Thompson & Son At It Again... Says Junior Bought Halo 3 at Target

Thompson & Son At It Again... Says Junior Bought Halo 3 at Target

September 27, 2007
Have you got Jack Thompson fatigue?

Yeah, we have it too.

In the wake of yesterday's server-crashing, mind-numbing revelation by GamePolitics that the anti-game attorney sent gay porn pics to a federal judge we could use a couple of Jack-less days.

Alas, it's not to be. The activist, who sometimes refers to himself as the "Energizer Bunny" of the game violence debate, is at it again.

In a press release issued late yesterday, Thompson claims that his 15-year-old son has once again purchased an M-rated (17 and older) game at a South Florida retailer.

Readers may recall our September 13th story in which Thompson claimed that Junior purchased BioShock at a local Best Buy. This time around Thompson says it was Halo 3:
Miami attorney and anti-violent video game activist today did a successful sting on Target Corporation.  His fifteen-year-old son, on the first try, was able to buy the “Mature-rated” Halo 3 without producing any age ID at the Dadeland Station Target.

GP: Hey, the kid is accumulating quite a game collection in the name of research. Hope he's finding time to get his homework done.

Comments

Well, Jack is full of shit. He may have encountered some careless retailers in Florida, but I've seen them card kids with extreme efficiency, up here in New Jersey. They did it quite visibly during the Halo 3 midnight launch. He proves nothing by doing this.
I might be giving him too much credit in saying he's familiar with The Art of War. He might know a few of its lessons - like being careful not to confront someone's strength but rather probe for weaknesses, and emotionally upsetting one's opponent. His tactics look to be all offense, though - no defense, no balance to his approach. One of the key lessons of The Art of War is that war - when done properly - is an intellectual process more than a physical one. Battle is about bringing the right troops, with the right preparation and mindset, to the right place at the right time; if you do this then you have virtually guaranteed victory before battle even commences. JT shows a manic willingness to throw down (in court, that is) with anyone and hope that his legal skill will carry him through the day; he acts more like a warlord than a general.
I hope that kid is enjoying his times at Best Buy & Target with his dad. Because in two years when he's 17 he'll have worn out his usefulness to ol' Jack and daddy won't have time to talk to him anymore. He'll be too busy hanging out at the local Jr. High trying to recruit kids for his ambulance chasing.
I'll bet anything they tried going to Best Buy first, and when they asked for the kids ID, Jack dragged him out of there and went next door to target, crying the whole way because "the jig was up."
hang about i thought jack had got halo 3 banned

how on earth did his son by it?
GP, I gotta say this.

His "stings" ain't exactly news. Why bother posting about them?

-P
If Thompson is so worried about kids and violence why is he teaching his own to break the law? What's the point in trying to protect everyone's child when you willingly put your own up on the chopping block.

Sounds like poor parenting.
Hey Jack, since it's probably a safe assumption that you didn't actually want that copy of Halo 3 (or BioShock, or all the other games you've accumulated over the years), can I have 'em? I'll even pay for shipping. And hey, if you autograph them I'll even kick some bucks to the charity if your choice; if you include an autographed picture as well I'll even pony up for your defense fund. (Or the Hire Someone to Kill Strauss Zelnick fund. Your call.)
Attacking yet another sizable company and expecting to get money and attention from it..

Y'know, these little stings of his might get more attention if they mattered. Target doesn't threaten to fire their employees and the managers on duty if an employee sells an M-rated game to an under-aged customer like GameStop does. More importantly, all the ultra-retailers, like Wal-Mart, Target, and BestBuy are so huge that one little incident like that couldn't possibly harm them.

Besides, it's the retailers choice to enforce the ESRB ratings, not the government or the local courts. But, we all know this, even JT knows this. More importantly, JT should know that it's HIS responsibility to raise his child and filter the media he's exposed to.
I want to know if Jack T also sends his son to websites to find gay porn links.
[...] So Chuckles decided to rock out another “sting” operation. He previous sent his son in to a Best Buy to pick up a copy of BioShock. His son isn’t yet 18, which is what he’s trying prove. However, he’s going after 2K Games for the problem instead of Best Buy. 2K Games doesn’t control a retailer’s action. They brand the game as mature and it’s up to the retailers to enforce the sales. The new “sting” operation involves Halo 3. [...]
He's just trying to build up some 'celebrity' so that he can find employment after he gets disbarred.
@Hackangel

"You know, I decided to “do” a “sting” of my own (I made phone calls). I called the nearest Best Buy and Futureshop and they both asks for Ids when selling M-rated games."

lie: a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.

So you called the store and asked "Do you check IDs for M rated games?" Brilliant. Also, Clinton did not inhale, OJ was innocent, and The Sims contains full frontal nudity including labia and pubic hair.

If I worked at a game store and a stranger called and asked "Do you check for IDs?" I'd say yes instictively, whether or not it's actually true. Because if I didn't, and it was the regional manager on the other end, I'm fired.

That doesn't mean when a kid goes up to the counter with a copy of Halo 3 he is actually carded by the same employee.

I'm not sticking up for JT: I've watched kids at Best Buy slink away from the counter, disappointed that he couldn't buy Crackdown because he wasn't 17+. But don't be so gullible as to think that the gamer being paid slightly above minimum wage at Best Buy is above telling a little fib to ensure his job is safe.
May his son grow up to be everything he hates; intellegent, tolerant, sane, and a decent human being.
@ Salen

Exactly what i thought.
Does anyone here think that maybe it's a good thing that Thompson is raising the general public's awareness of game ratings? His actions might prompt more retailers to verify the age of their customers. I can't say that's so terrible considering it's one of the ESRB's goals as well.

That being said, I have never approved of Thompson's laughable (guerilla) tactics. The ends do not justify the means. It should only be a matter of time before he gets booted from the Florida bar. I just hate to think what kind of martyrdom he would pull after that.

BTW, I'm almost 30 and I got carded at Toys'RUs when I bought Halo 3 on Tuesday.
Again, THIS IS NOT NEWS!

Stop giving this horrid man air time!

I'm a developer at Krome.

I currently have itchy balls because Krome doesn't pay us enough for me to afford beer and steak every night AND calamine lotion. It's one or the other for us!

That's game slash politic related... are you going to report that???

Or do I have to write you an email about it?
Now, now... while it's fun to poke fun at Jack's typing habits in his response to me, he does have a point. And I, for one, admit when I'm wrong.

*stand*

Jack Thompson, you are right. In my haste to post something this morning before I went to work, I skimmed the article and didn't read it carefully enough. If I'd realized you'd already mentioned the day and that you did it 'first try', I wouldn't have posted in that manner. For that, I apologize.

*sit*
If Sun Tzu was here, he would yell at Jack Thompson for the latter's tactics in achieving his goals. Yeah, so the game retailer clerk sold an M rating copy to a minor. Big deal. Is that even partly victory already?

Besides, that was only the kid's side of story. We don't even know if Thomspon's kid pulled a tactic like showing a fake ID or something just to say he's 17. And granting w/o accepting for the sake of argument, how will this benefit Jack? In my point of view, this is like an empty threat to that PhotoShop "cease and desist" thing. Nothing will happen and Jack just wants to be noticed by the public.
"Nah, it’s called vigilantism."


Actually its not even that. Its Jack blowing $50 on something that proves absolutely nothing and will not be able to use as evidence in anything whatsoever. He proved that one employee in one Target was negligent. Big deal. And beyond that what evidence do we have that this even occurred? Yeah, his word really isn't worth very much.

So essentially, Jack is $50 down and thats about the gist of it.
Hey if Jack says he is the lord Jesus Christ does that make it true?
ATTN Thompson:

Tell him to get on Live.
Good for Junior. Assuming that Papa lets him play it, he will probably love it.
Hope the kid is actually going to school, getting his homework done, having time to actually play, including with friends, and whatever else he may be denied by his father in favor of performing these UNSCIENTIFC and NOT LEGALLY RECOGNIZED "stings". "on the first try"? Not likely, and based on John Bruce's past efforts to lie to and deceive the general public as well as law enforcement and government officials, I seriously doubt it was the only try, though it could easily have been his ONLY success, out of most likely dozens, if the "sting" was even performed.

I'd also like to caution, in advance, any and ALL readers that if John Bruce slips in and does what he did the last time and posts phone number and name information on the cashier, that they NOT swamp the business with harassing phone calls at the bidding of John Bruce. If anyone should investigate the claim, let it be a mainstream media journalist or a specialist news media journalist, such as Dennis. John Bruce encouraged harassment the last time. A clearly unethical act. But if anyone actually fell for it, that's THEIR fault, not his. I know most here are intelligent enough not to call, but thought I'd say it anyway.

BTW, Dennis,... :: snicker ::... nothing about the cashier... :: chortle ::... having... :: LOL :: ... a piercing? ROFLMAO!

Sorry, I'll behave now. :D

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Jack must have a pocketful of cash. BioShock, Halo 3? At $60 a pop, his poor kid BETTER be able to play them. Unless Jack likes to Hoarde them for himself...
actually id like to see him on live, and whats his gamertag? im betting the kid has a bajillion gamer points from not being able to go out of the house - i mean considering thomson thinks everything is evil.
I'm surprised Target had copies of Halo 3. Would have thought they would be sold out.
You know he isnt allowed to play any of them of course.

A shame, since by the UK ratings (15) he'd be fine playing Halo 3 at least :)
yes, because doing this at one store out of thousands of others, and it not being the only store to carry it, makes it successful. that is like going out to catch a lowly drug dealer (not arresting him by the way) just pointing him out and saying "see! I found one! war on drugs is over! HOOHA!"

nice job JT, you must be proud
I still don't understand why Halo is given a M rating at all. The violence is less then what I see in sportsgames.
Considering that the source is Thompson himself, I think Thompson's lying.
"Miami attorney and anti-violent video game activist today did a successful sting on Target Corporation"

So, Jack, tell us more about this "today" person.
@ BearDogg-X

I agree with you. I also think that Jack Thompson is lying, just like he is lying about how he is going to shut down Best Buy. This new press release Jack Thompson is saying (about his son buying Halo 3), is more of his "Antigamer Propaganda".
I still don't get his point. Selling an M-rated game to a minor is not illegal, and won't be any time soon by the looks of things. If anything Jack Thompson is an irresponsible parent for allowing his son to purchase a game that is clearly meant for older gamers.
Thompson fatigue? I make you money every time you do a story about me and you love it. Look at the number of posts on Thompson stories. That converts to hits at you site, which increases your ad revenue.

What a liar you are.

GP: As you know, there ARE NO ADS on GamePolitics... I make no money based on traffic.  We had plenty of traffic during the 18 months that you were banned.

And I'm a liar?
I don't think he's lying, I just don't think he realises that no crime was committed in this happening. I'm sure the retailer in question would be annoyed to hear of it happening and the person who sold it repremanded or sacked, but nothing more is going to happen. And, once again, he fails to grasp that it has nothing to do with the gaming industry and everything to do with the attitudes towards carding by young minimum wage staff at retail outlets.
Hey, Jack! How many stores did you have to go to until you found the one where the poor underpaid clerk, having been inundated with Halo 3 purchases all day, managed to forget that one crucial step?

Why do you keep thinking this is a victory against the game industry? It was a Target employee, not a Bungie employee, that sold that game to your son, and human error does sometimes occur.
"today" is an adverb in the above sentence. thanks for the proof that games have made you into an e-tard.
@ Jack

The very fact that you think yourself a "crusader" for good, and then you turn around and consistently use your own child in the twisted little games you like to play goes to show one thing - what a complete and utter amoral twit you are.

I also call into question "first try," as you, sir, are a well known liar, more than willing to twist facts to your own needs. We've said it before, and we'll say it again - come November, you're out. Oh sure, you'll cry foul and conspiracy and any other number of things.

But by that point you'll also have turned everyone who may have been a friend to your cause against you, spreading the half truths and turning things to suit your own purpose as you do. No one will back you anymore. Just think on that.
What Mr. Thompson fails to mention is that at Target they ask you for your date of birth when you make any videogame purchase. This means that he is actively encouraging his son to lie in order to promote his personal agenda and lustful desire for a legacy.
Tune in tomorrow when JT forces his son to go into the back room of a sleazy video rental store to rent "Shaving Private Ryan" so JT can send it to a supreme court justice.

Oh what a barrel of yuks this man is, contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
*sigh* What kind of a parent are you Jack Thompson? You are exploiting your son to get what you want.
Now whilst I don't disagree that he shouldn't be sold this game, we have to use the following process.

1. What evidence does Jack Thompson have, other than his word, which we know is less than accurate and truthful most of the time. Did he video it? A receipt on its own doesn't count.

2. Did Jack stand with him as he purchased the game, or was he in a different location? Standing with him as he makes the purchase is essentially agreeing to the transaction.

3. Did he use the "Lil Jackie Visa" or did he use cash? Where did a 15 year old get the cash from to be able to purchase this game?

4. Why is this game rated mature in the first place? It is rated 15 in the UK. Maybe we're just far too liberal for Jackie's liking.

5. Were the $20 bills real money, or did he replace Andrew Jackson with a picture of a gay-orgy?

And the big question

Why haven't these stores in Florida got a photo of Jack and Jackie Jr with "DO NOT SERVE THESE PEOPLE" behind the counter? I certainly wouldn't serve anyone with that wild stare and obvious instabilities. He might cut himself on the edge of the CD as he tries to taste it.

Come on Jack, you should know words alone aren't enough, you need some evidence. Video proof. You word against Target and the minimum wage employee is just not enough.

But, at least Jack is taking on the right people, the retailers and not the games themselves, regardless of the legality of the enforcement of age ratings.
Not to derail this...but I'm sorry, after yesterday's story I just can't focus on any other of Mr. Thompson's antics.

From now on, every time I see a story about him I will immediately envision a snickering lawyer in a courtroom waiting for a Judge to open a legal docket, much like a child waiting for his neighbor to come out and stomp on the bag of flaming dog poo. I'll avoid the pornography jokes, though it takes all of my willpower. Besides, the previous story is much more amusing than a parent who, for his own agenda, exploits their child.

(posted under my full name per Mr. Thompson's request, normally post under the alias of GameDevMich)
Whenever I hear these stories I'm inclined to believe that JT's mostly telling the truth - JT Jr. was successfully able to buy an M-rated game. What I usually question is how many times it took him to succeed. If he went to ten Targets and got carded at all of them before getting lucky on try #11, we'd never hear about tries #1-10.
I don't know whether Junior is actively going along with his dad at this point or not. I'm starting to wonder now if maybe he's threatening his son to do it for him "or else." He probably can exert more leverage over his son than anyone else in his life. As Ian Charles said, he's probably not even allowed to play them. And if that's the case then, what does he do with these games? Does he take them back after buying them? I wouldn't be surprised if Target and Best Buy now regard him as one of those asshole customers they have to deal with so that when they hear about him they go, "Oh jeez... That guy again?"

I would love to hear what his son has to say about all this, and he proably does post on some forum somewhere, careful not to say who he's related to. But if Jack is like every other uber-conservative religous freak parent I've dealt with, he proably does't let him even use the internet.
Again, what's Thompson's point with these stings?

We already know retailer policy compliance isn't 100%. The FTC said so and no one from the industry or otherwise has debated it.


Andrew Eisen
If Thompson is a caring, independent, and expeditious parent (as we expect most American parents to be, particularly conservative ones - don't want to depend on the government too much, now), then one thing is obvious.

Thompson *clearly* has used the Family Settings on his son's 360 to ensure that his child will not be able to play Halo 3, and learn a $60 lesson to not pay for games he can not play.

After all, since console makers have given us, as parents, the resources (and thus the power, imagine that!) to control what our children are doing, then this is of little consequence.
Looks like Thompson has foiled us again. And I would've gotten away with it if it weren't for that meddling Thompson and his kid. :)
Hey Jack did you beat BioShock is that why you needed to get a copy of Halo 3?
Once again a 15 year old has purchased a M rated game with his parents permission. I still can't find the scandal in that fact.
That's odd; when I purchased Halo 3 at Target, the clerk required me to hand him my drivers license which he used to swipe the magnetic strip through to verify my age. It was quite annoying but I asked the guy and he said he couldn't bypass it. This was in Ohio.
Again, we're taking Jack's word that he had his son buy it. Thompson's word and $5 will get you a cup of coffee (these days, at least).
Not sure why people are against violence in video games. It's amazing that you don't hear these parents complaining when there kids watch HBO or Showtime when they go to bed. There are more violence TV shows and in movies than you will ever see in video games. This guy is just mad because his mom took away his Atari when he was little.....he wants all of us to suffer now. I think we can all say LLLOOOOSSSSSEEERRRR
Wow Jack.

