Target Rumored to Be Pulling Manhunt 2 From Stores

November 4, 2007 -
Consider this item way unofficial at this point, but PSP Updates is reporting on a rumor that Target will stop selling Manhunt 2.

Here's what PSP Update wrote in a story posted early this morning:
Reports have come in that Target is pulling Manhunt 2... A member of the Evil Avatar forums, Dr. Finger, said that he got news of an internal memo spreading within the company which states that every branch will stop selling the game and to refuse all future deliveries of the title for all systems.

If true, the move would appear to be in response to bad publicity the game has received in recent weeks. It's certainly not beyond the realm of possibility.

Should Target pull the game, it would seem likely that some other retailers may follow suit.

Indeed, as mentioned in the Evil Avatar post, the Manhunt 2 listing on the Target website says:
This item is available online, but is not available in stores.

Comments

@ Black Manta,

I agree with you but at the same time I think this, if true, could start a dangerous trend toward the banning/pulling of other M rated games. Once you ban on one M rated game it just makes it that much simpler to keep the trend going.

To keep it out of the hands of children is the responsibility of the parents. You don't want them to have it? DON"T BUY IT FOR THEM OR ALLOW THEM TO PURCHASE IT. Parenting 101 - "Parents make the rules, no exceptions".

I wish these "watchdog groups" would stop trying to destroy my rights as a parent.

Its true. I work at Target and we received specific notice to not accept shipments of Manhunt 2, and to send back any that we have received.

I would post the report if I didn't have the day off, haha, but I'm sure as hell not going back there on my day off. It sucks.

@ Shawn S,
Do you know if Target has already purchased the game but is refusing it? Or is it that they pay their share when they sell a copy of the game?

"However, wouldn’t you think that allowing poor sales due to a badly done game would teach a better lesson to developers than boosting interest in a bad game and also triggering a huge and costly legal war over protected free expression? I think the latter generates more losers than winners."

I agree with you. This is rapidly turning into "25 to life part two."

@Jabrwock:

My point exactly.

Actually, if it's only available online, and you need to use a credit card to buy online, kids really can't get it.

"Eh, his opinion and he’s free to have it."


I didn't say he wasn't allowed to have that opinion. But my opinion is shared by the people who wrote reviews for the game. Manhunt tanked, and would be a bargain bin game right now if it wasn't riding on the coat tails of controversy that Thompson and Yee are spreading.

Its so amusing that because of Jack drawing attention to it, that it is in the hands of more minors than it otherwise would have been. Irony is amusing.

How many people who want to play Manhunt 2 actually buy their video games at Target, or any department store at that? I suspect there are very few.

Sorry if this is a double post I don't see it coming up.

I hate posting as Anon. but gotta keep my job. Target is in fact refusing all Manhunt 2 shipments. The DPCI it refers to specifically comes up in the system as the PS2 version.

Here is the Internal Target Memo in all its glory:

11/02/07 Manhunt 2 Shipment

Electronics, Guest Service (Front End), Receiving Chargebacks

Issue 1

Manhunt 2 (207.12.1742) is a new video game releasing this week. It is currently on the way to stores. The game has been identified as having graphic nature and we have decided not to carry this title. The vendor, Take Two Games, has agreed to take back the title.

Action 1

Please REFUSE shipments of Manhunt 2 (207.12.1742). It will be coming direct to store on PO 5208023. DO NOT, in any circumstance, put this title on shelves.

Action Due Date

11/03/2007

mw

[...] Filed under: Rumors [...]

@ Pandralisk

How the hell are Target and conservatives or religion for that matter in any why mentioned or even conected with the article? Honestly Pandralisk, you can have some good opinions and insight on matters, all we ask is that you leave your twisted views on religion out of it.

If true, then Take Two should sue them, being that they've broken an agreement on selling M rated games.

Somehow i doubt this... though i hate to see the watchdog groups gloating, even prematurely.

@Doggyspew: TakeTwo can't control what Target (or any other store) decide to sell or to not sell.


I don't really care. There are hundreds of other places to get the game and the only people losing out here are Target.

I believe it. Frankly, I think they're probably the first of more to start pulling it. Honestly, I came real close on friday to picking up the dang game on friday myself if only to find out what the hubbub is about.

I'm starting to think we ought to close Rockstar. The quality of the games they make isn't high enough to offset the PR damage they cause.

If true, it would be a sign that certain retailers give in easily to fear mongering, fraud, lies, deceit, and corruption of various individuals and and so-called "morally superior" organizations.

One could easily use similar inflammatory statements as the "morally superior" individuals and organizations and state that such retailers are clearly against Freedom of Speech, against the US Constitution, against the First Amendment, against everything that the US Constitution stands for, and in favor of an Anti-American dictatorship, just like those individuals and organizations who falsely and fraudulently claim to be aginst censorship and "only protecting children" when, in fact, their pressure to violate the Rights of citizens of the US is clearly acts of Anti-American forces within the US.

Hey, if they can make all sorts of false inflammatory statements against those who SUPPORT the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech, it only seems fair to make TRUE inflammatory statements against those who are openly AGAINST Freed of Speech, AGAINST the US Constinution, and even AGAINST Parent's Rights to make their OWN decisions regarding their OWN children. They can lie and deceive people all they want, claiming that they offered less severe actions, but their OWN actions PROVE otherwise.

Do retailers have the Right to carry or not carry a product? Of course they do. HOWEVER, when the claimed justification is inconsistant with the carrying of other similar products, one has to wonder what the TRUTH is. Let them make up whatever justification they want. To date, the only TRUE excuse is bowing to Anti-US-Constitution forces attempting to create and Anti-American dictatorship. Let those who are in favor of a dictatorship come to Target's defense all they want. They just show their TRUE stances by lying and deceiving the general public with all sorts of false claims.

As I said, if Target were consistant in its actions, that would be one thing. Not to mention that facts about the content of Manhunt 2 were known months ago, before they started ordering. So, let them cover up with whatever false excuses they can. The Truth, The WHOLE Truth, and Nothing But The Truth will always win out.

Nightwng2000
NW2K Software
Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

[...] check the full story here [...]

"I’m starting to think we ought to close Rockstar. The quality of the games they make isn’t high enough to offset the PR damage they cause."


Grand Theft Auto 4?

Damn now R* won't make as much money. Stupid paranoid stores.

R* won't lose any money. Anyone who is planning on buying the game will buy it anyway, they'll just go somewhere else to do it. Like I said; the only people losing out are Target.

Somehow I doubt that the loss of a few of the massively over-expected sales they'll get as a result of all this hype will bother R*.

It's not as if they're short a few bob.

Target waited for the reviews to come in, then said, "Oh, it's not gonna sell all that great. Looks like a good time for a PR stunt."

Or, and this is just MY idea on why they're taking the game down, they don't want to get sued when a parent buys this game for their kid, and then sues them for DARING to sell her kid such a violent game.

I understand the selling it online only as it is a way for thm to placate the critcs whilst still put it out for the target audience.
If they pull it completely it is a pointless excercise as they will get criticised by their customers for bowing to pressure and in-store censorship.

So Target is selling the game, but not really selling the game.

Talk about hypocritical. Taking the game off the stores will allow them to spout all the family values crap they want while they're still reaping profits selling the game online.

That's the third major retailer that still has the Rating Pending logo showing for this product. BestBuy.ca still has it (and also says " If you’re under 18, don’t even bother thinking about it. We’re not selling you a copy. ") as does Futureshop.ca (who also says "Parents - if you haven't figured it out yet, this isn't for your kids under 18, so please don't buy it for them, okay? Thanks.")

So, is it possible that BestBuy & Futureshop are enforcing an Adults Only rating despite the ESRB recommending M17+?

Manhunt 2 doesn't seem to be selling well anyways, considering theyve sold like 3 at the local Gamestop, and none at Blockbuster. I was really thinking about renting Manhunt 2 just to see what everyone is crying about

i am in no way supportive of what rockstar or take 2 does/creates, but if target or any other store for that matter, is not going to sell the game based on its content or crap they have heard from these fanatical "watchdog" groups, then they need to stop selling all M rated games, movies, etc, NO EXCEPTIONS.

what they are doing is pulling a double standard and separating manhunt from a group that it really isnt any different from. while its their right to decide what they want to sell and not sell, its really unfair to both rockstar and the consumer if they are going to single out this one game when there are countless other games and movies that share similar content. i may not care for manhunt myself but this is really pushing the line.

I'd never make a mass retailer my first selection for buying a game anyway, Target, Walmart, whomever, unless they had some kind of price advantage.

For example, when Unreal Tournament 3 comes out later this month, I'll head to Fry's electronics to buy it...

@gs2005

Is Fry's selling it for cheaper?

Are we going to see the ECA comment on the Manhunt2 issues and this if it turns otu to be true? While I appreciate most posters comments here I would like to see what the ECA has to say on all of this as well.

