Tivo Alert! ...Law & Order SVU Episode: "Avatar"

October 2, 2007 -
When TV cop shows air a video game theme, it's almost never good news for the reputation of the gaming community.

Rather like a Jack Thompson press release, TV drama plots generally portray gamers as either completely geeked out, obsessive or stone-cold teen killers.

So we'll keep our fingers crossed as we await tonight's episode of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. Here's the capsule version of the story line:
A woman involved in virtual reality video games goes missing, and her "avatar" is at the root of the investigation.

You can tell this is mainstream stuff, because, where you and I would just say avatar, they say "avatar" ...

GP: Thanks to GamePolitics reader marc for the tip!

Comments

Kaisis, something tells me that's unlikely.

I'm just pissed that Richard Beltzer was nowhere to be seen in the whole episode. What good is a pop culture episode if he's not there to inform and mock the whole thing?

I caught the last 15 minutes of the show without really meaning to, only staying because I'd heard about it beforehand. Technologicialy and graphicly, anyway, they did not use SL as a model. The interface looked like that of old Myst games but with limited camera zoom and pan. The 3d didn't even look as nice as Myst, somewhat cartoonish and even a skilled SL creator could have done better, but I suspect they were done on the cheep. Then again it had things it didn't have; an offline avatar sleeping in a bed, objects casting correct shadows, etc. And apparently the writer never heard of SL's "Force Sun" option. Anything technical that happened seemed to be on the level of tap several keys and wave a magic wand. ("I can write a program to compare the virtual reality landscape to RL geographical data...give me five minutes!")

I can't speak much to the plot, except that the acting sucked and everything seemed incredibly contrived, if creepy. But it's a show that deals exclusively with sex crimes...is anyone really surprised at the subject matter?

let us pray for a good portrayal...

Meh they find killers in all walks of life why the PC nastzisim over this eh?

Law & Order: SVU is such a freakin' joke...

Mostly video games + tv series = bad.

i still remember the cringeworthy X-files episode entitled FPS.

That one was extramely really stupid...

Wasn't this also the plot of a Criminal Intent episode?

Anyone got the airtime?

I have nightmares about the CSI:Miami episode...(shudders)

10pm Eastern, 9pm Central on NBC.

From the previews, it looks based on Second Life.

I'm hoping that the main thrust of the episode is that the victim's killer made contact with them through the game they were playing, then leading to the cops going through the records, asking whether it's classified subscriber information in an effort to track the person down.

Confidentiality and the dangers of the internet would be a good modern storyline for a cop drama. I can only hope that they portray it realistically, ie. a murderer who uses this online social network to find victims, and not some silly tale about a normal person who becomes a murderer by playing the game ("Your honour, the harvard brain scans show it!").

Worst case scenario? The killer turns out to be someone who missed a roll for some zomg epix and tracked down the winner. "We present exhibit A your honour, the Sword of a Thousand Truths"!

Reminds me of one CSI episode(not sure which one, maybe New York?), and I can't remember it all(brain is too tired to make google work).

One female CIS character asked if the suspected killer had played the GTA games.

The guy replies something along the line that the suspected girl is a child prodigy.

Same female character then says something like "Well, I play them and think they are fun."

... So who knows where this one will go.

Ah, online avatars. It's nice to see TV catching up with the 1997's internet.

From the commercials that were on last night, it seems that the villain was meeting girls in some online sex game and then going after them. So the game was not anything main stream, but they will probably demonize all games.

I don't know much more than that.

I hate the Law & Order series. One of them literally let a young girl (age 6-9) get away with the murders of a young boy (I forget how but I remember she then put a battery in his mouth in order to "defribillate" him) and a cat (unrelated to the case but was something she admitted to, she didn't seem to regret it as she went into detail). She hated boys because she knew her mother was having sex with a new one each day.
How PETA missed this I don't know.

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

they have done a "games made me do it" episode before, based on that GTA killer incident. the end scene however has the DA destroying the "games made me do it" defense in court. not bad but only the last 10 minutes could be considered a positive thing for the image of most gamers and the gaming community as a whole.

