Jack Thompson Wants to Subpoena George Bush

Jack Thompson Wants to Subpoena George Bush

September 6, 2007
Embattled attorney Jack Thompson filed documents with a federal court in Florida yesterday, requesting to subpoena President George W. Bush for a deposition in what appears to be an increasingly desperate fight to retain Thompson's license to practice law.

The controversial attorney, facing a pair of ethics complaints (see below) filed by the Florida Bar, will stand trial before a referee appointed by the Florida Supreme Court beginning on November 26th.

Thompson is currently suing that referee, Judge Dava Tunis, along with the entire Florida Supreme Court and the Florida Bar in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

So where does The Decider (seen at left in full Madden regalia) fit into the case?

That's not really clear. But the linkage - at least in Thompson's mind - seems to be that the Blank Rome law firm represents video game industry defendants in Strickland vs. Sony, an Alabama lawsuit alleging that an 18-year-old was acting under the influence of Grand Theft Auto when he killed two police officers and a police dispatcher in 2004. And Blank Rome - or at least some of its partners - are also lobbyists as well as heavyweight Republican donors.

Thompson, by the way, was thrown off the Strickland case by an Alabama Circuit Court judge in November, 2005. In a document filed yesterday with the U.S. District Court, Thompson writes:
I have already sent the George and Jeb Bush subpoenas to Referee Tunis for her signature. She may run on this, but she can’t hide. She must sign the subpoenas, as her filing [of the Thompson Bar complaints] with the federal court has made the testimony I seek in the depositions of both men highly relevant to my Bar defense.

If the President’s position is that I do not get to depose him while he is in office, then I would note that Paula Jones’ lawyers were able to convince a federal judge otherwise. If President Bush is successful is convincing the court that I must wait until he leaves office, that’s something I am prepared to do.

GP: In fact, waiting until President Bush left office in January, 2009 would suit Thompson quite well, effectively delaying any action on the Bar complaints until then. This looks like a stall tactic from here.

On the other hand, it's extremely unlikely that Bush would be compelled to appear. Thompson is also seeking a subpoena for President Bush's brother Jeb, the former governor of Florida.

The Bar complaints filed with the U.S. District Court by Judge Tunis relate to Thompson's Alabama video game case (37-page PDF) and Thompson's conduct in last October's failed attempt (15-page PDF) to have Bully declared a public nuisance.

Comments

@chris

If he were, he might actually get somewhere. But then it's also possible he'd never have started this bollocking.

But then he also might never have become a lawyer in the first place.
@chadachada:

Maybe he isn't doing much for gamers (the buyers) other than providing hella good entertainment, but, when it's all said and done, I think the game industry (the sellers) get more out of Jack Thompson than he's taken from them. They can't begin to pay for the publicity he brings them. Even Wendy's got a free bump. I went and got me a Frosty -- just because.
Sorry for the double post but this just hit me...Doesn't someone screen the presidents mail, Email or packages in case of malicious content?
And if Michael Jackson dangling his (cough) child of a hotel balcony is newsworthy, then so too is Jack Thompson trying to subpoena the President of the United States -- if not more so.
Maybe we`ll get lucky and JT will uncover how Goerge Bush got to be president while losing the election in the first place. JT you might have found am MAJOR conspiracy here. That won`t save youre ass by the way...
@BaronJuJu:

Sometimes, for the sake of appreances and to avoid the criticism that you rushed to judgment, you gotta give folk enough rope to hang themselves.
@jccalhoun, JDKJ:

Bah, I've seen that episode already... though november sweeps is coming up, I heard rumors he gets disbarred in the series finale, won't that be a hooah! er I mean a hoot?
Has anyone figured out exactly on which side of the battle line Jack's placing Jeb and George Bush? Are both of them or only one of them (and, if only one, which one) part of the conspiracy against Jack? Or are they not at all part of the conspiracy? It's not at all clear to me. For example, on my read of Jack's letter to Jeb Bush, he alternates between first being somewhat fawning and then vaguely threatenting, with the end result being that I can't tell whether Jack's approaching Jeb as an assumed friend or an assumed foe.

And I'm not trying to be funny (not this time). I'd really appreciate any serious answers.
@JackDon'tKnowJack

Well, President bush did say "Parents just need to be better parents." Funny how he seemed to coins the wisest phrase of this whole debate.
@Jack Thompson:

How about Whitney Houston as one of your trial witnesses? You can put her on the stand and have her sing, "I believe that children are our future; teach them well and let them lead the way . . . etc.," as proof of your theory that Jack Thompson is motivated in part by his concern for children and not by spite, vindictiveness, petty jealousy, misplaced anger, idleness, pride, fame-seeking, greed, or small-mindedness, feeble-mindness, mental disorder, etc., etc. I've discussed her availability with Bobby Brown and I understand that she's wide-open.

Plus, it'll be such a touching, tear-jerking, courtroom moment. And all good trials gotta have at least one of those.
Someone who posts here as much as Jack shouldn't say that people who post here have no lives.

Jacks logic.

Gamepolitics posters = no life
Jack Thompson = Gamepolitics poster
Ergo
Jack Thompson = no life
@ Jack Thompson

Also, that ruling didn't exactly strike down the Michigan Bar's rules.

A comment from the Overlawyered blog from the disciplinary counsel of Fieger's appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court:

Two important points about the decision. First, the judge explicitly conceded (as he had to) that the legitimacy of Fieger's reprimand was not being challenged. The decision is prospective only. Second, there is a distinction between a declaratory judgment and an injunction. Although the court's decision purports to declare that the courtesy rules "shall not be enforced," a declaratory judgment does not necessarily prevent future prosecutions. In Steffel v Thompson, 415 US 452 (1974), a declaratory judgment was described as "persuasive, but not ultimately coercive; noncompliance with it may be inappropriate, but is not contempt" (at 471). By way of disclosure, I am the disciplinary counsel who argued the Fieger appeal in the Michigan Supreme Court.

Posted by: Robert E. Edick | September 7, 2007 09:22 AM


Meaning a) any reprimand against you by the Florida Bar would be legitimate and b) a court decision in your favor doesn't protect you from future complaints, if you haven't already been disbarred by that time.

Practice what you preach, jabroni: Grow up and get a life.

Dennis, it's time to ban him again. He's getting closer and closer to what got him banned in the first place, IMHO.
Dear Jack,

My name is Richard Dunn. I am 26 years old. In addition to my job, working for the local College, I am working to finish a degree in Computer Science. I am married to a lovely woman, and we are both very active in our religious beliefs. I do not drink, I do not smoke, or take drugs.
I have, in the course of my life, played just about every violent video game out there. I've done the GTAs, the Mortal Kombats, the First Person Shooters, all of it.
How many times have I ever been in a fight? Never.
how many times have I been arrested? Never.
How many times have I used a gun? Once, on a shooting range, with the Boy Scouts of America.

Jack, I am living proof that Gamers are not all violent druggies, We have our misfits, but as a whole, we're normal people, not that different from you. We just have a hobby that you don't share. To say that Gamers are going to cause violence is just as likely as saying that Big Game Hunters or people who enjoy Karaoke or Crocheting will cause violence. Go do a survey and see how many murderers enjoyed playing the Guitar. I'm honestly curious now.

Honestly, Jack, whatever comes from the next few months, whether you carry on or whether you are disbarred, it doesn't matter to me. Like the above poster, I kind of hope you succeed just because it makes the new so much more entertaining to see what your latest antic is. But no matter what, I'm going to carry on knowing that I have proved you wrong. We enforce the ESRB in my house, and it works, but beyond that, I play the games before any of the children that come to my home play them, so I know what they are and are not allowed to load. I have taken responsibility for the electronic entertainment in my home.

I am a Gamer. I am a responsible, informed man who enjoys digital media. And though you try to categorize us, I will always be here, proving you wrong.
Hey Jack, you forgot Mickey Mouse, Lord Lucan and the Beatles.
heh... 'under the influence'......

I can imagine it:

"Mommy, mommy, the bad game posessed me!"
Sadly, I'm not sure Jack would really see this as a stall tactic.

I am fairly certain he believes he is important enough.
Jack really HAS gone crazy.
3 words.

Stark.Staring.Bonkers.
lol, Jack is a very silly man.
Wow. I wonder what his connection with the Bush family really is. I remember him posting his letter to subpoena Jeb Bush, but this is the first time I have heard of G W Bush.

Crazy. Crazy. Crazy.
how in the world could george bush be highly relevant to jacks defence?

answer me that jackie and at the same time neither claim involvement in the alabama case or say 'hooah' and we might have a half civilised post for once.
Either that or he hopes that if he can make it enough of a bother to Bush, then Bush might just wave a magic wand and tell the Florida bar to drop the entire thing just so he dosnt have to be pesterd with it anymore. Or maybe that Bush will take it out on someother than Thompson himself *shrugs*

Thing is, im not sure anyone has to subpeona anyone here. Didnt Jack try to subpeona the Penny Arcade guys once and the judge in that case wouldnd let him because he couldnt prove any real connection or reason for it?

Course, Jacko dosnt really seem to think about these things. Stall tactic sure, but if National news should happen to grab onto it and make it widely known... well there goes his reputation. Jack probably thinks they would spin it his way but betweent he choices of possible spins on THAT story go.. well.. I see the media going with the "Crazy attorney takes meritless swipes at President in desperate stall tactic" more than anything.

The Media has already turned on Jack, they turned on him after V-tech when he kept spouting his nonsense in the middle of the tragedy and couldnt support any of his claims. Hes been getting dumped from debates and shows alike. The man dosnt seem to realize this however and soo... yeah. Id say reality will be a cold shock to Jack, but when has he ever bothered seeing reality?
Ok. I may not be a lawyer (thank You God for that by the way) but even I have enough legal knowledge to point out something here. In the Paula Jones case President Clinton was the defendant. He was directly tied to the events that she was suing over because she was suing Clinton for sexual harassment.

President Bush and his brother are, at best, third or fourth parties who's campaigns may have received donations from the Blank Rome law firm. There's nothing illegal there and it, to me any way, it would seem like any judge in the country would realize what he's trying to do and deny the subpenea on the grounds that its baseless grandstanding.
Good grief, what does he expect to accomplish with this? George Bush is already busy enough with all the public criticism of his policies, the mess that the war in Iraq has turned into, and not to mention his job of being the president in the first place. How much time does Jack think that the president is really going to devote to pandering to a failed attorney attempting to dig himself out of a hole?

How can he continue to present anything regarding the Alabama case as part of his defense when (a) He was removed from the case, and (b) it was his terrible behaviour in and outside the court that led to one of the ethics charges he is facing.

Jack Thompson would do himself a lot more favours by simply admitting that he has done wrong and behaved in a manner unfit for an attorney. I would have more respect for someone who is honest and faces the music when they have done something wrong instead of trying to pass the buck and blame everyone else but himself for his own behaviour.

If it is a delaying tactic as GP suggests, it just shows how desperate he has gotten, indicating that he knows full well just how serious the consequences of his inappropriate behaviour are, and how likely it is he will have to answer for his behaviour.
What a fucking nutter
I'm trying to figure out what is more crazy, the fact he's doing this, or the fact he's actually bragging about it as though it somehow benefits him.
Can the Courts do something about JT constantly using these idiotic stall tactics? Just drag him to court and get it over with or something.
Just when you thought you've heard the limits of Jack Thompson's inane stupidity, he goes and pulls something that proves you wrong time and time again. Apparently we're still scratching the surface on his idiocy.
@GoodRobotUs

I'm sure he'd love to subpoena John Lennon. That really would be a delaying tactic.
It's like Thompson wants his license revoked at this point.

Seriously, serving the President of the United States and his brother, the former Governor of Florida subpeonas when they have zero involvement is just a foolish desperate act.
double post

What's next, he's gonna subpeona Hillary Clinton or even Bill Clinton?
Bush isn't answering anyone else's question, so I doubt he will answer Thompson's.
@pokemaster

I agree, when does enough stall and BS diversion tactics end? What next?
He is wasting courts time and taxpayers money by letting this drag on.
thompson, bush wouldnt give you the time of day. and with that said, you might want to tread this situation carefully thompson. you wouldnt want to end up on the terrorist watch list for stalking and harrasing the man until you get their attention, like you do everybody else. and you can just imagine how that would look on you when you face the board.
(deep breath) AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Good lord, this man is comedy GOLD. Congress can't even get him to let his flunkies testify. He's got BIGGER PROBLEMS. I don't know what would be funnier, that he served the president or if the president actually testified.
@Jack Thompson:

Nice move, Jack. Sheer legal brilliance.

Keep that health plan coverage up to date. In-patient psychiatric hospitalization costs an arm and a leg nowadays.
Here's an idea, you could always subpoena Osama Bin Laden to give evidence on the 'Moral Corruption of the West' and state you're willing to wait until he's caught, that'd buy you LOADS of time!
Dear Demon-Pretender-To-The-Throne-Of-Heaven that John Bruce worships,

Must really be slim pickings if this is the best warrior you could come up with to pretend to be a "Warrior For God".

Seriously, dude, ya need more intelligent, charismatic, SANE people to do your work if you truly expect to win ANYTHING.

Sincerely,
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
lol @subpoena Osama Bin Laden
I figured one of these day's he'd get desperate to try something with the president.

It's obivous he's scared now trying to despreately hold onto his licsence to practice law.
I bet he sent Dubya a copy of his book along with the subpeona as well.

------------

In his next dashng move of legal brilliance, hot shot attorney Jack Thompson subpeonas HIMSELF! but not just himself, his mustachioed past-self from his television appearance.

Jack thompson had this to say; 'The testimony of the former Jack thompson is not only relevant, but entirely neccesary, he has key evidence that I am not privy to. If this means we have to wait till viable timespace manipulation technology is developed, then so be it."
And nobody got him in this much trouble but himself and his disrespectful mouth.
Ok so we all know what JT is doing, but what is the Bar doing? Are the ystill trying to find the right person to give Jack-o his psychological exam? Is there a court date? What's going on on the opposite part of the spectrum? And please tell me that this isn't a legitimate legal move....and by legitimate I mean "look at me! look at me! I know how the system works give me a cookie and a few more weeks of practicing law!'
Well, it has been awhile since he's been on TV...and with GWBush in the spotlight here, he'll get another chance!

if(subpoena==GWBush)
{
JT_TVappearance++;
}
else fail;
now that he's officially requested to subpoena Jeb, doesn't that make his "gift" a little unethical if not outright illegal?

i watch Law & Order, i'm pretty sure handing someone a book of all your ideas and asking for him to help you is leading the witness.
Well, he's probably got about 25,000 unsold copies of the book laying around, I guess he has to get rid of them somewhere...

To be honest, I'm wondering how long he can push this before he crosses over into Emergency Suspension territory.
@conejo

youre neglecting the fact that JTs book is probably godaweful, so its not really making the witness anymore compliant.

Jacks just trying to get rid of the copies since no one is actually paying for them.
If Dennis McCauley were able to read and comprehend a federal court filing, he would have found that The Bar is asserting, as did Blank Rome, that my letter to President Bush is one of the specific, enumerated communications that provide the basis for the Blank Rome/Take-Two Bar complaint. The need to depose President Bush does not rest upon what Dennis imagines, but what The Bar complaint itself says: That the letter to Bush was "unethical."

Further, what Mr. McCauley has also chosen not to report is that the lawyers for the Howard Stern Show broadcaster alleged, as does The Bar, that my letter to Governor Jeb Bush was "unethical" in that it pointed out the efforts of the law firm one of Jeb Bush's buddies, Al Cardenas of Tew Cardenas, to keep Stern on the air despite the illegal broadcasts.

The clear relevance of these depos is proven by the fact that I am in fact deposing Al Cardenas on September 17.

So nice try, Dennis, in attempting to characterize this discovery from the Bushes are some sort of desperate effort. There's nothing desperate about it. Blank Rome chose to put President Bush in the middle of this desperate SLAPP Bar strategy, and I have a right to ask Bush about it.

Hooah! Jack Thompson
That’s not really clear. But the linkage - at least in Thompson’s mind - seems to be that the Blank Rome law firm represents video game industry defendants in Strickland vs. Sony, an Alabama lawsuit alleging that an 18-year-old was acting under the influence of Grand Theft Auto when he killed two police officers and a police dispatcher in 2004. And Blank Rome - or at least some of its partners - are also lobbyists as well as heavyweight Republican donors.

Seems to me like if that's the only connection then he might as well subpoena every single member of the Republican party.

Wonder how long before he actually tries that...
I remember reading somewhere that George Bush is an avid gamer, setting aside time in his day to play in the office. That wouldn't have anything to do with this would it Jack?
In support of JT being gonzo nuthouse crazy I call to the stand Hunter S. Thompson, Lord Buckley, and Marquis De Sade.
Good Lord. Every time you think JBT can't get any more ludicrous in his crusade, something like this happens.

I'd love to know what sort of testimony JBT thinks Dubya could give to clear his name. Even if Blank Rome does contribute to the Republican party, I doubt that's something GWB has intimate knowledge of.
Actually, come to think of it this might be a genius move on Thompson's part. Given how stupid the president is and how he seems to like corrupt people serving in his administration I wouldn't be surprised if George Bush hired Thompson.
Alderune,
Technically, the Bar may be following some of its own rules. When the issue came up about Dennis's complaint against John Bruce, someone pointed out that the issue wasn't supposed to talk about it (and Dennis discussed that issue of his previously in that 4 part story recently).

Whether that is the reason the Bar is or is not talking isn't certain. It may be that they wish to protect policy and procedure in general. After all, all we really are hearing is from John Bruce. The Bar itself may be granting him the respect of not gossiping about the issues outside the court, despite his own public actions. We really don't know for sure.

But talking or not talking is always a double edged sword when it comes to the legal system. The concern of saying too much, saying the wrong thing, or not offering any information is always a concern to the most dutiful legal professionals. That I've always recognized. As the average nosy citizen, when I hear about a crime or other legal issue, I always want to know details. But at the same time, I don't want a technicality to foul things up for either the victim or a potentially falsely accused individual.

To put it in more technical terms:
The legal system is very hinky.
:)

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
There any way we can get JT declared as a public nuisance? I bet if we got a lawyer that actually understood the law, we'd win, unlike that whole Bully thing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

THE FLORIDA BAR,

Complainant,

v. Case Numbers SC 07 - 80 and 07- 354

JOHN B. THOMPSON,

Respondent.

ADDENDUM TO RESPONDENT’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST

COMES NOW respondent, and files this trial witness list, pursuant to the referee’s order and permission of August 30, 2007.
Respondent neglected to include in his trial witness list, filed yesterday, the following individual who has been collaborating for quite sometime with the video game industry to harm Thompson. He has also repeatedly communicated with Norm Kent, whose role in The Bar’s efforts against Thompson is well known to this court. The additional trial witness, who himself filed a Florida Bar complaint against Thompson which was eventually thrown out as baseless is:
36. Dennis McCauley, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, whose address is known to The Bar. It’s on the Bar complaint he filed.
Thompson will inquire of McCauley as to his communications with and collaboration with Kent and the video game industry regarding Thompson.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have provided this to Sheila Tuma, The Florida Bar, 1200 Edgewater Drive, Orlando, Florida, this 6th day of September, 2007, and to Judge Tunis.

_____________________________
JOHN B. THOMPSON, Attorney
Florida Bar #231665
1172 South Dixie Hwy., Suite 111
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
@ Jack Thompson:

When I heard that you'd pulled Judge Tunis from the hat, I'll confess that I was disappoined. While certainly a competent and fair jurist, she's no Judge Friedman. She's patient with and tolerant of those who appear before her. Perhaps to a fault. I thought that if there was only one judge left in the entire 11th Circuit who wouldn't angrily snatch your license away and tear it to shreds in front of you, it'd be Judge Tunis.

I'm no longer concerned that Judge Tunis won't recommend that you be disbared. With each passing day, you steadily push her further and further into that corner. By the time you're done, she'll have but one option left. Your license, Jack, is toast. And you're the one that toasted it.
And here I thought I couldn't be surprised any longer by Jack and his antics, and yet this does come as a surprise. The first thing I did when I read the headline was laugh out loud for minutes on end. It is unbelievable that Jack can be diagnosed as a sane person. If he is sane, I am the Easter bunny.
It should also be noted that, if I understand correctly, the Bar Complaint centres around 2 judges and their opinion of Jack's behaviour inside and outside the courtroom, and the spew of hatemail that followed his reprimand by them?

To call up GW as a witness with regards to attacking a 3rd Party in the complaint seems a little odd to me? The fact is that the evidence of Thompsons' poor level of professionalism in the matter is right there, in black and white, signed by Jack Thompson, this isn't about some over-arching conspiracy, it's about his inability to act in a professional or ethical manner, something he blatantly demonstrated repeatedly in the form of faxes, letters and press releases.

This hasn't ever been about Thompsons' actions, it's been about his reactions, and that is something he simply cannot hide from.
@ GoodRobutUs

Don't forget the psycho spurned lover phone calls.
@ Conejo:

It's not "leading" a witness, which is only grounds for objection by opposing cousel to that particular examination tatic and the presiding judge sustaining the objection and telling the witness-leader to knock it off.

It's "influencing" a witness, which is indeed a violation of the Rules of Conduct and grounds for a disciplinary proceeding by the Florida Bar. And, if of a sufficiently serious nature, grounds for disbarment. .
@WarOtter

you can't subpoena here, this is bat country!
Thompson is just trying to inject his name into the mainstream mind. If pulling an obviously ridiculous stunt like this gets him on Page 10, it's more time than his message is getting now.
@Lowe

This is certainly a ridiculous stunt, but not as good as when he charged Janet Reno with battery a few years back. Now that was ridiculous.

The man is just grasping at straws now.
Definitely a narcissistic personality disorder...apparently he thinks he is important enough. I highly doubt that President Bush really gives a shit.
Speaking of stall tactics, i wonder how Jack's preperations for running as a judge down in Florida are coming along. You all remember, how during that whole taking Bully to court fiasco, he announced just after that whole contempt of court thing he announced that he was going to be running for Judge Freidman's seat, the very same judge that was looking over the case and would having been looking over the contempt of court case... yeah... don't think i've heard much about that lately...
I have 3 choice words to say about this.

What. The. Hell.
He obviously needs to sue Dubya to find out the names of the black helicopter pilots who delivered the games, guns, and sodium pentothal to all the GTA-playing, "Manchurian Candidate" killers. Duh. :p
If anyone would like to judge for themselves as to whether my law license is "toast," please go to the Pacer access for Case 07-21256, Southern District of Florida. Toast? I'm having The Bar for lunch.
@ Phoenix, Filmmaker:

I don't think he does, either. But I think the Secret Service gets paid to look out for crazies in the crowd and Thompson's letter is headed straight to their Watch List file. And I wouln't be surprised if they've maintaned one on him going back to the days when Janet Reno was Attorney General. It's a standard respnse to unpredictable kooks and loonies.
Does he really think he is SO IMPORTANT that he can involve the PRESIDENT? This is the "smoking gun" of Jack Thompson's insanity. I mean, this is just ourtageous.
So is the Bush family in this conspiracy to ruin Jack's career as well? Or is the Bush family here to tell the court to leave Jack along cause he is a good upstanding citizen who drank the party line kool-aid.

Either way this will be good and entertaining.
@ JackDon'tKnowJack

If we hear anything about a FBI raid on his house, we'll know why.
WTF....Is he serious!? He seriously needs to be subdued or put down like a stray dog...He's more of a public nusense than Bully every was.
This is beginning to resemble the McCarthy communist scare. I wonder if Jack Thompson runs around to his various cases with a briefcase full of blank paper or empty liquor bottles, as McCarthy was rumored to do during the McCarthy hearings in 1953? Thompson's latest moves certainly smack of desperation similar to McCarthy's ill fated attacks on the United States Army. That particular foible hastened McCarthy's exit from the public eye, we can only hope that this one hastens Thompson's exit from ever practicing law (if it can be called that) again.
Once again, I'll say it once again: I can't wait to see your head roll when this blows up in your face, JT. Just quit while you're ahead of yourself.
Wow. Seriously. Wow.
With every passing day this website reminds me that Thompson is a mad tool.
But it is a bit much. Maybe GP needs a sister site called JackWatch.com as that seems to be the only subject these days, just to make sure the real news is not lost in the swamp of Thompson craziness.
Meanwhile, in the White House:

Aide: "Mr. President? It seems you've received a letter from a.. John Bruce Thompson."

Bush: "Who the hell is that?"

Aide: "I don't know, sir."

Bush: "In that case... the shredder is on the right."

OK, so it wouldn't go down like this, but it might as well. Bush will never set foot into the same room as Jack.
I just hope he gets disbarred/disgraced so that he can't file insane lawsuits or appear on TV as a self-proclaimed "expert". I'm just so tired of him.
Even if he does get disbarred Thompson will still portray himself as an expert on these matters. The difference will be that he'll likely make himself out to be a "victim" of a vast conspiracy against Christians and Christianity.
@ Seb D:

I gotta disagree.

Coverage of the situation surrounding a very public attorney who has been reportedly called upon to brief presidential candidates and to help draft legislative bills is, I believe, "real news" and therefore, I also believe, entirely newsworthy. And, as an added justification, there appears to be quiet some appetite for that particular coverage on the part of GamePolitics' readers. Thompson may be completely disconnected from the real world, but that alone doesn't render what he does less than real news.
I can tell you all how this will go down.

1. Bush Receives subpoena.
2. Bush reads subpoena.
3. Bush laughs.
4. Bush's lawyers tell JT to fuck himself.

He just subpoenaed the president of the USA. You know Bush doesn't give a fuck what Thompson wants.

To Jack Thompson.

Ever action you do makes you look crazier and crazier and crazier. And Bush won't come down on your side.
See, what Jack doesn't know, or foresee, is that upon the delivery of the subpoena, Bush is going to take it as a terrorist threat and enact the Patriot Act, detain Jack and the vast majority of the Anti-Bush side in the not so secret CIA prisons and we'll never hear from them again.

The upside, Jack will be out of everyones' hair, downside, so many others that don't need to be detained.
Wow the next time I'm in court for something I'll just subpeona Jesus and FSM...
@ Jack Thompson, who wrote:

"If anyone would like to judge for themselves as to whether my law license is “toast,” please go to the Pacer access for Case 07-21256, Southern District of Florida. Toast? I’m having The Bar for lunch."

Maybe you don't know this, Jack, but PACER isn't free. It's a service to which the user must subscribe. I assume, as you may want to also, that not everyone can afford the services of PACER. Why don't you those poor unfortunates like myself a favor and POST WHATEVER IT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT!!!!!
"Toast? I’m having The Bar for lunch."

And I'm sure it will go just as well as you against Wikipedia, or you against the Mortal Kombat create a fighter, or you versus Bully, or you versus Grand Theft Auto, or you versus Sims 2. Oh thats right, you failed all of those. And in each you counted your chicks before they hatched, just like you are doing now. Don't make such grandiose claims. Failure is a possibility. With you failure is nearly assured.
You know, back when he got his own head checked, i though they guy had some sense in him, covering his own ass, but every day he reeks more and more of desperation, and crazy or not, jack is kicking and screaming to the finish line.


Give it up jack, youre not going to convince anyone here youre anything but a washed up loon, we're sitting back and enjoying your disbarrment, maybe you should try and tone yourself down from the ridiculous tactics that are the reason yuore getting disbarred.

Youve lied, youve stroked youre ego all the way along your twisted pride and hate filled career, please mr thompson, go to hell more quietly.
Jesus Tap-Dancing Christ. O_O Of all the moves that Jack could've made... This has got to be the most over-the-top circus stunt he's ever pulled. George W. Bush? For F@$*'s sake Jack, are you mental? He's the President, why the hell would he give a damn about a pissant little lawyer like you?

Ladies and Gentlemen, Boys ang Girls, Children of all Ages: This is the last bit of proof that Jack is F@$*ing nuts. The ONLY possible way this man could make himself look any sillier is to demand that the Pope Himself show up at the courthouse.

... ... And I'm pretty sure he'll send the letter to Pope Benidict next week.
"If anyone would like to judge for themselves as to whether my law license is “toast,” please go to the Pacer access for Case 07-21256, Southern District of Florida. Toast? I’m having The Bar for lunch."

Hmmm...looks to me like all you've done is file several dilatory motions/notices to amend your lil' complaint (since apparently, you can't be expected to get it right the first, second or third time), which will no doubt result in several more motions to dismiss said complaint. Not only that, but it appears that the Bar has filed Jack's admittedly "colorful" disciplinary history with the Southern District, as well as the two pending Bar complaints, of which Judge Jordan will no doubt take judicial notice.

My educated guess is the Bar's got you roasted, toasted AND burnt to a crisp. But as always, it remains to be seen...
Eriks got it, jack always one for celebrating right before he gets his ass kicked. lets not forget hes always gloating and has yet to win a case.

remember last time when he 'sprung' a trap on taketwo saying theyd made the biggest mistake yet and hed finally get them.

yeah he ended up getting beated by their lawyers and settling. of course then he claimed that as a victory.


Why does he bother? I'm suprised he can even convince himself of his own competence, how does he hope to convince his enemies? Maybe he really is just that stupid.
Jack Thompson said: "If anyone would like to judge for themselves as to whether my law license is “toast,” please go to the Pacer access for Case 07-21256, Southern District of Florida. Toast? I’m having The Bar for lunch. "

You remind me of that Iraqi minister of information guy who kept insisting to anyone who'd listen that they were winning the war and that the Americans were having their asses handed to them.

At the end of the day it doesn't really matter whether or not you lose your license, Jack, you're completely out to lunch.

1. There is no causal link between video games and violence, just like there is no causal link between music or movies or any other medium. In fact many studies are now saying that video games are GOOD for kids. Some even say that violent video games help some kids get aggression out in a way that isn't harmful.

2. Trying to institute a law that bans the sale of any kind of expression to anyone for any reason is against the Constitution. I'm Canadian and even I know that.

At the end of the day you've actually gotten to the point where you're helping the gaming community. What your'e saying is so completely insane, uninformed and myopic most of the time and you say these thigns so loudly that you've become the poster child for critics of the gaming community. For now the mainstream media (read; Fox Noise Network) is still picking you up, but you're quickly becoming looked at as a joke.

In the end it won't matter whether you can keep practicing or not. Please, please, please keep shooting that big mouth off, hopefully if enough people listen for long enough they'll realize how bat-poop insane you are and stop listening.
Why do I keep thinking of Futurama when I read about Jack's escapades?
If Dennis McCauley were able to read and comprehend a federal court filing, he would have found that The Bar is asserting, as did Blank Rome, that my letter to President Bush is one of the specific, enumerated communications that provide the basis for the Blank Rome/Take-Two Bar complaint.

So let me get this straight. Your unethical conduct is "ethical", because GWB was a crooked President steeped in corruption, and so your entire case hinges on tricking him into sitting down in court and admitting that he is up to his neck in bribes?

Have you been asleep during the last 4 years? I'll refresh your memory with a lovely phrase that government officials have adopted like it was the 1st Commandment:

I don't recall

So even if you DO get the President or Governor to come down and sit in the witness box, you'll get zero to little useful information out of them. None that would prove that you don't send nasty spiteful emails to government officials.

Stalling tactic indeed.
I have a feeling that the scene at the courthouse when all of this goes down is going to be very much like a Simpsons or South Park episode. Every one from those fat motercycle riding twins to the Ghost of Christmas Past. Or Jack will pull out the wookie defense. Either way, it's not looking good for a certain hoohahing lawyer-ish fellow.
Considering that congress can't even get whitehouse cabinet officials to appear under a subpoena, I seriously doubt "JOKE" Thompson could ever get one issued in the first place.

he was deemed sane right? wtf?
We need one of those Random Fact generators for Jack Thompson.

Or a Jack Thompson Mad-Libs!

"You don't (unspeakably depraved act) unless you're a gamer! I should know, I'm an expert on the (highly publicized tragedy) case! I was on (television show) (number greater than 3) years ago! (Notable gaming industry entity) is going down! (Inappropriate exclamation that degrades American military)!"
And he's going, going.... still going..
@jeffy

thanks to InJM I'm thinking lionell hutz is more appropriate
"If anyone would like to judge for themselves as to whether my law license is “toast,” please go to the Pacer access for Case 07-21256, Southern District of Florida. Toast? I’m having The Bar for lunch."

I'll remember that when you lose your license.
@The Central Scrutinizer

Yes, he was, or at least, theorhetically. I don't think he really appreciates the irony inherent in that; in order to prove he's NOT crazy of his @#$@#$, he supeona'd the president.
Yeah I have to say; if the government can't get it's own people to admit to wrongdoing (see recent issues with Gonzales.) then what makes you think they're going to respond to you? You mentioned that Blank Rome had lobbyists..That's great. Wonderful. How many lobbyists actually have ANYTHING at all to do with the president?
I'm really confused here.

What kind of relevance do the President and former governor of Florida have to this case? Neither man is a friend or confidant of JBT. I seriously doubt that either man has any real contact with Blank Rome or even game industry funded lobbyists? And while it may be true that a judge ordered a sitting president deposed in the Paula Jones case, I seem to remember that former Pres. Clinton was, how shall we put it ... "intimately involved" in that case.

Does JBT have real legal clients other than himself these days? I suspect that the only real impact that losing his license to practice law would have is that he could no longer act on his own behalf as a licensed attorney.
@Verbinator

He thinks they can pardon him. Not bloody likely..
Jack's wife might make him get a real job then, since he can't play lawyer from home anymore.

Either that or he better become a better Mr. Mom than Michael Keaton.

OH NOES!
@ Mark Standridge:
"My educated guess is the Bar’s got you roasted, toasted AND burnt to a crisp."

Excellent reference ^_^ I agree.

@ Werrick:
"You remind me of that Iraqi minister of information guy who kept insisting to anyone who’d listen that they were winning the war and that the Americans were having their asses handed to them."

Jack Thompson == Bagdad Bob? Priceless!

Once again, I hope material from GP, with IP records, would be submissible in court if it came down to it.
@Mazinger-Z

Yeah, she'll make him go to Maccy D's for a job.
@ JackDon'tKnowJack

Here is something relating to Case 07-21256, Southern District of Florida he mentioned:

http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2007/06/juror-didnt-follow-courts-instructions...
Dennis, can we have a party when he's gone? Send all the members of the Florida Bar a bottle of Vintage Wine. I'll pay for it myself.
@JackDon'tKnowJack

Ew... do you /really/ want him to spam everyone again? It's always inconsiderate when he does so.

@Werrick

Exactly. Jack is an obstacle to the very progress he's trying to bring about. Most everyone knows this by now.

In fact, it's a relief to see so many people laughing here rather than getting angry. The Devil cannot stand to be mocked. There's nothing he can do to hurt us at this point, so we might as well get out the popcorn and have a seat with Joel and The Bots as this story unfolds.
How's that song by Saliva go...?

"Ladies and Gentlemen please
Would you bring your attention to me?
For a feast for your eyes to see
An explosion of catastrophe
Like nothing you've ever seen before
Watch closely as I open this door
Your jaws will be on the floor
After this you'll be begging for more
Welcome to the show
Please come inside
Ladies and gentlemen

Boom
Do you want it?
Boom
Do you need it?
Boom
Let me hear it
Ladies and gentlemen
Boom
Do you want it?
Boom
Do you need it?
Boom
Let me hear it
Ladies and gentlemen

Ladies and gentlemen good evening
You've seen that seeing is believing
Your ears and your eyes will be bleeding
Please check to see if you're still breathing
Hold tight cause the show it not over
If you will please move in closer
Your about to be bowled over
By the wonders you're about to behold here"

Looking at the lyrics, they seem to fit this case perfectly.
Having said that, the look on his face should be priceless..
This is quite simply unbelievable. But in a way I understand this. Jack's conspiracy theory has finally reached the top. It was only a matter of time.

Personal note: Desperate men do desperate things.
What ? Did Jack just subpoena Dennis ?

What are the qualifications needed exactly for someone to subpoena ?

According to Wikipedia "Typically subpoenas are issued "in blank" and it is the responsibility of the lawyer representing the plaintiff or defendant on whose behalf the testimony is to be given to serve the subpoena on the witness. "

So doesn't this mean that a lawyer must physically hand over the order to the one he subpoena's ? (Either in person, or by someone else ? )

But what qualifies as a legit subpoena ? Can (As Jack clearly did) everyone lawyer subpoena anyone, even if the one subpoenaded (sp?) has in no way a connection to the case ? Must the lawyer then have "solid" evidence the one that is to be subpoena-ded (How do you use "subpoena" as a verb anyway?) is connected to the case ?
Jack Thompson: out to prove to the world that his insanity has no limits. Nor does his desperation.
@Imperialist Agenda

That didn't really add much.
@JackDon'tKnowJack

Actually if you type: Case 07-21256, Southern District of Florida into Google you will see he has been throwing this up on several blogs, with the same reaction as folks here.
Jack is continuing to set the groundwork for his martyrdom. He will cite these subpoenas as evidence of the conspiracy against him in his usual self referencing way. And the inevitable rejection of the subpoenas will demonstrate that the courts are actually part of the conspiracy.

He is already planning for his disbarment and arming himself to continue the fight thereafter.
This is a funny circus starring John Bruce Thompson.

Street Fighter 3 Alpha announcer: "Next on stage is John Bruce Thompson attempting to avoid getting disbarred! Nobody blink!"
Heh,

Jack Thompson vs Florida bar

Fight !!!

MORTAL KOMBAT !!!!!!!!
Boxing Announcer: And now, due to popular demand, we will forgoe our national anthem. Ladies and Gentlemen, Lets get ready to Rumble!!

*Ding Ding*

*Fight Ensues*

And it's all over. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you our winner; God! But please, spare a thought for the corpse of Jack Thompson and his, idiotic Crusade.
All I saw was essentially:

Blah blah blah blah, George Bush. Blah blah blah suing entire state of Florida judicial system. Blah blah blah I don't want to lose my license. Blah blah blah Dennis McCauley took my bottle. Blah blah blah Blank Rome.

Odd that he didn't mention how his (almost enumerated by now) statement of how many times he's been on television. Did you guys know that professor Levinson (who GP has communicated with recently, and debated with Thompson on television) has appeared on national television more times than Thompson (by a fairly wide margin)? Kinda puts a wrench into the Rube Goldberg machine that is Thompson's (backwards) thought process.

For Jack,
Are all of you lawyers on drugs or something?
Wow, just, wow.

And just how will George Bush help with your defense? Just wondering. Cause I don't think he even knows who you are. Seriously.
I love reading the other blogs where Jack has posted Case 07-21256. He posts them in comments fields that are completely unrelated to his case. Of all the places to put them, a freakin' blog.

This guy is the epitome of unprofessionalism. My favorite was this little gem from JAABlog (on a post about Judge Dale Ross...completely irrelevant to JT) - " I encourage you all who post here to have similar courage to start signing your names to these posts. The reason is obvious. It will display your courage, and The Bar will not be able to do anything about an entire rebellious horde."

Yes, Jack. Get a group of bloggers behind you. That'll show 'em. Go ahead and get a thousand or so anonymous people behind you. As for displaying courage? I'm gonna go ahead and assume you meant "folly" instead of "courage." I'm not sure you understand what courage is, anyway. You are a coward, little Jacky-boy. Hiding behind your legal documents, scared of the big, bad people who are "out to get you." You're pathetic.

You can keep your horde, and you may go down in history as having the smallest horde of all time - one person strong.
"...Paula Jones’ lawyers were able to convince a federal judge otherwise" Jack, did Mr. Bush touch you?

Seriously though, this is fucking priceless... wait... Jack I just thought of something! Grand Theft Auto San Andreas features voice acting of Samuel L. Jackson. Samuel L. Jackson was in Snakes on a Plane with Rachel Blanchard, who was in Where the Truth Lies with KEVIN BACON!!! Oh my god, Jack you must supeona Kevin Bacon, it is critical to your defense.
@gs2005

You forgot the rest of that!
"Nobody blink! JT will soon be broke!"
I did what BaronJuJu suggested, and searched for that term in Google. The 6th hit made me LOL:

http://jaablog.jaablaw.com/2007/05/15/fred-grimm-on-dale-ross.aspx?pg=2&...

*snip*
This is absurd. Lawyers are well positioned to alert the public to the antics of sitting judges, and criticism of governmental officials and policies, no matter which of the three branches they occupy, is not only warranted, it is dutiful. This is what the First Amendment, at its core, is for. "Political speech" of this type enjoys the highest rung of First Amendment protection.
*snip*

That statement about the First Amendment. Funny how it can be made to suit your own purposes when required, eh Jack?
Wow... just wow... No other words needed they've all been said before...
I looked up the word subpoena and wikipedia says "A subpoena is a command to appear at a certain time and place to give testimony upon a certain matter."

Now how the hell is Jack Thompson going to get the president of United States (a moron who is probably if not on par with Jack, more of a moron) going to get him to appread to defend him?
Sounds like this whole thing is gonna turn into some kind of circus with JT sending out subpoenas to just about everyone. I predict he will throw a huge tantrum when the judge tells him to knock it off.

His behavior during this whole thing will do more to hurt his "career" than what this case is about in the first place.
It's not so much the new of Thompson making a fool of himself that brightens my day. It's really not. It's scrolling down the page and reading his responses like he thinks he's ever going to convince a single person that reads this website that he's not completely off his rocker. THAT is what makes my day, and for that, Mr. Thompson, I thank you. Keep on truckin' man! Hooah!
Jack, I love your attempts. They make me laugh like nothing else does.
Wow, what a good thing to read before heading to work... It was a good laugh, I hope to be able to record the moment a network brings up that headline stating how nutty he is to bother the president. :D
It is a stall tactic, but he likely believes (it is Jack, he believes his viewpoint is from the god he believes in) the Bush is connected to it.

It'll be perfect if Dr. Phil joins the bandwagon and supports him.
Subpeonaing the president? Because it hasn't been said yet, "Yeah. Good luck with all of that!"

I keep thinking of something Harley Quinn said when she impersonated a lawyer, "I served you a subpoena once. It was a small subpoena!" ;)

Thing is, Thompson may be crazy and he may be an asshole, but he's not stupid. We've seen him wriggle his way out of defeat before, taking advantag of some procedural technicality or loophole to avoid being held resonsible for his actions. He's like one of those old James Bond villains or Berg Katse from Gatchaman (Battle of the Planets to the rest of you) or Cobra Commander who, when their grand scheme and base of operations falls apart, manages to run to a conveniently tucked-away escape pod that rockets him to safety all the while angrily shaking his fist and snarling, "I'll get you next time! NEXT TIME!!!"

I'm equally as frsutrated by the Florida Bar who still continue to drag their heels on this case as evidenced by the postponing of his trial. Michael Nifong was slammed down and stripped of his license within days after the Duke students were acquitted. But after more than ten years, a clear pattern of gross misconduct, flagrant abuse of his license and his hogging of the media spotlight, it's taken the Bar this long to take serious action against him?

Maybe it's because up until now they didn't consider him enough of an annoyance, or maybe it's because the worst of his antics hadn't been reported on until relatively recently (thanks in part to this site and Wikipedia). In any case, I'm still frustrated that they didn't do anything to him sooner. Better late than never I guess. :\

I second BlackIce's suggestion for a party, Dennis. Where should we have it?
The great thing about Dennis McCauley appearing on the witness list is that the Bar will have equal access to question Mr. McCauley, and perhaps he can shed some light on the side of Mr. Thompson which the rest of us see. I welcome that.

I don't know why Mr. Thompson shares this information so pointedly in this forum, unless for chilling effect. It seems a transparent attempt to silence Mr. McCauley, a critic of his for some time now...the message is clear: "If you don't shut up, I'll keep you in courtrooms for years, casting aspersions on your character all the while."
HA HA HA HA! OMG, does Jack honestly believe he has even the slightest chance of the President coming down to the witness box for him? The president probably doesn't even know who he is or Jeb for that matter too. HA HA HA HA! This is just a move out of complete desperation. This is like the biggest fat chance I've ever seen. So let me get this straight, Jack is saying that he practically owns this case, and yet he is pulling a move that is quite frankly, the dumbest idea I've heard in a long time. Your not fooling anyone Jack, we know your getting desperate at this point. I'm not going to say it's for sure though mostly because if (for some insane reason) he actually keeps his licence, he can't hold it over MY head at least.
@Jack

I don't know if your letter to the President was unethical, but I do know that your attempt here to drag him in, and thus, unnecessarily drag out and bring press to your legal struggle, is.

Oh yeah - stop "hooah"-ing. Unless you're a member of the USMC, you're doing them a disservice by usurping their phrase.
Jack Thompson vs. Florida Bar, in Mortal Kombat.

"FIGHT!!!"

Florida Bar beats Thompson flawlessly, "FINISH HIM!"

Florida Bar performs Babality.

"Florida Bar Wins! Babality!"

Thompson whines and cries as he is transformed into a baby. Spectators don't notice anything unusual or out of the ordinary.
I noticed that Dennis is 36 on JT's witness list. Besides George W and Jeb Bush who are the other 33? Does anyone know?
Dennis, you had better give that Fucker what's coming to him.
Speaking of stalling tactics: Jack, how's that campaign for judge going?
We're behind you all the way, Dennis!
Very funny..
Wow... just... wow. I am truly speechless.
I find it disorienting when a JT post pops up in the middle of a thread that wasn't there before...I assume that's the filtering at work?

But anyway...Dennis is actually on the witness list?! Oh, sweet hilarity.

Dennis, if you see JT with a shotgun and he mentions something about "Quailhunt 2: The Murder Simulator"...duck.
Have I already noted that, Mardi Gras-Schmardi Grad, the final moments of the Jack Thompson train wreck are, without doubt, THE GREATEST FREE SHOW ON EARTH!!!

And, in the particular instance, it's made all the more entertaining to me by my undelying awareness that all these witness subpoenas that Jack's been posting to various weblogs are not at all certainly filed with any real court anywhere (at least, not until I've seen with my own eyes a copy with some clerk of courts' receipt stamp affixed). That's an old trick in Jack's bag o' tricks. Claiming to have mailed/faxed/filed some letter/document/court paper when, in fact, he's done nothing of the sort is a well-established part of his modus operandi. Which leaves me constantly guessing and thoroughly entertained.

I'm tuned in to JTTV for the entire season -- and the re-runs in the off-season. I can't get enough.


The tone of Jack's communication is amazing in a business setting. I am utterly surprised that people of this type of poor communication can even succeed in this world. Although, my father was a con man and he succeeded until his death from cancer. So I guess communication is not a deal breaker. :(

I find some things compelling in arguments on various topics, but Jack has made it very clear what I do not want to support; anything that he is. I may be the low man on the totem pole in this wide world but alas all will revolt one day to destroy those who abuse their position in society.

Dennis, keep up the good work!
@ Phantom, who wrote:

"Speaking of stalling tactics: Jack, how’s that campaign for judge going?"

I don't think that was a stall tatic as much as it was a feeble-mind attempt to force Judge Friedman to recuse himself from the Bully case (a judge cannot properly preside over a case involving a party that is also his electoral opponent). But there was just one minor wringle in that brilliant scheme: at the time Jack was making his threat, Judge Friedman's seat wasn't coming up for re-election for another year and more.

Typical Thompson.
I don't know whether to laugh or shake my head in sorrow. This is pathetic. The president? As in President of the United States?

@Jack Thompson: If all you're going to do is bitch whenever Dennis posts something of yours, why do you bother sending him anything in the first place?
Yes Bush is going to answer Jacko's claims even though he ignores Congress when they want him and his cronies to testify. That's going to work real well for Jacko.
Jack Thompson, Aug 2nd
The Illuminati's plans against me are proceeding more quickly than I thought. Spies are everywhere. I was at the zoo with my family, and I caught one of the monkies watching me. I'm sure it reported my movements back to its Democratic Overlords. I must speak to the President! He is the only one who can stop this conspiracy!

August 6th
I have filed a Watertite Legal Thingy with the Florda bar that will force the Conspirators to allow me access to Bush. They are ruined!

August 7th
No! It can't be! Bush is one of them! I am told by a trusted source that he heard about the subpena and laughed, muttering something about "crazy people always try to subpeena the president in unrelated matters". They truely do control everything!
"36. Dennis McCauley, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, whose address is known to The Bar. It’s on the Bar complaint he filed."

Real professional there. /sarcasm

@Werrick

"You remind me of that Iraqi minister of information guy who kept insisting to anyone who’d listen that they were winning the war and that the Americans were having their asses handed to them."

The difference is that the Iraqi minister was A) just doing his job, B) showing more courage than most of the rest of the government combined, and C) said things so outrageous they were funny, not so stupid they were funny.

@DoggySpew

"So doesn’t this mean that a lawyer must physically hand over the order to the one he subpoena’s ? (Either in person, or by someone else? )"

In my experience working in an office's records department, yes. Usually by someone from the local sheriff's office acting as a representative of the court system. You then wait to receive a letter that says there's been no motion to quash the subpoena, or that any such motions have been resolved before responding to it.
But if he'd lucked-out and, as it happened, coincidentally Judge Friedman's seat was up for re-election, you can bet dollars to donuts that Jack would have made good on his threat to run. Not that he'd have ever really wanted to sit in the seat or that he thought he had a snowflake's chance on a hot summer's day of ever winning it. Rather, just to be able to say to Judge Friedman, "I filed for your seat and you must therefore now recuse yourself. Hoaah!"

And that, my friends, is how Jack Thompson thinks that law is properly practiced.
I have nothing to say that has not already been said, so just try and imagine the sound of a cuckoo clock going off.
@Quad9Damage

What is more interesting is that fact he always waits until the posting has died down a bit before 'stoking' it back up again.
GameClucks,
I try, but every time I do, I keep seeing a cuckoo popping out of a clock and saying "Hooah!" in John Bruce's voice.

Nightwng2000
NW2K software
@Gray17, who wrote:

"[Witness subpoenas are usually served by] someone from the local sheriff’s office acting as a representative of the court system."

True enough. But there's a tiny snag in Jack's plans. There's no local sheriff’s office on the Moon. And Jack's no doubt planning to also call the Man in the Moon to the witness stand. How's he gonna skin that cat?
"Now how the hell is Jack Thompson going to get the president of United States (a moron who is probably if not on par with Jack, more of a moron)"

Don't you even dare putting Bush on the same level as Jack. Jack's idiocy comes from his own insanity, need to prove himself and his points, and arrogance.

Bush is . . . well, just dumb.
He's just about Sane.

By British Standards, he's extremely sane. By Russian Standards, he's in a mental institute. By Cuban Standards, he's due for a firing squad.

(Raul doesn't like Mental Patients)
Mr. Thompson there is no conspiracy to ruin you. Quite frankly most of us in the gaming world could care less about your so call crusade. You have consistently lied, born false witness, name called and generally acted like a two year old all the while telling us that we should be more like you because you are a self professed Christian.

You sir are nothing even remotely resembling a Christian. I'm no angel myself by any stretch of the imagination. I make mistakes everyday and everyday I pray for forgiveness and try not to make the same ones. We have tried to speak reason with you time after time only to be met with contempt, vitriol and hatred. So I'll speak plainly for you.

There is no, repeat no, conspiracay against you. Your ruination will come about, not because of some implausibly grandiose scheme, because of your own unbelievable arrogance, pride and lust filled greed for a personal legacy. You care so much about the letter of law that you've lost sight of the spirit of the law; and that makes you, in Christ's own words, a Pharisee.

I don't hate you sir. More to the point I pity you. To be filled with such hatred and contempt for the people we, as Christians, are supposed to love and live as shining examples of Christ's love shows that you don't really get it at all; and for that reason alone I truly pity you.
Owned Methinks..
Let's take some guesses as to the extensive contents of Jack's witness list:

We already know about Dennis and Dubya and Jeb, so we can guess that he'll also want to chat to:

Straus Zelnick
Paul Eibler
Mike Gallagher
Doug Lowenstein
Mike Krahulik
Jerry Holkins
Patricia Vance
Bill Gates
Brian Crecente
Scott Ramsoonair
That woman from T2 who JT emailed about age-verification
David Walsh

He'll also want some people who he can try and get support from:

Dave Grossman
One of the politicians who fell for one of his bills
Someone from Strickland vs Sony
A survivor of Columbine and/or VTech
The shrink who he tried to use to get the Bar to not have him evaluated

Come on! Less than 20 to go!
@lumi:

“You don’t [masturbate to photos of air duster cans] unless you’re a gamer! I should know, I’m an expert on the ['Cannibal Holocaust' snuff controversy] case! I was on [Buffy the Vampire Slayer] [five] years ago! [Mystique] is going down! [Fire in the hole!]!”
I've got it, thompson has downloaded americas army. Then when he decides to shoot up the courtroom at his hearing he'll be shouting 'HOOAH' and all his posts here corroborate his plan to make it look like he was brainwashed by the army into becoming a murderer.

Thats what makes sense in Jts head
@Fedule

Crazy Ken
Phil Harrison
The owner of the barbers that cuts his hair
Jesus
God
Satan & Lucifer (Funnily enough)

I can't think of anymore. (We are going through his enemy list right?)
If there's anyone who I think deserves sympathy, it's Sheila Tuma, the Bar Counsel (think, "prosecutor') in Jack's case. Bar Counels aren't exactly overpaid and underworked. And I know Jack's been making that poor woman earn every single one of her dimes. I might actually chip towards a muffin basket for her, if the hat came my way.

@Sheila Tuma:

But, of course, if you and the Bar skate Mr. Thompson, there'll be no muffin baskets for you.
@Fedule

I got somemore!

The other Barber that trims his netherregions
His Wife
His Kids
The rest of the U.S.A
The rest of the sane world
The little green men who play GTA: Space Andreas (that's why you don't see it on UK shelves anymore- or anywhere else for that matter)
I am so glad I started posting on this site..
@Fedule:

Damn. That's impressive. All good guesses but for "[t]hat woman from T2 who JT emailed about age-verification," who happens to be T2's legal counsel and therefore can't be made to testify about much of anything having to do with T2 that isn't attorney-client privileged.

And you didn't include Wendy (with the red-headed pigtails and the square hamburgers). She's an obvious addition.
I might send Sheila Tuma a pre-emptive "get well" card.

Anyone who has to sit through an entire session of Thompson attacking everyone and everything, as well as him and his intense lack of intelligence and rational thought...well, they probably aren't going to be feeling too well afterwards.

So Sheila, I'm very sorry that you will have to endure a temporary drop in IQ, but just know that should Jack finally be disbarred, this pain will only be temporary.
We can add the store clerks who fell victim to his undercover credit card sting.
His what?
You ain't heard? It's the subject of another Gamepolitics article about an e-mail exchange between Jack and Gena Feist of T2.
OH YEAH.. that one where jack ends it by saying: Are you nuts?

I think I called him a stupid Nazi on that one. I also petitioned a Muffin Basket for Gena Fiest.
Recurrence of Godwin's Law! Stop, before the fun ends!

*runs*
Well, that's the sting where he sends his son into stores with a credit card to pose as a buyer undercover. Hence, "undercover credit card sting."
Okay thanks for clearing that up. Now then, What the hell is Godwins Law?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
This is MADNESS!!

JT: THIS! IS! FLORIDAAAAAAAA!!!!
I see.
Another thought. This may have been stated before earlier in this mountain of replies, but...

Jack, you are aware that President Bush doesn't answer subpoenas, right? We all know what happens when someone forces him to testify. Whether it is right or wrong of him to do so doesn't matter: his lips are sealed.
Here's another typical piece of Thompson logic:

He repeatedly argues in his court papers that Ms. Tuma is unqualified to prosecute his proceedings because she's never practiced in the private sector (which is, for what it's worth, true). But what has Ms. Tuma instead spent most of her professional career doing? Prosecuting attorney disciplinary proceedings for some Bar or the other.

Hmmmm.
@GP:

Holy shit. Did he really name you as a witness? O.O Damn, Dennis. *lightbulb over head* Take in that 4-part story you wrote. If that isn't evidence that Jack Thompson is a paranoid, unprofessional nutcase, I don't know what is.

$5 says he removes you after he realizes that you'd ream him. Just a thought. :D
Jack: I have to ask what you think either Mr. Bush could say that would be useful to your defense? You arent denying having sent letters to either of them and the contents of those letters are available for the court to read. There would appear to be two possibilities - 1) what you wrote violated the ethical rules governing members of the florida bar or 2) it didnt. The opinion of the intended recipients is entirely irrelevant, particularly as it seems likely that neither man would even have read their letter (I can only imagine how many letters get sent to President Bush on a daily basis).
Good lord... and someone with a psychologists degree to protect actually declared you sane?

As it is Jack, we don't really care anymore. We follow this as we follow a soap opera - entertainment purposes. You're no longer seen as the largest threat to the gaming world, and haven't for some time. So, please, continue on until you're disbarred. Should be fun for Dennis if he manages to be in the courtroom when you're thrown out of the club, and a good read for us.
@Mark Lucherini:

I suspect that will dawn on Dr. wunderman one day that the retainer fee wasn't worth the reputational damage.
I still haven't figured out how the Reverse Vampires or the Atlantean Illumati work into all of this.
@Dog_Welder:

But you're clear on the Man in the Moon and Wendy?
Wow, his delusions are getting more delusional.

~Sol~
@Fedule and BlackIce

Don't forget:
Batman
Superman
The Fantastic 4
The rest of the Superfriends or whatever they're called
Dr. Doom
Lex Luthor
The rest of the Legion of Doom (both the supervillians and the hackers)
Gabe and Tycho (not the authors, the cartoon characters)
Everyone who has any respect for Jack

Which one entry on the list is not fictional characters (Hint: it's not the last one)?
@Josh Martz:

Was there ever a formal adoption of Godwin's Law? If not, I move to adopt. It certainly has its good uses. I believe its invocation saved Austin Stevens from I'm a Shrink.
How can we omit Janet Reno from Jack's witness list?

And that kid that got busted for prank-calling Jack's phone?

Or the Beltway Sniper (who trained on Counterstrike)?
@HandofCrom:

The Gabe and Tycho, the cartoon characters? Aren't they based on the real Gabe and Tycho?
Damn, they really need to televise jacks disbarrment, better than any soap....


@blackice; hey! the muffins were my idea.
@chris:

That CourtTV is providing round-the-clock coverage of that boring Phil Spector trial and no coverage of the Jack thompson hearing tells me that someone over there don't have no idea of what they're doing.
What remained of Jack Thompson's relevance just went into the can.
Dear Jack, when you get this sorted out you should sue Zenimax Media, the Parrent company of Bethesda Softworks (if the name sounds familer it is, they were the ones that released the "T" rated Oblivion, a game containing hidden nudity that could be acessed with "cheat codes") the current owner of the highly violent "Fallout" franchise.

In this Ultra violent franchise it is not not only is it possible to kill children by hitting them in the groin with a sledgehammer but the player may also earn "caps" by becoming a porn star or prostitute. What is even more disturbing in a true offense to Christians everywhere, when the player completes a level, the bodys of his slain foes are crucified to mark his victory. Fruther more should the player kill all the residents of a peaceful town, he is rewarded and glorified as a hero.

Normaly this would be aceptable if the game was marketed to adults, but Bethesda Softworks is clearly forcefully marketing the franchise in order to make the so called "humor" appeal to the teenage market.


P.S. Please? I really want to see you and Todd Howard in the same room.
Hey, Thompson, let me toss up a quote form the President himself about this

"Parents just need to be better parents."

Hmm, so even Bush doesn't agree with your "regulation or ban" approach.
@deuxhero

One of those games Jack would say something about, , but only if Rockstar were deve;loping it.
@ Sheila Tuma and the Florida Bar, The Florida Supreme Court and Jack Thompson:

"Florida Bar Rules of Condunt, Rule 4-3.2 Expediting Litigation

A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client.

Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Delay should not be indulged merely for the convenience of the advocates or for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a competent lawyer acting in good faith would regard the course of action as having some substantial purpose other than delay. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client."

Ed.: And because Jack Thompson does not appear in his disciplinary proceeding pro se but rather as his own co-counsel, he is in effect his own client and Rule 4-3.2 therefore, I would think, clearly applies.
@ Gameboy:
nice song but jack seens to me to be closer to Weird Al's Everything You Know is WRONG

to be more precice the end of the song

Everything you know is wrong
Black is white, up is down and short is long
And everything you used to think was so important
Doesn't really matter anymore
Because the simple fact remains that
Everything you know is wrong
Just forget the words and sing along
All you need to understand is
Everything you know is wrong
Everything you know is wrong
@chris

True, but I copyrighted it.
Jack seriously wants Dennis to appearing in court? I honestly don't know what he's going to get out of it considering he has little to no evidence to prove they were ever conspiring against him and is mearly speculation on his part. If anything, it will be funny to see Dennis smash down every claim JT throws at him.
Doesn't King George III* have better things to do, like dealing with Mess O'Potamia?

*Dubya being the third US president named "George", after Washington and Bush Sr.
@blackice


if only thompson were the legal mastermind you are.
"Pay no attention to Jack Thompson, we purposely trained him wrong... as a joke."
@JackDon'tKnowJack

I meant the cartoon characters distinctly from the guys at PA, because we already have those guys on the list, and I think Jack's crazy enough to go after the cartoonists and the cartoon characters as distinct entities.
yeah ummm whats aking the courts so long is simple

everytime jacky opens his mouth they are totally stunned by the stupidity
@cullarn

LEARN TO SPELL DAMN IT!
Sorry, I meant use proper grammar.

I'm also agitated. Very agitated.
@Sheila Tuma and the Florida Bar, and the Florida Supreme Court:

And the easy part is that once you get to Rule 4-3.2's requirement of "a competent lawyer acting in good faith," you can quickly find Mr. Thompson lacking in both competence and good faith. Case closed and you're back home in time for dinner.
@Jack Thompson, who wrote:

"If Dennis McCauley were able to read and comprehend a federal court filing, blah, blah, blah, blah. blah."

What? Like you can?
Thompson does the legal equivalent of fishing with dynamite, he just attacks everything and everyone in the hope that something, anything, will actually lose.
If dork-vomit is not disbarred, he wins and gets to tell the world how he was persecuted and survived to tell the story.

If dork-vomit is disbarred, he wins and gets to tell the world how there was a giant conspiracy against him, proven by the fact that he lost.

I'd love to see a comments section of a story where, once Jack posts, no one else does. Kind of just let him have the last word and we can all move on.
@GoodRobotUs:

True dat.

With the paralell observation that dynamite fishermen have been know to blow themselves up.
He makes entertaining reading, but when the only 'proof' we've got that these claims exist are from Thompson himself, who is more than comfortable with lying through his teeth if he thinks it will serve his cause, I'm always a little dubious as the to the accuracy of anything the man says.

Problem is, he always words his posts as a challenge, and people cannot resist pointing out his falsehoods, partly because they know that there are people that will will actually believe him.
That was @ jds btw :)
He forgot to subpoena the Saudi Government and Osama Bin Laden. Everyone knows they're connected to everything, and the Bush family is connected to them.

Get to it Jackhole!
Like: "If you don't believe I got the phone call, there right there on my phone bill (which he doesn't then let you see)."

I can't help myself but to respond, "Idiot, that proves nothing!"
@GoodRobotUs

Thanks for the good point: Didn't think about the 'challenge' aspect of his posts.

It is funny to read the things that leak out of his ears and find their way to his keyboard. If he stopped posting to this site I might long for his lunacy. But while he posts, his constant accusing, lying, whining, bullying, etc., gets on me-nerves.

I never considered myself a rubber-necker, but I just can't resist it.
Remember at the end of Dr. No, how the titular villain tried to climb up a pipe, but instead slid down the pipe to his death?

I can clearly see Jack trying to do just that right now.
@Nathan:

Either that or he's hoisting himself on his own petard (a much more impressive physical feat, I think).
@VenomandCarnage

Not to mention bringing up every post Jack ever made on GP, and the IP addresses to prove it.
@JackDon'tKnowJack

“If you don’t believe I got the phone call, there right there on my phone bill (which he doesn’t then let you see).”

Which is funny, because unless HE originated the phone call (AND it was long distance), or was using a cell, it wouldn't appear on his phone bill at all...

Unless US phone customers are suddenly on the hook for RECEIVING calls?
@HandofCrom:

And what do all those people have in common?

They're all fictional! *rimshot*

Good lord I would reply to more but I'd be here all day and there'd be 100 more replies by then anyway.
Ladies and Gentlemen!

A toast to the madness of John Bruce Thompson, a source of perpetual annoyance and hilarity!

Thank you jack for all the laughs, now p*** off!
@Jabrwock:

Dude, the stuff he comes up with don't even make make sense in English language, much less anywhere else.

How can anyone not be fascinated and enhralled by the Jack Thompson Show?

"Are you not entertained? Are you not entertained?!!!!" --Sampled in 2Pac (Makaveli)'s The Don Killuminati: The 7 Day Theory
*sigh*....you'd almost think he's actually working FOR us, how comedic and stupid he is
Ok can someone (even if it's Jack) explain to me in layman's term what Mr. Thompson is trying to do. It all seems very confusing.
Bush and Jack... wow. Bush has a chance for a photo-op with a monkey in a suit!
@ HandofCrom

No, he actually equated himself to Batman, so wouldn't summon him to court to sue him.

Which, to be honest, irritates me more than anything else Thompson has ever done - Batman, a fictional character, is 10 times the man that Whacko Jacko is.

Plus, I may or may not have a man-crush on the caped crusader...
@Mark Lucherini
Eh, i like Wolverine, much more manly
@ Mark Lucherini

To be fair, Batman is at least 10 times the man that ANY non-fictional man is. C'mon. He's -Batman-.
lets not forget that jacko is farther from batman than any person, jack is on the villain side.

you dont hear batman shouting "Youll live to regret this!"
@Father Time:

Befuddle everyone with his bullcrap.

From your question, it sounds as if he's doing a good jod.
@jt

1) thanks for posting, the message boards are way more entertaining when you post

2) i wrote an email to george bush from the email address listed on whitehouse.gov... i don't think i could subpoena W. from that, though... although, it would be cool if i were able to
*Head explodes*
Heh, Jack Thompson's actions cause me to live longer with the heavy dose of laughter they give me. Thanks, Jack!

But, really, who's the next witness? Tony Montana? He was a fictional character in a violent movie AND video game. Two birds with one subpoena.
He's jumped the shark. What can he do for an encore, who he's gonna serve next, the UN secretary general? Oh yeah, sure, I heard Ban Ki Moon might have been in the same room as a game once.
Jack's finally completly flipped his lid. He's drawing conclusions where none exist to be drawn. He's lying to himself, and he believes his own lies. How sad. How pathetic. How typical. (yes, I am copying his style here, I thought it fitting)

Either that, or he's trying to go out in a blaze of glory. There's no way he will get George - hell, he's in Australia right now for the APEC summit. You can't get him later because he's the farking commander in chief of the most powerful millitary on the planet. You think he's going to be required (forget even considering it himself) to show up? You're out of your farking MIND Jack. The best part is, your slow spiral downward into the pits of self delusion has been VERY entertaining to watch. I hope for your wife's sake she finds someone less BONKERS to hook up with while you're undergoing treatment.

*insert smug grin here* She's certainly find it less stressful, and THAT would improve her health.
Jack Thompson: For my next act of legal desperation, I subpoena THE WORLD
@Father time - I'll take a stab at translating this.

Mind you, I don't understand any of this, but this is as close as I can get to understanding his logic.

1. Apparently at one point or another he's written letters to both the president and Jeb Bush
2. Apparently he believes that the florida bar thinks those letters consituted "unethical" behaivior, and will site them as examples of "unethical" behaivior at his discplinary hearing.
3. Apparently, because he believes he's being charged with them, he feels he has a right to question their recipients about them at the hearing.

I guess he wants to ask the president under oath if the letter to the president he wrote was unethical.

Mind you - I think the irony of subpoena'ing the president to prove that a letter to the president wasn't unethical is.... irony-licious
Jack Thompson is a GENIUS. I've finally figured it out.
I'm not trolling - hear me out.

This case cannot happen. American citizens have a right to a fair and speedy trial. Because of the nature of this case, it is impossible for Jack Thompson to retain this right.

1. This will not be a speedy trial. I'd elaborate, but you all know what I mean.
2. This trial will clearly not be fair. With the prosecution against JT, and JT constantly driving to undermine HIMSELF, there's absolutely no one to defend JT! Bias on both sides of the trial? That's unconstitutional!

I can't believe it took me this long to figure that out. Can I have the internets now, please?
Prepare for the EPIC battle!

...k, not really. lol.
Ah waiter? one reality check for Mr. Thompson please. Thank you. =^.^=
OK, now that I've added my 'I read the thread, and LOLed' comment, onto some responses:

@Murry:

Either that or he hopes that if he can make it enough of a bother to Bush, then Bush might just wave a magic wand and tell the Florida bar to drop the entire thing just so he dosnt have to be pesterd with it anymore.

Well on one of the sites I hang out at we did nickname him 'Lord Voldemort' so that might be it *shrug*

@BearDogg-X:

It’s like Thompson wants his license revoked at this point.

I can't find any other explanation, either so that must be it.

@Jack
(Even though I should know better)

Reading Comprehension? Pretty sure you're not the poster boy for Reading Comprehension...

@Rob:

NO! don't give him any ideas! (That'd prolly put him closer to presidency... and if that happened, well I'll see you guys in Canada, cause I ain't staying here.)

@lumi:

I LOLed.

@BlackIce:

Party sounds good... can I come? :P

@GameClucks:

I... don't even know how to follow that up. Bravo!

@Fedule:

Don't forget:

Cap'n Crunch
Count Chocula
Boo & Franken Berry

@jds:

If dork-vomit is not disbarred, he wins and gets to tell the world how he was persecuted and survived to tell the story.

If dork-vomit is disbarred, he wins and gets to tell the world how there was a giant conspiracy against him, proven by the fact that he lost.


But we'll still continue to ignore him, the world will continue to spin, and the sun will still rise in the east.

@JDKJ:

I'm just waiting for the series finale where he finally gets disbarred.

whew, that was 10 minutes well spent, thanks guys.
Here's the part I don't quiet get:

It appears that Jack's not entirely keeping his own counsel in all of this. He's apparently got another Florida Bar-admitted attorney who's also a counsel of record to the cases in which Jack's a defendant. Who is this "co-counsel" to Jack. What is this co-counsel to Jack thinking? Why is he apparently not helping his client further their interests? What kind of strategy sessions do they have?

Jack: I've been thinking that it'd be a good idea to subpoena Pres. Bush.

Jack's Co-counsel: Yeah, Jack! Great idea! Let's do it!

Who is this guy who apparently has the stomach for Jack that hardly anyone else has? Why does he have no apparent mitigating effect on Jack's misconduct? Is he getting paid to represent Jack? He can't be pro bono on Jack's case, can he (which'd be like signing up for a root canal you don't need)? Is he Robin to Jack's Batman?

I just can't believe that there's another attorney who's a willing participant to this madness. Does he even exist or did Jack invent him? Has he ever been seen by anyone other than Jack?
So by Jack's logic if I go to work and get written up for doing something against (I don't know wearing flip-flops) policy and keep getting written up to the point where I'm about to be fired from my job... I can call the company's CEO to pardon my actions and make the company pay me a huge fee for my trouble?
@Mysticgamer:

And I thought I was the only one to subscribe to Jack Thompson Logic Monthly... small world, huh?
@JackDon'tKnowJack

Jack Thompson's co-counsel is John Bruce.
@Mysticgamer

"Doesn’t someone screen the presidents mail, Email or packages in case of malicious content?"

yep, and I'll bet "OMFG you industry-bribed hack daddy's boy president! stop selling pr0n to kids or I'll sue the gov'ment!" probably goes straight into the "This Mofo is Crazy!" bin... ;)
@ JDKJ

I wonder if the co-counsel is court-appointed. Perhaps for some reason (beyond the obvious), Jack isn't allowed to represent himself alone.
@Mysticgamer:

Fun and jokes aside, here's what I think's happening:

You'll notice that Dennis' article states, "Jack Thompson filed documents with a federal court in Florida yesterday, requesting to subpoena President George W. Bush . . . ." It doesn't state that Jack's actually served President Bush a subpoena. I take Dennis' reporting to mean (I could be wrong) that Jack's first seeking the court's approval to thereafter serve a subpoena on the President (a subtle but important difference in terms of legal process but not a real difference to the underlying insanity). If my read's correct, then Pres. Bush won't ever have to worry about getting any subpoena from Jack because the waste-paper basket of the Judge to whom he made the request is where the request now reposes.
@Xlorep DarkHelm

It wouldn't surprise me if Jack represented himself in court. To quote Gomez Addams, "They say the man who represents himself in court has a fool for a client. Well as God is my witness, I am that fool!"
@lumi:

Nope. It's not a criminal case. More like a civil case, where there's no right to have an attorney provided to you if you can't afford one.
@Jabrwock:

Which probably is green (or blue) and has a large 'recycle' logo on the side, I'm guessing.
And I think that technically (i.e., as it appears on papers filed with the court) there're actually two attorneys representing Jack Thompson in his Bar proceeding: Jack Thompson (as his own attorney) and Jack Thompson's co-counsel, Wassisname.
@bayushisan
"[Thompson will] likely make himself out to be a “victim” of a vast conspiracy against Christians and Christianity."

Is that even possible, seeing as Christianity is the largest religion on Earth?
@Kincyr

The only way I can really explain this is to get kinda Biblical, please don't take this as me being preachy or condescending because I really don't mean it to be.

In Christianity we believe that the world, as in the worldly and those not of God, are going to hate Christians because we tell the world that the way they do things is wrong. We expect this and accept it because Christ told us to expect it. If we truly live and teach as Christ told us to then we're going to be unpopular, its to be expected all things considered.

However the self righteous, like Thompson, take this and make it grandiose as a means of inflating their own self importance. They scream "Look at me, look at how they're oppressing this warrior for God!" and there are those who will listen and follow based on that and that alone. However someone who's being honest about their walk with Christ will not talk about himself, but rather pray for the people who hate him out of love. We, as Christians, are implicitly told to keep a civil and gentle tongue. If we hold anger in our heart toward our brother then in God's eyes we are guilty of murder.

Its an issue that's weighed on my concious for a while now actually. I do understand that Christians are often the butt of jokes about being prudes and are often portrayed as tyranical or simply enducated about things; but according to the Bible we're supposed to expect that kind of thing.

Basically I only meant that Thompson will use what Christ said about people hating him because he's a professing Christian to prop up himself and his own lust for a legacy instead of accepting such things with humilty as we were are instructed to do by Christ Himself.
It's stuff like this that gets me to thinking that Jack ain't for real:

"The additional trial witness, who himself filed a Florida Bar complaint against Thompson which was eventually thrown out as baseless is:
36. Dennis McCauley, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, whose address is known to The Bar. It’s on the Bar complaint he filed."

@ Jack Thompson:

C'mon, Jack. You know you're required to state an actual address of the witness you're subpoenaing. You know "whose address is known to The Bar. It’s on the Bar complaint he filed" doesn't satisfy the procedural requirements. Or, maybe you don't. But I do know that what you're calling a subpoena for Mr. McCauley's appearance ain't worth the paper it's filed on (assuming you actually filed it).

You summ'n else, Jack.
I can't believe this little puke stain of a human being is trying to go after dennis in court now as a witness.

Dennis, were behind ya 100 percent, don't let this lunatic bully you.
@JackDon'tKnowJack

"Either that or he’s hoisting himself on his own petard (a much more impressive physical feat, I think)."

It's "by his own petard", not on. A petard being a bomb used to blow up gates during a siege. So it's not all that an impressive feat to harm yourself with your own attack, just a matter of being klutzy or careless.
Jack, why stop at bush, subpoena the Pope while your at it, it's obvious that these company's our out to destroy religion so he's a credible witnes too right
@ Gray17:

You're absolutely correct. One can be hoisted "by" or hoisted "with," but not "on." I stand corrected. Thank you.

And, interestingly enough, use of the word "petard" imparts a humorous undertow to its conotation of a bomb (in its most literal sense):

[French pétard, from Old French, from peter, to break wind, from pet, a breaking of wind, from Latin pditum, from neuter past participle of pdere, to break wind. See pezd- in Indo-European Roots.]

The French used pétard, “a loud discharge of intestinal gas,” for a kind of infernal engine for blasting through the gates of a city. “To be hoist by one's own petard,” a now proverbial phrase apparently originating with Shakespeare's Hamlet (around 1604) not long after the word entered English (around 1598), means “to blow oneself up with one's own bomb, be undone by one's own devices.” The French noun pet, “fart,” developed regularly from the Latin noun pditum, from the Indo-European root *pezd-, “fart.”

(Source: curbstonecritic.blogspot)
Man, this is getting good. :popcorn:
"I have already sent the George and Jeb Bush subpoenas to Referee Tunis for her signature. She may run on this, but she can’t hide. She must sign the subpoenas, as her filing [of the Thompson Bar complaints] with the federal court has made the testimony I seek in the depositions of both men highly relevant to my Bar defense." -Jack Thompson

Right...like a subpoena to the President of the United States of America is gonna be signed.

1. It's a completely ludicrous claim that his, or his brother's deposition has any relevance to your defense.

2. He's the frickin President! You're just begging to be locked away and have your license stripped from you!

3. You're digging a hole you possibly can't pull yourself out of now Jack, you don't have the Bar by the balls, they have you by the balls.
Now now lets give jack the benefit of the doubt, there must be a very good reason he needs the president's attention for his defence.

go ahead jack? whats your reason?


we're waiting...
@Jack Thompson:

"serves some substantial purpose and is not only for delay" Say it with me slowly, Jack. "sub-stan-shee-al pur-pus" As is substance. As in substantive. As in having something to do with something. Not as in the outer fringes of of some vast, all-encompassing, world-wide, conspirarcy. Not as in ain't got nothing to do with nothing.
Now wait a second..

Jack is posting here.

Didn't Dennis BAN him?

Then why is he even posting? Wouldn't that be even MORE evidence against him?
Please would you stop publishing stories about Jack Thompson?

The man is clearly insane and doesn't deserve the pixel space.

I realise you Americans have a hard on for free speech, but it's not like he's prohibited from making his own website and posting his rubbish elsewhere.

Nutcases post letters to newspapers and radio stations all the time. Their letters are never published because it only encourages them to post more.

Until they actually do something newsworthy, they are ignored.

Subpoenaing the President isn't newsworthy, it's insane.

By constantly reporting on Jack Thompson, you're only giving him power and a soapbox he doesn't deserve.

If you keep posting stories on him, I will have to seriously reconsider using this website as a video games news source.
Anyone else find it funny that Jack thinks that by posting something he submitted to the court on a blog or forum it automatically makes it correct and legally binding?
@BlackIce

sorry the stupidity drained my iq and i forgot to proof read
[...] Thompson is currently “facing ethics complaints filed by the Florida bar.” If he is found guilty in a trial before a referee appointed by the Florida Supreme Court, he could lose his license to practice law. In response to the upcoming trial, Thompson is suing the appointed referee and the entire Florida Supreme Court. He has also used a tenuous linkage between a law firm that represented some video game defendants and the Republican party to subpoena President Bush for testimony in his trial. [...]
@Questionmark

Indeed it is! It also really makes me wonder if this is his idea of being "talked by the masses." After all, people are talking about him. My guess is, he prolly wants to be a movie star. After all those things he said in his e-mails with that representative from Take Two? It's really, really much alike with those showbiz answers. Oh and we gotta "love" that legendary line of his: "Nice try, dennis" Hahaha!
@Funky J:

Maybe it's that we Americans are just plain starved for news (Paris Hilton and Lindsey Lohan ain't got but so much mileage in 'em) or maybe we more cherich our loonies as an important part of past and present American culture, but I find Jack Thompson subpoenaing the President to be insanely newsworthy. And shame on GamePolitics if they hadn't reported it.
@Funky J:

Plus it's hard to dismiss 550+ comments in response to an article. That ain't peanuts in the blogsphere. It that don't make it "newsworthy," it makes it somethingworthy.
"Thompson is currently suing that referee, Judge Dava Tunis, along with the entire Florida Supreme Court and the Florida Bar in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida."

You know, I think Jack is aiming for the world record of most lawsuits.
@ Funky J

So there shouldn't have to be a voice of reason to drown out the voice of the unreasonable? I've made a comparison before:

If you give a hungry man a rotten apple, and withhold the fact that you have a fresh apple, the man is going to eat the rotten apple if he's hungry enough. If we let Jack spoon-feed the public all this bull, and nobody else provides a reasonable voice to disprove him, the public is eventually going to accept the spoonfuls of crap he feeds them.

I don't know about you, but I'd much rather have a reasonable voice speak out and tell the public to think for themselves, as well as pointing out these inaccuracies and blatant lies that Jack throws around, than to let Jack run around making a fool of himself, while at the same time wasting MY tax money when he convinces some bozo politician that it's a friggin' peachy idea to write up some bullcrap unconstitutional law just to push their personal agenda.

Don't even get me STARTED on the special-interest groups. I will tear them a new one with but a word.

The only way one can bring this bozo down is to report on the negatives of his shenanigans- it's only positive, biased reporting in his favor that gains him a podium to speak on.
@Funky J

Hey man, I understand what you mean by news worthy articles. I'm a journalist after all. I'm very strict with the news I read and if it's trash, I discontinue reading it.

In my point of view, this is a news worthy article. The fact that it involves a legal issue concerning the president of the United States, it's already worthy of being news. Unless of course the headlines read "George Bush likes Eating Donuts in the Morning," I'll be the first one on the list to unsubscribe to any newspaper that will do that.
Michael Jackson crazy as a bed-bug but that ain't stop the legitmate news media from covering him. Ed Bradley interviewed him on 60 Minutes.

Hang on, there. Didn't Ed Bradley also interview Jack Thompson?

Pattern?
@Funky J

The thing is that this particular nut job has gotten unconstitutional legislation written in the past. So some of his antics are worth tracking. How his defense against professional censure is going would be one of those things worth tracking. Obviously it can't be going very well if he thinks that testimony from the president about a letter that likely never made it past the secretary's screening could prove useful.
@ JackDon'tKnowJack

Ed Bradley interviewed a lot of people, whether they were newsmakers or they were crazy nutjobs(Jack Thompson). He interviewed Howard Stern shortly before his move to Sirius satellite radio.

Considering that 60 Minutes has been on the air seemingly since dinosaurs roamed the earth, it ain't really worth mentioning being on a show that's on every week.
Step 1: Find a Wall (Part A)

Step 2: Find Your Head (Part B)

Step 3: Forcefully Push Part A and Part B Together

Repeat As Necessary
He's also successfully petitoned the FCC (a public entity funded in large part by tax-payer's dollars) to levy hefty fines against public media operators. If my tax dollars are funding a public entity with broad investigative power and the authority to levy significant fines on the public that can't quickly figure out that Jack Thompson either is: (a) a habitual liar and not to be believed, (b) is crazy as a bed-bug and to be ignored, or (c) both (as his Bar proceeding may likely disclose), then that's something I want to know. So I can write my Congressional representatives and let them know that I believe there's someone over at the FCC who needs to be fired right quick.
@ Funky J

Funky, Funky, Funky. Clearly you don't much about Jack (or journalism). This is indeed news, and for those of us who follow gaming it is of the most delicious variety.

The man's days are numbered, and it's finally not just us who can see it anymore. Now THAT is great news!
"By constantly reporting on Jack Thompson, you’re only giving him power and a soapbox he doesn’t deserve."


Uh, like it or not Jack will already have a soap box. I'm not sure how the media works in your country, but here its sensationalist, fearmongering garbage. He will already have a soap box in CNN and any other large news outlet during sweeps week that need to bump up the ratings. Though Jack thinks this is because he is an "expert", when in reality its because he is just loud.

But point being that if we remain silent, then only his side of the story will be told. Silence is not the answer.
Anyone remember my comparing Jack to Denzel Crocker from Fairly Oddparents? I'm sorry, but that's not cutting it anymore. A more accurate comparison right now would be GIR from Invader Zim. The talking hotdogs in his head say, "Flap your gums with us, Jack Thompson! Flap your gums with us into oblivion!"

In all seriousness, though, this is extreme, even for him. The RICO conspiracy was one thing, but trying to subpoena the President to save your hide when he probably doesn't even care who you are? That's just... Jack, you have broken my mind with the sheer weight of your madness.
I'm just looking forward to the next chapter in this story. It's great comedy at its best. I use to get angry when I read a Jack post, but now I just get popcorn.

@ GP

So, is Jack actually serving you a subpoena? Or is that the kind of thing you can't talk about, if he is? If so, do you think you could bring up Jack's... colorful (for lack of a better word) history with you and this site? Thanks in advance!

@ Fedule

The way things look, I'd bet Austin Lewis' money that the list is larger than 36. Fifty or better wouldn't surprise me. Probably an attempt to bog down the process, so that they just give up. Nah, Jack ain't that clever and I doubt it would work anyway.

@ Lost Question

I don't know. I thought my song applied more to the spectacle that this case was becoming. You're right about one thing, though. Everything Jack knows is wrong. Besides, we could probably spend all day finding Weird Al songs that apply to Thompson. He is a nut.

@ Jared J.

Isn't that how Jack comes up with his theories? Or is that the one thing people who support him have in common? I forget. Maybe it's both.
Maybe court TV will show the proceeding. Wouldn't that be fun to watch.
@j

The one time in history people would get Court TV confused with comedy Central.
@sabin_blitz

I've made another comparison before but with this JT has just managed to out-insane Gene Ray (creator of the brain cell killing timecube.com)
For those who keep asking, I'll try to sum up again the basis for JT subpeona-ing Bush. (Recalled from previous posts, since I didn't really get it myself until someone else explained it.)
1) At some point JT has correspondence with Bush. If anyone knows when this happened or what it was about, it would be appreciated.
2) Blank Rome files a Bar complaint against JT. In part it states that the correspondence in 1) was unethical. It also sounds like JT's trying to set up a straw man in saying that this is the lynchpin of the entire complaint, not unlike how he said he had blown apart a Bar complaint against him because he was not legally bound to pass on some information regarding his colorful past - while he was correct in stating this, it was pointed out on GP that the bulk of the complaint was not JT's failure to fully disclose his legal history but his well-documented series of questionable actions taken during the Alabama case.
3) JT subpeona's Bush, presumably to get him to state that the correspondence in 1) was not unethical. This is the least crazy part of this whole explanation, I think, but it does run into two problems. One, I'm not sure if Bush saying he did not feel he was unethically influenced, is equivalent to him not being unethically influenced - influences can be insidious and sneaky to the point where those being influenced may not realize the extent of the influence. Second, he's the President of the United friggin' States, and one that's made abundantly clear his efforts to increase the power of the office of President. Even if this weren't the case, I'm not sure if the amount of information Bush can shed on the case is worth the time it would take to pull the commander-in-chief away from more pressing matters.
For Jack

They´re coming to take me away,
Haha, they´re coming to take me away,
Ho ho, hee hee, ha ha,
To the funny farm
Where Life is Beautiful all the time
And I´ll be happy to see
Those Nice Young Men
In their Clean White Coats
And they´re coming to take me AWAY,
HA HAAAA!
@ Rey

Hey Rey, wadda ya say? Heh. Just curious, that sounds awfully familiar, could you remind of where I might have heard that from before? A song perhaps?
I've heard it and use to use it a lot but I too haven't a clue where it originated, I got it from my mother so it's pretty old.
Then with the mighty powers of Google and Wikipedia combined I find the answer..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/They're_Coming_to_Take_Me_Away_Ha-Haaa!
I am delighted to have so thoroughly and demonstrably increased traffic at this site. 300 posts on this thread? Dennis McCauley, you're welcome, as I continue to make you money.

Just a reminder, if I may, since I have a busy and productive day ahead of me which will not allow me to correct the thousands of errors here on this thread as they occur:

The Florida Bar has put Jeb Bush and George Bush on my discovery and trial witness lists, not I, by asserting, in the charging document that my communications with them are not protected by the First Amendment (they are) and that the communications were ethical breaches.

I, of course, get to ask each of them about the two lobbyists that filed these Bar complaints to protect their relationship with these two Bushes and who have bundled millions of dollars in campaign cash to them.

You kiddies aren't lawyers (thank God!) and you don't understand these things, but you are welcome to post your rants here about what you don't understand.

I'll depose the Bushes. Count on it. Jack Thompson

GP: You still can't seem to grasp that I make no money based on traffic to GP. Or perhaps you don't want to.

As to you deposing the Prez & his bro, I'll believe that when I see it. How many things have you "guaranteed" here on GP over the years?

And, yes, all of us gamers realize we could never be as smart as you...
Thank God I'm not a lawyer. Then I'd always be worried of the day I might have to be compared to Jack Thompson. :shudder:
Oh, and Jack? If you haven't realized yet, we'll stop pretending like we know something about law the day that you stop doing the same.
And here ladies and gentlemen we hear it straight from the horses mouth. Mr. Thompson believes that its all about him. Never comprehending that his unparalleled arrogance will be his down fall. I believe the verse is "Pride goeth before a fall."

I'm glad I'm not a lawyer as the profession seems to breed mosly liars, cheats and dishonorable crooks.

I will say this though. I'm not pretending when I say I know something. See I actually believe in telling the truth. Unlike some lawyers I know.
@ Jack Thompson

Actually, I'm glad I'm not a hearse-chasing corpse-violating scumbag like your worthless ass, you delusional weirdo.

I'm 27, and if you think that's a "kiddie" to you, then your career is in even worse shape than anyone thought.

President Bush and his brother have nothing to do with your law career about to be ended by your own misconduct. Why bother deposing them if their connection to your percieved enemies is infinitestimal at best?

Practice what you preach, Metropolitian Motard of Miami: Grow up and get a life.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/23/09 at 10:08am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: http://tinyurl.com/ye6x9nv
Posted 11/23/09 at 10:08am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: The very definition of "Lucky Shot":
Posted 11/23/09 at 07:56am
DarkSaber: http://tinyurl.com/yl2vfw6 Here's the link, good for conspiracy theories.
Posted 11/23/09 at 07:42am
JDKJ: Leaders never follow. Followers never lead.
Posted 11/23/09 at 06:48am
DarkSaber: Anyone been following this Hadley Climatic Research Centre server hack story?
Posted 11/22/09 at 11:48pm
ZippyDSMlee: AE:they feeding you well? I am enjoying win7 and heading to bed...uhg I need to get up early and start back to cleaning/painting blahg >< need tog et stuff done befor thanksgiving....
Posted 11/22/09 at 11:41pm
Andrew Eisen: Just got home from an eight hour recording session at Capitol Records. A lot of fun but damn exhausting.
Posted 11/22/09 at 08:44pm
BearDogg-X: 10 N. O. Who Dat?
Posted 11/22/09 at 09:45am
ZippyDSMlee: JD:I think doc phill is still sout about the break up with his wife he dose not fill holes as much as make them bigger these day
Posted 11/22/09 at 12:06am
JDKJ: You should get Phil McCraken to help you spackle those banisters.
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:57pm
ZippyDSMlee: Oh in the pirate hunter article I need my song ieda heckled DS,JD,Beemon sic im !!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:56pm
ZippyDSMlee: JD:no I am tried from prepping the banisters for painting , worked on them from 12 to 4 and 6 to 8...after I got back from the store...got up early got ready...blah...been up all day..I need a nap...
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:42pm
JDKJ: No. You gonna stay up late tonight soldering?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:41pm
ZippyDSMlee: JDKJ:Don't you mean Mctite?
Posted 11/21/09 at 11:33pm
JDKJ: @Zip: Neil, Bob, and Lik McTaint. The McTaint brothers. LOL!!!
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:44pm
Flamespeak: I still think military personell, killing other military personell, on a military complex should be handled by military courts.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I could see this a mixture of the two charges rather than just one or the other.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:43pm
Flamespeak: I think this was mainly a person who snapped, but evidence is showing he definitely had strong inlinations to islamic-extremism.
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:41pm
Flamespeak: People are trying to claim that Hasan's actions were not terrorism. I don't jump on the 'terror train' like others, however
Posted 11/21/09 at 09:38pm
mentor07825: Britain certainly does deserve it! And the French! God damn it, it was a hand ball!!!
Login or register to post shouts