@chadachada

Really? Every Best Buy / Circuit city / EB games in my local area is all sold out. I ended up having to order it online

the thing is, these stores are giving in to the half truths and panic caused by the watchdog groups. they use the "protect the children" excuse but i feel that is just an incredibly sleazy cop-out and they use it because they are incapable of coming up with a REAL reason that people would listen to. they are playing off the emotion of fear that they know everyone has, and exploit it by claiming it is harmful to something they know everyone tries to protect.

The stores have a right to decide what to sell and what not to sell. That being said, if this is the result of the "morally superior" watchdog groups (and I believe it is), then this a violation of free speech and an example of defamation. Take Two deserves better than this and Target is holding a double standard here. They, just like the other retailers, sell games like God of War, Mortal Kombat, Grand Theft Auto, and so forth. Although they are not as bloody as Manhunt 2, that is not the point. An M-rated game is an M-rated game through and through. Target, while having the right to choose what to sell, should never refuse to sell anything because of false and/or blown-out-of-proportion information put out by watchdog, "morally-conscious" groups.

You know, even if this news is true and if Target is indeed pulling this game and if others will do the same, I'm still not getting it. Rockstar's tactic of artificially inflating sales by creating controversy (and thanks in no small part to the antics of said watchdog groups and other people we could mention in doing it) isn't going to work on me this time. They got me with Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (I got the original edition before it was pulled when Hot Coffee broke), and they got me with Bully, but that was also because behind all the controversy they were still good games when all was said and done.

Manhunt 2 has no appeal to me in any way. Aside from maybe being able to play a guy who looks like Chester Bennington, it's a stealth game and I hate stealth games. Not even the gory kills as a reward would be enough to make me consider. There are lots of other more worthwhile games out there to spend my time and money on. I'd rather hack and slash monsters in Hellgate: London, blast aliens in the PC port of Gears of War, put one between the eyes of the North Koreans in Crysis, fight with my friends in Team Fortress 2, command intergalactic armies in Universe at War: Earth Assault or duel with Slash in Guitar Hero III than pick up this dreck. It's all about voting with your pocketbook.

I was at the VGXpo yesterday where I got to see Moral Kombat which turned out to be a very good film. At one point someone (I forget who. Henry Jenkins I think) Says that at some point Rockstar will make a game and people will go, "You've gone too far." And they'll say, "OK, we've gone too far." I think this is that point. I'm still all for free speech and I will stand by the right of developers to make whatever game they want, but when a company has to generate publicty in order to sell what turns out to be a bad or mediocre game, I'm not going to support them.

I could make a great many false and inflammatory statements about this.

But then I'd be Jack Thompson.

@Spellchk

Fry's Electronics has a first-day sale for many items. You have to GO to the store though. For example, I bought Unreal Tournament 2004 for $19 brand new. I'm guessing that the DVD version of Unreal Tournament 3 will come in at $40 or less.

This applies to DVD's as well, especially boxed sets.

Of course, the prices of games do come down eventually, but if you want to get something new and not pay a premium, I have yet to see a store offer something better than what Fry's does.

Note-I do all my shopping at the one in Fremont. You'll just have to go to Fry's on November 19th and find out for yourself.

God forbid they just enforce the ratings.

That tells you one important factor. That no matter how strongly they refuse to sell it to teens, PARENTS will still think it's a kid's toy, and buy it for them anyway.

Jabrwock Says: "God forbid they just enforce the ratings.

That tells you one important factor. That no matter how strongly they refuse to sell it to teens, PARENTS will still think it’s a kid’s toy, and buy it for them anyway."

Then return the game, filing an official complaint. It never ceases to amaze me.

Regarding this story specifically, am I to assume the game is unavailable on all platforms, or does that only pertain to its PSP version?

Best Buy is making you be 18 to buy the game so why don't they allow AO games???

http://tinyurl.com/3ymcs7

Never much cared for Target anyways. Prices to high, quality and selectipn to low. Their game section is more behind the times than Walmart. Seems rather doubtful that if they do pull it that R* would care either way.

Let Target be paranoid (besides they do need to answer to their stockholders which is understandable). Wonder what other retailers that matter to games and gamers are linked to them though.

@ Retro

Tis good that you have not fallen into the pit of doom and becoming a JBT clone. Then we would probably have to shoot you to save you from your misery.

I'm truly tempted to suggest they abolish the AO rating to begin with, but that'll never happen.

I'm honestly not certain what I think about this. On the one hand, I've played the game and it's garbage. I'm not sure I support anybody buying a garbage game in the first place. However, I do understand the higher social implications of this move. Lets just see how this all plays out, the first domino has been hit.....

Personally I'm not really sure how I feel about this. I detest the lack of consistency involved but I also support the stores right to sell or not sell merchandise.

If this is true then I don't think I'll ever be stepping foot in a Target store agian.

Wouldn't this only matter if they pulled games that people wanted to play more? quite a few people appear to be buying/renting this game purely because its at the centre of a lot of publicity. from the massive amounts of screen shots, interviews, trailers etc. this doesn't even seem to be a very fun game to play.

I would imagine if Target decided to pull, for want of a more suitable word, 'better' games then they would hear a public uproar and serious business repercussions, but they must feel they wont lose too much money to make this a financially unsafe move.

Thompson takes full and complete credit for this in 10.... 9.... 8... 7....

@Kurisu7885

that made me laugh, thank you very much.

Personally I wasn't planning on getting this game and I still have no plans to do so but as someone said this is a slippery slope. Stores already won't carry games that are rated AO by the esrb, and now they will start making decisions as to what lower rated games will be sold? This is the problem with the industry as a whole...The retailers either need to tell the esrb to go to hell or get on board with them...they can't tetter totter on the edge like this.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Goth_SkunkHeh. Yes, they do. Last I checked.02/03/2015 - 6:10am
ZippyDSMleePETA must hate furries too.....02/03/2015 - 5:35am
Andrew EisenPETA has a ton of gems but my personal favorite is "by wearing the skin of an animal [it's refering to the Tanooki Suit], Mario is sending the message that it's OK to wear fur." http://gamepolitics.com/2011/11/14/peta-targets-mario-latest-campaign02/03/2015 - 3:39am
Goth_SkunkI was drawing a blank for examples of animal abuse portrayed in games and that one was the first that game to mind, due to how ridiculous it was.02/03/2015 - 3:32am
Andrew EisenAnd if anyone's wondering about the "stabbing a rat" thing, that was PETA on a sequence in Battlefield 3. http://gamepolitics.com/2011/11/07/peta-upset-over-battlefield-3-rat-backstab02/03/2015 - 3:05am
Andrew EisenJust to be clear, no one is suggesting games need to follow some inclusivity checklist, no one is asking for games to be forced to conform to any particular standards, and Sarkeesian and her ilk also want more from games, not less.02/03/2015 - 3:04am
Goth_SkunkI am all for getting games to explore more issues as they get larger in scope, but I am *not* in favour of them being forced to conform to standards of political correctness. I want *more* from my games, not *less.*02/03/2015 - 3:01am
Goth_SkunkBut nitpicking about things like Damsel tropes, or meeting a non-white, non-hetero character quota, or stabbing a rat to crawl through a pipe is a ridiculous waste of time, in this member's opinion.02/03/2015 - 2:56am
Goth_SkunkGames *do* have messages and meaning. And not all of them are comfortable, either. And they do so while keeping the experience enjoyable, meaningful.02/03/2015 - 2:50am
Andrew EisenThat's enough, folks.02/03/2015 - 2:11am
MechaCrashYou know what else is uncalled for? Your whiny tone policing.02/03/2015 - 1:54am
Sora-Chan@MechCrash my complaint is more direct at how you reacted. When someone is leaving you do not run up behind them and kick them in the ass out the door. Hense, what you said, was uncalled for. It doesn't matter who it is.02/03/2015 - 1:40am
Andrew EisenPlus (and I know you didn't say otherwise, I just feel it's important to point out) there's nothing wrong with discussing the elements of games that you take issue with or find problematic.02/03/2015 - 1:34am
Andrew EisenMatthew - That's one way to handle it but you'd potentially be missing out on a ton of great games. After all, just because a game has elements that may rub some the wrong way doesn't mean they aren't worth playing.02/03/2015 - 1:33am
MechaCrashSave your crocodile tears. I'm glad to be rid of the people who complain when games get treated as a form which can have messages and meanings and demand they be relegated to simplistic toys, to be played with and discarded.02/03/2015 - 1:12am
Sora-Chan@MechCrash Simpley put: Uncalled for.02/03/2015 - 1:03am
MechaCrashThank you for confirming you want games to remain the playthings of children and not art of any kind, Wonderkarp, and good riddance.02/03/2015 - 12:23am
Goth_SkunkThe tropes that bother me the most don't appear in video games: Dumb/Jerk Jock trope, Narcissitic Psycopath (when male), and Dad Is A Homophobe But Unaware Child is Homosexual.02/02/2015 - 10:22pm
prh99They can make zombie games all they want, I just wish they mix it up a bit. My use vampires etc or some Lovecraftian horrors.02/02/2015 - 10:09pm
Matthew WilsonI tend to be on the side of free markets. if you do not like a trope, do not buy a game that uses that trope.02/02/2015 - 9:59pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician