Joystiq Interviews Jeff Gerstmann

December 3, 2007
Over at Joystiq, scribe Kyle Orland has scored an interview with deposed GameSpot editor Jeff Gerstmann.

Among Gerstmann's comments:
Losing a job you've held for over 11 years in an abrupt manner is shocking, yes.

Gerstmann wouldn't talk specifics of the Kane & Lynch review that proved his undoing, but said:
I stand behind my work, regardless of where I do it... I'm not really sure what I want to do next. This whole situation has left me with a lot to think about... Despite the number of people who are taking these rumors ... to mean that game writing is ethically bankrupt, I don't feel that's the case...
Posted in

Comments

Exchanging an email is not an "interview." It cheapens the term to misuse it like this. An interview is when you speak with someone directly and have a spontaneous conversation of questions and answers, not when someone responds in writing to a canned list of questions.

Well jeef when you have as little faith in game reviews as I do this whole situation basically justifies my stance. However I know that alot of people have a hard time making their minds up about stuff and so I can see the merit in reviews.

Im just hoping gamespot get ripped a new one over this debaucle.

I personally have never felt that game reviewers were completely objective to begin with. Even terrible games get average scores.

I don't hang my purchasing decisions on people I don't even know based on a number and a 2-page description.

It sucks that he lost his job, but this isn't some far-reaching conspiracy to bury a bad game review. This doesn't warrant a boycott, but maybe more people will start to be more skeptical about videogame reviews, as they already should have been.

And maybe, just maybe, it will motivate developers and publishers to make quality products instead of rushing derivative crap to the market. But probably not.

@Skylar

I don't think people see this as a far reaching conspiracy to bury a bad review. Rather they see it as the first step in burying all future bad reviews if a game's creator buys enough advertising.

That'd switch reviews from being one person's opinion that's attempting to inform others, to reviews being just another advertisement that won't actually warn you about any bad aspects.

[...] Source: Joystiq Interviews Jeff Gerstmann Bookmark it: [...]

I wonder if "independent" gaming sites will make their triumphant return following this situation. The cost of bandwidth has gone down considerably since The GIA closed, so the possibility exists.

hmmmm. sounds like a couple people who wanted what they say to get heard. Instead of really commenting on the article, you gave your own version of "right". Not terribly useful to the reader.
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ZippyDSMleesigh...was playing anice game of empire at war and then boom crash...hope new oparts come soon ><05/22/2012 - 1:17pm
Andrew EisenI still say the particular word or phrase the MPAA uses to describe what it's fighting against is the least of its problems.05/22/2012 - 1:12pm
ZippyDSMleeMPAA finally admits piracy is not the same as stealing, kinda http://tinyurl.com/chtcf8p05/22/2012 - 11:55am
ddrfr33k@EZK Bwahahaha! @Michael: Yeah, several news sources have said that google DNS can bypass the TPB roadblocks.05/22/2012 - 11:38am
Michael ChandraWeird, I can still visit piratebay. Wonder if Google DNS is related to that, or I simply have an exotic ISP?05/22/2012 - 9:03am
Lisa PhamNo harm done, E. Zachary Knight. :)05/22/2012 - 4:50am
Uncharted NESBSA Claims Half of PC Users Are Pirates- http://slashdot.org/palm/17/12/05/22/0051216_1.shtml05/21/2012 - 11:18pm
E. Zachary KnightAh. Missed that. My mind just connected DDR3 with ddrfr33k and ran with it. Oh well.05/21/2012 - 10:12pm
Lisa PhamHe also mentioned the game "Shadows of the damned" which is on PS305/21/2012 - 8:08pm
E. Zachary Knightddrf33k, I think Zip is referring to computer hardware.05/21/2012 - 7:33pm
ddrfr33k@Zip: Excellent game. It's a trip.05/21/2012 - 7:09pm
Lisa PhamIanC - if you read/looked at the report (PDF and written) then you'd see where they failed and why. Some games have come close to passing and some have passed. The list of games evaluated. http://www.reclaimyourgame.com/content.php/18-RYG-Evaluations05/21/2012 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMaybe I'll luck out and the Wii version won't have this retail exclusive DLC nonsense.05/21/2012 - 5:12pm
ZippyDSMleeBought new guitar...trying to find a nice DDR3/mobo combo under 200$ sicne I need new ram thats 100$....fun times..... picked up shadows of the damned tho!!05/21/2012 - 4:56pm
E. Zachary KnightYeah, that's how I feel about retail exclusive DLC too. ;)05/21/2012 - 3:37pm
RedMageThat's what I started to figure too. They seem to have trouble coming up with an effective scare tactic. At one point they referred to it as "online looting" which just sounds stupid.05/21/2012 - 3:34pm
E. Zachary KnightOf all the sucky suckiness that ever sucked. Lego Batman 2 will suffer from sucky retailer exclusive DLC. Suck! http://tinyurl.com/ckq67vg05/21/2012 - 3:30pm
E. Zachary KnightAs for Dodd, I think it is mostly that he realizes that calling copyright infringement "theft" is bad for PR and that they need to change tactics. Just like how they went from using "piracy" to using "theft."05/21/2012 - 1:48pm
E. Zachary KnightIan, I think in this case, the rating is well deserved. To get a good rating, I would assume that a company would have to release the game with no DRM, or at least fully disclosed DRM.05/21/2012 - 1:46pm
IanCLisa - what do companies have to do to get a good rating from that site?05/21/2012 - 12:54pm

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician