
Is she the British Dr. Phil?
That's hard to say, but
Tanya Byron, psychologist, author and host of a pair of self help-oriented television programs, has been chosen to lead the British government's review of video game violence.
According to
MCV:
Byron will talk to both parents and the interactive entertainment industry before reporting her findings to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and the Department for Children Schools and Families.
She will also tackle the issue of children’s access to pornographic and violent material on the internet.
Said Byron:
The internet is a powerful and positive tool for children in terms of their learning and ongoing development. However, we must all enable our children to use the possibility presented by the internet in a way that is both positive and safe.
Therefore it is essential that parents and anyone involved in the care and development of young people are familiar with the material they will access and view - and of the potential and actual risks therein.
Byron's review is expected to take six months to complete.
Comments
Good thing, but I'd like her to talk to some video game journalists and players too. After all, gamers are the first people concerned.
Yes, but so is that Judge at your hearing. Shouldn't you be listening to him, Jackie Boy?
No, you aren't, nor would she choose to associate with you.
In some ways it is good that this woman is involved, she has a deal of respect for children and their intelligence and doesn't just write them off as violent, brainwashed thugs. Most of her show centres around educating parents and listening to all points of view, including the childs', there could hardly be two more polar opposite views than hers' and Jacks 'Do their thinking for them' mentality. That's how I know that Mr Thompsons' claims are false as most of his previous ones.
I guess the question begs to be asked, why doesn't she plan to talk to other psychologists?
I like what she had to say, but I'm a little concerned she's only taking six months to do all this in. I guess we'll all have to wait for her report. Hopefully someone from the UK will pop in and let us know what kind of person she is.
I have to wounder why, in light of the previous findings, why such a review is needed.
I think this is a good thing. The only people involved in video games and children's exposure to them should be parents, and the only people involved with explaining the existing guidelines, safeguards, parental controls and ratings should be the gaming industry. I like the fact that there is no mention of politicians, special interest groups or fear mongers.
"She will also tackle the issue of children’s access to pornographic and violent material on the internet."
This is always a concern, but access to things on the internet is very different to access to a video game. A website does not cost €50 to view. A pc will not be in the living room plugged into the tv.
"The internet is a powerful and positive tool for children in terms of their learning and ongoing development. However, we must all enable our children to use the possibility presented by the internet in a way that is both positive and safe."
Therefore it is essential that parents and anyone involved in the care and development of young people are familiar with the material they will access and view - and of the potential and actual risks therein."
This is what we have been saying all along. She is talking about it in reference to the internet, but the same is true of games. They can be powerful and positive in terms of learning, but there are elements of certain games that may not be suitable for young children. Parents have to be aware of this, need to make themselves familiar with the type of games out there, with the ratings system and use this knowledge to make sure that their children only play suitable games.
The paragraph gives me hopes shell come to an impartial and practical solution based on parenting and parental awareness, but untill she publishes her findings we'll just have to hope.
PS: Hooah!
Entertainment responsibility asks: "How can we over-expose this as a big issue and make everyone think that they have something terrible happening all around them? What can we do to milk this for all it's worth and make as much money as we can off the fear of ignorant parents?"
Which instantly negates any credibility that she might of had.
There will be as many reviews as necessary for the House of Commons to find someone who reaches the conclusion they want to hear.
In order to prevent your child from viewing violent or pornographic material on the Internet, either don't let them go on it unsupervised or use the parental controls that every ISP provides.
Wow. That was easy. I figured out what we need to do to curb children's access to "inappropriate material", and it only took me five minutes.
And now it's doomed to failure, excellent work.[sarcasm]
"She’s talking to me. Jack Thompson
PS: Hooah! "
Translation:
"She sent me a form letter to one of my inane press releases that a 10 year old would find grammatically deficient.
PS: FUCK THE TROOPS!!"
Apologies for using one of the FCC'S SEVEN DIRTY WORDS OF DANGER DOOM HURT PAIN, but, as Frank Zappa said, such strong language can get the point across properly without beating around the bush.
I enjoy that she is actually a psychologist, though. I don't even think Dr. Phil manages that even though he has Dr. in front of his name.
"Which instantly negates any credibility that she might of had."
No need for that. We talk to jackyboy all the time don't we?
Then she obviously doesn't know enough about you.
And enough with the hooah already - have you no respect?
Too true. But if I had my own television show I would only bring him on to humiliate him.
Like Jeb Bush "talked" to you? Jack, it doesn't count when YOU contact THEM...
Therefore it is essential that parents and anyone involved in the care and development of young people are familiar with the material they will access and view - and of the potential and actual risks therein.
Hopefully they actually see how well parents use the BBFC system, and also that they don't hype up the "risks" by using bad science.
Either way, both lie.
If that was the real Jack Thompson, then proove that she is talking to you.
And I'll thank you to keep a civil tounge about it.
"Too true. But if I had my own television show I would only bring him on to humiliate him."
Hell, a retarded chimp could do that!
@SchemeMonkey:
Gonna be waiting a while on both counts... Seeing as how a) said 'proof' doesn't exist and b) Jack? Civil? How long have you been posting here?
Don't you just love trolls?
No, not particularly, but I do enjoy seeing them get the smackdown/banhammer, which I assume after his disbarrment in November JT will get to wave buh-bye to his posting privledges here, and we'll all live happily ever after.
I think it is safe to say she knows nothing about video-games, so I am not too optimistic about the outcome. She is no Dr. Phil thankfully, although I would not be surprised to see a new TV series or book launch on the back of this. She seems to be a populist who passes off soft-psychology as fact.
No doubt the report will completely disregard external factors such as poverty or inequality, it amazes me how, when analysing the effects of certain media, that the context they are a part of is ignored. It is as if video-games exist in some abstract bubble, detached from the reality around them.
... also will people just ignore this 'Jack Thompson', every topic degenerates into some petty exchange that detracts from the subject at hand.
i don't think the senate would allow Dr. Phil to talk about anything.
i expected better from England.