Anti-Israel Game Sparks Online Protest in Bahrain

Anti-Israel Game Sparks Online Protest in Bahrain

August 27, 2007
Recently GamePolitics reported on a first-person shooter released by the radical organization Hezbollah (see: Hezbollah Game Celebrates 2006 Clash with Israel).

Word of the game has sparked outrage among some in the Arab world. As reported by the Gulf Daily News, an online petition was created to ban the game from sale in the Persian Gulf nation of Bahrain.

One of the petition's creators - described as an avid gamer - told the Gulf Daily News:
It's created by a religious and political party and that makes it unacceptable. And it's [inexpensive], so it's accessible to children. The war happened only a year ago and so it's not appropriate to make a game out of it. It's not helping Bahrain and the region.

As a Muslim, I should not promote violence against a social sect or religion, and we are supporting Hizbollah with this... We are recruiting the next line of Hizbollah fighter. What's next, being against Sunnis or Shi'ites?

Why not create a strategic game like Rise of Nations and teach them this way. Honestly, Hizbollah is killing more civilians and all they are doing is creating havoc and agitating the Israeli government. I have friends in Beirut and it was destroyed.

But  Mohammed Hassan Al Aradi of the Bahrain Society Against Normalization with the Zionist Enemy scoffed at the petition:
[The petition creators] can't take a decision for everyone in the country... If I wanted to make a petition against this I already have 150 people in my family who would sign. The game is just putting a message to Arabs that we can win.

Our children are already watching all this on TV anyway, so it makes no different... Let's remember, we are hearing the name of Israel all the time on the TV and they are showing films against Arabs and no-one is saying anything. Again it is free will.

There are also games for [low price] that are against Muslims and you can probably get all these types of games through the Internet even if they aren't sold here. If they start banning this, you will have to ban everything.

GP: Due to their ubiquity, online petitions don't normally rate getting picked up on GamePolitics. But we made an exception for this one because the game is topical, because the petition surfaced in the volatile Middle East, and because it was apparently an important story in the island nation of Bahrain. View the online petition.

Comments

Is it bad that I agree with the anti-semite? Look, this game has a message/propaganda that I destest, but I think Free Speech is universal right (or should be), so in that light, I can't call for a ban.
Whoever wrote that petition may very well be the Middle-East version of JT or Keith Vaz. They share the same theories: Game will be marketed and sold to children, game will mainpulate children, game will teach children that violence is okay; it all sounds oh-so-familiar.

Anyway, I also agree with Al Aradi. Children are already seeing this stuff on the six o' clock news, the responsibility lies with the parents (though he doesn't explicitly say that, he does seem to hint at it), you can't censor one set of beilefs without censoring many others. This also sounds very familiar.
Terminator, there's only ONE problem:

The Propaganda folks in Hezbollah DO market it to kids. They said so themselves and are proud of it.

That's the difference between US game retailers and Hezbollah. At least in the US, they try not to sell M rated games to minors. Hezbollah wants to spread their propaganda so they target kids because they're the easiet to influence.
I'm with Jeffy on this.

This feels like I'm damned if I do, and damned if I don't. I don't want to agree with the one demanding the game gets banned because that's censorship and that's wrong (even if the game is trash). Yet, I feel dirty agreeing with the anti-Semite.
Al Aradi is a liar.
Israel does NOT show anti-arab or anti-muslim propaganda films.

I'm an Israeli officer myself. I've been a part of the last war, and this game is indeed just a piece of propaganda. Call me bias - I am.

But unfortunatly, it is the way of the Muslim extrimist nations. Just watch the TV programing they have during the Ramadan month. It's filled with atrocious soap operas about Jews (not just Israelis, so don't believe Ahmadinajad saying that he isn't against Jews, just against Israel) eating children or executing their own or arabs by cutting them limb by limb. I've seen those movies. And this is something NO ONE in ANY Arab country can claim about Israel - cause there are NO such movies.
Ya all the violence and brainwashing against "others" is marketed to kids so they can becoming better lemmings 0-o
@Cypher

I don't think it's "anti-arab/muslim propaganda" per-se, but rather the impression that arabs are painted in a bad light in "western" films. See "black-guy-dies-first" myths. Or the "terrorists are always arab/eastern-european/asian".

Then again, I too have seen the "Jew soaps" you speak of, and yeah, for Al Aradi to whine about Israeli tv shows' portrayal of Arabs is pure irony...

And I don't think anyone would deny that Special Forces 2 is anything but propaganda. That seemed to be it's intention, to be a propaganda game promoting Hezbollah...

Is it a conspiracy that Firefox's dictionary says "Hezbollah" is spelled wrong, and that I should try spelling it "Ayatollah"? ;)
@ Cypher

Agreed.

@ DarrelBT

Agreed

@ Jeffy

THe diffrence with this case is that Hezbollah is counting on violent games to make children more violent and attack Israel. Now you have videogames being used for the EVIL. Also, I would not say that the Arab countries in that area are the most "free speech" loving countries. Also with the volitile situation there it would make sence to remove a game that could cause actual real life deaths due to real life violence propigated by men who tell children to "Kill the Jews and oh... By the way here is a videogame so you can get used to it. Now run along and watch the TV so you can see Jews being the monsters that they are with their baby eating." THis is the one and only time a game should ever be banned. When it is created for one perpose, not entertainment but indoctrination into a terrorist group.
@Archgabe

Agreed.

In my book, this "game" goes right there alongside the piece of crap called Ethnic Cleansing.
@ Archgabe

I understand your point, but what good would banning this ONE game do? Rather than ban this game it would be better to marginalize Hezbollah and their propaganda. It would do more good to educate the populace proper respect for human life, than remove one game. By your own statements, there is far more anti-Israel propaganda coming from Hezbollah, than just THIS game. For example, the Mickey Mouse rip-off, Fanfur (is that the correct spelling?) is a genocidal version of Barney aimed at children. Your intentions are noble, but banning this game could do more harm than good if it would have any effect at all.
I agree with Gameboy. You will do more with proper education than you could ever accomplish with banning anything. That is the problem I have with video game legislation and this is the problem I have with people calling for this game to be banned.

You cannot stifle free speech. Look at China and the problems they are having with it. It would do more for these people to do as Gameboy says and work to discredit the Hezbollah and their mission.
@ Cypher

There has been all kinds of entertainment that makes the arabs look bad while the jews look good. And alot of that entertainment would not show what the Israeli's did wrong to the arabs on these kind of situations.

The jews took a great deal of the Palestinian's land over greed, and whenever the Palestinian's would try to get the land back the Israeli's would kill them, bulldoze people's houses that had nothing to do with another Palestinian's action, randomly shoot children in the head that was reported to not have a weapon. Israel has done alot of things that are criminal acts.

The same goes with Lebanon where if Hezbollah did nothing the people would have gone through way worse then when Israel first invaded Lebanon killing so many innocent people. Israel always has to hide behind all of their high weaponry and armor while they kill a bunch of people that do not agree with what they are doing. When Hezbollah put up a good fight, Israel was out of there in not that long because the Israeli's love themselves to much to get killed just like they love all of their power.

I believe that this game is not bad if games where you kill arabs for the causes of people like the Israeli's are allowed. The reason why there is no movies made in America showing showing what is really going on in these situations is because America sucks up to Israel big time because of the power situation.

Everyone needs to look at what is really going when it comes to Israel before they start saying stuff.
Free speech is a very good thing to have, but sometimes you just have to draw a line in the sand. I said the same thing when that Danish Newspaper published cartoons of Muhammed, and there is very little different about this.
@Michael

Wow, you sound incredibly biased.

"Israel always has to hide behind all of their high weaponry and armor while they kill a bunch of people that do not agree with what they are doing."

Just like Hezbollah encourages people to go out and blow themselves up, trying to take as many innocent people with them. Great way to solve the problem, huh? It's amazing how the leaders of Hezbollah never seem to go out and blow themselves up as an example but would rather send children to die for them.
where can you download this? I want to see how wrong this game is.
And cue racist comment from jack thompson nnnnnnnnnnnow!
First of all the story is fake. Bahrain is used as the location for a zionist created and planted story (anyone can pretend to be muslim, and start an online petition) because the naive readers of sites like this will not know that Bahrain, far from being a muslim state, is entirely under the control of stooge forces working for British and US interests.

No decent Human could take any offense at a game designed around the premise of a poor nation defending itself against invasion by one of the most depraved, racist, and violent regimes the Earth has ever seen, the state of Israel.

What is interesting, of course, is how sites like GamePolitics take zero concern with the tens of thousands of game, film, book, and TV product that have the mass murder of muslims as their central theme. Computer wargames in particular almost exclusively focus on the genocide of muslim nations, if they have a contemporary setting. At the same time, Israel demands the genocide of Iran, after having actively supported the acts of genocide in Bosnia, Chechnya, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

Israel, of course, also supplied nuclear weapons to South Africa, when South Africa was ruled by a vile Apartheid regime (that was a regime that declared in law that all black Humans were racially inferior to white humans). Israel was the strongest supporter of apartheid in South Africa.

What does it mean when a group can be attacked for making a game encouraging their people to believe that they can fight and obtain victory against an invader dedicated to the most obscene racist ideology? Self defense is a basic Human right.

The irony with Israel is because it believes its people are a "master-race" (ring any bells?), the victims of Israeli military aggression can defeat their racist enemy even if they suffer much greater losses. You see, Israel only likes war under the condition where thousands of muslim civilians are butchered for the loss of each Israeli 'soldier'. If the ratio of Israeli losses are forced higher (as with last year's Israeli war of aggression against Lebanon), the racist Israeli population considers that the cost is too high.