It's SVU, so there'll be a rapist, etc. The episode sounds to be based upon sexual MMOs that have been coming out quietly on the internet.

I doubt this will be that bad. From what I've seen of Law & Order: SVU, the male cop will spend the whole episode questioning his daughters internet access. The other characters will likely express the gambit of opinions on the internet (a few will support it). In the end, the only person who will look bad is the criminal.

I hope.

I saw a commercial for this last night, I think it was supposed to be about a stalker who tracks a girl down via her online avatar on an online 3d sex game. I think.

@jonc2006

Yeah, that was the first thing I thought of when I read the headline.

@ Gameboy

Hehe...that sounds about right, actually =)

I've seen prime time dramas do video game episodes that weren't bad. JAG comes to mind (the ep was about a programmer for the U.S. military who basically stole software when he left the service and then got hired by a developer, where he used it to make an FPS...really didn't cast games in a bad light, just that one guy). But that GTA ep of SVU made my blood boil.

Somehow I doubt it'll portray them in a bad light. I've seen another episode involving a very GTA-esque game. Dr Wong (the psychiatrist) pretty much says the game defense is bullshit, and the defense attorney in the episode always pulls out bat-shit defenses. I know in one episode, he tried to classify racism as a mental defect, and in another, he tried to justify a hate crime by someone's genes.

And as jonc put it, the last 10 minutes had the 'games made me do it' defense screwed.

Law and Order did a Video Game themed episode before.

And they portrayed it in a positive light. The Asian therapist for the police department had made comments that it takes more then a video game to make someone kill. And that video games are not to blame.

I only caught the end of the episode...but video games were portrayed in a positive light.

the preview to the episode kinda confused me as they mixed two separate cases together like normal. They seem to be doing a Second Life-ish game. Will be interesting, lets hope we dont have to boycott them.

I myself won't be watching it cause I got lots of other shows to watch (I especially can't wait to see how the premiere of Las Vegas is going to tie up the 50-some cliffhangers that were left at the end of last season's episode:

A robbery
An explosion
A murder
A kidnapping

and then some.

But I am interested to know how they portray games as a whole, Second Life, and so on.

Keep us posted, please! :)

~Otaku-Man

David Ikari Says:
Wasn’t this also the plot of a Criminal Intent episode?

Yea, it was the WoW-esque game in which one of the developers was the murderer, if I remember correctly. Still, all the L&O's have had video game themed episodes over the years. Most "___made me do it" plots show that claim as a last ditch effort by an obviously guilty person.

I like Law and Order but hate SVU, and well...all of them have went down in quality the past 2 or so years...

Prepare to be vilified.

Law and Order SVU goes virtual with "Avatar" episode...

Beating CSI:NY to the virtual punch, Law and Order: Special Victims Unit tonight features a sex crime linked to a remarkably Second Life-looking virtual world called AOI. As described by a character in the preview: People do everything in AOI:...

There is one show that kinda protays gamers in a better light.

Criminal minds, one of the main characters was a gamer.. though she was a bit geeky. (30-40 year old woman though)

There is one TV series that portrayed MMRPGs in a positive light: Noah and Saskia. In it, an two teens from opposite sides of the world fall in love inthe online world (very much like SL, despite being made before SL was even created), despite never actually meeting each other face to face.

Meh ... it's a TV show.

* If your a doctor and it's a medical episode, you can pick holes in it
* If your an IT specialist and it's about computers, you can pick holes in it.
* If your a teacher and it's about the classroom you can pick holes in it.
* If your a gamer ..... get the picture?

I'm a big nut for Law & Order, but not SVU overall. Unlike some of the "other" programs, the franchise is typically fair and intelligent, however.

Anyone seen the school shooting episode of Numbers? The killers played an actual school shooting simulator they created, but videogames weren't blamed for the shooting.

