Ouch! Someone Wasn't Impressed By Hodge's LGF Comments

Ouch! Someone Wasn't Impressed By Hodge's LGF Comments

November 2, 2007
In its recent coverage of  British Culture Minister Margaret Hodge’s address to U.K. game industry types at the recent London Games Festival, MCV had a rather positive take.

As writer Stuart Dinsey put it:
Whilst forthright in her view that tax incentives for UK games businesses are unlikely, and insistent that legislation would be changed if self-regulation was deemed to be failing, Hodge was generally positive about the contribution games are making to the creative industries.

But not everyone in attendance saw it that way.  One unnamed senior executive told GamesIndustry.Biz:
With Margaret Hodge, I felt she wasn't listening, she said her piece and left. She's not going to be any use to this industry.  I felt her mind was closed and she didn't care. Maybe I'm wrong, I would love to be proven wrong. But the impression I got was a whole load of key gaming executives wasted an afternoon there.

We had an interesting talk afterwards between ourselves but I felt Margaret Hodge snubbed us and it's a real shame.

Hodge’s entire address can be viewed here.

-Reporting from San Diego, GP Correspondent Andrew Eisen

Comments

stupid brits
Bite me.... you really dont know what a cross/equals sign means?

It means "does not equal".

Moron :)
"Margaret! Margaret!"

What?

"The Game Industry wants to know if you mean what you said. Did you?"

No!

"She says no."
Is she picking her nose in that picture?
@blackice

either that or snorting cocaine
That explains the utterly hysterical look on her face..
That photo is pure, undatulterated winnage, seriously.

It's amusing, someone in the game industry has said what thousands of persons have said, that politicians don't really care when they say they care and that they only care about looking and sounding good in front of people.
@Anonymous
wait, i thought that's what politicians were for....
Wow. I live in the UK and can tell you that your worst fears are right. she won't listen, she will just pay lip service to the report and then cow tow to the majority of the tech fearing public. I mean come on, Tanya Byron leading the report? A celeb phychologist working for the government? These so called celebs often don't have the qualifications they say they do (take note Gillian Keith). this is a hiding to nothing folks.
Considering what is said of her position here:

http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/arts_entertainment/media/uk+video+...

I know she is not in any way supportive of the game industry and would not trust her as far as I could throw and freight train.
she is snorting cocaine because england sucks because they ban games
.......

Oh do shut up bite me. Manhunt 2 /= every game.
manhunt 2 divided by equals every game is not a mathmatical statement
moron
suck it
Engilish are a bunch of F***ERS
my spelling sucks
@bite me

Without us, you're country wouldn't exist. Silly Arse..
@ BlackIce

Actually, without the British, we would be speaking Dutch. :)

@ bite me

You are not contributing to anything. Please stop.
@bite me

You phail. End of story. A quintuple post just for attention is sad, and you need to grow up.

Anyways, she seems like a poitician, say one thing, do another (that satisfies the majority of voters).
@ bite me

No you.
To All Brits:

We, the American people, are willing to state that "bite me" does not represent the American public's view of the British if you are willing to state that Margaret Hodge does not represent the British public's view of gaming.

(This statement will be official once I locate Jack Thompson to notarize it.)
@McDaddy

That's okay. We like trolls on GP. We currently have about three.
Margaret Hodge doesn't represent the views of the UK people.
She is the definition of nanny state.
Is she anyone important enough that what she says matters? I haven't heard of her before, though I tend not to pay too much attention to people over a certain elevation in government as they tend to say/do what will keep them in their job and earning money.
Really good and really interesting post. I expect (and other readers maybe :)) new useful posts from you!
Good luck and successes in blogging!

Post new comment

By posting comments on this Web site you agree to abide by the Comments Policy.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This image is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The letters in the picture are all UPPER-CASE.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 07/06/08 at 01:57pm
BlackIce: It might be just a bit too late now.
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:07pm
Shadow Darkman Anti-Thesis of: Jack, Jack, Jack... When will you learn?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:38am
tallimar: hmm... youre right, im not getting the right mind frame... "YOU WILL LIKE FRIES WITH THAT!" how's that?
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:36am
gameman9: Nah, he will just scare the customers.
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:35am
tallimar: i think jack's new line may end up being "would you like fries with that?"
Posted 07/06/08 at 11:00am
Adamas Draconis: His fave line. Always thought it should be "They've got me right where I want them."
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:43am
gamepolitics: he's got 'em right where he wants 'em,LOL
Posted 07/06/08 at 10:30am
Silencets: It was a great idea. Just another step in the overarcing master plan off JT...we little people wouldn't understand....
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:35am
Jack Wessels: Yeah I knew that part. I'm just amazed at whatever thought process led him to think that was a good idea.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:33am
gamepolitics: actually, he also sent similar material to the FL Supreme Court about 6 months before that
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:24am
Jack Wessels: for him and would somehow get Kent in trouble.
Posted 07/06/08 at 08:23am
Jack Wessels: @GP: Wow, I've skimmed that one before, but I never noticed that JT actually thought this was good news....
Posted 07/06/08 at 04:40am
gamepolitics: eraser: see our original story on that:http://tinyurl.com/6nm9oe
Posted 07/06/08 at 12:21am
infect999: because he's an idiot
Posted 07/05/08 at 11:41pm
eraserheadthelynch: why did he send gay porn to the judges?
Posted 07/05/08 at 10:44pm
Jack Wessels: @Silencets: Maybe it'll come to JT soon too, so he can finally complete that show cause order....
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:30pm
Jose_Pedro_Ramirez: No one believed that the ice at the North Pole would ever melt, but...
Posted 07/05/08 at 04:28pm
Haggard: Maybe he thought the judges would appreciate it?
Posted 07/05/08 at 03:27pm
Silencets: I'm sure JT had a perfectly good reason sending gay porn....It'll come to me any day now...
Posted 07/05/08 at 02:54pm
Grendal: once you send gay porn to judges, I'm comfortable calling you crazy
Login or register to post shouts