The wargames that are made in the West are DESIGNED to encourage the creation of aggressive wars- a form of warfare designated as the SUPREME CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY by the Nuremberg trials conducted at the end of WW2. British, American, European and Israeli financed wargames encourage the idea that powerful nations should use global violence as a standard tool of political power, and should have no guilt planning to use genocide as a means of resolving issues like who gets to control and consume the resources of this planet.

Meantime, wargames like this one out of Lebanon represent a pure desire for effective self-defense against enemies funded and armed to an extreme that is beyond belief (the US recently announced that they were giving Israel 30Billion dollars exclusively for the use on weapons of mass destruction). Germany gave two submarines to Israel for the purpose of carrying nuclear armed cruise missiles, nuclear missiles targetted at every major muslim population centre in the Middle East.

The recent 'friendly-fire' incident in Afghanistan killed teenagers serving in the UK forces there. How do you think the Israel supporting West gets kids into the army? The computer wargames produced by companies in the West are explicitly designed as recruiting tools for these kids. Weeks earlier in Afghanistan, US forces butchered an entire town meeting, declaring that because the majority of victims were males of 'military age' (ie., 8-80), that the murder of hundreds was a great thing. The parallel to the serbian act of genocide in Srebrenica, where Israeli backed serbian forces removed all military aged males from a town, and then executed them all, is exact.

Prior to, and during WW2, nazis objected to any media story that suggested that jews and others should be allowed to defend themselves against nazi aggression. At the same time, every effort was made in film, and book, and radio production to encourage support of the 'glorious' german war machine. Today, WE ARE THE NAZIS, and the world had better tremble, for unlike in the time of Hitler, there is no one that will be able to prevent this evil from hurting the entire Earth.

GamePolitics.com can be proud of inheriting the legacy of Goebbels, and doing its part to denigrate those that merely seek to defend themselves in the face of extraordinary military evil.
I've seen some of the TV releases of Anti-Semite propoganda that is shown in areas of Palestine, I don't think any area is particuarly better than the other regarding their attitude towards each other, that's part of the problem, it's so much easier to think of the person trying to kill as something 'less' than human. But in truth, be it IDF, Hezbollah, Hamas or the American Army, it's all people.

Now, if they sorted it all out with Computer Games, no-one would get killed, but that's never going to happen. Basically, the computer games themselves are harmless, the problem in the area is one that permeates every social, and military, aspect of everyone's lives, it's not the computer game that is the problem, it's the level of hatred, mistrust and fear that creates these kinds of attitudes, and that's been around since long before Video Games.
Davell... What's the first word in the name of GAMEpolitics? I even gave a little hint.

Yes, I wouldn't be surprised if this was fake, but was it really called for to go Jack Thompson and start comparing Dennis with Goebbels, I mean, seriously, you aren't doing yourself any favours.
davell,

You are scapegoating Israel to cover for the faults of your own people. (If you are, in fact, a Muslim). More innocent Muslims die at the hands of their fellow Muslims than die to the Israeli military. The reason you overlook this, is because you don't count certain Muslim sects as 'true' to your vision of Islam, and therefore beneath your notice ... that is until a comparably small portion die at the hands of the Israelis. Then, you cry foul. Wake up to the fact that radical Islam kills more of its own than infidels, and start working to stop those members of your beliefs from perpetuating this unneeded jihad. Religion of Peace, my ass. Peace, if and when we are all under the Judgment of the Caliphate.

I knew I would regret siding with the anti-semite, despite his being on the side of free speech this instance (being that it's speech he agrees with, of course).
Davell- I applaud a game the gives the false hope to the poor Muslims and causes them to rise in mass against the oppressors. It will just make it more justified when they are slaughtered!
The poster 'davell' raises highlights some very interesting points, shedding light on the numerous contradictions that separate Zionist discourse from Zionist actions. One small issue I would like to pick up on is the claim that this game will reach children, as far as I am aware national military service is compulsory in Israel among Jewish (and Druze) men as well as women over the age of 18.

It shows that the Zionist discourse is riddled with hypocrisy on every level, to complain about a low-budget game that may, or may not, influence children and then to condition and dehumanise young men and women for war is ludicrous. Hizbollah is a legitimate and popular resistance movement, to damn them for creating a video-game whilst Israel is equipped with the latest Western armaments and copious funds is to not see the forest for the trees. When faced with the military might of Israel, a relatively minute state that manages to rank in the top 15 of military spending, I see no major objections to Hizbollah utilising every means of resistance at their command.
My problem isn't with the political position between Israel and Palestine, I am nowhere near either state and am perfectly aware of the fact that we only get told what it is wanted for us to know, but nonetheless, he did, more than a little, shoot the messenger in this case, this isn't about GP's opinion on the Middle East, it is merely reporting the existence of the Poll, I think that to go all guns blazing about GP, purely for pinting the existence of this, is over the top to say the least.
Michael, I'm sorry, but you obviously do NOT know what the Israeli Palestinian conflict is all about.

It has nothing to do with taking land out of greed.
Get your facts straight, my friend.

Before there was Israel, the British who ruled these mandates had a plan to have two countries, for us and the Arabs in the region. With Jerusalem ruled by the British.
However, it were the Arabs that did not agree to that plan, and the rioting began.

On the very next day, AFTER Israel's declaration of independence, the WHOLE of the Arab world attacked us in the War of Independence. We won that war against the combined forces of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq. In the wars after that, we took lands - all wars were NOT of our initiation. Although, admitedly, the Six Day War was a preemptive strike - but the whole world saw Egypt mobilizing and forcing the UN Peace Keepers to leave under threat.

Are we to blame for conquering land in wars that we did NOT start? And we gave that back, when we made peace with Egypt.

I'm sorry to disillusion you, but except for extremists here (and we deal with them, as you've all see during the Gaza Disengagement two years ago), no one teaches intolerance against Arabs. Sure, there is that. But every country has intolerances towards other peoples. It stands to reason that people here would fear and ultimately hate those who are taught from infancy that their sold purpose in life is to drive every Jew into the sea....

Me and my Wife are both Officers in the IDF. Her father was an Officer as well (retired now). He now runs a furniture business, in which he deals with a lot of people from Gaza and Hebron. People he calls friends. Palestinians, not just Israeli Arabs.

Yes there are those that try to take the Palestinian's lands - my wife's cousin is among those (though she's just a young woman and never actually did anything of the sorts... yet). But we deal with them, promptly. We go in, with the police and military, and take them out of those lands - by force if and when necessary.

Yes, mistakes happen in a war. And do not doubt, we are in a war. For our survival.
But those that make the mistakes are dealt with. Severely.

But it's those actions we took to protect ourselves that had virtually stopped mass bombings of buses and restourants. More and more terrorists are caught before they succeed. Should we be sorry for that? I don't think so.
...
And i tought games were for entertainment. Come on, games should be about playing, leave out politics out of them, unless they have awesome gameplay.
Dear Everyone,

Before you comment on the middle east in regards to land use, please do some research first. And if you're too lazy to do so, here's a truncated and still probably only 85% accurate history lesson.

1) People live in Middle East
2) British Empire (and others) comes along draws lines and plays name the land.
3) World war... rawr!
4) Jews en mass flee to Israel which they have for the past 50 years or so have been campaigning to be made theirs.
4) Palestine says no, even though the proposed Jewish state would only take away some 20% of land away from Palestine.
5) Less land for some more land for others, Palestine says no regardless of the deal almost always being super in their favor.
6) Palestine looses out Israel is born.
7) Israel gets gang banged
8) Somewhat miraculously Israel survives getting attacked on most sides. In retaliation for being attacked they take more land.
9) History...
Problem is, I think the cycle of vengeance has to end. Everyone has a reason to be angry at the 'other guy', there's probably hardly a single person in the area who's life hasn't been affected in some way by what is going on there, be they Israeli or Palestinian. But as long as every attack is 'revenge' for the last one, by either side, this is going to continue ad-infinitum.
As tempted as I am to bite davell, (or even argue with him) I’d prefer to get back to ~the1jeffy’s original post, which I feel is within the domain of Gamepolitics. I hope that ~the1jeffy doesn’t find me too critical of his position, because I do sympathize with the idea that in matters of Free Speech we should err on the side of being less restrictive. With that in mind, I would like to offer the following.

I agree that Free Speech is a right that should be extended universally. Let's be clear on what universal means, however. Is it universal in the sense that 1) anything one can say is protected, 2) it is extended to everyone in the universe, or 3) both?

I'm a big fan of #2 only. It's okay to concede that some things should not be allowed to be said. There is no need to feel like we are going soft on Free Speech – or losing ground in the fight to keep the content of our games free from censorship - by saying that some statements (gasp – even those made by games) are just not appropriate. The distinction that has to be made is between morality and taste. Where things get confusing is that some people would disguise their tastes as morality and others simply have a taste for immorality. Are such games immoral? I’m not convinced as yet, but I suspect that the answer is tied up with how effective versus how redundant they are towards their alleged immoral aims.
Thing is, having watched the 'John Rambo' trailer, where, once again, a mass of 'semi-identified' foreigners are slaughtered in the most gruesome way possible (far more gruesome, I might add, than most video games, at one point he rips out a mans larynx with his hands, and that's just the trailer), I think the Media industry in general suffers from this problem. Sensationalism isn't going to go away, simply because not only does the industry use it, but those who see themselves as on a mission against the Industry are equally wont to use Sensationalism and stereotype if it suits their purpose.

Check out the Rambo Trailer on YouTube if you like, but be aware, it's far more unpleasant viewing that a Video Game.
I don't like either side of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Call me an antisemite if you want, but Israel's foreign policy is overly aggressive, especially given the power of their allies and the moral high ground that they like to claim, and Palestine can't seem to control individual terrorist groups. As such, I can't really condemn one side more than the other for putting out propaganda, and in the interests of freedom of speech, I certainly cannot support censorship.