This isnt the first time that I SVU has done a game related episode. They had one previously related to GTA where a person beat up a hooker. They didnt buy the video game defense in that episode but this is a new episode so we shall see.

Watching now...

"Another Youniverse", looks like a Second Life parody.

lmfao, the cops are drawing outrageous accusations that people are partners in crime because their avatars have hung out four times.

It looks like from the commercials, that a pervert was going around and cybering with teenage girl's. Then he goes and finds them, kidnaps them, and possibly kills them also. Hooray for good press.
Quote from commercial:
"You had her in the virtual world, so you wanted her in the real world too! Didn't you?!"

Episode's over. They manage to remain neutral, not accusing the game of anything. It's just a means for some kidnapper to relive a past offense. No sensationalism like CBS and CSI would do.

@ Sean

Yeah, I saw it. IIRC the girl masterminded the whole thing to pay back a few students that were responsible for her rape at the hands of a jock, because the mathematician found that one of the shooters were targeting certain people as opposed to randomly shooting people.

....I'm watching it now. It's also the first time I've watched this show and will probablly be the last. Hate it with a passion, but I'm forcing myself to watch it just to find out how they portray it.

SVU is my favorite of the Law & Order series, but this episode is not good at all.

Just finished watching it.

It wasn't that bad, The graphics were years out of date, and the MMO both had too much information on it's people (Meetings with Avatars) and way too little (A Cabin you can't see from above? CHANGE THE COLOR OF THE GROUND. Or something, geez.)

Yeah, that is pretty much crap.

My favorite part is how the killer coordinated where he kept the girl on the game with where he kept the girl in real life. That sounds EXACTLY like what a killer would.
Also:
"But I can't turn the sun on in the game to help catch a killer! It might scare people on the game!"

Side note: Yes the CSI Miami game episode was wretched. (IMO, so is the rest of the Miami spinoff) But on the Vegas side, Nick and Warrick are apparently casual gamers: there was one brief scene long ago where Girssom chewed the two out for playing Madden (or insert fictional equivilant) on the clock. ;)

@ Playitbogart: Munch is barely even in a lot of the newer episodes. A shame, too. He'd be awesome in this episode, but it appears they've had him neutered.

I have about 100 ways I could pick the episode apart, both positive and negative, but I'll let that slide for the most part. I thought it was a decent episode, if a little behind. I am wondering though if the writers picked up a little on the stories about rape charges in SL. Can anyone find any proofing or production dates?

And I do want to say two things:
1) Positive point: They showed, on a few levels, that games can be used constructively.

2) Negative point: The image of games as a cesspool of debauchery and perversion wasn't helpful.

Overall, I think a fairly neutral episode.

-Mike Schwinger

Saw the episode and I believe it remained neutral quite nicely. If we analyze it even further, a lot can be said about media in general and quite frankly i like the episode.

I should probably give my opinion in my blog and not rant it here.

Oh yeah, THAT was a creepy ending.

And it wasn't the game that he was addicted to. It was "youth". Not "young" people, but "young LOOKING" women. Or, rather, young looking women who looked like young Lauren.

But cripes! He's got that look down, doesn't he? The revulsion. The insanity. Oh yeah, he's got those solid.

I see insanity plea in the future for that character.

Nightwng2000
NW2K software
Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
james_fudgesome states have "at will" employee laws10/20/2014 - 7:50am
quiknkoldIt says in the article that being in florida, you can get fired regardless if its a fireable offence10/20/2014 - 7:19am
Michael ChandraIf your employee respectfully disagrees with your advice, that's not a fireable offense. If they ignore your order, THEN you have the right to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 6:49am
Michael ChandraI... Don't get one thing. If you do not want your employee to do X, why do you tell them it's advice or a wish? Give them a damn order.10/20/2014 - 6:48am
james_fudgeA leak that had me worried about being swatted by Lizard Squad.10/20/2014 - 6:03am
james_fudgeIt should be noted that the author leaked the GJP group names online10/20/2014 - 6:03am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician