
Despite an official
government report absolving video games of involvement in the April massacre at Virginia Tech, far-out political figure Lyndon LaRouche and his followers continue to insist that violent games influenced killer Seung Hui Cho.
A
Friday post on the LaRouche website reads in part:
Six families, whose relatives were killed in the VA Tech massacre in April, have retained a law firm which previously represented the families who lost members in the 1999 Columbine shootings, reported yesterday's Washington Post...
Both Harris and Klebold were fanatical users of violent video games such as "Doom."
...The VA Tech report touches on number of issues which could come out in full, in legal proceedings. These include Cho's mental history, which was not made known to the University, and his addiction to killer video games.
GP: The LaRouche group is really working its agenda here. As previously reported on
GamePolitics, there's nothing in the VA Tech report about any supposed "addiction to killer video games".
Nor does the
Washington Post article referenced on the LaRouche website even mention video games. Rather, it details pending lawsuits against the University for allegedely failing to adequately safeguard the victims.
Finally, it's ironic that the LaRouche folks are even citing the WaPo as a source, since they previously
implied a cover-up by the newspaper on the video game issue.
Thanks to: Longtime GP reader
Soldat Louis...
Comments
Yup, I remember them appearing a few months ago. The thing is, LaRouche doesn't really care what the UK thinks of him, he already knows our opinion of him as clearly as we know his opinion of us, but the last thing in the world LaRouche wants is for the US to find out that his own Youth group is on the verge of being re-investigated for this death. A swathe of UK politicians wrote to the German government in May, iirc, requesting that the investigation be re-opened and done properly this time, when a mass of evidence that had been ignored came to light. The response was for the Schiller group to write to all 80 of those MP's urging them to withdraw those letters.
I always point people to LaRouche's claim that because the Queen knew that drug dealing was going on in her country, that she was a 'Pusher'. I think that comment in itself gives a wonderful example of how LaRouche's mind works and how he will claw at any excuse, no matter how ridiculous, to forward his ideals. He doesn't even seem to have noticed the fact that we had a Civil War a few hundred years ago and it isn't 'her' country any more ;)
Not saying that we aren't, but now it's personal.
For future grammatical correctness, I am British. So don't refer to us in 3rd person when talking to me.
~Sol~
The LaRouche group are so 'innocent' that the Schillers institute is trying to block the investigation.
Probably not as long as there are people like Jack Thompson and the LaRouche group around, but I can dream can't I?
GP: Interesting that, while Jack says he has no connection with the LaRouche folks, their views on video games - and the VA Tech case in particular - are nearly identical.
This really isn't so much an issue, as it is a complete and utter lie. Still, kudos for trying.
Also, as far as craziness goes Jack Thompson has nothing on Lyndon Larouche. He's basically the leader of some weird political cult.
Well, books and movies aren't new or sexy or scary enough to be a scapegoat and no one cares about Marylyn Manson or Eminem these days, so they are off the hook as well.
Video games are simply the most new and unknown medium to the older folks, therefore it must be bad because they didn't grow up with it.
@ Jack Thompson
Alright, if violent games caused this little percentage of kids to kill then why are all the rest of the millions of kids that play these games nonstop not killing people? And the investigators in these cases throw the violent video game excuse out as any of the cause of the killings.
Alot of the worst killings in American history including some caused by kids happened before very violent video games were available. Cant you understand Jack that the reason why these shootings are happening in schools is because parents are not taking responsibility in raising their children. Most of the worst serial killings happened several years before very violent video games because the serial killers did not get raised right and was abused by the parents and rejected by society.
Rejection and parents abusing their children is what is causing these killings, not video games as the video games have always been thrown out of cases. Parents just want to blame video games because they did not do their part as a parent and you are giving parents a safe haven when you are going against video games.
Jack, this is not about you caring for the kids, this is about you getting your fame and starting trouble because if you really cared about children then you would go after parents that do not do their job as a parent. These groups that go after video games are trouble makers that just want to make headlines. If these groups really cared about people, they would go after way more serious issues rather than show their face over video games.
You do not want to face the facts Jack.
Even one of our own forum regulars has had at least one run in with LaRouche Youth Group members. I -think- it was DemonTestament, but can't remember for certain. (It's the act I remember more than the person involved.) The LaRouches remind me of the article about the Peaceaholics' protesters at Take-Tao last year. They heavily spin their PR but when it comes to actual confrontation, it's a whole different story.