Although I doubt it will happen, I'd rather see the guys who made this petition create a game/mod from their own perspective -- there are far too few games that show peace (or the potential for peace) in the Middle East, and I'd like to see that change :)
Guess there is one thing games teach us undeniably about ourselves (and hit yourself if you don't recognize this):

"War, war never changes."
It would be a uniquely challenging political game to try and find a solution to the problem, or to attempt to rebuild the infrastructure in Palestine etc. I'm not sure how well it would be received, but it would be a fascinating concept :)
@HandofCrom

Fallout reference! What do I win? ;P

But seriously, that quote is very true...and that gives me an idea!
One of us could could make a poster with the fallout guy and that quote, then make it freely available on the internet. People could download the file, print out copies of the poster, and put then up around their hometowns!

...but that's just me. :-)
This is way different than what JT is trying to do. The games he hates are game marketed for adults that people are supposed to understand are fake. These games that Hezbollah is putting out are violent, but they are also marketed towards kids with the sole purpose of recruiting them for their Jihad. I don't agree with JT and what he's doing. However, I do side with the people trying to ban this game in Bahrain.
@Sidewinder

I've never been a fan of banning speech, even hate speech, because it is only the symptom of a deeper problem. The deep problem is the long history of conflict in the region, and there is no easy solution. I am for allowing the game to be released, and even pressed to children, but I am also for those opposing its twisted message to confront its message, expose it, and try to spread a message of tolerance. When these symptoms are suppressed, they only fester, while if they are confronted and discredited, the we can start to fix the deeper causes. You don't snip off the growth of the weed and leave the roots to grow, you grab the growth and pull to get the roots out as well, or use the growth as a marker to dig out the roots and kill the weed for good.
And sorry for the double post, but Fallout rules! metroidprimegmr, you win a Pip Boy (as soon as it is invented) or a copy of Duke Nukem Forever (as soon as it is released). I'd go for the Pip Boy, it's going to be here first.
To whom it may concern,
I am Jewish, and I live in Israel.

To the hypocrites above, who actually support this kind of game, now hear this:
Just Six years ago, nearly three-THOUSAND people lost their lives in less than 2.5 hours, when the two towers of what was the World Trade Center collapsed into concentrated concrete-ash and bended steel.

Let's say that the people who affiliate with Bin-Laden or some other group say, in Iraq - would have created a sweet-looking, highly popular, top-of-the-line computer game (and not those moronic flash based-crap they call games).

In that game, letting you actually board aircrafts from select U.S. soil airports, later on, while "in-flight" you'll actually be able to hijack the plane using which ever means you see fit - killing passengers, threats and what not.
Eventually - you'd be piloting and crashing the aircraft directly into the WTC over and over again, generating extra points if you actually hit it exactly on the spots of the original two aircraft that hit it six years ago, would that make you just a bit angry?

Give me a break! This entire talk-back thread would have been engulfed in flames if this article was about a game like the one I described.

Some of the people here have got alot of nerve trying to justify those kind of games.

Think about it.
@GoodRobotUs

http://www.peacemakergame.com/

The game already exists. It got some nice praise on Gamasutra when it was first released.
futility,

Thanks for the grade-school history lesson. *head pat*

Filorux,

"It’s okay to concede that some things should not be allowed to be said. There is no need to feel like we are going soft on Free Speech – or losing ground in the fight to keep the content of our games free from censorship - by saying that some statements (gasp – even those made by games) are just not appropriate."

No. It's never OK to tell people what can, and cannot be said. You are certainly free to think/feel/say that certain subjects are not appropriate for yourself, and avoid them. But it's another thing altogether to want them to not be said. However, Free Speech is not a get-out-of-jail free card. Each person is responsible for his/her speech, and must accept the consequences of his/her speech.

If a person walks into a predominantly black neighborhood wearing a sign that says "Death to all (N-words)," then that person must accept the consequences of his/her intolerant speech (Die Hard III). If I (falsely) shout, "Fire," or, "Bomb," in a crowded building, I must accept the criminal penalty because my speech directly caused a riot.

I would argue that protecting speech I disagree with is more important than protecting speech I agree with. I think that this attitude is what separates the truly free, and the Jack Thompsons, CCFC's, and other people who want speech they disagree with to be banned.
Samuel,

I can understand your outrage. I can also agree that if a 9/11 game was to be made, with the terrorists as the 'heroes,' there would be a justified public outcry.

But, do not deign to tell me how I would react. I would loathe the game, and its creators. But I would not call for it to be banned. I would hold the creators of such a game accountable for their hatred and their violent propaganda.

To be clear, this anti-semitic game being discussed is vile. But, even my enemy has the right to free speech. To take it away from anyone would reduce myself to their level. Shine the Light of Truth on the lies, don't hide them from sight. The lies will only fester if hidden, given credibility by the effort to quash them, allowing them to corrupt more people.

Shalom,
~Jeff
Thanks Lumi, I'll take a look at that :)
Attaching consequences is all I meant by telling someone what can and cannot be said. I wouldn't want to stop anyone from saying anything because given the right context it might be really deep/funny/witty, or at least harmless. Protection isn't about enabling speech before the fact, it's about not requiring consequences after.
Cypher, im on the side of peace, so im on both sides. But does winning a fight mean you can take someones land/homes? There is a saying, two wrongs don't make a right...and how often is a soldier on either side killing because someone on their side was killed they know not to have deserved death and not because of their belief in the rightness of their cause?
No, if you are on the side of peace then you are on Israel's and the Palestinian PEOPLE's side. Not the PLO nor Hamas.

Do you really believe that a people that's killing it's own wants peace? Look at what's going on IN Gaza right now. Yes, we occasionally kill a terrorist leader or a cell that's trying to either infiltrate Israel or fire off Kasam rockets into Sderot and the West Negev. But Hamas are killing their own people.

Last week we saw a broadcast of a wedding in Gaza being interrupted by so called Hamas police - they started beating the attendees and shooting in the air and throwing chairs at them.

Your saying "two wrongs doesn't make a right" does not belong here. What two wrongs?
It's not a matter of taking someone's land. It's a matter of being attacked and then driving the attacking force back. What do you think this is?
"Okay guys, the war is over. You've won. Sorry, now can we put our troops back on the original border?"
It doesn't work that way. Yes we took advantage of the lands - we created strategic depth for us. Do you know what strategic depth means? It means that during a war, we have a certain depth, a certain area to which we can fall back to and regroup. Israel, currently, has NO strategic depth, with the exception of the Sea.
When we had the Sinai desert, which we conquered from Egypt, and which we gave back in peace talks, we had a vast one there.

Do you, btw, even know what the Palestinian people are?
They are, for the most part, refugees from Israel who elected to flee Israel or help the Arab nations in those wars we had with them. Unlike many other Arabs who are full citizens of Israel (with actually less responsibilities and all the rights of Jewish citizens). They became refugees in those Arab countries, which later, after the wars, threw them back out. They didn't want them.
And now they pretend to care about them?

Learn your history and facts guys.

As for the eye for an eye comment you've made. We don't go killing Palestinians cause our soldiers get killed. We don't target civilian populace, while they mostly target that of ours. We've shown a lot of restraint in the face of killing and terrorism. The only problem is that we don't show everything on TV, like they do (well, they also fabricate alot of stories... like that "dead family" on the Gaza beach last year....).
On the PEOPLES side, thats exactly what i meant. But im on everyone's side too, why? Because to put it simply, people are stupid. They have to be taught peace if all they've known is hate and all I see is young soldiers in the PLO on TV. They have to know why all people deserve life, or at least, don't deserve death. Words and ideas have to be spoken and disseminated by leaders to all of the people. You seem to be letting the actions of the violent Palestinians speak for the whole of the community.

Do i really believe that the Palestinians want peace? The people do, yes. Hamas leaders want power, but the young men and teenagers want fellowship and a sence of purpose and belonging, like the gang members of the Crips and the Bloods during the 90's. What i mean by two wrongs don't make a right is, how does bulldozing homes and taking further land ok? Are you going to give it back eventually? I just heard about a home being bulldozed the other day.... I understand your explanation of strategic depth, and it might be a good idea i admit, but are you going to give that land back? And perhaps more importantly, has Israel made it known to the people of Palestine that its going to be given back after Israel feels safe again? This tit for tat warfare shouldn't go on. If i were Israel's leader, peace talks would go on daily, whether or not i had an audience of Palestinian leadership. I would find a way to make it known to all of the Palestinians that peace was a paramount desire and the foremost goal for the sakes of both peoples.

People simply do the best they can with what they have physically and mentally, whether you like it or not. The Nazi party did the best they could with what they had; ...all they had was pride and hate. I think you'd agree with me that the modern Germans would not act the way their Nazi fathers and mothers acted. But what is the difference? Knowledge.
The only homes that are bulldozed these days are those of Israeli illegal settlers (we do it ourselves) and those of terrorists.

And there is no more land that is being taken. Again, there are the illegal settlers that create settlement sites - but, again, those are cleared by us - the IDF and the Israeli Police. Not by others.
It has nothing to do with Strategic Depth, cause it's not something the government sanctions. It's illegal and is being taken care of when happens.

So what are you talking about?
@ Cypher

What are we talking about?

I used to follow up on the coverage of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict and seen where the bulldozing of the Palestinians homes in PALESTINE got so out of hand that a female American journalist was standing infront of an innocent Palestinian family home and the Israeli soldier was parked getting ready to bulldoze so evidently the soldier seen the American female and ran her over to smash the innocent Palestinians home. This does not surprise me after seeing how cowarly the Israeli soldiers would kill innocent children by shooting them in the head and killing cops when they invade Palestine to make a point by which they are making no point other than they want to keep the land and are willing to do any cowarly act to get there way for Israel.

Since you live in Israel, do you know if any of the Israeli soldiers was charged with these criminal acts just like with what happened to that American female that was trying to protect that house?
This is why the game, its developers, and the message it supports must be rejected: their god and prophet require the conversion, subjugation and humiliation, and killing of non-Muslims to make the world Islam.

Here is just a taste:

"the Messenger of Allah . . . would say: 'Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war. . . . When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. . . . Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. . . . If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them . . .'" (Muslim Book 19, Number 4294).

More from Allah and the false prophet Mohammed on offensive warfare against the "Infidel":

"fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war) . . . " (Qur’an 9:5).

"Fight them, and Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you (to victory) over them, heal the breasts of Believers . . . " (Qur'an 9:14).

"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued" (Qur'an 9:29).

"Allah's Apostle said: 'I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle . . . '" (Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24).

"Allah's Apostle was asked, 'What is the best deed?' He replied, 'To believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad).' The questioner then asked, 'What is the next (in goodness)?' He replied, 'To participate in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah's Cause.' The questioner again asked, 'What is the next (in goodness)?' He replied, 'To perform Hajj (pilgrimage to Mecca). . .'" (Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 25).
Michael, first of all, that was not an American journalist, she was an activist. You know, like all those bra burning females that have an itch to scratch....
And she wasn't standing in front of it. She ran to it when the dozing started.
That was back when we had a policy of buldozing houses of suicide bombers and their senders. By no means it was an innocent family.

But yes, the soldier was charged.

The officer who shot that little girl was also arrested. However, according to the investigation, he didn't shoot her in the head in close range as the news stated. They fired from a far because she presented a threat. It wasn't the first case of the Palestinians sending kids with bombs strapped on to their bodies.
Just a few months ago, or maybe a year, a 12 or 13 year old kid was sent - but he got so scared that he cried out for help and told our soldiers he was strapped with a bomb to his body. We took him, removed the explosives and sent him to the hospital.

I really do love when ignorant people, mostly kids, such as yourself get a strong opinion regarding a place they have NEVER visited, will never dare to come near to, only see bits and pieces of the stories once every few months while channel surfing and then call us cowards and claim to know everything there is to know about it.
“Michael
The jews took a great deal of the Palestinian’s land over greed, and whenever the Palestinian’s would try to get the land back the Israeli’s would kill them, bulldoze people’s houses that had nothing to do with another Palestinian’s action, randomly shoot children in the head that was reported to not have a weapon. Israel has done alot of things that are criminal acts.
Michael”


Michael Either you are misinformed by propaganda or you are one of this games developers (yes I said-> misinformed or terrorist)

In 1948 only 3 years after the holocaust, jews in a land mass called Palestine(just like Africa is a land mass and not a country)with a UN madate created a tiny nation of Israel(about the 1/10 of new jersey) on anscestral land on which jews have lived for thousands of years… most of todays Israel was part of what was supposed be the NEW nation of palestine. ALL of its neighbors including those in “Palestine” refused to let Israel survive and refused to create Palestine they attempted to exterminate all jews in this tiny land and when they lost took what remained of the would be Palestine, Israel captured some land two while defending itself from a second holocaust… the rest of the lands were taken in wars with those same neighboring nations for the same reason they tried to exterminate Israel and even publically stated that this was their intention and lost some land as a result of their evil plans… as for what happened after the Palestinians decided they want freedom and that THEY SHOULD NOW BE CALLED PALESTINIANS well, what usually happens in a war zone? Especially when Palestinians use children as soldiers and shields and teach their kids to dream of murdering some Israeli kids as we in the west would teach our kids to go to want to go to college…



“Michael
The same goes with Lebanon where if Hezbollah did nothing the people would have gone through way worse then when Israel first invaded Lebanon killing so many innocent people. Israel always has to hide behind all of their high weaponry and armor while they kill a bunch of people that do not agree with what they are doing. When Hezbollah put up a good fight, Israel was out of there in not that long because the Israeli’s love themselves to much to get killed just like they love all of their power.
Michael”

You are saying that if Hezbollah didn’t start the war then the people would have had to live peacefully and that would have been way worse? Wow you are such a compassionate person, you should run for hamas’ human shield congressional representative…
In almost all wars (until the last decade) Israel has had completely inferior weapons and was always outnumbered 20 to 1
By good fight do you mean lose over 700 hezb soldiers which is the vast majority of its military forces? Or get most of the south of the country demolished by firing missiles from residential locations?


“Michael

I believe that this game is not bad if games where you kill arabs for the causes of people like the Israeli’s are allowed. The reason why there is no movies made in America showing showing what is really going on in these situations is because America sucks up to Israel big time because of the power situation.

Everyone needs to look at what is really going when it comes to Israel before they start saying stuff.
Michael”

What power situation? If anything US has EVERY political interest in bombing Israel itself, except for morality(but that isn’t a political interest is it?)
Cheaper oil, better relations with a 1/6 of the world, no more blown up buildings, no one in the middle east will care about US invading Afghanistan or Iraq hmm nope don’t see any power problems here…

I agree that everyone should look at what is really going on, so before you Michael decide to strap on a bomb and go blow up a bus perhaps you should look past the propaganda and stop being a rascit? Oh well didn’t think I would convince, I hope the next time you try to fire a rocket at a civilian city it blows up in your face…
“Hannah Says:
I don’t like either side of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Call me an antisemite if you want, but Israel’s foreign policy is overly aggressive, especially given the power of their allies and the moral high ground that they like to claim, and Palestine can’t seem to control individual terrorist groups. As such, I can’t really condemn one side more than the other for putting out propaganda, and in the interests of freedom of speech, I certainly cannot support censorship.
Hannah”

Well you are simply misinformed If nations with overwhelming military forces tried to exterminate you every other decade, what would your foreign policy look like?
Though I do agree that it is a little too aggressive when dealing with non-nations…
The elected governments of both parts of Palestine are terrorist organizations which can’t control themselves(well, they can, they just don’t want to)…and do nothing to try to control others. Since the PLO got beat up by hamas they have became a lot more tame though they are still terrorists…
While I do have great sympathy for innocent people in Palestine(not their murderous terrorist leadersip) Hezbollah has NOTHING to do with Palestine, in fact they recently wiped out a small Palestinian uprising themselves…
Hezbollah is a political party which controlled half of Lebanon and started a war over land that NEVER belong to lebannon, ask Syria who the land belongs to…IF you watch their TV then you will see Nazi re-runs of the glory days…as well as hezb equally disturbing programs… They have advertisements of hezb holding head of IDF soldier on childrens programs with the one holding the head saying you can be just like me to huge applause… am I for censorship YES I am against all things that tell you to hurt or kill someone. If this game is anything like hezb tv than it should definatly be banned in the whole world!!!

“Hannah
Although I doubt it will happen, I’d rather see the guys who made this petition create a game/mod from their own perspective — there are far too few games that show peace (or the potential for peace) in the Middle East, and I’d like to see that change
Hannah”

While I agree I doubt this game can be salvaged by anything other than a total conversion mod which would ofcourse by the same as banning the game...
you are all cowards, but the americans games which you shoot women and children in iraq are good for you and for children, but a video game which you shoot soldier are not good?? what is that shit, fuck all americans!!!

viva hezbollah
Err... in what American game do you shoot women and children in Iraq?
A Game where the Israeli troops are the enemy is a good idea. And its Israels fault why I say this if they wernt a terrorist state then I woudn't say this comment. But its about last years war. Its going to bring remind people of bad memories. There are many people who havent recovered from the experiences of last years war mainly the Lebanese who were the victims of Israels terrorism which was only succesful becuase of Britian and USA.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/23/09 at 10:08am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: http://tinyurl.com/ye6x9nv
Posted 11/23/09 at 10:08am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: The very definition of "Lucky Shot":
Posted 11/23/09 at 07:56am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yl2vfw6 Here's the link, good for conspiracy theories.
Posted 11/23/09 at 07:42am
JDKJ: Leaders never follow. Followers never lead.
Posted 11/23/09 at 06:48am
DarkSaber: Anyone been following this Hadley Climatic Research Centre server hack story?
Posted 11/22/09 at 11:48pm
ZippyDSMlee: AE:they feeding you well? I am enjoying win7 and heading to bed...uhg I need to get up early and start back to cleaning/painting blahg >< need tog et stuff done befor thanksgiving....
Posted 11/22/09 at 11:41pm
Andrew Eisen: Just got home from an eight hour recording session at Capitol Records. A lot of fun but damn exhausting.
Posted 11/22/09 at 08:44pm
BearDogg-X: 10 N. O. Who Dat?
Posted 11/22/09 at 09:45am
ZippyDSMlee: JD:I think doc phill is still sout about the break up with his wife he dose not fill holes as much as make them bigger these day
Posted 11/22/09 at 12:06am
JDKJ: You should get Phil McCraken to help you spackle those banisters.
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:57pm
ZippyDSMlee: Oh in the pirate hunter article I need my song ieda heckled DS,JD,Beemon sic im !!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:56pm
ZippyDSMlee: JD:no I am tried from prepping the banisters for painting , worked on them from 12 to 4 and 6 to 8...after I got back from the store...got up early got ready...blah...been up all day..I need a nap...
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:42pm
JDKJ: No. You gonna stay up late tonight soldering?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:41pm
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:Don't you mean Mctite?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: @Zip: Neil, Bob, and Lik McTaint. The McTaint brothers. LOL!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:44pm
Flamespeak: I still think military personell, killing other military personell, on a military complex should be handled by military courts.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I could see this a mixture of the two charges rather than just one or the other.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I think this was mainly a person who snapped, but evidence is showing he definitely had strong inlinations to islamic-extremism.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:41pm
Flamespeak: People are trying to claim that Hasan's actions were not terrorism. I don't jump on the 'terror train' like others, however
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:38pm
mentor07825: Britain certainly does deserve it! And the French! God damn it, it was a hand ball!!!
Login or register to post shouts