't thing there should be a problem with a game such as this. As much as I have the right to express my acceptance of homosexuals and bisexuals I must stand up for others rights to not accept it. I believe in freedom and in a free society you are allowed to disagree. So I really don't see any reason why any game reflecting homophobic or anti-gay ideas or actions should be restricted. What you need to ask yourself is if you believe in freedom? If you answer yes you should just let these games be just as you would like games with a more positive message be.
Wow, JT told me I need help. That's the funniest thing I've heard all week.
Are Jack's posts requiring verification now or something before they show up? Or was I really just too tired to notice?
I am really getting exhausted with him hijacking every single topic here. Every other headline has to do with something inane (sorry, Dennis) about JT (did his letter to the FTC really matter?). Now that his ban is gone, JT comes in and turns the remaining stories into his own attention-grabbing topics.
Its the GP reader's fault for replying to it and feeling the need to feed him with your attention. You do realize thats why he posts here right? He gets the reaction he needs and moves on. All he cares about is your reaction he is like any other troll. Stop feeding his unsatisfiable hunger for attention and starve him to death!
The even sadder part is that we are the only people who listen to him at all any more.
I truly and honestly hope that as GP readers we can learn to ignore JT. He doesn't contribute anything of value to the topic and often he distracts us from discussing it. Perhaps people will read this message and take it to heart but I understand how hard it is to do that as JT brings my blood to a boil on a daily basis.
The bible also says that slavery is alright and in fact allows you to sell your daughter to another person.
The bible also promotes the degradation of women and demands total submission from them, it states that women aren't to speak in public and only permitted to speak in private when they are home with their husband.
You're also supposed to kill anyone who does not believe in your God and your religion.
The bible is the last book I'd use for moral values, it's a disgusting book that's far worse than any M rated video game or R rated movie.
Check this place out: http://www.godisimaginary.com/
That explains a lot if that really is Jack.
But on this blog I suggest we stop replying to him. Overtime he will get bored and leave like any other troll.
I really do find it strange that some individuals that promote tolerance wish to promote intolerance to other things. I think people should accept people of all religions, skin colors, sexual preferences and walks of life. It should be acceptable to be different and it shouldn't cause people to want to police the morals of society because they think their way is the only right way. But of course this wont ever happen but its a nice dream.
'Homo' means 'same'
'Phobic' means 'irrational fear of'
So by extension, being homophobic means having an irrational fear of (people of) the same (sexuality)
Also, it does not mean hating gays....just being scared of them....
That said, i also support the other side; the side that made this game. I doubt they were really hateful, and even then, its just a game, and will always be just that; a game
You have fun with that, if it comes to it
Actually, that scene was a staredown between Naruto and Sasuke, and a third party, not paying attention while talking to friends, bumped Naruto into that position.
Keep spouting your holier than thou crap - I'll keep laughing at how dumb you sound.
Correction..."acting out" on homosexual impulses is considered a sin by some biblical preachers....not homosexuality (defined as: being ATTRACTED to a member of the same gender) in and of itself.
I am a straight man, so I could be dead wrong, but I feel homosexuality should be viewed in the same manner as an attraction to music or art. Why is some music and art appealing to some yet appalling to others? Are you born being attracted to certain music? No. Do you make an active choice of what music sounds good to your ears? No. It is a combination of heredity, life experiences, various past relationships with others, and your subconscious that help form your attraction to certain music, art, and in my opinion…what attracts you to a mate (whether it be of the same or opposite sex).
"Bisexuality and homosexuality are sins. God says so."
Yeah, only in the mosaic law.
One of the big themes of the New Testament is that Christians are not bound by Mosaic law. If the Bible is infallibly true, then Christians may use their own judgment in choosing whether to follow the Mosaic law, and shouldn't bother about those who choose differently.
Read Romans all the way through and its hard to miss Paul's point: He's writing to a group of Jewish Christians who have been criticising gentile Christians for not keeping the Mosaic law, and Paul is telling them, politely but firmly, to knock it off. If the Bible is infallibly true, it's wrong to use Leviticus or the story of Sodom as a basis for condemning homosexuals.
Funny thing, Jack never went publicly apopleptic over that. Probably distracted by his personal bete noir of Rockstar, I guess.
And btw, homosexuality is a sacrament in the gospel of Boohosebuf. Hey, you have your own fiction books, I got mine.
How DARE they use a screencap from a shitstorm like Naruto as a Game Over screen!
And people wonder why the "terrists" hate us!
Gay should be okay, but disagreeing with homosexuality should be okay too, but you should still accept it if you disagree with it. Tolerance is something our society lacks. One might say society has zero tolerance...