In Spain, Outrage over Strategy Game Based on 1936 Civil War

November 17, 2007
It's not often that historical military strategy games draw criticism.

But, as reported by The Guardian, an upcoming release based on the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) is upsetting some folks:
A computer game that allows players to take sides in the Spanish civil war has caused outrage at a time when the country is still struggling to come to terms with the legacy of the conflict.

Shadows of War: The Spanish Civil War is the first game dedicated to the 1936-39 conflict, which cost the lives of an estimated 500,000 people and resulted in General Franco's 36-year dictatorship. It has been designed to enable players to take on the role of Franco's victorious forces or the defeated republicans.

The game's November 20th release date is apparently a point of contention. That is also the anniversary of the death of the dictator Francisco Franco, a date on which modern fascists gather to commemorate Franco and his era. 

We're having a tough time locating Shadows of War on the web, but it may be the Spanish release of this product, which is described by GameSpot as a historical RTS which begins in Europe in 1936. Of the game, the Guardian writes:
Gaming websites have been full of criticism for the game, with some viewing the idea of playing the part of a fascist soldier as repellent. Others, however, welcome the chance to rewrite history and emerge victorious as a republican soldier.

Paco Perez, project director for the game told the newspaper:
As well as being entertaining, it could serve to remind people that they need to be conscious of past events to make sure they are not repeated.

However, the daughter of one of Franco's victims in the war said:
It is not a historical event buried in the past, but is very fresh in the memory of Spaniards. There is no justification for trivialising the killings and the suffering and pain of the victims when we still haven't reconciled ourselves with the past.

UPDATE: The International Herald Tribune has a more detailed report with some additional information...

Comments

Well, to me, history is history; no amount of video games will change what happened in the past. I mean, how about Civilization III? On one victory setting, it's genocide, but nobody says anything about that, but as soon as you base it on a historical war, it's suddenly crossing the line though that is, for the most part, what happened? So you want to other side to win when you play them, big deal. It won't change the tides of time, it won't suddenly change the world. Just because you PLAY on a fascist side doesn't MAKE you fascist or mean that you are. And who knows; it could lead a new perspective of the war; at least for the sake of learning.

Lavarock, you asshole, calling all Spanish facists is not only untrue but really offensive. And it's "pendejos", you ignorant tool.

I'm getting tired of people like "daughter"

They always "Wah wah wah! You cant do that cause somewhere along the line i was effected by that event!"

Like the swastika. People always get upset whenever it appears, of course not realizing that origanly it was a sort of tibentian symbol. It is soo much more than the 3-4 years it was used by nazis

There is also the cross. I remember people were upset about NWN 2 graveyards having crosses in them, because everyone sees cross as instantly christian symbol, when it is just simply two planks of wood crossing each other.

Course those are just symbols. But still... Whenever someone does something that involves something in real life, SOMEONE will always be upset. Esspecially when it involves combat cause they are always like "Its a game it trivilizes the loss of life now i cry..."

But i'm rambling a bit now..

I'm going neutral on this :/ .

...hmm....World War 2 games....

What about those?....There are so many it's like a whole genrie yet we never hear people whine like this...

And often WW2 games do kinda show US soilders getting killed.

thats such bull-hockey. i now lump spaniards in with the wussy french. we make games about the vietnam war, and theyre bitching about a game about their civil war?

Stupid people make my head hurt.

the "daughter" person really doesn't have an arguement. I mean there's games out there that let you play as the nazis, and that was the holocaust.

there's much bigger fish out there.

The spaniards have just lost the respect for them that they gained from NOT bitching about resi 4.

It is not a historical event buried in the past, but is very fresh in the memory of Spaniards.

I'm fairly sure that the Second World War is very fresh in the minds of a number of people. Yet they generally don't scream about movies or games made that are based on that time. Something similar is true of the Vietnam war as well.

Indeed, as Paco Perez said up there, one of the things the game could serve to do is keep the war fresh in people minds. Which is a good thing from the standpoint that it's a reminder of past lessons learned.