We even saw it in the forums and here when a few LaRouche Youth members popped in, spewed a few brainwashed comments, then fluttered away because they couldn't spread the brainwashing.
Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
I remember him saying that Ladou... er, LaRoucheite actually tried to provoke a fight so the kid could go "SEE!? SEE!? A GAMER HIT Me!!!!"
I can see how GP can report on JT because he is constantly babbling at Dennis and the users. However, I see no point in reporting on LaRouche. It made sense when the VT shooting was still big news, but it's been five months now. When was it decided that GP should report all anti-game sentiment, instead of just generic JT and video game legislation stories?
I'd rather read another whiny, unprofessional legal filing from JT than another story about how LaRouche and his followers think that because they disapprove of violence and video games, neither should exist.
No, he thinks the British did. Have a good look at LaRouche. He seems to think that the Brits are involved with every conspiracy ever envisioned.
Actually, I like that idea. That way he can't come back and say "wrong again knuckleheads, I never said that and you can't prove I did"
Bleh.
Anyway, LaRouche should get his head out of his ass.
The government report rejected the LaRouche cult's baseless rantings/whining.
The legal proceedings will just find more of the same.
To quote Ron White: "You can't fix stupid."
Of course he doesn't want to face the facts. Facing the facts bars him from pushing his control agenda.
http://www.rickross.com/reference/larouche/larouche54.html
Most interesting LaRouche quote....
"This concerns the causes and circumstances of the suicide by a young, emotionally troubled British national, Jeremy Duggan, who, as the official forensic evidence showed beyond doubt, threw himself repeatedly against moving automobiles on a highway near Wiesbaden."
Threw.Himself.Repeatedly......
Fishy isn't it..
You make very good points there man.
I mean, let's have a quick review.
1. They share the same viewpoint on a lot of things.
2. They refuse to accept facts from an impartial source.
3. They don't back up what they have to say with fact.
Also try the wikipedia article on La Rouche. I think it mentions their abusive brainwashing methods. Speaking of which, the La Rouche Youth are so brainwashed that you can pretty much see suds and bubbles dripping from their ears.
La Rouche and the Washington Post (and the New York Times which correctly reported his game abuse) are correct and this site, once again, is wrong. Hooah! Jack Thompson
You conveniently forget that they took that part out (wait, addiction?) because they took it from your interview on Fox 3 hours after the tragedy, and realizing that you were talking out of your ass, took it out.
You're wrong again, motard.
The Washington Post removed the reference to Counterstrike because it was unsubstantiated(a big word for LaRouche and yourself; it means it was never proven).
In fact, Cho's own mother told the Virginia Tech review panel that "none of the games that Cho played were war games or had violent themes."
Not to mention that his own roommates never saw Cho play a video game the entire time Cho was at Virginia Tech.
And again long-term effects of "violent" video games have NEVER been proven by anyone.
Practice what you preach, jabroni: Grow up and get a life. And get a new cause while you're at it, loser.
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/results.html?st=basic&uid=&MA...
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/results.html?st=basic&uid=&MA...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/NewsSearch?st=cho+counterstrike
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/NewsSearch?sb=-1&st=cho+counter...
Only morons who can't find the source of phrases like art being that which is beautiful or true, or don't think you can be sued for someone posting under someone else's name on your blog, or you can't be arrested for asking someone if they have a dick in their ass wouldn't be able to find the Washinton Post's voluminous (that's a big word for gamers, it means Having great volume, fullness, size, or number) coverage of Cho's playing Counter-Strike
Several Korean youths who knew Cho Seung Hui from his high school days said he was a fan of violent video games, particularly Counterstrike, a hugely popular online game published by Microsoft, in which players join terrorism or counterterrorism groups and try to shoot each other using all types of guns. –Washington Post
“When Mr. Cho entered Virginia Tech, which is crouched in the Blue Ridge Mountains of southwest Virginia, his parents drove him to school with guarded expectations. Perhaps he would no longer retreat to video games and playing basketball alone the way he did at home. Perhaps college might crack the mystery of who he was, extract him from his suffocating cocoon and make him talk.” –New York Times
Now, does that say Cho was addicted to Counterstrike? No, it doesn’t.
How sad that Thompson’s entire supposition is based on two sentences that, to put it lightly, do precious little to support his position.
Andrew Eisen
Besides, when the next comet flies by, everyone but LaRouche will commit seppuku anyway...
... and Jacko will probably try to blame that on video games too.
"In fact, the Washington Post correctly reports that Cho was addicted to Counterstrike when he came to college. The long-term deleterious (that’s a big word for gamers. it means harmful) effect of such games has been proven."
Proven? If I may ask so politely, where has it been proven? And if so, can you give us a link to the site or paper stating such claims so we can see it for our selves? I'm sure that the bulk of you would be happy enough to change our tune a little if you were to give us some hard evidence that shows how video games can have long term harmful effects on the players brain if any effects at all for that matter. But so far we have yet to see any. So a point in the right direction would be much appreciated.
Don't even bother asking, there isn't any-- because it's all been covered up by the big bad game industry.
He's a nutjob and should be treated as such, stop asking him to explain things rationally.
"i think even Jack Thompson is wise enough to not touch the LaRouche cult."
actually, that's just coincidence
Let me make this simple for you.
THE
WASHINGTON
POST
RETRACTED
THAT
STATEMENT
BECAUSE
IT
WAS
ERRONEOUS
Actually studies, many of which are seriously flawed, only prove a weak correlation.
"The long-term deleterious (that’s a big word for gamers. it means harmful) effect of such games has been proven."
Once again you have no clue to the content of any of the reports that you supposedly read. Direct harmful damage would be indicative of a direct cause and effect relationship. These studies, many of which are seriously flawed, have only pointed to a correlation, not causality. Now break out your dictionary and look up "causality" and "correlation".
So once again you are wrong. Constantly stating the same wrong opinion over and over, without backing it up will not magically make it true. So back up your shit with verifiable facts, or go the hell away.
Now I see why you pussy out of every debate you are invited to. If you can't offer a counterpoint to a bunch of internet geeks, then well....
lol so true man, so true :p .
I want a direct quote from the person who wrote the article saying "WE removed the mention of games because the comment was based on rumour and turned out to be false" Ten extra points if they say the unsubtantial source was JT.
We need a comment in exact response to comments from JT and larouche that cite the WP, an instant counter and im sure the WP are willing to defend their decisions, as such an action will prevent association from unreasonable types like JT and Larouche (like the NIMF did).
So next time jack says 'WP' in a debate, we have exact definitive proof in one quote that he is talking out of his ass, that kind of ammunition in a debate is invaluable.
If you know this sight is wrong why do you keep coming back? You should have been able to figure out by now that we never believe anything you say so there's no point in trying to convince us to join your side. You also don't seem to want to engage in any debate with us (although it might be because every one of your posts generates dozens of replies). Are you just here to anger us or do you just like reading stories about yourself?
It looks like you are acting like a coward since you cant answer any of the questions except you said that Cho played Counter Strike.
Guess what, millions of other people including middle school children are playing games like Counter Strike nonstop and are not in the newspapers.
Dont you get it, the main reasons reported about the case was that he was always getting rejected by students and when he came across a girlfriend he caught her with another male student.
This case is about the way people having been changing over the years when it comes to their attitude towards an innocent lonely person that had enough of getting rejected and messed with.
You do not want to face any of the facts except the same nonsense that you keep on saying over and over again that many people have proved that those same things you say are wrong.
Take Two would have enough stuff to go on to take you to court and take action against you if you keep causing trouble for their games.
Ignoramus. That's a big word for you. It means a person who doesn't know facts.
The Washington Post was in error. They were in error to anyone who knows more about Counterstrike than "you shoot weapons at people". Why?
MICROSOFT
DID
NOT
CREATE
COUNTERSTRIKE!!!!
They publish it for PCs, but they are not the creators of the game. Oh, and why are you suddenly saying LaRouche is "right" when you formerly said you have nothing to do with them? Bill O'Reilly would be shocked at your hypocrisy.
Oh, and would you please stop saying "Hooah"? Just because in a cap, you look much older, and the bag across your shoulder makes you look a little like a military man, doesn't mean you have the right to steal that phrase from them.
If humanity is worth a damn, JT will understand the Beatles reference I made in that last sentence.
But who am I kidding.
I wasn't referring to Jack's connections, but rather to his extremely predictable habit of showing up right where you would expect him to.
No miscommunication, just a clarification!
GP: It's interesting that he has changed a little bit. Ever since he posted that shrink's report on himself he's been a little more...humorous.
@ GP
I was thinking that Jack was always humorous. I was certain that we would see him on "Last Comic Standing" or "Comedy Central Presents" soon.
I'm thinking he's rearranging the letters in those articles to "make it so" that the articles once again state that there was a connection to playing counterstrike... Of course since it's all in his head no one else can see it... So why he continues to make such claims I'll never know. *shrug* Ah well.
So how's the depostion of the Bushes coming, anyway? Nah I'm just ribbing ya, I don't really care.
Actually Jack, as I've told you upwards of 40 times now, YOU are wrong, and both news agencies retracted their statements.
Which, once again, leaves you, good JackAss, with no fact. At all. Anywhere.
But I'm sure that the committee that did this fact finding study on the VTech shootings is part of the vast videogaming conspiracy, eh JT?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ik_SQSllYG4
Like I said, save your (virtual) breath. It's gonna take nothing short of a real-life USMC a**-whooping to get him to stop, so why bother?
We all know how a soundbite can be used to back up shaky statements, and the last thing we need are the JTs and the LaDouches of the world working as giant feedback loops supporting each other's bullshit.
The BS needs to be exposed - and for it to be exposed as BS, WE need to know about it.
Know thine enemy and all that ;)
well if you go to the forums SoldatLouis has a thread goingkeepign up wit hthe Laroucheite's exploits.
Fancy that.
The VA Tech report touches on number of issues which could come out in full, in legal proceedings. These include Cho’s mental history, which was not made known to the University, and his [apparent in-]addiction to killer video games [which was actually commented on by his peers as being strange, as many of them played videogames regularly]."
Fixed for accuracy.
you rip your damn tongue out now!!
we allready have to apologize to the rest of the world enough as is
Stop getting your blood pressure up arguing at Jack. He knows the statement is false, and he's simply trolling. Let me put it banner style:
JACK
THOMPSON
IS
A
LIAR
And let's leave it at that.
Dennis, shame on you, but why am I not surprised? Jack Thompson
PS: And oh: Hooah!
GP: Yes, right here on this website I'm orchestrating an international cover-up of one of the most intensely analyzed events of the last decade. Please...
Also, you're not paying attention. GP reported that Cho's HD was missing a long time ago... as to your GTA comment, no idea what you are talking about. I note your use of the qualifier "apparently" based on GTA... I note that you often use such qualifiers... Nice, because they leave loopholes open, eh? How about some proof? Where is your supposed GTA story?
I'm assuming the GTA short story would be this one: -
"He and the “gothic girl” drive to her home in a stolen car. “If I get stopped by a cop my life will be forever over. A stolen car, two hand guns, and a sawed off shotgun.” At her house, she retrieves “a .8 caliber automatic rifle and a M16 machine gun.” The story concludes with the line “You and me. We can fight to claim our deserving throne.”
As a person who has played GTA 1, GTA 3, GTA Vice City and GTA San Andreas, and have no urge to commit any criminal acts that are depicted in any of these games (although I may be guilty of a little speeding, curse that extra 1 mph over the limit!), I do no recollect anything like this happening in the GTA series. It has nothing to do with organised crime which is the basis of the GTA series (mafia, gang wars, triads). To me it reads more like he wants to go out in a blaze of glory just like Thelma and Louise, although to be fair as I've only caught small portions of the movie I cannot justifiable compare the film and Cho's short story.
Also, I'm slightly confused about that you are employing Mr Jack Thompson. If a computer has no hard drive, a computer in fact has nothing on it... which means... no video games. Exactly how is that "crap"?
Evidence please. And I do hope you know that a story with car theft does not instantly equal the Grand Theft Auto series. If you believe that then you are a bigger idiot than we already think you are.
Page 32: "Sun and her parents recall that Cho seemed to be
doing better. He was enrolled in a Tae Kwon Do
program for awhile, watched TV, and played video
games like Sonic the Hedgehog. None of the video
games were war games or had violent themes."
Oops, no that doesn't support your claim Jack. Lets keep going shall we?
Page 32: "I like to listen to talk shows and alternative
stations, and I like action movies…My favorite
movie is X-Men, favorite actor is Nicolas
Cage, favorite book is Night Over Water, favorite
band is U2, favorite sport is basketball,
favorite team is Portland Trailblazers, favorite
food is pizza, and favorite color is green."
Peculiar his supposed addiction to games you mentioned isn't mentioned in his interests now isn't it? You think that would be the first thing to be mentioned wouldn't you? Carrying on.
Page 34:
"His tested IQ was above average."
I just tossed this one in for the hell of it. Since you think we was a gamer, but also since you think that gamers are mentally hobbled with your bullshit "frontal lobe" based insults.
Page 42:
"Cho’s roommate never saw him play video games."
Still have nothing here Jack.
Page 50:
"Several writings by Cho in Hicok’s
class were produced, one of which is of particular
significance. It tells the story of a
morning in the life of Bud “who gets out of bed
unusually early…puts on his black jeans, a
strappy black vest with many pockets, a black
hat, a large dark sunglasses [sic] and a flimsy
jacket….” At school he observes “students
strut inside smiling, laughing, embracing each
other….A few eyes glance at Bud but without
the glint of recognition. I hate this! I hate all
these frauds! I hate my life….This is it….This
is when you damn people die with me.…” He
enters the nearly empty halls “and goes to an
arbitrary classroom….” Inside “(e)veryone is
smiling and laughing as if they’re in heavenon-
earth, something magical and enchanting
about all the people’s intrinsic nature that
Bud will never experience.” He breaks away
and runs to the bathroom “I can’t do this.…I
have no moral right.…” The story continues by
relating that he is approached by a “gothic
girl.” He tells her “I’m nothing. I’m a loser. I
can’t do anything. I was going to kill every god
damn person in this damn school, swear to
god I was, but I…couldn’t. I just couldn’t.
Damn it I hate myself!” He and the “gothic
girl” drive to her home in a stolen car. “If I get
stopped by a cop my life will be forever over. A
stolen car, two hand guns, and a sawed off
shotgun.” At her house, she
retrieves “a .8 caliber automatic rifle and a
M16 machine gun.” The story concludes with
the line “You and me. We can fight to claim
our deserving throne.”
Well one line mentions a "stolen car", but that is hardly indicative at all of the Game Grand Theft Auto by Take-Two now isn't it? As a lawyer, even one as bad as you are, you would have to realize that that as evidence wouldn't hold up in any court in the world.
Page 51: "Cho went to bed early and got up early, so
his roommate just left him alone and gave him his
space. The only activities Cho engaged in were
studying, sleeping, and downloading music. He
never saw him play a video game, which he
thought strange since he and most other students
play them."
Gee, the gamers didn't kill anyone, but the one non-gamer did. Fancy that.
Face it old man. You are grasping at straws at this point, and there aren't many straws left. You are just pissed off that the biggest shooting, therefore the biggest potential boost to your wasted career didn't have evidence in your favor. The "big one" got away. Deal with it.
Quit lying to yourself. The only link between video games and Virginia Tech is with EA Sports' NCAA sports games(NCAA Football, NCAA March Madness, and NCAA MVP Baseball), not GTA.
Practice what you preach, jabroni: Grow up, get a life, and get a new cause.
Please provide a primary source qualifying the fact that the Post is, in fact, factually correct. 'I said so' is not an acceptable qualifier for a secondary source like a couple newspaper reports you cherry-pick.
In my line of work, if I justified a professional attitude based on cherry-picked information, my career would stagnate, and I'd likely be fired sooner rather than later. I'd bring my boss a nice Fox News report showing that lumber and pulp&paper are both great and the economy is doing fine, so I should get some nice big capital expenditures this year, and I probably wouldn't get any capital.
If your professional use of information is as haphazard as your use of it in public polemic, it's obvious why you've got such a poor record winning cases; If I was a judge or jury member, and you countered people citing a government report with a couple newspaper articles, qualifying their authority with the statement that "They correctly state the facts", you'd lose all credibility.
If you want to try building a case, build a case. Gather primary facts (Along the way, explain why violent crime in the US has halved since the release of Wolfenstein 3d(DoJ reports confirm) and how your characterisation of video games as causing an epidemic of violence fit within this dramatic decrease in violent crime).
Until you actually form a solid argument based on solid primary facts, it's just "your word vs. their word", and I'm not sure how you think you'll be able to advance your cause or gain sympathy among the unconvinced with petty arguing.