Romney Campaign Dives Into Video Game Cesspool with GameTrailers Ad

Romney Campaign Dives Into Video Game Cesspool with GameTrailers Ad

September 21, 2007
GamePolitics readers may recall the Mitt Romney campaign ad that lumped violent video games into a "cesspool of violence, sex, drugs, indolence and perversions."

Apparently, candidate Romney is willing to dip his toe into that cesspool a bit in search of a few extra votes. As reported by Joystiq's Alexander Sliwinski, a Romney banner ad (left) has popped up on the GameTrailers site:
It is interesting that this ad pops up on a site that proudly displays clips of those violent video games and has a viewership that likes them too.

We have no idea how the advertising process works at GameTrailers, for all we know we could have that ad pop up soon on our own pages, but how times have changed to see political ads on video game sites.

GP: Romney's flip-flops on a variety of issues are pretty well documented as the former governor of a liberal state (Massachusetts) tries to re-invent himself to appeal to the Republican base.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
At first, this confused me too.

Then I realized this is Romney we're talking about, so it's okay.
Keep in mind that many of the staffers decide where to post these banners. Romney, himself, probably did not choose this.

Regarding Mike Huckabee...
Mike gave a speech today to the NRA (National Rifle Association). I thought this was interesting:

It wasn't all jokes and one-liners, of course. He almost got the crowd misty-eyed when he talked about his late father's gun, and how fathers like to pass down memories to their children, and how he hopes to pass on his guns to his children. He concluded, "I can't imagine any father saying to his child, 'when I die, I'm going to leave you my PlayStation."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1900273/posts (I can confirm this is accurate as I watched his speech on CSPAN...I know...I'm a dork)
Well, everyone should vote. Especially gamers! Just find out who's *not* trying to turn the nation into a "nanny dictatorship" and give them your vote.
It's like he wants to appeal to the masses by pissing them off. I always hate people who flip flop around like this. One day he could be fighting for us, and the next day he could be demonizing us.
@ JB.
Mike Huckabee.
If you click on the link, does it mention that you just came from a cesspool?
I wonder how he gets his kids to eat their vegetables... Advertisements on their Skittles?
I have always thought it was interesting that a politician can never change his mind without being labeled a "flip-flopper". I doubt that anyone has noticed that since his first mention of videogames in the cesspool add he has not mentioned them since.

This is probably due to the fact that several people, myself included, brought to his attention the fact that video games are not just for children, that adults play them, and that gamers gete upset when politicians ignore that. From what I've seen and heard from him since is that video games are not lumped together with the traditional "for the children" tirades which all politicians use.

Interesting that a politician has done exactly what everyone here wants, look at the problem and alter his position when the facts are made clear to him. Yet he is still called a flip-flopper and oportunist. Which way do you want it?

Oh yeah, I also think that it is very bad taste for Dennis to link to articles not having to do with video games and politics which do nothing but further a private political agenda outside the realm of videogame politics, I mean Richard Cohen? please
Can't an incompetent millionaire fool stick to his principles, on the campaign trail?

I hated him before this, but now I think he might second worst candidate running out of the lot (first being 9/11 man).
Little known fact: the ad system at GameTrailers is actually powered by irony. So they pretty much /had/ to run this ad!
Someone should contact his opponent, the media "watchdogs" (lol), and alarmist media types. You could get some cool stories like "Romney loves violent media" or "Romney hates children".
Hypocites, damn dirty hypocrites!
This guy is such a BushCo bitch, oy. Constitution Terrorist!
I have to agree with bitnine. Game Trailers is using an ad service and therefore does not control which ads are placed on their website. the most they can do is complain to their ad service and have them stop sending those ads over. Mitt Romney probably does not know that his ad has been featured in support of the cesspool. ;)
Ditto, sounds like an ad-service goof. There are so many categories for ads, so most just try to filter out obscene stuff, and from there expect the ad server to figure out based on category preferences what ads they should show.

The ad server probably linked Romney to games through keywords, and had no method to determine he was actually *against* games. :)
@DCWill

Romney is the same jackass who claimed the VTech shooter was inspired by video games to commit the shooting, even though no one saw him play video games during his time at VTech. When the report came out a few weeks ago that also showed the shooter didn't play violent games, Romney didn't apologize or say that he was mistaken for falsely claiming video games were involved. Yet you seem rather sympathetic towards him. Romney is, and always will be, a heartless jackass for using a tragedy that caused more than 30 innocent people to lose their lives just for political gain, and anyone dumb enough to vote for him is a bigger jackass.

Romney blames games for VTech - source:
http://gamepolitics.com/2007/05/06/prez-candidate-romney-video-games-in-...
@Gamer81

Just a quick correction to your point. Romney blamed all violence and pornography in media, not just video games. So in actuality, he is not pointing the finger directly at video games, but at media as a whole. So your statement is not 100% accurate.

Actual Quote:
Pornography and violence poison our music and movies and TV and video games. The Virginia Tech shooter, like the Columbine shooters before him, had drunk from this cesspool.
romney you ass
At least Hillary found that demonization didn't work for her, oy.
That, and regarding Romney, he's as stupid as Lyndon LaRouche, oy.
@Jlodus

I never said he didn't blame other mediums previously. Besides, in that particular quote, he did include other mediums, but soon after that, he dumped that viewpoint and focused on video games, solely.


http://gamepolitics.com/2007/07/20/prez-hopeful-romney-continues-to-push...

http://gamepolitics.com/2007/07/23/romney-continues-video-game-theme-in-...
JB:

Vote based on video games? Are you kidding? It's worth paying attention to which politicians (from both parties) are doing this kind of pandering, but c'mon. You don't think the war, or the environment, or education, or the economy, or the war, or foreign relations, or disaster preparedness, or health care, or the war are bigger concerns?

None of us want the government mucking with our favorite artistic medium, but I think anyone for whom this is the sole factor (or even a major factor) in who they support politically needs a reality check.
Shih Tzu:
Consider the position that someone takes regarding video games as a "tell".
This communicates how much intrusion they want the government to have into you and your private life, your health, your education, your kids' education, etc.

Take Ron Paul, the obscure Republican from Texas. He voted against the War in Iraq....a war that's not reduced the WMD count, and has increased the total number of terrorists. He's voted against more socialized medicine (what's wrong with our medical system is a combination of government intervention combined with the most powerful union in the country -- the AMA). Paul was given the best scorecard for "technology voter guide" in the house. Paul is one of the few candidates that would rather have you in control of your life, and not big government.

I don't know what his specific position on video games would be, but based upon his other concepts, I would guess that he would say that parents should be involved in what video games kids should play, not the government. I think that concept should resonate well with most people on this forum, eh? He has consistently opposed media censorship, i.e. government tinkering with free expression.
And this is why I hate the republican riche....

I am for Ron paul all the way but sadly he dosent have a chance in hell hes not reptile enough....and hitlery is a queen snake *shudders*
DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB!
Folks, let's keep this in the realm of logic, not emotion. Whether or not you like Mitt Romney.

So, Romney would like to use the power of the government to limit the sale of a product to minors. Is that not the root issue here? Do we not do this all the time in every other industry?

"But we limit guns and alcohol to kids because that stuff is really dangerous!" "Video games aren't!"

Perhaps you're right. Perhaps your hobby has no influencial effect on children. Is that why Pokemon is a billion dollar franchise? Is that why kids and adults alike will be lined up outside retailers for Halo 3 tonight?

When it's positive, we accept it. When it's negative, we resist it. When music influences other artists, we champion the "respect" an artist has for another. When music influences Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, we turn away, and blame something else.

If we want to raise the intellectual bar, we have to be willing to avoid the "quick attacks" we are used to using. Yes, Mitt is wrong on his narrow minded view of video gaming. Yes, Resident Evil is for kids just like every stupid R rated movie is for kids. (Don't pretend you don't remember being in school drawing gross pictures thinking "Splatterhouse is the coolest game ever!")

In the end, kids are influenced by everything. Music, movies, church, friends, family...everything. Some things we legislate, others we don't. Should it be left to the states? Counties? Neither? You'll never convince anyone if you prattle on like an internet stereotype. Raise the bar.

PS: Don't really care for Mitt myself, but voting or not voting for someone based on one issue is as uninformed as condemming a hobby based on GTA.
CONGRATULATIONS Romney!! You have successfully tried to suck up to video gamers after you threw us into your Cesspool of violence and all sorts of crap.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 11:23am
gellymatos: ...paranoid, as lawyers, that the language of the law may do so. But like I said, paranoid.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:22am
Valdearg: They see this as the Government encouraging the "sinful sexual behavior." They don't want gays to score ANY political victory, even one that protects them from violent homophobic psychopaths.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:22am
gellymatos: Oh, hell yes. And nothing annoys me more than that fact. They stray and make real catholics look bad. And yes, they could be...
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:21am
Valdearg: Also, you really think that people who are smart enough to practice law REALLY believe that this law will prevent them from expressing their religious beliefs? The fact is that these guys hate gays, and don't want them to be protected in any way.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:20am
Valdearg: The catholic teachings, perhaps, but certainly, there are PLENTY of Catholics who condone violence and hate. Just like these guys.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:19am
gellymatos: violence or hate against anyone.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:18am
gellymatos: Like I said, paranoia that the law could make it illegal to voice an opinion on gay marriage. And catholics don't condon...
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:15am
Valdearg: Can you find a different reason behind the lawsuit, other than the fact that they want to protect their "right" to perpetrate violence against homosexuals, based on their religious beliefs?
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:14am
Valdearg: The fact is that this Law Center, which specializes in the defense of Catholic Beliefs, kind of like a Catholic ACLU, I suppose, is challenging a law that PROTECTS homosexuals from violent acts motivated by hatred of gay people.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:13am
gellymatos: Again, sorry I jumped the gun like I did.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:13am
Valdearg: @Gelly: It's a liberal blog. Its not designed to be balanced. Does that mean that everything there is completely false, and not worth investigating? Nope.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:12am
Valdearg: To be completely honest, I would argue that that assessment is more biased and farther from reality than the Daily Kos assessment.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:12am
gellymatos: I'm sure the story itself is true, it's just that the site seems to be biased. More so than Fox. And that takes effort.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:11am
Valdearg: Would you rather I link straight to the horses mouth? Here's the story from the Law Center involved in the suit.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:10am
Valdearg: @Gelly: I love how you jumped on the A_L train, and EVERYTHING that EVER comes from Daily Kos is questionable. Clearly, NONE of it could POSSIBLY merit a closer look.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:09am
gellymatos: I'm sorry. I thought you were attacking the church due to your history of doing so. My bad.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:08am
gellymatos: ...that these laws will make it illegal to voice an opinion against gay marriage. Third, Your source is questionable. And by...
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:07am
Valdearg: @Gelly: Wow, jumping right to the defense of the church, despite the fact that I never implicated the Catholic church?
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:06am
gellymatos: , not orders from the church. Second, the paranoia about these laws that SOME christians have is based off of the parnoid idea..
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:05am
gellymatos: Vald: Where to start. Oh yes. First, he doesn't seem to represent the whole church. His doing this out of his own conviction...
Login or register to post shouts