After all, as someone once parodied that famous axiom about the past:

"History doesn't always repeat itself. Sometimes it merely shouts "Weren't you listening the first time?!?" and lets fly with a club."

ZOMG! how are people make films,movies,TV shows,,books,new stories about past events!

Why if we use this logic roots is the greatest evil TV show in the history of the US!

uhg...

ZOMG! how DARE people make films,movies,TV shows,,books,new stories about past events!

For still fresh and painful wars, there are plenty of Vietnam games in the US. Granted, that's not a civil war.

Actually, Vietnam was a civil war, just not a US civil war. I wonder how games about the Korean war play in Korea?

WAIT!!!

BF2, BF2142 and CoD4!!!!

THESE GAMES ARE TRIVIALIZING THE WARS THAT ARE GOING ON RIGHT NOW (cept 2142. That one is trivializing future wars!)

UPSET CRY!!!

/sarcassssim..

So, you can't make a game about the Spanish Civil War, but you can about any other war in history. Including more recent conflicts.

@Ace of Sevens

Actually, it wasn't. North and South Vietnam were two different nations that used to be whole. Therefore, it wasn't a civil war.

@black ice

Why do you think they are seperate now?

@Vladmire

Last I checked, Vietnam was still in one piece, Korea is the one that was split in two.

@gray

I was thinking blackice was saying that North/south korea was split.

The way i see it though.. They are split cause it was a civil war. For instance if america never resolved compleatly, they just compleatly seperated we could have north and south usa.

The second world war might have been "worse" than the Spanish civil war, but the Spanish civil still causes big fights in Spain. The civil war is still a very touchy subject. It might seem stupid with all the world war II games, but people who know Spain understand the outrage.

I'm gonna say what my wounded in action Grandfather told me about veterans in close proximity to nuke sites: "Of course its bull, but as long as they can get money out of it, they will. I'd do the exact same."

Plus: [Lard mode] I could swear those developers and that newspaper (+ interwiewees) work together for a shameless promotion, prove me wrong. [/Lard mode]

@Vlad

Actually, you'd have the Union and the Confederacy. I've always liked that word.. Confederacy..

No, North and South Korea used to be Korea, so they are split. Vietnam is whole again.

On one hand, there is really no room to criticize this game for "trivializing" the war. There are representations of wars as recent as Vietnam in all forms of media, and the Spanish Civil War has been represented in other media such as books and films. Video games are not "undignified" in that representing an event in the form of a game "trivializes" it.

However, it does seem a rather simplified representation of the war from these reports, especially if it follows the standard RTS form of "get your troops and throw them at the others side." The politics behind the war were very intricate, considering the relations between the monarchists and fascists on one side, opposed by communists, anarchists, and republicans. If they failed to take those elements into account, it would be a very poor representation of the war.

@Vlad

Well, the way things worked was like this:

Korea and Vietnam were under the control of others until after WWII. Due to various political factors, when they regained their independence, they each got split into a North and a South. Eventually, the north invaded the south.

In the case of Korea, things eventually resolved so they remained seperate.
In the case of Vietnam, the north eventually conquered the south, and the two were fused into one country.

@black

Thats cause Korea is still under civil war right now. Just it is at a stand still. Korea is still not resolved.


But for truth, isnt all wars "civil" wars?

@Hand

That was one of the fun things about Lords of the Realm 2. You could play politics and the like, or you could become very brutal. I remember running in on one guys country and destroying everything. Civlians, crops, anything i could destroy. Eventually His civilians that were left revolted and threw him out of office. I came in and cleaned up the mess.

GP: LOTR2 ?   Wow, great game... you're reaching back a ways into the memory bank for that one, though, no?

World wars 1 and 2 took place in that time frame. If most people can get over that between now and then, so can these people.

@Vlad

"Civil" War is an oxymoron.

The "daughter's" probably just pissed she won't get money from the project. If History Channel came to interview her, you can bet she'd jump on it. And what the hell is this "trivialization" argument. It makes no sense and magically applies to everything. You want to know what gets trivialized in the process here? Logic, that's what.

Oh boo hoo. You don't see veterans protesting every single WWII game that comes out. Besides, it happened almost 70 years ago. Get over it.

@blackice

Thats pretty much my point.

The only time War is civilized is when your playing video games of it. (sometimes)

Although I certainly don't think it is the game developer's intent to trivialise or insult those who suffered from this war.. I can see why they would be upset by it. We're not talking about some war against a foreign nation, or some distant part of the world.. we're talking about a fairly recent civil war, followed by a lengthy dictatorship which ended well within the lifespan of many modern gamers. I don't know much about the whole thing, but I do know how devastating civil war can be, and that I was born only five years after that dictatorship ended... I know a lot of gamers who would have been alive during it.

To those of you who don't know why a civil war in your nation is different from any other kind of war... it is because it isn't your army fighting and dying against another army, it is /you/ fighting and dying, against people who a week ago were your neighbors, friends, lovers, brothers, sisters, parents... the results of this, even without a dictatorship following it, last for generations.. please, go ask the peolpe in Northern Ireland how they would feel about a video game being made that allowed people to play the IRA, the British Army, and various other factions in that recent struggle.. my father was there, and I know he would feel insulted, as would I on his behalf.... especially if it was not done with consideration. Go to the former Yugoslavia, and ask how people would like a game that allowed people to fight on various sides of their struggle... while glossing over the atrocities that were commited.

RTS games simplify war.. and civil wars are so personal that it hurts to see those details glossed over for the sake of someone's entertainment. You may not understand this, but have some compassion.. a virtue sadly lacking it seems in many of the posters in this thread.. stop for a moment and realize the effects of a civil war on a nation, and why people might be upset by this.

Funny...
So spanish war a touchy subject while WWII not a touchy subject???

HA-ha-ha-ha-ha

Do you have any idea how many game let you play as nazis?????

I am glad that a strategy game is coming out that isn't about WWII since about half of them ARE...

I mean common let the two sides in spain fight it out in online commetions instead of on the street brawls...

I am assuming that in Spain this subject causes on street brawls and if the subject doesn't cause on the street brawls then it is a much LESS TOUCHY SUBJECT THEN SOCCER/FOOTBALL GAMES... and I assume no one has any problem with those...

@Thomas.

Compassion is one of the 8 virutes of the Avatar from Ultima. :P

After reading your comment. I like to recline of my first post I made eariler.

Civil Wars do seem to have a different war about it. Sence it's in your own back yard compaired to fighting people across the big pond.

While this "daughter" might be hurt from this...I don't think those developers are insensitive or doing the game to piss off people.

I'm sure we can agree on all that...hell I bet the outcry was unpredicted...

I think it all boils down to who is sensitive about things and who is not....I'm sure not every person is upset about it and I'n sure there are rational people.

WWII, surprising as it may seem to you, is not as touchy a subject.. you know why? Because virtually nobody is going to argue for the Nazi's. Its extremely rare to find two people having a stand up fight over who was right or wrong in that war.

I'm willing to bet you find exactly that in Spain.. this is probably something that causes rifts in families that may never repair.

I'm not personally against a game like this, I too think its interesting and might be a good game.. however, I think the developers, the industry at large, and gamer's would do well to remember that sometimes these topics do cause upset to people, sometimes alot of people and that their feeling should not just be ignored because you don't understand them.

@Lightwarrior

I agree, it doesn't seem that they are doing this to cause offense. But there is a difference between doing something to cause offense and dismissing the fact that it does upset people as unimportant which it seems that many in this thread are doing... really, my comments are not against the game, but rather against those commenting here who do not seem to have a single clue what they are talking about when it comes to civil wars.

I must take issue with your use of the word "rational" however, as if the people offended are irrational lunatics... even a rational person might be offended when they find out that someone will be taking entertainment from something which involved people they love being killed, and which they need to deal with every day of their lives.

Soccer?! You americans and your renaming of things! It is not soccer. Its football! Your american football is so weak! play a real man sport like Rugby!




Actually thats one of things that is really funny.

No one has ever been killed at a halo tornement as far as i know..

But people have died while playing soccer. Theres actually a video on you tube about a guy who was running around like nothing was wrong one moment then fell over and died.

Riots have broken out after a bad soccer game. And still nothing has ever happened like that after huge quake tornements or anything.

Not saying that sports cause volience, but i defently think some of them are alot closer than video games.....

@Vladmire

Definitely agree with you there, that's something I always like to point out.... espeically to people who slate videogames as pointless or violent, after they are done screaming insults at the ref during their local football (not soccer dammit!) match.

@aspeaker

Do you have any idea how many game let you play as nazis?????

As the party itself? None that I'm aware of. You can play as German soldiers, Germany the country, etc. But you are never really associated with the ruling party.

The contentious issue here (as far as I can see) is that you (essentially) get to play as Franco, commanding the Republican forces to crush the Nationalists.

There are a lot of people on here ridiculing the Spanish for making a fuss about a war that ended nearly seventy years ago - and before WWII even started. However, there's a good reason they're more touchy about Franco in Spain than they are in Germany about Hitler (and I think a lot of Americans underestimate just how sore a subject that still is, but that's another matter): While the civil war ended in '39, Franco won it and ruled the country until his death in 1975. That may be before most of us here were born, but it's not really very long ago. And it's still a touchy subject: It's only this year that they'll remove all references to the regime in street names etc. - a similar measure was outvoted as late as 2002.

Does that mean it's out of line to make a game about it? Not really. But it's not that surprising that some people would think so.

I highly doubt that the game triviliases the spanish civil war, if anything I wouldn't be surprised if it glorified the war in some way. For an example, see every war movie ever made.

@father time

Grave of the fireflies is the one i've seen that doesnt, oh.. and Howls moving castle.

course... those are kinda diffrent..

I doubt "trivializing" is the right word.

Why is there no whining about WWII games? They are even fresher in the history books.

Well, I can't imagine how it could /not/ trivialise it... I mean... how many RTS games really address the long term pain and suffering caused by something like this? They can do as much as they can to include factual stuff, but at the end of the day, to someone who has suffered.. simply making a "game" out of it is making it trivial.

@Christian

See konrad's comment about Franco's dictatorship, and my own on the nature of civil wars.. its a different thing.

Off topic but just so people know autocracies were committed on both sides of the isle in the Spanish Civil War. The Republicans killed many people in innocent blood most much the same as the Nationalists did (mainly devote catholics most of whom took no side during the conflict). Most people consider the Republicans all perfectly good and the Nationalists as completely evil but both sides were in essence pretty damn bad.

Yeah I find a lot of times in stories on this site about people in other countries taking offense to certain games many of the posters on this site seem to be very quick to dismiss the very notion that these people should even be so much as upset, and very few posters take the time to really read into it at all or understand why exactly these people seem to be so upset for the game. I am not inclined to believe the game trivializes the Spanish Civil War any more than the slew of games and movies about WW2 trivializes that war. That being said, understand at the very least what we are talking about, Franco's reign ended in 1975, the people of Spain lived under a brutal dictatorship until that point in time, even today fascists in Spain and throughout Europe hail this dictator as a godsend against the spread of Communism. Lighten up on these people, they aren't irrational, they simply take issue with a game that deals with subject matter that hits close to home and they find disturbing, that is a perfectly reasonable stance. Should the game be banned? Of course not. Was it insensitive? I don't believe so, they released it as a historical game to tackle a historical conflict, they probably didn't mean to offend anybody. Do those offended have a right and reason to be offended? Of course they do! This woman's father was killed by this guy and now she hears about some game where you can play fighting for this very dictator. Yes she's offended, yes she probably is not familiar with the game or the medium for that matter, but cut her some slack, it's a tricky issue some people will be offended some won't be, that's how it is with free speech.

@cpt crunchie
Grow the hell up, French jokes stopped being funny in 2004, choke on your freedom fries.

@marlowe

Esspecially how the french are kinda becoming a bigger ally now than the british? or at least so i hear..

Odd no one complained about hearts of iron. I mean the game doesn't focus on the spanish civil war, but its one of the major events you can use to your advantage or participate in.

@Vlad,

My Grandfather was wounded in a french "civil war" of late that never existed officialy.

I think he'd be pissed about a video game about it not because of the subject but because of the media coverage around it. He hates the media for their "stupid" coverage of pretty much everything.

But people have died while playing soccer. Theres actually a video on you tube about a guy who was running around like nothing was wrong one moment then fell over and died.

Riots have broken out after a bad soccer game. And still nothing has ever happened like that after huge quake tornements or anything.


Yeah, Soccer games traumatize me - ban them pls.
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ZippyDSMleesigh...was playing anice game of empire at war and then boom crash...hope new oparts come soon ><05/22/2012 - 1:17pm
Andrew EisenI still say the particular word or phrase the MPAA uses to describe what it's fighting against is the least of its problems.05/22/2012 - 1:12pm
ZippyDSMleeMPAA finally admits piracy is not the same as stealing, kinda http://tinyurl.com/chtcf8p05/22/2012 - 11:55am
ddrfr33k@EZK Bwahahaha! @Michael: Yeah, several news sources have said that google DNS can bypass the TPB roadblocks.05/22/2012 - 11:38am
Michael ChandraWeird, I can still visit piratebay. Wonder if Google DNS is related to that, or I simply have an exotic ISP?05/22/2012 - 9:03am
Lisa PhamNo harm done, E. Zachary Knight. :)05/22/2012 - 4:50am
Uncharted NESBSA Claims Half of PC Users Are Pirates- http://slashdot.org/palm/17/12/05/22/0051216_1.shtml05/21/2012 - 11:18pm
E. Zachary KnightAh. Missed that. My mind just connected DDR3 with ddrfr33k and ran with it. Oh well.05/21/2012 - 10:12pm
Lisa PhamHe also mentioned the game "Shadows of the damned" which is on PS305/21/2012 - 8:08pm
E. Zachary Knightddrf33k, I think Zip is referring to computer hardware.05/21/2012 - 7:33pm
ddrfr33k@Zip: Excellent game. It's a trip.05/21/2012 - 7:09pm
Lisa PhamIanC - if you read/looked at the report (PDF and written) then you'd see where they failed and why. Some games have come close to passing and some have passed. The list of games evaluated. http://www.reclaimyourgame.com/content.php/18-RYG-Evaluations05/21/2012 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMaybe I'll luck out and the Wii version won't have this retail exclusive DLC nonsense.05/21/2012 - 5:12pm
ZippyDSMleeBought new guitar...trying to find a nice DDR3/mobo combo under 200$ sicne I need new ram thats 100$....fun times..... picked up shadows of the damned tho!!05/21/2012 - 4:56pm
E. Zachary KnightYeah, that's how I feel about retail exclusive DLC too. ;)05/21/2012 - 3:37pm
RedMageThat's what I started to figure too. They seem to have trouble coming up with an effective scare tactic. At one point they referred to it as "online looting" which just sounds stupid.05/21/2012 - 3:34pm
E. Zachary KnightOf all the sucky suckiness that ever sucked. Lego Batman 2 will suffer from sucky retailer exclusive DLC. Suck! http://tinyurl.com/ckq67vg05/21/2012 - 3:30pm
E. Zachary KnightAs for Dodd, I think it is mostly that he realizes that calling copyright infringement "theft" is bad for PR and that they need to change tactics. Just like how they went from using "piracy" to using "theft."05/21/2012 - 1:48pm
E. Zachary KnightIan, I think in this case, the rating is well deserved. To get a good rating, I would assume that a company would have to release the game with no DRM, or at least fully disclosed DRM.05/21/2012 - 1:46pm
IanCLisa - what do companies have to do to get a good rating from that site?05/21/2012 - 12:54pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician