
Every gamer's favorite academic, Prof. Henry Jenkins of MIT,
blogs a two-part series detailing his impressions of the controversial documentary film
Spencer Halpin's Moral Kombat.Jenkins, who appears in the film, is enthusiastic:
Moral Kombat is perhaps the most important film ever made about video games.and you should see it if you get a chance. The film will force people on all sides of the debate about games and violence to re-examine their own positions and ask harder questions...
I will admit to having had a crisis of faith when I first saw the trailer. It felt sensationalistic and one-sided... don't judge a book by its cover and don't judge this film by its preview.
Frankly, I have been deeply troubled by those in the gaming community who would seek to silence this film, even if its perspective were fundamentally opposed to our own. Surely, we can't defend the free speech rights of game designers and players by seeking to silence those who disagree with us... How does that make us any better than what we are fighting against?
I am proud to have been included in this important work. I hope my readers will be open-minded enough to check their assumptions at the door, give the film a chance, and think through the implications of what it has to say with fresh eyes.
Full Disclosure Dept: Spencer Halpin is the brother of ECA president Hal Halpin. The ECA is the parent company of
GamePolitics.
Comments
I'll be glad if it isn't a one sided bit of propaganda or sensationalism for either side; that's a good thing. I will probably watch it at some point and judge it on its merits, but clearly Spencer made a misjudgement releasing the trailer in the form it was in.
...I hate myself.
Anyways, the film itself was really good. I recommend it heartily.
And if we have to pay, somebody needs to seed it or post it on Youtube.
now the only major question is: where do i get a copy?
is the ECA going to sell them? is Halpin himself?
I think that Dennis has posted this to help alleviate the concerns that many people have on this film. The trailers that have been shown here and elsewhere have seemed quite one sided. So Dennis has posted the opinion of a respected person in the game industry to counter the misinterpretation by many gamers.
I look forward to this film and will gladly buy it when available. I will also be buying Playing Columbine and the Discovery Channel's documentary.
Can't wait.
Why should we not have to pay for seeing this movie? It took time, effort and money for people to make the film, why shouldn't they be able to make it back? It'll be hard to see it because it's a documentary, which won't be showing many places, but that's not excuse for thinking that we're entitled to see it for free.
How many documentaries have you paid money to see?
While the question was directed elsewhere, I have paid to see Bowling for Columbine, Supersize Me and Touching the Void. All were very good and worthy of the price of admission.
Documentaries are just as much worthy of release as Films and not all are funded by TV Companies to allow them to be made and free to air. A Documentary maker needs to make money just as much as the next person.
Truth be told.. None. I'd pay to see this one though.
Someone'll put it on YouTube. Eventually..
He woudln't have agreed to appear unless he was getting some form of monetary compensation
When Henry takes the time to call it significant, that's worth writing about.
also I liked his comment
"Frankly, I have been deeply troubled by those in the gaming community who would seek to silence this film, even if its perspective were fundamentally opposed to our own. Surely, we can’t defend the free speech rights of game designers and players by seeking to silence those who disagree with us… How does that make us any better than what we are fighting against?"
I hope that they show good examples of videogames like Mario and Pokemon, also commenting on how Pokemon was accused of Animal violence by critics who 'never played the game'
It is all too easy to blame videogames for the problems of the world, but the real way to combat this is not trying to say that they are wrong, but to also prove that on many occasions their words are biased and also misleading,
In orther words, perhaps the only mistake that the Videogame industry has made is that they have not been able to have a good spokesperson on behalf of the industry until recently.
Plus Miyamoto at the GDC this March has said that the public perception of videogames is one of the greatest challenges facing the industry as a whole.
Since they talk about violent videogames as if they have played them, it would be good for a gamer to point out that if they did play videogames, why do they still say that games reward players with points when they shoot police officers???
It will be interesting how they would comment on that.
The only way we as gamers can fight against these anti-gamers is to point out that their comments show that they might not have played videogames at all, instead they just make up arguments of what they perceive videogames to be like.
Also if we can also rebut their statements that most videogames contain violence, we should get an accurate tally of how many games with an E rating and T ratings and measure that against the number of M rated games.
It is all about integrity and we have to debate that their integrity is not as strong as they try to portray in the mainstream media.
Trying to say that these anti-gamers are n00bs are not really a professional way of attacking their arguments and it makes us gamers look like we are selfish.
"I hate old people."
And not that it's ever going to happen, but if they do take away our First Amendment rights, then we won't be able to say anything about it.
Because we won't have the right anymore.
Thier right is being respected. Ours is not.
I've always been of the mind that turnabout is fair play. I think it's fine to deny people a voice. Espically when that voice is shrill, unhelpful, and teeming with lies and disinformation.