November 17, 2007
It's not often that historical military strategy games draw criticism.But, as reported by The Guardian, an upcoming release based on the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) is upsetting some folks:
A computer game that allows players to take sides in the Spanish civil war has caused outrage at a time when the country is still struggling to come to terms with the legacy of the conflict.
Shadows of War: The Spanish Civil War is the first game dedicated to the 1936-39 conflict, which cost the lives of an estimated 500,000 people and resulted in General Franco's 36-year dictatorship. It has been designed to enable players to take on the role of Franco's victorious forces or the defeated republicans.
The game's November 20th release date is apparently a point of contention. That is also the anniversary of the death of the dictator Francisco Franco, a date on which modern fascists gather to commemorate Franco and his era.
We're having a tough time locating Shadows of War on the web, but it may be the Spanish release of this product, which is described by GameSpot as a historical RTS which begins in Europe in 1936. Of the game, the Guardian writes:
Gaming websites have been full of criticism for the game, with some viewing the idea of playing the part of a fascist soldier as repellent. Others, however, welcome the chance to rewrite history and emerge victorious as a republican soldier.
Paco Perez, project director for the game told the newspaper:
As well as being entertaining, it could serve to remind people that they need to be conscious of past events to make sure they are not repeated.
However, the daughter of one of Franco's victims in the war said:
It is not a historical event buried in the past, but is very fresh in the memory of Spaniards. There is no justification for trivialising the killings and the suffering and pain of the victims when we still haven't reconciled ourselves with the past.
UPDATE: The International Herald Tribune has a more detailed report with some additional information...



Comments
They always "Wah wah wah! You cant do that cause somewhere along the line i was effected by that event!"
Like the swastika. People always get upset whenever it appears, of course not realizing that origanly it was a sort of tibentian symbol. It is soo much more than the 3-4 years it was used by nazis
There is also the cross. I remember people were upset about NWN 2 graveyards having crosses in them, because everyone sees cross as instantly christian symbol, when it is just simply two planks of wood crossing each other.
Course those are just symbols. But still... Whenever someone does something that involves something in real life, SOMEONE will always be upset. Esspecially when it involves combat cause they are always like "Its a game it trivilizes the loss of life now i cry..."
But i'm rambling a bit now..
What about those?....There are so many it's like a whole genrie yet we never hear people whine like this...
And often WW2 games do kinda show US soilders getting killed.
the "daughter" person really doesn't have an arguement. I mean there's games out there that let you play as the nazis, and that was the holocaust.
there's much bigger fish out there.
I'm fairly sure that the Second World War is very fresh in the minds of a number of people. Yet they generally don't scream about movies or games made that are based on that time. Something similar is true of the Vietnam war as well.
Indeed, as Paco Perez said up there, one of the things the game could serve to do is keep the war fresh in people minds. Which is a good thing from the standpoint that it's a reminder of past lessons learned.
After all, as someone once parodied that famous axiom about the past:
"History doesn't always repeat itself. Sometimes it merely shouts "Weren't you listening the first time?!?" and lets fly with a club."
Why if we use this logic roots is the greatest evil TV show in the history of the US!
ZOMG! how DARE people make films,movies,TV shows,,books,new stories about past events!
BF2, BF2142 and CoD4!!!!
THESE GAMES ARE TRIVIALIZING THE WARS THAT ARE GOING ON RIGHT NOW (cept 2142. That one is trivializing future wars!)
UPSET CRY!!!
/sarcassssim..
@Ace of Sevens
Actually, it wasn't. North and South Vietnam were two different nations that used to be whole. Therefore, it wasn't a civil war.
Why do you think they are seperate now?
Last I checked, Vietnam was still in one piece, Korea is the one that was split in two.
I was thinking blackice was saying that North/south korea was split.
The way i see it though.. They are split cause it was a civil war. For instance if america never resolved compleatly, they just compleatly seperated we could have north and south usa.
Plus: [Lard mode] I could swear those developers and that newspaper (+ interwiewees) work together for a shameless promotion, prove me wrong. [/Lard mode]
Actually, you'd have the Union and the Confederacy. I've always liked that word.. Confederacy..
No, North and South Korea used to be Korea, so they are split. Vietnam is whole again.
However, it does seem a rather simplified representation of the war from these reports, especially if it follows the standard RTS form of "get your troops and throw them at the others side." The politics behind the war were very intricate, considering the relations between the monarchists and fascists on one side, opposed by communists, anarchists, and republicans. If they failed to take those elements into account, it would be a very poor representation of the war.
Well, the way things worked was like this:
Korea and Vietnam were under the control of others until after WWII. Due to various political factors, when they regained their independence, they each got split into a North and a South. Eventually, the north invaded the south.
In the case of Korea, things eventually resolved so they remained seperate.
In the case of Vietnam, the north eventually conquered the south, and the two were fused into one country.
Thats cause Korea is still under civil war right now. Just it is at a stand still. Korea is still not resolved.
But for truth, isnt all wars "civil" wars?
That was one of the fun things about Lords of the Realm 2. You could play politics and the like, or you could become very brutal. I remember running in on one guys country and destroying everything. Civlians, crops, anything i could destroy. Eventually His civilians that were left revolted and threw him out of office. I came in and cleaned up the mess.
GP: LOTR2 ? Wow, great game... you're reaching back a ways into the memory bank for that one, though, no?
"Civil" War is an oxymoron.
Thats pretty much my point.
The only time War is civilized is when your playing video games of it. (sometimes)
To those of you who don't know why a civil war in your nation is different from any other kind of war... it is because it isn't your army fighting and dying against another army, it is /you/ fighting and dying, against people who a week ago were your neighbors, friends, lovers, brothers, sisters, parents... the results of this, even without a dictatorship following it, last for generations.. please, go ask the peolpe in Northern Ireland how they would feel about a video game being made that allowed people to play the IRA, the British Army, and various other factions in that recent struggle.. my father was there, and I know he would feel insulted, as would I on his behalf.... especially if it was not done with consideration. Go to the former Yugoslavia, and ask how people would like a game that allowed people to fight on various sides of their struggle... while glossing over the atrocities that were commited.
RTS games simplify war.. and civil wars are so personal that it hurts to see those details glossed over for the sake of someone's entertainment. You may not understand this, but have some compassion.. a virtue sadly lacking it seems in many of the posters in this thread.. stop for a moment and realize the effects of a civil war on a nation, and why people might be upset by this.
So spanish war a touchy subject while WWII not a touchy subject???
HA-ha-ha-ha-ha
Do you have any idea how many game let you play as nazis?????
I am glad that a strategy game is coming out that isn't about WWII since about half of them ARE...
I mean common let the two sides in spain fight it out in online commetions instead of on the street brawls...
I am assuming that in Spain this subject causes on street brawls and if the subject doesn't cause on the street brawls then it is a much LESS TOUCHY SUBJECT THEN SOCCER/FOOTBALL GAMES... and I assume no one has any problem with those...
Compassion is one of the 8 virutes of the Avatar from Ultima. :P
After reading your comment. I like to recline of my first post I made eariler.
Civil Wars do seem to have a different war about it. Sence it's in your own back yard compaired to fighting people across the big pond.
While this "daughter" might be hurt from this...I don't think those developers are insensitive or doing the game to piss off people.
I'm sure we can agree on all that...hell I bet the outcry was unpredicted...
I think it all boils down to who is sensitive about things and who is not....I'm sure not every person is upset about it and I'n sure there are rational people.
I'm willing to bet you find exactly that in Spain.. this is probably something that causes rifts in families that may never repair.
I'm not personally against a game like this, I too think its interesting and might be a good game.. however, I think the developers, the industry at large, and gamer's would do well to remember that sometimes these topics do cause upset to people, sometimes alot of people and that their feeling should not just be ignored because you don't understand them.
I agree, it doesn't seem that they are doing this to cause offense. But there is a difference between doing something to cause offense and dismissing the fact that it does upset people as unimportant which it seems that many in this thread are doing... really, my comments are not against the game, but rather against those commenting here who do not seem to have a single clue what they are talking about when it comes to civil wars.
I must take issue with your use of the word "rational" however, as if the people offended are irrational lunatics... even a rational person might be offended when they find out that someone will be taking entertainment from something which involved people they love being killed, and which they need to deal with every day of their lives.
Actually thats one of things that is really funny.
No one has ever been killed at a halo tornement as far as i know..
But people have died while playing soccer. Theres actually a video on you tube about a guy who was running around like nothing was wrong one moment then fell over and died.
Riots have broken out after a bad soccer game. And still nothing has ever happened like that after huge quake tornements or anything.
Not saying that sports cause volience, but i defently think some of them are alot closer than video games.....
Definitely agree with you there, that's something I always like to point out.... espeically to people who slate videogames as pointless or violent, after they are done screaming insults at the ref during their local football (not soccer dammit!) match.
Do you have any idea how many game let you play as nazis?????
As the party itself? None that I'm aware of. You can play as German soldiers, Germany the country, etc. But you are never really associated with the ruling party.
The contentious issue here (as far as I can see) is that you (essentially) get to play as Franco, commanding the Republican forces to crush the Nationalists.
Does that mean it's out of line to make a game about it? Not really. But it's not that surprising that some people would think so.
Grave of the fireflies is the one i've seen that doesnt, oh.. and Howls moving castle.
course... those are kinda diffrent..
Why is there no whining about WWII games? They are even fresher in the history books.
See konrad's comment about Franco's dictatorship, and my own on the nature of civil wars.. its a different thing.
@cpt crunchie
Grow the hell up, French jokes stopped being funny in 2004, choke on your freedom fries.
Esspecially how the french are kinda becoming a bigger ally now than the british? or at least so i hear..
My Grandfather was wounded in a french "civil war" of late that never existed officialy.
I think he'd be pissed about a video game about it not because of the subject but because of the media coverage around it. He hates the media for their "stupid" coverage of pretty much everything.
Riots have broken out after a bad soccer game. And still nothing has ever happened like that after huge quake tornements or anything.
Yeah, Soccer games traumatize me - ban them pls.