You see, all my life I've felt that people who used children to advance their agendas are the lowest of the low. The kind of people who ought to have child services kick down the door and take their children to a reasonable home.

I don't believe for a minute that your kid bought it. I'm more than willing to believe that you stood by his side and said 'yeah, it's cool, give him the game, I know why its rated M'. You see Jack, you are a liar. And liar's don't change their stripes, nor do they prosper (if you don't believe me, review your record of court successes). Oh wait, you can't. You don't have any in the last 10 years!

So go fuck off Jack. You're washed up, and you using your kid to further your assinine agenda is the lowest thing you've ever done.

You're a snake and a liar,
Austin Lewis.
Jack, you are a punk.

Jack, you are a hypoctite.

Jack, you are a bully.

Jack, you are all things you claim to hate.

Get a life, and go get the Unabomber's manifesto. I'm sure you'll enjoy it.
Bullshit.

Target has a prompt that comes up at the point of purchase AT THE REGISTER. Nice to see JT explioiting his son though.


This is non-news.
@ Wuz Ranger

I'm more inclined to go with Tim Buckley's theory for Jack's motivations. At this point, it's the only one that makes any sense!

Bathing Suit Area (08/08/2005)
"“today” is an adverb in the above sentence. thanks for the proof that games have made you into an e-tard."

If you're going to police grammar, you do know that proper sentence structure requires capitalization of the first letter of the first word in the sentence...

E-tard? Very professional Jack.
On the grammar subject, Mr. Thompson's use of the adverb "today" is technically close to being correct, even if it is awkward to read. Furthermore, "today did" is commonly used in interrogative statements, and not so much direct statements, usually separated with commas.

Correcting one's grammar while labeling them as an e-tard is very paradoxical, albeit entertaining.

(as per Mr. Thompson's request, I have posted using my full name. My normal posting alias is GameDevMich)
I have to agree with Zerodash. Why even post this?
C'mon guys, there's plenty to jump on him about without resorting to grammer naz--*GODWIN'D*
@Michael Perry

Yes, "today did" might be technically correct in some settings, but not this one. One does not usually "do" a sting, but rather "conducts" a sting. So, Jack would've been better served by saying "...today conducted a sting..."

However, given that he refers to people as "e-tards," we can't expect too much, notwithstanding his law school education, such as it was.

@ Jack

Where did you learn the term "e-tard" anyway? I've only ever seen that in online gaming contexts. It seems strange that you'd have adopted the customs of the culture you so obviously loathe, but, then again, you're out buying video games and surfing for gay porn, so... I'm not sure what to think anymore.
@Sam White - Exactly, which is why I exactly said:

"...is technically close to being correct," =)

(as per Mr. Thompson’s request, I have posted using my full name. My normal posting alias is GameDevMich)
Yet another pointless JT article...Seriously I don't consider this news. I'm under the impression he does this stuff daily and then yells about when it works. Please Dennis calm down on the JT stuff its not why I come here. As I keep saying Jacks time is over...about the only thing I want to know about him is how his disbarment is going.
/yawn

You know... a decent, moral, loving and educated parent wouldn't allow his underage kid to buy this if he didn't want them to have it. Looks like all JT did was prove he is a crappy parent. Congrats I guess.

Parenting 101 JT - Remember, its ok to tell your kids no sometimes.
@ Jack

I'm curious - what does your church think about all this? Does your pastor know that you're looking at pictures of gay porn and buying awful, morally depraved games?
I hope he has proof that his son bought it.

Probably not, though.
@Lard:

If he doesn't, Target should have the video of the purchase. Now whether or not they'll let him actually have the video is another story.

-P
@jt

the only e-tard here, would be you.
actually id like to see him on live, and whats his gamertag?


Probably "AmendmentOneHooah"
"The activist, who sometimes refers to himself as the “Energizer Bunny” of the game violence debate..."

One has to wonder: Would that fact that he keeps 'going' be because he's full of crap?
To everyone who's complaining about the Jack Thompson stories:
Get over it. Jack Thompson is news because he WRITES LAWS TO BLOCK GAMES and tries to blame games for murders. As he likes to point out, he's also been in the mainstream news (Not just that FOX bullshit). When he's not actually in court to legislate games, he's a great stress reliever and entertainment figure. I for one love to these articles and look forward to watching him blow his legal career to smithereens.

If you don't give a damn about Thompson's antics, DON'T READ THE ARTICLE.

and while I'm at it... @Jack: You just absolutely refuse to believe the truth. Look around dennis' website. What do you see? Links to other pro-game groups, his archives, his forums, etc. I have yet to see an ad for anything. If you're going to be a crusader of truth, learn how to speak without lying through your teeth. Thanks.
One has to wonder: Would that fact that he keeps ‘going’ be because he’s full of crap?

Makes sense. The constant stream of BS leaving his mouth would keep him at a constant velocity. Not to mention the fact that he has high inertia due to being full of shit.
John Bruce,
"e-tard"
Inigo Montoya (The Princess Bride): You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=etard

You fail. Oh, and get used to THAT word (fail). You've heard it a lot already regarding your own life and career. Expect it more and more.

Rest assured, that even if you meant it in that way, there is no factual proof that anyone here uses Ecstacy. Which means you are, once again, making false and fraudulent claims against others. And, as usual, that seems to be an acceptable tactic to be used in the name of your God. And since no honorable, ethical God would advocate lying and deceiving others, I'll repeat my statement that clearly you, and others who follow that exact same God, are actually worshippers of a Demon-Pretender-To-The-Throne-Of-Heaven. I really must contact the leader of your church to verify this. If, in fact, your entire church worships such a being knowningly and intentionally, and is "mentally molesting children" (your phrase I believe) with the obscene abominations of Demon worship, then the rest of your community needs to know. Seriously, worship of a Demon who promotes lying and deceiving others, possibly among other unethical and harmful acts, places the community at large in danger. After all, everyone knows that Demon worship is "harmful to minors". Maybe the DA should seek banning children from your church under the Public Nuisance laws you like to toss about.

(Now, as an intelligent being, I would never really deny any Parent teaching their own children whatever religious beliefs they want, even if it included bigotry, hate, ignorance, lying, and deceiving others, among other acts and beliefs. But, at the same time, I would certainly want to know about such organized teachings so that I can protect my own child by having them stay away from such families that I feel would abuse my own child verbally, mentally, physically, perhaps even sexually. Nevertheless, since John Bruce feels that a theocratic dictatorship run by him is acceptable, it seems only fair to counter his argument with similar ones.)

Amazing how the uninformed use of a single word can lead to a long rant, eh?

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
you is a hoot jack thompson
I actually worry about Jack's son, I mean he's using him to do his dirty work and just the other day it was confirmed that he's got an obsession with "kiddies" and gay porn. Hey, Jack, the "e-tard" here is you. You're covered here and in the real world where you're just plain retarded. Only you could think submitting hardcore gay porn to the court would have something to do with your case and that it'd help somehow, and now you're in hot water over it. Screw the retard comment, you're just a dumb fuck.

Just do yourself a favor and come out of the closet and while you're at it stop using your son to do your dirty work for you. You're fucking up his life as it is.
I feel sorry for Jack's son, because clearly jack wont let him play the evil games.

JT: "Get your coat son, We're going to get you a copy of halo 3!"
JT Jr: "Wow thanks dad, my friends will be so jealous"
JT: "And then we can burn it when we're done."

Its like his modest proposal, offering money to charity and then not giving it. Only I feel this is more cruel, its exploiting his own son and both crushing his hopes to play popular games and destroying any chance of a meaningful father-son bond.

Jack, that makes you one huge asshole, enjoy hell when you get there.
get back to downloading gay porn thompson.
I live right by the Dadeland Station Target. It's the same shopping center as the Best Buy that Thompson's son bought Bioshock. It sounds to me that he first sent the kid to Best Buy, then after being checked for ID, the son was sent to Target.

Like another person commented here, Thompson probably dropped his son off at several stores before finally hitting paydirt.
“Miami attorney and anti-violent video game activist today did a successful sting on Target Corporation” -Thompson

So, Jack, tell us more about this “today” person. -LoopyChew

“today” is an adverb in the above sentence. thanks for the proof that games have made you into an e-tard. -Thompson

Ignoring the fact that LoopyChew’s remark was obviously a joke, perhaps you should bone up on your capitalization rules before giving us syntax lessons.

You don’t play games so what’s your e-tardation excuse?


Andrew Eisen
@Jack-Off Thompson

Did you and your son look at some gay porn together when you went back home?
John Bruce, if what you claim is true: your son actually bought a copy of Halo 3 at Best Buy, why don't you sit down and give it a try with him?

Knock on the door to his room, a frosty can of Pepsi in each hand, and ask him if he'd actually like to play Halo 3, and if you could both do it together. You can bond as you blast your way through Covenant soldiers. You can laugh if the ragdoll physics does something interesting to an alien solder. You can work together as a team to make your way through a desolate battlefield teeming with Brutes equiped with deadly Spike Rifles. You can ruffle his hair when he figures out a difficult puzzle. You be be your son's friend.

Jack, you might actually like it. It's a scary thing, actually liking something that you've been vehemently hating for so long, but just try it out. I'm not trying to be a dick, and I'm not trying to draw you out or anything. My comments are in no way sarcastic, but honest. I may be one of the few gamers in the world who doesn't actually want you to die, but rather open your eyes to all the good things that games can do, and all the good times they can provide.

I'm serious, Jack. Try it out. Play it with your son. And when you're done for the evening, reflect on what you guys accomplished. You'll be surprised, and I bet you'll be at his bedroom door again the next night, wanting to continue to finish the fight :)
Hey Jack, I thought Halo 3 wasn't due out until Oct 25? Also, it seems Extra Life still has that Photoshop thing going on.

Laugh your ass off.
i feel sorry for his son,having a dad like that
i wonder if he makes his son do it, or if he has brain washed his son into hating games and he does it willingly?
either way, his son needs a different dad
Jack, please stop using your son to further your own political agenda. It's not his fault his father is a myopic bible-thumper with no real perspective and an inability to really understand what "personal responsibility" means. Please don't screw him up anymore.
So his point is this: if you are a terrible parent, your child can get M-rated games. For someone that is so often labelled a "conservative whack-job," the idea of forcing the government to do your parenting is pretty liberal. The point of game ratings isn't to prevent retail from selling games - it's to inform parents of the game's contents so they can decide for (or god forbid WITH) their children what is appropriate. So I guess Jack wins, by proving that with terrible presumptions and twisted facts, you can make your point completely unarguable and yourself detestable.
@Oni

That, my friend, was brilliant. I'm also one of the gaming community that doesn't outright hate JT. I actually feel sorry for him more than anything else. What you suggested was a great idea. I add my voice to it and call on him to sit down with his son and play Halo 3, might be the most fun he's ever had.
I'm tempted to think that the retailers in Miami are just selling games to Jack's son out of spite, then they card everyone else.

I'm kinda scared for Jack's kid the same way I'm scared for Brittney Spears' children. I shudder to think how his mind is being contorted without a proper responsible parent.
The question is...

...how many stores in the Miami area did Thompson visit before finding one that'd sell his kid the game?

TJ: "My dad's been driving me around all day, he smells weird and he's been muttering under his breath about traitors and pigs. I really wanna go home and finish my homework. Can you please just give me the fucking game, lady?"

...

JT: "Did you get it son?"

TJ: "Yeah, dad. They didn't even card me, honest. Can we go home now?"

JT: "AH-HA! I am vivified! Let's go home before your mother realizes I pulled you from school for this... I'll make my Dennis-sweetie write up an article as a monument to my fox-like cleverness!"

...
@AgnostoTHeo

Ok I get that you are a JT fan, but that doesn't mean we all need to hear when he takes a dump. Can you really call this article news? How many times has an article EXACTLY like this(besides game name) been on GP? Its getting silly...I don't want or need to hear every little detail about JT. Especially something THIS stupid. If I were to do the same thing would I get my own article?

Look I'm all for JT being in an article if its something actually newsworthy, but so much thats not gets through. Don't read the article? Sure I generally skip over them, but when i have to skip over a number of pointless JT articles to get to real news its silly.

Sorry, but I started reading this site because it had relevant articles all the time about things that matter. This while it may be relevant to games it DOES NOT MATTER at all...not even a little.

Dennis if this site went to a news site to a "Jack is becoming even more wacko and some news on the side" let me know. Change the name or the site or add a disclaimer...Then I will know what to expect....
Wow you guys sure let Jack Thompson troll the hell out of you guys
@bayushisan

I outright hate Fag Thompson. Not because he is an (ineffective) anti-game Attorney(and your not). I hate him because he is a biblewhore.
Guys guys guys, JT is not as despicable as you think. Yeah, he's a dickhead, but are his conspiracy theories out of this world and does he have a track record of murder (German kid incident) and ruining youths' lives like a certain other game hater?

At least JT knows what enjoyment is. Larouche doesn't even approve of CHESS.
Okay, how's this theory for all this ridiculousness lately:

Jack Thompson is actually completely sane, for the past 20 years he's been trying to see just how far someone who scape-goats something new can go before they get themselves debarred.

He already knows he can lie to judges, people, and basically everyone else, so now he's sending out Gay porn and making vaguely homoerotic comments towards Dennis.

I wonder what's next?
I expect you sent the game back too. No? Well, you didn't give him the money for it did you? Oh, you did?

And you have the right practise law why?
Jack Thompson=christian scum
How does Jack think his son buying a game at Target is relevant at all? Yeah he bought an M rated game, congrats. I bet at the same store he could buy an R rated movie? Does that mean Hollywood is selling "porn to children" Jack?
@Mutantemeco

I happen to be a Christian myself dude. Lets not insult an entire group of people just because you don't happen to like what they stand for. After all that's exactly what JT himself does.
Something odd just occurred to me. How many lawyers, o I'm sorry, how many "attorneys" feel the need to send out "press releases"?? (As if their personal crusade makes them celebrities?) I wonder who/what are on Jack Thompson's "press list"? I wonder how he feels he's helping his case?
JT wrote:
"'today' is an adverb in the above sentence. thanks for the proof that games have made you into an e-tard."

So what's your excuse, Jack? Were you not taught proper grammar and punctuation in school, because I don't see any commas in your original post, nor do I see any capital letters at the beginning of those sentences. You also neglected to use your own name, thereby making "today" the proper noun in your release, not an adverb.

How your little press release should have read is "Miami attorney and anti-violent video game activist, Jack Thompson, today did a successful sting on Target Corporation." You could also have put your own name in front of your title separated by a comma. I'm surprised you missed an opportunity to write your own name out!

If you're going to attempt to mock someone for having a poor grasp of the English language, you might want to get a better grasp of it yourself. All your press releases read like they were written by your 15-year-old son.

Also, for your "sting" to be successful, it needs to have some impact other than another bill that will inevitably be deemed unconstitutional. The only thing you've been successful at thus far is becoming the butt of jokes for the entire gaming community. Thanks, Jack! Endless hours of entertainment and we don't have to pay you a dime for it! I especially like it when you allow us a little window into your fantasy world where everything you do is "big trouble" for the gaming industry and where you are never under scrutiny. Then again, they say that crazy people don't know they're crazy.
@ Mutantemeco

i'm a christian, and i've played quite a few of the games that JT criticises, without moral qualm. when i play online, i see my christianity saying i should try and promote friendly, fair gameplay.
i would hope that no one see's Jack Thompson as a typical christian.
JT uses more offensive language and says more hurtful things than ANYONE i know who says they're a christian. and a few satanists actually...
@bayushisan

I'm sorry to hear that.

P.S. Fight fire with fire.
@mutantemeco

fight fire with water.
@ Mutantemeco

When we fight fire with fire, everyone gets burned.
@Christian gamers.

In my eyes your are a fellow gamer first. I don't care what you worship or about who your savior is.
@Mutantemeco

When we put Things before People, that's when we're failing as christians. the point of games is to play and have fun, God or faith need not impact at all in the gaming community, but the values i play by, as a christian gamer, i would hope, ensure that everyone has a GG.
@Christian Scum.

You know who you are..